Posts Tagged ‘Socialism’

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Broadband

Saturday, October 17th, 2009

I think the interwebs are a great thing, but this is ridiculous,

Finland has become the first country in the world to declare broadband Internet access a legal right.

Starting in July, telecommunication companies in the northern European nation will be required to provide all 5.2 million citizens with Internet connection that runs at speeds of at least 1 megabit per second.

The one-megabit mandate, however, is simply an intermediary step, said Laura Vilkkonen, the legislative counselor for the Ministry of Transport and Communications.

The country is aiming for speeds that are 100 times faster — 100 megabit per second — for all by 2015.

“We think it’s something you cannot live without in modern society. Like banking services or water or electricity, you need Internet connection,” Vilkkonen said.

Finland is one of the most wired in the world; about 95 percent of the population have some sort of Internet access, she said. But the law is designed to bring the Web to rural areas, where geographic challenges have limited access until now.

“Universal service is every citizen’s subjective right,” Vilkkonen said.

This strikes me as a great opportunity for the Blogmocracy to extend its growing empire into the previously untapped rural Finnish market. 

All joking aside, this is a perfect example of that perversion of the rights concept, known as “positive rights.”  See, American constitutional liberty rests on the basis of “negative rights” – you are free to do what you want, for yourself, without being hindered by the government, so long as you are not harming someone else.  “Positive” rights turn this on its head, and obligate citizens to provide things to other citizens, thereby placing a burden via the government onto those forced to provide (usually the productive classes).   Yet another bad idea for which we can thank Rousseau. 

Let’s all be revolutionaries!

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

That crazy winger over at Renew America is at it again,

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” — George Orwell

If there was anyone who should know about deceit, it was George Orwell. Orwell — the pen-name for Eric Arthur Blair — was quite an idealistic man. Unfortunately for idealistic people, they are also often naïve, and susceptible to being deceived. Many are unaware of this, but George Orwell — despite the popularity of his antitotalitarian book 1984 — was a socialist. And as a good socialist in the mid-1930s, he went to Spain, to “fight against fascism,” as he put it. What he found out after he had been there for a while, however, was that his erstwhile Stalinist allies in the Spanish Communist Party were not so much interested in rescuing Spain from the fascist clutches of Francisco Franco (which they signally failed to do anyhow) as they were in coercing all the other leftists — including Orwell’s Marxist-but-not-Stalinist group — into seeing things the Stalinist way, or arresting them if they wouldn’t. Orwell — and a lot of other idealists like him — got snookered, but fortunately for him, he was able to get out of Spain without ending up on the wrong end of a firing squad.

He shouldn’t have been surprised, however, but the deceptions of his “allies” and “compatriots.” After all, the first half of the 20th century was a high-water mark for the radical Left. In Russia you had a genuine successful Communist revolution that put the forces of ultrabig government firmly in control of the largest piece of property in the world. Meanwhile, fascism (also a Left-statist philosophy) was rolling to victory in Italy, Germany, and in a host of smaller eastern European countries. The Left — those people who wanted to use the power of government to stamp out traditional society and replace it with devotion to the all-powerful State — were on the march, and could afford a little backstabbing against their useful idiots.

Given all the propaganda flying around in those days, it’s no surprise that Orwell would have thought himself living in a time of universal deceit. The Communists, the Socialists, the Fascists — everyone on the Left was constantly engaged in trying to dupe people into believing falsehoods that would make their particular version of Statism seem acceptable, or at least palatable. This was so even in the USA — let’s not forget the whitewash of the Soviet-engineered famine which killed several million Ukrainians, conveniently covered up by Walter Duranty of the New York Times.

Unfortunately, we here and now in the United States find ourselves living in a similar time of universal deceit.

Revolutionaries?  Sounds subversive. Better go read the rest of it, just to find out for sure!

Government Motors Kills Saturn

Friday, October 2nd, 2009

Great, I knew I should have bought that Honda instead,

For those who expected General Motors’ once-funky Saturn brand to live on with a new owner, there has been a sad twist. Saturn, once billed as a different kind of car company, appears as dead as Pontiac and Oldsmobile.

At the brand’s 350 remaining dealers around the country, there were high hopes that a deal would be announced for GM to sell the brand to former race car driver and auto industry magnate Roger Penske.

Instead, Penske Automotive Group Inc. announced Wednesday it is walking away from the deal, unable to find a manufacturer to make Saturn cars when GM stops producing models sometime after the end of 2011. GM then announced it would stop making Saturns and soon would close down the brand, just like it did with Oldsmobile in 2004 and soon will do with Pontiac.

The day’s events mean an almost certain end to Saturn, a brand that was set up in 1990 to fight growing Japanese imports. Instead of celebrating a rebirth, the announcements sent dealers scrambling for ways to stay open and preserve about 13,000 jobs.

“I find this hard to believe,” said Carl Galeana, owner of two Saturn dealerships in suburban Detroit. “Everyone’s been saying we’re right at the goal line.”

News flash for Mr. Galeana – people connected with the government lie. Routinely.

However, I suppose that this one can’t be blamed on Obama. Apparently Saturn was running in the red for quite a while, but nobody bothered to do anything about it because it was “hip” and “cool” and appealed to young people, just the sort of idealism that finds things like “making the necessary changes to our business model so that we can become profitable” to be just a tad tawdry.

On a personal note, I guess I’m going to have an even tougher time getting service for the used Saturn Ion I bought earlier this year with the payout from my totaled Scion. Which is a shame, because the Ion is a piece of junk.

Michael Moore – A Capitalist Success Story

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

In many societies, being fat is a sure sign of wealth and financial success.  Ours is apparently no different,

The bars were sponsored by liquor companies, the kitchen by Lufthansa. One room had marble walls, another, cashmere. Hundreds of guests plucked hors d’oeuvres from Plexiglas trays, but when I reached for a passing tray of pigs in blankets, the waitress tried to stop me. “These are for Michael,” she said.

That would be Michael Moore, filmmaker, who was enthroned nearby on a crowded sofa nibbling from a skewer, which did seem less in harmony with his everyman sneakers and populist persona than a sausage wrapped in fried bread. The Monday night party in Manhattan, which spread over two luxurious penthouse suites, was sponsored by Esquire and tricked out with the magazine’s advertisers’ products. The guests were there to celebrate Moore’s latest movie, which had just had its New York premier uptown.

Capitalism, A Love Story, takes aim at nothing less than the whole capitalist system. It uses all the trademark Mooreisms familiar from earlier works like Bowling for Columbine and Fahrenheit 9/11: Stakeouts, clever editing and innuendo, with the extra-wide filmmaker himself shambling up to corporate headquarters as a self-declared representative of the people. In voice over, he calls capitalism “a system of taking and giving, mostly taking,” and he interviews two priests who call it evil. He praises socialism, and near the end of the film concludes of capitalism that “we have to replace it with something, and that something is called democracy.”

If this were a different kind of movie, it might make sense to point out here that neither capitalism nor democracy nor socialism exist in pure form, and that pretty much every nation in the Western world, including the U.S., combines elements of all three. But Moore, to borrow a phrase coined by a physicist, is “not even wrong.” He makes jokes and tugs at heart strings. He shows pilots who can’t make a living wage, corporations that take out life insurance policies on their workers and families who are thrown out of foreclosed homes. It’s a litany of economic disasters, but it’s not an argument. I’ve heard him compared to Leni Riefenstahl, which is apt insofar as he is a brilliant propagandist. (He’s also fond of cueing Wagnerian-sounding music at dramatic moments.)

It’s been observed that Moore, crusading leftist and now explicit anti-capitalist, has made piles of money from his movies. In a question-and-answer session after Monday night’s screening, an audience member asked Moore if he wouldn’t concede that U.S. capitalism was better than Soviet Communism. Moore replied that the question was “bullsh–” and refused to answer directly, saying that his movie was not about that but about “democracy versus greed.” The hazard of being a professional polemicist, I suppose, is the risk of boxing oneself into intellectual corners. He couldn’t tenably claim that the Soviet system was good for its people, but if he conceded that capitalism had a few things going for it he would have undercut the revolutionary rhetoric that is his bread and butter.

This should drive home the point to us all that whenever you have someone loudly proclaiming that he’s “for the people,” he’s really for his own wallet and his own ability to wield power, first and foremost.  Now, apply that to the conglomeration of cretins who inhabit the Obama administration.  Hypocrisy becomes an art form for those on the Left.

As Sgt. Schultz once said on Hogan’s Heroes, “I am too poor to deserve to be this fat.” 

Michael Moore doesn’t have that problem.

Cause I’m The Tax Man….Yea, I’m The Tax Man…

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

Let me tell you how it will be.  There’s one for you; nineteen for me…

View ImageAFL-CIO, Dems Push New Wall Street Tax

The nation’s largest labor union and some allied Democrats are pushing a new tax that would hit big investment firms such as Goldman Sachs reaping billions of dollars in profits while the rest of the economy sputters.

The AFL-CIO, one of the Democratic Party’s most powerful allies, would like to assess a small tax — about a tenth of a percent — on every stock transaction.

[Thea Lee, policy director at the AFL-CIO. said that] “The big disadvantage of most taxes is that they discourage some really productive activity,” she said. “This would discourage numerous financial transactions. People flip their assets several times in an hour or a day. They make money but does it really add to the productive base of the United States?

Lee said that taxing every stock transaction a tenth of a percent could raise between $50 billion and $100 billion per year, which could be used to pay for infrastructure projects and other spending priorities. She said the tax could be applied nationwide or internationally.

The AFL-CIO and some allied Democrats would like to cut down on the overall level of trading, or at least give the U.S. government a piece of the action, which would likely tamp down trading.

Democrats and labor officials would also like to take a bite out of Goldman’s profits. Liberals are angry the company, which immersed itself in the frenzy of speculation leading to last year’s financial collapse, is now making huge profits after accepting (and repaying) $10 billion in government aid. Goldman employees are on track to earn an average of more than $700,000 this year.

There is also a growing realization among Obama administration officials and lawmakers that tax increases may be necessary to curb the ballooning federal deficit.

{The Article}

Spreading the wealth around? Check! Attempting to control the free actions of the people? Check! Spending other people’s money? Check! Arrogant attitude about how much others should make? Check!  Check!  Internationalism?  Check!

Ah…this must be “Change We Can Believe In”.

…And your working for no one but me!

__________________________________

Let’s put this Congressional “generosity” in context:

Congress’ Travel On Taxpayer’s Dime Rises Tenfold

Video: The Government Can….

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

Blogmocracy in action…


A Tim Hawkins video; as requested by ”citizen” Skippy.

Obama’s Creeping Government Control: Credit Cards

Sunday, May 24th, 2009

 

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3006/2366638601_815b52ed9e_o.jpg













Last Wednesday, President Obama once again abused the power of Government to dictate to private individuals on how they can do business.  This time it was to credit card companies.

Unsurprising, the main stream media is hailing this horrible infringement on an individual’s liberty as a huge reform to protect the consumer.

_______________________________

Banks say the changes may cut the flow of credit to consumers because it will make it more difficult for issuers to set rates based on the risk their customers pose.

“With this bill we are putting in place some common sense reforms designed to protect consumers,” Obama said at a signing ceremony at the White House.

“We’re not going to be giving people a free pass and we expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe. But we also expect financial institutions to act with the same sense of responsibility that the American people aspire to in their own lives,” he said.

Enactment marks the crest of a backlash against the card industry after years of rate and fee hikes and aggressive marketing programs that have angered consumers, analysts said.

The law largely codifies a set of rules issued by the Federal Reserve last year and puts them into effect in February 2010, five months sooner than the Fed had planned.

It also represents the first major financial regulation reform completed by Obama as he tackles a rewrite of the rules of banking and the markets to better protect consumers and investors, and prevent another credit crisis.

{The Rest of The Article From Yahoo News}

_______________________________

AOL adds the following:

The White House staged a signing ceremony in the Rose Garden, an indication of the legislation’s importance to Obama. Though opposed by many financial companies, the bill cleared Congress with broad support.
Obama made clear that he didn’t champion the changes with the intention of helping those who buy more than they can afford through “reckless spending or wishful thinking.”
“Some get in over their heads by not using their heads,” the president said. “I want to be clear: We do not excuse or condone folks who’ve acted irresponsibly.”
And yet, he said, for many of the millions of Americans who use credit cards and carry a balance, trying to get out of debt has been made difficult and bewildering by their credit card companies.
Obama said many “got trapped” because of the downturn in the economy that has turned family budgets on their heads. But, he said, “part of it is the practices of the credit card companies.”
He criticized policies that allowed for confusing fine print; the sudden appearance of unexplained fees on bills; unannounced shifts in payment deadlines, interest charges or rate increases even when payments aren’t late; and payments directed to balances with the lowest interest rates rather than the highest.
“We’re here to put a change to all that,” Obama said.
“So we’re not going to give people a free pass, and we expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe,” Obama said. “But we also expect financial institutions to act with the same sense of responsibility that the American people aspire to in their own lives.”
Obama decried the “uneasy, unstable dependence” that a minority of card users have on credit.
_______________________________
Credit card contracts can be confusing, and paying off debt is exceptionally difficult.  However, Government intervention isn’t the answer.  Despite the tone of President Obama’s comments, no one forced any of these consumers to get credit cards (especially if they didn’t understand their contract), or live beyond their means.

Additionally no one got “trapped”.  Every credit card was sold to an individual over the age of eighteen, and thus only to adults.  If they are wise enough at eighteen to get an abortion (although they don’t need to be 18 to do that),  join the U.S. armed forces, and VOTE then they are wise enough to decide what sort of deal to make with a private credit card company, or not to make one at all.

This is just another example of an Administration with a nanny-state mentality, overreaching with the powers of the Federal Government to gain control of another industry and eliminate any sort of individual responsibility.  The Government will be making this decision for you now.

Although every individual instance might not by itself  be a tragedy, this is all part of a larger trend.  This constant slide away from personal liberty should be cause for alarm; not praise.  Although it might seem like a helpful intervention now, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, and the path to political slavery with precedent created for the “common good”.

What is the list of Government controlled private industries at this point?  It is great to see that this Administration isn’t wasting this “good [financial] crisis”. (sarc!)

Massachusetts Welfare Recipients Given Cars

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

This is unreal, but another example of the creeping Socialist/Marxist direction America is going in. In the Radical Neo-Marxist state of Massachusetts, Gov. Deval Patrick is giving cars to welfare recipients.

Free cars for poor fuel road rage

Gov. Deval Patrick’s free wheels for welfare recipients program is revving up despite the stalled economy, as the keys to donated cars loaded with state-funded insurance, repairs and even AAA membership are handed out to get them to work.

But the program – fueled by a funding boost despite the state’s fiscal crash – allows those who end up back on welfare to keep the cars anyway.

“It’s mind-boggling. You’ve got people out there saying, ‘I just lost my job. Hey, can I get a free car, too?’ ” said House Minority Leader Brad Jones (R-North Reading).

This just pisses me off. Why should the government give away cars to people collecting money from tax payers? This is wrong and setting a bad example. Why not provide everyone with HDTVs and Blu-Ray Players also? Why stop at cars, how about a free boat also? This is disturbing, but it seems the public wants this.

We reap what we sow

Monday, April 27th, 2009

In today’s society, there are calls for government control of most anything.  Hamburger meat too fatty?  Call the FDA.  Don’t like that your neighbor works on their car on their driveway? Call Zoning.  Government is working on running a car company, and is already heavy-handed into the financial industry, telling CEOs what kind of salary they’re allowed to have (meanwhile, Congress’ salary goes up without having to vote on it).

There are calls, as well, for the government to run healthcare.  And we may get it.  And it may end up being deserved.  Here’s my thinking..

(more…)

House Proposes Legislation To Have The Treasury Dept. Control Employee Wages

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009

The U.S. Democrat majority is taking further steps to completely control the private sector.  Like all tyranny, what was borne out of a crisis, is exacerbated by professed “good intentions”.  If we continue down this path, all major aspects of the private sector could be owned and controlled by the Federal Government.  I fear that the actions we see today are going to be used as precedent for future actions along these lines, and thus the damage to our Liberty being done today to ‘cure the crises’ will be irreparable.

Oh, and if you object to the Government taking full control of the once-called private sector, you are “corrupt” and unpatriotic!  Read the article below.

________________________________

http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=96070&rendTypeId=4
The House Financial Services Committee, led by chairman Barney Frank, has approved a measure that would, in some key ways, go beyond the most draconian features of the original AIG bill.  The new legislation, the “Pay for Performance Act of 2009,” would impose government controls on the pay of all employees — not just top executives — of companies that have received a capital investment from the U.S. government.  It would, like the tax measure, be retroactive, changing the terms of compensation agreements already in place.  And it would give Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner extraordinary power to determine the pay of thousands of employees of American companies.

The purpose of the legislation is to “prohibit unreasonable and excessive compensation and compensation not based on performance standards,” according to the bill’s language.  That includes regular pay, bonuses — everything — paid to employees of companies in whom the government has a capital stake, including those that have received funds through the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The measure is not limited just to those firms that received the largest sums of money, or just to the top 25 or 50 executives of those companies. It applies to all employees of all companies involved, for as long as the government is invested.  And it would not only apply going forward, but also retroactively to existing contracts and pay arrangements of institutions that have already received funds.

In addition, the bill gives Geithner the authority to decide what pay is “unreasonable” or “excessive.” And it directs the Treasury Department to come up with a method to evaluate “the performance of the individual executive or employee to whom the payment relates.”

The bill passed the Financial Services Committee last week, 38 to 22, on a nearly party-line vote. (All Democrats voted for it, and all Republicans, with the exception of Reps. Ed Royce of California and Walter Jones of North Carolina, voted against it.)

The legislation is expected to come before the full House for a vote this week, and, just like the AIG bill, its scope and retroactivity trouble a number of Republicans.  “It’s just a bad reaction to what has been going on with AIG,” Rep. Scott Garrett of New Jersey, a committee member, told me. Garrett is particularly concerned with the new powers that would be given to the Treasury Secretary, who just last week proposed giving the government extensive new regulatory authority. “This is a growing concern, that the powers of the Treasury in this area, along with what Geithner was looking for last week, are mind boggling,” Garrett said.

Rep. Alan Grayson, the Florida Democrat who wrote the bill, told me its basic message is “you should not get rich off public money, and you should not get rich off of abject failure.”  Grayson expects the bill to pass the House, and as we talked, he framed the issue in a way to suggest that virtuous lawmakers will vote for it, while corrupt lawmakers will vote against it.

“This bill will show which Republicans are so much on the take from the financial services industry that they’re willing to actually bless compensation that has no bearing on performance and is excessive and unreasonable,” Grayson said. “We’ll find out who are the people who understand that the public’s money needs to be protected, and who are the people who simply want to suck up to their patrons on Wall Street.”

________________________________

DON’T JUST SIT THERE….DO SOMETHING!

Contact your House of Representatives!

In addition, here is the contact information for Barney Frank, and Alan Grayson if you are so motivated.