Archive for the ‘Middle East’ Category

Adolescent Boys Used as Sex Slaves by Powerful Men in ‘Anti-Homosexual” Muslim Afghanistan

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

Blogmocracy in Action

Guest Blogger: Moe Katz

Young Afghan boys are taken from their families, made to dance in women’s costumes, and raped by prominent men in a widespread, centuries-old practice that is disapproved of by Muslim scholars but nonetheless tolerated in that war-torn society. By their later teens, many of these boys will end up as male homosexual prostitutes earning scarce money for their families:

Despite the dangers, they continue to dance, making $30 for the night — a night that usually ends in assault — because they say it is the only thing they know and their only way to make money. There are no opportunities in Afghanistan for people like them.
And once branded as men who danced as women, there is no turning back.
“We are not happy with this line of work,” Jamel said. “We say that it would be better if God could just kill us rather than living like this.”

Read the rest.

American Support for Israel Remains Solid

Monday, October 26th, 2009

ADL Poll: American Support for Israel Remains Solid; Increase in Support for Action to Prevent Iran From Going Nuclear

The American people’s strong support for Israel remains constant and their
support for action to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power has
substantially increased, according to a new nationwide survey released by the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today.

The survey’s findings demonstrate that Americans recognize Israel as a strong
and loyal U.S. ally, are skeptical about “peace dividends” that would be
realized by Israel stopping all settlement construction and believe that a
Palestinian state must not be established until the Palestinians demonstrate a
commitment to end violence and accept Israel’s legitimacy.

Meanwhile:
French FM warns: Israel will attack Iran

Kouchner hinted that Israel had been generous in the time it had provided the international community to solve the crisis diplomatically, but warned that eventually the threat will cross a red line and Israel will be compelled to act.

Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki responded to Kouchner’s warning on Monday by saying that Tehran views the “Zionist regime” as weak and incapable of launching any kind of substantial attack on it’s nuclear facilities.

Reminding the world that “Palestinians” weren’t the only ones that lost homes when the world finally recognized the state of Israel:
Project Documents Stories of Jewish Refugees from Arab Countries

And an update to this thread:
Police: Temple Mount entry as normal

Clashes at Jerusalem’s holiest

Sunday, October 25th, 2009
Getty Images perpetuates the bull:

getty

JERUSALEM – OCTOBER 25: An Arab youth runs for cover as an Israeli policeman takes aim at Palestinian rioters on October 25, 2009 in the Arab neighbourhood of Ras al-Amud in East Jerusalem, Israel. Renewed violence erupted in the city between Israeli police and Palestinians, in and around the holy site known to Muslims as the al-Haram al-Sharif and Jews as the Temple Mount.

Who runs for cover toward their supposed threat? Who stands in the middle of an open throughway making themselves a perfect target for their supposed threat? Someone who is not afraid of that threat actually doing anything.

Yeah, that’s what I was thinking too.

Violent clashes erupt at Jerusalem’s holiest site

JERUSALEM – Israeli police firing stun grenades faced off Sunday against masked Palestinian protesters hurling stones and plastic chairs outside the Holy Land’s most volatile shrine, where past violence has escalated into prolonged conflict.
[...]

The Jerusalem holy site is a hot-button issue for Muslims worldwide, and the Palestinian condemnation was quickly taken up abroad. The head of the 57-nation Organization of the Islamic Conference warned that any provocative act by Israel “would bear grave consequences,” while the Arab League called on the U.N. to “stop the Israeli aggressions.” Egypt urged Israel to refrain from actions with “negative repercussions” for the region.

The Islamic militant Hamas movement, which rules the Gaza Strip, called on Palestinians to rise up against Israel and urged Arab countries that have ties to Israel to sever them.

Nine police officers were lightly wounded and 18 protesters were detained, police said. The Palestinian president’s adviser on Jerusalem affairs and a leader from Israel’s Islamic Movement were arrested for alleged incitement, police said.
[...]

The disputing claims to the man-made platform in Jerusalem’s Old City lie at the heart of the Israel-Palestinian conflict. It is revered as the holiest site in Judaism, home to two biblical Temples, and Jews pray at the foot of the compound at the Western Wall.

In the Islamic tradition, it is the place where the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven in a nighttime journey recounted in the Quran, and is considered the third-holiest site after the Saudi cities of Mecca and Medina.

Israel has carried out numerous archaeological digs in nearby areas, but has denied Palestinian allegations that the work could endanger the compound.

The Palestinians seek to make east Jerusalem — including the holy compound — the capital of a future independent state. Israel’s government says it will not share control of the holy city.

(thanks to BenZacharia and Bumr50 for the link)

(and thanks to Nevergiveup for the next one:)
Hamas: War will settle Jerusalem dispute, not talks

Following a conflagration of violence at Temple Mount in Jerusalem on Sunday, Hamas political leader Khaled Meshal declared that “Jerusalem’s fate will be decided with jihad (holy war) and resistance, and not negotiations.”
[...]

Arab MK: Israel provoking a billion Muslims over Temple Mount

An Israeli Arab lawmaker warned earlier Sunday that Israel was “provoking” the Muslim world by cracking down on Arab rioters on the Temple Mount in Jeruslaem.

“Israel is provoking a billion Muslims around the world, who will not hesitate to protect the Temple Mount with their own bodies,” said MK Talab Al-Sana (United Arab List-Ta’al).

As snork said, he’s admitting it is the Temple Mount and not al-Haram al-Sharif (the Nobel Santuary)? He must be one of those mythical Loyal Arab Israelis.
/

Previously, at the Blogmocracy:
Um…About Those “Loyal” Israeli-Arabs
About Those “Loyal” Israeli-Arabs…
Israeli Muslim Leader Attacks Police!

Guess who’s coming to dinner? (Mohammed Bakri and Hamid Dabashi)

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Blogmocracy in Action

Guest Blogger: Delectable

Israel Matzav and Artists 4 Israel have the scoop on the underlying story of the Manhattan JCC supporting a film festival, and Shabbat dinner, that promotes blood libels against Israel. (The Shabbat dinner is sponsoring Mohammed Bakri as a speaker – he was the filmmaker behind Jenin, Jenin, which claimed Israel committed a genocide in Jenin. He was later sued for libel by soldiers, and admit he lied in his ‘documentary.’)

I was scanning over the JCC’s “Other Israel Film Festival” web page today, and found another juicy little “nugget” of information.

In addition to the “Other Israel Film Festival” being co-founded by Mohammed Bakri, who was the filmmaker behind the blood libel, Jenin, Jenin, our old friend Hamid Dabashi is also supportive of this festival.

That is right – Hamid Dabashi. He is the known bigot who is a cheerleader for both Hamas and the Iranian regime. Source, source, and source. He has made his career openly supporting a regime (Iran) and fake-regime (Hamas) that brutalizes their own people.

This is what we are up against.

The JCC is allying itself with the Iranian regime (via Dabashi), propagandists for Jihad (Bakri), and J Street. (no real difference between the three at this point)

On the plus side, I now understand why J Street opposed the Toronto Film Festival’s attempted boycott of Israeli films! Carole Zabar (of the Zabar’s food store fame), founder of this “film festival,” explained that she opposed the Toronto Film Festival’s boycott because she believes it is better to show anti-Israel Israeli-made films!

This all makes sense now! Rather than boycott the Israeli film industry, it is apparent that the Manhattan JCC, and J Street, support the Israeli film industry…which they see as a vehicle for their version of anti-Israeli activism! Recall that one of the claims J Street makes about it being “pro-Israel” is that they were against the Toronto Film Festival’s boycott. They are doing all this while claiming to be “pro-Israel.” (pro-Israeli surrender, but in their eyes, that might be considered “pro-Israel”)

I find it shocking, how these progressives are twisting reality into such a cartoonish caricature.

The other positive I can say is that I now see the money train from Zabar’s to Jihad-supporting activities. I never would have imagined that Zabar’s of all places would support such a twisted ideology, but now at least I am aware of where part of the money train is emanating from.

Update by Delectable:

One point of clarification…

When I compared J Street to the Iranian regime, I did so because they are the only major Jewish organization to oppose sanctioning the regime, and they invited a paid lobbyist for the Iranian regime (Trita Parsi) to speak at their Annual Gala. They also invited Salam al-Marayati (who has repeatedly linked himself with terror groups), Palestinian Authority representatives, and many other supporters of terrorism.

J Street was also the only major Jewish organization to oppose Cast Lead, support the “settlement freeze,” oppose building in Jerusalem, and not oppose the Goldstone Report.

I just wanted to clarify why I stated what I stated.

Perhaps I was being a tad overdramatic to say there is “no difference” between J Street” and the Iranian regime, but there are open connections between J Street and the Iranian regime, and clear unification of policy in many respects.

Bret Stephens Agrees: Obama Is An Anti-Human Rights President

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

Blogmocracy In Action!

Guest Post by “Delectable”

I have repeatedly stated that Obama is at war with human rights around the globe.  On Blogmocracy, I have called him an anti-human rights president.  He backs the oppression of humanity in every country on earth, without any exception I am aware of.  This great article, written by Bret Stephens, explains this well.

Nobody should get too hung up over President Obama’s decision, reported by Der Spiegel over the weekend, to cancel plans to attend next month’s 20th anniversary celebration of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Germany’s reunited capital has already served his purposes; why should he serve its?

China: In February, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton landed in Beijing with a conciliating message about the country’s human-rights record. “Our pressing on those [human-rights] issues can’t interfere on the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis and the security crisis,” she said.

In fact, there has been no pressing whatsoever on human rights. President Obama refused to meet with the Dalai Lama last month, presumably so as not to ruffle feathers with the people who will now be financing his debts. In June, Liu Xiaobo, a leading signatory of the pro-democracy Charter 08 movement, was charged with “inciting subversion of state power.” But as a U.S. Embassy spokesman in Beijing admitted to the Journal, “neither the White House nor Secretary Clinton have made any public comments on Liu Xiaobo.”

Sudan: In 2008, candidate Obama issued a statement insisting that “there must be real pressure placed on the Sudanese government. We know from past experience that it will take a great deal to get them to do the right thing. . . . The U.N. Security Council should impose tough sanctions on the Khartoum government immediately.”

Exactly right. So what should Mr. Obama do as president? Yesterday, the State Department rolled out its new policy toward Sudan, based on “a menu of incentives and disincentives” for the genocidal Sudanese government of Omar Bashir. It’s the kind of menu Mr. Bashir will languidly pick his way through till he dies comfortably in his bed.

Iran: Mr. Obama’s week-long silence on Iran’s “internal affairs” following June’s fraudulent re-election was widely noted. Not so widely noted are the administration’s attempts to put maximum distance between itself and human-rights groups working the Iran beat.

Earlier this year, the State Department denied a grant request for New Haven, Conn.-based Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. The Center maintains perhaps the most extensive record anywhere of Iran’s 30-year history of brutality. The grant denial was part of a pattern: The administration also abruptly ended funding for Freedom House’s Gozaar project, an online Farsi- and English-language forum for discussing political issues.

It’s easy to see why Tehran would want these groups de-funded and shut down. But why should the administration, except as a form of pre-emptive appeasement?

In Massachusetts not long ago, I found myself driving behind a car with “Free Tibet,” “Save Darfur,” and “Obama 08″ bumper stickers.  I wonder if it will ever dawn on the owner of that car that at least one of those stickers doesn’t belong.

There is more – please read it all!

It is important to be aware that Obama is a self-styled progressive.  The anti-human rights nature of our progressive president shows the cognitive dissonance of the trans-nationalists (or “tranzis”) who pretend to believe in universal ideals of “hope” and “change,” only to then later stand for stagnation and despair when they enter office.
It thus is no surprise that Obama should follow this anti-human rights pattern.  And it is no surprise to me that Obama refuses to use his UN veto against the Goldstone defamation report against Israel. He thus will apparently be pushing for action on the Goldstone Report – including possible sanctions against Israel (a democractic state which adheres to the highest ideals of human rights) - while blocking sanctions against Iran (a thugocracy that shoots its citizens in the streets and rapes and tortures its prisoners).
This is where Obama stands today.  He has revealed himself as the anti-human rights president.  The good news is that others are starting to see this.

Obama Lied and People Died

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

Good morning Blogmocracy Netizens! I hope everyone is well, I am under the weather a bit which is why I have not been posting much. As usual I have to bring grim news of the antics of our Progressives leaders.

Our Radical Totalitarian Progressive president Barack Hussein Obama, lied during the 2008 campaign. He discussed how important Afghanistan was and that he would do what it takes to win. After approving an initial increase earlier this year, the situation is deteriorating. The Taliban is on the offensive and they are taking advantage of the new Rules of Engagement Obama imposed this year. Obama also is dragging out his decision whether to approve Gen. McChrystal’s request for more troops. While all this is happening ,our troops are dying and their frustration is rising.

WASHINGTON — Only nine months ago, the Pentagon pronounced itself reassured by the early steps of a new commander in chief. President Obama was moving slowly on an American withdrawal from Iraq, had retained former President George W. Bush’s defense secretary and, in a gesture much noticed, had executed his first military salute with crisp precision.

But now, after nearly a month of deliberations by Mr. Obama over whether to send more American troops to Afghanistan, frustrations and anxiety are on the rise within the military.

A number of active duty and retired senior officers say there is concern that the president is moving too slowly, is revisiting a war strategy he announced in March and is unduly influenced by political advisers in the Situation Room.

Read the rest.

Obama promised victory and that he would take the advise of the generals. Clearly this is not the case and our soldiers are suffering because of his indecision.They are fighting with little Air or Artillery support. They are unsure if their Commander in Chief supports them.

Obama lied and people have died!

We are winning! Senators/Congressmen are dropping out of J Street’s Annual “Gala” like flies!

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Blogmocracy in Action

Guest Blogger:Delectable

This post is meant to inspire you all to further action. On Friday, I posted a call to action for Blogmocracy readers, to email their senators/congressmen, telling them to drop out of the J Street Annual Gala. Please read that post right here. It contains critical information about J Street!

I wanted to let you all know that this advocacy has been working and WE ARE WINNING!

Just check out what the Weekly Standard has to say:

The names of Reps. John Salazar (CO-03) and Ed Towns (NY-10) have been scrubbed from the list of congressmen serving on the host committee for J Street’s inaugural conference. That brings to ten the number of congressmen, Republicans and Democrats, senators and representatives, who have bailed on J Street after learning that, contrary to their promotional materials, they are not a pro-Israel group. Apparently even the Friday afternoon roll out of Jim Jones as the conference’s keynote speaker — an announcement that J Street surely would have preferred to make on Monday but which they were compelled to move up lest their entire roster of Congressional supporters defect en masse — wasn’t enough to stanch the bleeding. The tally of defections so far:

Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR)
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)
Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS)
Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE)
Rep. Mike Ross (D-AR)
Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX)
Rep. Leonard Boswell (D-IA)
Rep. John Salazar (D-CO)
Rep. Ed Towns (D-NY)

Among the members who remain on that list there are a few who aren’t likely to hang around much longer. Senator Mark Udall is too savvy to be caught up in this mess. Will Senator Mark Pryor really go to the mat for an anti-Israel, pro-Hamas organization? And what about Republican Reps. Charles Boustany, Brian Bilbray, and Howard Coble? Are there large anti-Israel constituencies in those districts of which I was previously unaware?

I doubt those three are even aware their names are on this list, but after watching J Street speaker Josh Healey’s rousing performance of “Queer Intifada” in which he declares that “Guantanamo is Auschwitz” and “Anne Frank is Matthew Shepard,” I’m pretty confident they will ask to have their names removed.

Healey also wrote a poem about how “We’re the ones writing numbers on the wrists of babies born in the ghetto called Gaza.” A few weeks ago in his speech to the UN, Israeli PM Bibi Netanyahu drew some very obvious parallels between the Iranian regime and Nazi Germany. The anti-Israel left went nuts (see Andrew Sullivan here, Juan Cole here, and Philip Weiss here, for example), but here is a J Street confederate who compares Israel and the United States to Nazi Germany every time he picks up a pen. Even by the left’s own standards this kind of thing is beyond the pale. What member of Congress can attach his name to an event where the speakers will accuse the United States of running a concentration camp at Guantanamo?

Our advocacy is WORKING! Please continue to write to your senators/congressmen and keep up the pressure on J Street!

Already J Street is complaining of the scary “neocons” who are running them out of town! Poor, poor progressive babies!

The updated list of senators/congressmen attending J Street is right here. Please check if your senator/congressman is on the list!

We cannot let this progressive organization succeed in re-defining the English language!

Friday Night Drinking Thread: The Lebanese Arak Edtion

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Blogmocracy Netizens, it’s our Friday Night drinking thread. Tonight there is a twist, I am not drinking! I posted this to continue our tradition here. Tonight my feature liquor is Arak, a Middle eastern drink that originated in Lebanon. I am familiar with this as on my Dominican side, I have Lebanese roots. My Grandmother although born in DR, her parents were from Lebanon. So I have been exposed to Arak since youth. The Greeks calls it Ouzo and the Turks call  it Raki. It has to be mixed 2/3 Water, 1/3 Irak and then wine. Below is a description of the drink.

Abou_Akl

Arak is usually not drunk straight, but is mixed in approximately 1/3 arak to 2/3 water, and ice is then added. This dilution causes the clear liquor to turn an translucent milky-white colour; this is because anethole, the essential oil of anise, is soluble in alcohol but not in water. This results in an emulsion, whose fine droplets scatter the light and turn the liquid translucent, a phenomenon known as louching. Arak is also commonly mixed with teas and juices. Drinkers may also take arak with a chaser on the side. Arak is usually served with mezza, which could include dozens of small dishes, which many arak drinkers prefer as accompaniment rather than main courses. When the main course of the meal is served, it may hardly be touched, in favour of these smaller dishes. It is also well appreciated with barbecues, along with garlic sauce.

Tradition requires that water is added before ice. If ice is added directly, it results in the formation of an aesthetically unpleasant skin on the surface of the drink, as the ice causes the fat to solidify out of the arak. If water is added first, the ethanol causes the fat to emulsify, leading to the characteristic milky colour. For the same reason some drinkers prefer not to reuse an arak-filled glass. In restaurants, when a bottle of arak is ordered, the waiter will usually bring a number of glasses along with it for this reason, whilst at home with regular drinkers it’s deemed unnecessary.

The best company for Arak is LAC Products, a Lebanese Alcohol company that has a wide variety of Arak, Beer, Wine and other spirits.

Below is a Tribute to Lebanese Women!

Here is also a tribute to Lebanon.

Enjoy your evening I will be on around Midnight.

If the Taliban win, there goes the neighbourhood

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Blogmocracy in Action

Guest Blogger: Moe Katz

Retired Canadian Major General Lewis Mackenzie explains why Canada (and by extension, the U.S.)  needs to remain in Afghanistan: The terrifying possibility of  a nuclear-armed Taliban in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The reality is that al-Qaeda doesn’t need a “headquarters” or traditional training camps any more – the Internet has provided a far more effective means of organizing attacks. Since 9/11, the movement has metastasized: Dedicated freelance supporters of poster boy Osama bin Laden are recruited, trained and assigned via the Web. Just witness the London Underground and Madrid bomb attacks.

So, if this is the case, then Canadians can be forgiven for asking why we are still in Afghanistan. Well, here’s the real reason: the neighbourhood.

The doomsday scenario that would follow a Taliban resumption of power in Afghanistan is much deadlier today than it was in 1989 when the Russians were evicted. Once firmly established as the government in Kabul, the Taliban could and would focus their energies and talents on the real prize, Pakistan, where their brothers in arms have managed to advance, in one case, within 100 kilometres of the capital, Islamabad. With Afghanistan under their control, a reinforced Taliban would have greater potential to close that gap and bring the control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal and delivery systems within reach.

Read it all.

The Upcoming J Street Gala, and what to do about it

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Blogmocracy in Action

Guest Blogger: Delectable

This is a call to action on ALL Blogmocracy netizens, to email their Congressmen and Senators to IMMEDIATELY drop out of the J Street Gala, to take place October 25-28 2009.

A full listing of Congressmen/Senators planning to attend the Gala is right here. Please take the time and email your Congressman/Senator, asking them to drop out of J Street, should they appear on this list.

Now, you might be asking why this action should be done. Below explains what J Street is all about, and why it is imperative that this action be taken.

J Street is a new organization that seeks to “engage” those Jews who know nothing about Israel, haven never been there and likely will never go there, in the Middle East process. Its goal is to present Jews who care little to nothing about Israel as “experts” in the Middle East, who are empowered to tell Israel what to do. It bills itself as “pro-Israel, pro-peace,” but the term “peace” is an Orwellianized desecration of the English language, in the hands of J Street.

Don’t believe me? Just check out what Jeremy Ben-Ami, the director of J Street, had to say in the Jerusalem Post, after Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren rejected an invite to speak at the J Street annual “Gala.”

You seem well aware, both as an American by birth and as a student of American Jewish communal dynamics, that the connection to Israel for a large number of Jewish Americans has become strained over time.

We’re all looking at the same research and data. A majority of Jewish Americans have never been to Israel. Large – and increasing – numbers don’t take part in the traditional communal organizations. Levels of attendance at synagogues among the non-Orthodox remain low.

There is a generational dimension to these trends as well, one you undoubtedly noticed as a respected academic in the classroom. Young, liberal Jews have even less connection to Israel than their parents and grandparents, and they talk more openly about the challenges and difficulties facing Israel and about its responses.

THERE IS good news, however. The excitement that J Street has generated and its rapid early growth indicates that there is a thirst in the progressive Jewish community – and among young liberal Jews – to find a way to relate to, to talk about and, yes, to advocate for Israel that is consistent with progressive Jewish values. We are only one facet of a new and growing movement in American Jewry that is attracting hundreds of thousands of progressive Jews into study, communal service and non-traditional observance.

Jeremy Ben-Ami is thus admitting the following: (a) he is a progressive, and his organization is progressive; (b) his organization goes after other progressives who don’t give a fig about Israel, but nonetheless feel empowered, through his organization, to speak about Israel.

But there’s more!

What exactly does J Street stand for? Does it in fact “advocate for Israel”? Or is it a water carrier for Obama and the progressive movement?

Let’s examine the evidence:

  • (a) During Operation Cast Lead, J Street became famous as the only major “pro-Israel” organization to publicly oppose Cast Lead and seek a “ceasefire” prior to Israel finishing the job. Even the far-left Meretz Party of Israel, as well as “Peace Now” were supportive of Cast Lead. Recall that Cast Lead occurred after eight years of rockets aimed at Southern Israel, and was in defense of a civilian population, aimed specifically at disempowering Hamas. Source.
  • (b) J Street raises money for political candidates who include Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison and Congresswoman Donna Edwards, who have a famous antipathy towards Israel. Source.
  • (c) J Street publishes made up polls to advocate on behalf of its twisted policies. Source.
  • (d) J Street is the only major “pro Israel” organization to publicly push Obama to NOT increase sanctions on Iran. Source.
  • (e) J Street supported Obama when he pushed Israel for an anti-Semitic “settlement freeze,” that stood directly against the Roadmap that Bush published, and Israel relied upon when it evacuated 8,000 settlers from Gaza. Source.
  • (f) J Street is endorsed by Stephen Walt, of famed Walt and Mersheimer fame, who wrote the anti-Semitic screed, “The Israel Lobby and Foreign Policy.” His screed claimed a cabal of Jews control U.S. foreign policy, and this caused the war in Iraq. Source.

We thus far have established a grounding in how and why J Street is a progressive, anti-Israel organization, masquerading as a “pro-Israel” organization, at war with the English language, and only pretending to be “pro-Israel” in order to distort what it means to be pro-Israel. But some people may still claim they want more evidence. So I present you with the smoking gun, so to speak, that proves J Street is openly aligned with Jihad. (and yes, I mean that literally)

J Street invited Salam al-Marayati from the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), and Trita Parsi from National Iranian American Council (NIAC) to come speak. See the full list of progressives and Islamists who will be speaking right here.

MPAC is the Muslim Brotherhood’s propaganda arm in the USA. NIAC is the Iranian regime’s lobby group in the USA. See this dossier on Salam al-Marayati.

NIAC is the Iranian regime’s propaganda arm in the USA. See this dossier on NIAC and Trita Parsi.

Other notable Jihad propagandists include: Ziad Asali from the American Task Force on Palestine, Robert Malley, Program Director for Middle East and North Africa, International Crisis Group, Oded Na’aman, Breaking the Silence (a blood libel organization), and Eli Pariser, Former Director, MoveOn.org (a George Soros organization).

This would make little sense until one examines J Street’s funding, and sees they are funded by Arabs and Jihadists.

They were told to disinvite the jihadists to their “Gala,” and openly ignored this advice.

J Street is inviting Jihad propagandists to its Annual Gala and is funded by Arabs and Jihadists. It cannot be legitimized through a large cadre of Senators/Congressmen and dignitaries.

Conclusion: J Street is Exhibit A on how the progressive movement is aligned with Islamists. It cannot be allowed to succeed.

What are you waiting for? Write a letter to your Congressman/Senator who is planning on attending the J Street Gala, today!

Update: Stand With Us on J Street – even more links and information on this progressive organization!

AND THIS IS CLASSIC: J Street complains that politicians are dropping out from their “Gala” like flies due to the scary neocons! We are getting to them! Poor babies!