Archive for the ‘Hate Speech’ Category

« Older Entries

The Upcoming J Street Gala, and what to do about it

Friday, October 16th, 2009

Blogmocracy in Action

Guest Blogger: Delectable

This is a call to action on ALL Blogmocracy netizens, to email their Congressmen and Senators to IMMEDIATELY drop out of the J Street Gala, to take place October 25-28 2009.

A full listing of Congressmen/Senators planning to attend the Gala is right here. Please take the time and email your Congressman/Senator, asking them to drop out of J Street, should they appear on this list.

Now, you might be asking why this action should be done. Below explains what J Street is all about, and why it is imperative that this action be taken.

J Street is a new organization that seeks to “engage” those Jews who know nothing about Israel, haven never been there and likely will never go there, in the Middle East process. Its goal is to present Jews who care little to nothing about Israel as “experts” in the Middle East, who are empowered to tell Israel what to do. It bills itself as “pro-Israel, pro-peace,” but the term “peace” is an Orwellianized desecration of the English language, in the hands of J Street.

Don’t believe me? Just check out what Jeremy Ben-Ami, the director of J Street, had to say in the Jerusalem Post, after Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren rejected an invite to speak at the J Street annual “Gala.”

You seem well aware, both as an American by birth and as a student of American Jewish communal dynamics, that the connection to Israel for a large number of Jewish Americans has become strained over time.

We’re all looking at the same research and data. A majority of Jewish Americans have never been to Israel. Large – and increasing – numbers don’t take part in the traditional communal organizations. Levels of attendance at synagogues among the non-Orthodox remain low.

There is a generational dimension to these trends as well, one you undoubtedly noticed as a respected academic in the classroom. Young, liberal Jews have even less connection to Israel than their parents and grandparents, and they talk more openly about the challenges and difficulties facing Israel and about its responses.

THERE IS good news, however. The excitement that J Street has generated and its rapid early growth indicates that there is a thirst in the progressive Jewish community – and among young liberal Jews – to find a way to relate to, to talk about and, yes, to advocate for Israel that is consistent with progressive Jewish values. We are only one facet of a new and growing movement in American Jewry that is attracting hundreds of thousands of progressive Jews into study, communal service and non-traditional observance.

Jeremy Ben-Ami is thus admitting the following: (a) he is a progressive, and his organization is progressive; (b) his organization goes after other progressives who don’t give a fig about Israel, but nonetheless feel empowered, through his organization, to speak about Israel.

But there’s more!

What exactly does J Street stand for? Does it in fact “advocate for Israel”? Or is it a water carrier for Obama and the progressive movement?

Let’s examine the evidence:

  • (a) During Operation Cast Lead, J Street became famous as the only major “pro-Israel” organization to publicly oppose Cast Lead and seek a “ceasefire” prior to Israel finishing the job. Even the far-left Meretz Party of Israel, as well as “Peace Now” were supportive of Cast Lead. Recall that Cast Lead occurred after eight years of rockets aimed at Southern Israel, and was in defense of a civilian population, aimed specifically at disempowering Hamas. Source.
  • (b) J Street raises money for political candidates who include Muslim Congressman Keith Ellison and Congresswoman Donna Edwards, who have a famous antipathy towards Israel. Source.
  • (c) J Street publishes made up polls to advocate on behalf of its twisted policies. Source.
  • (d) J Street is the only major “pro Israel” organization to publicly push Obama to NOT increase sanctions on Iran. Source.
  • (e) J Street supported Obama when he pushed Israel for an anti-Semitic “settlement freeze,” that stood directly against the Roadmap that Bush published, and Israel relied upon when it evacuated 8,000 settlers from Gaza. Source.
  • (f) J Street is endorsed by Stephen Walt, of famed Walt and Mersheimer fame, who wrote the anti-Semitic screed, “The Israel Lobby and Foreign Policy.” His screed claimed a cabal of Jews control U.S. foreign policy, and this caused the war in Iraq. Source.

We thus far have established a grounding in how and why J Street is a progressive, anti-Israel organization, masquerading as a “pro-Israel” organization, at war with the English language, and only pretending to be “pro-Israel” in order to distort what it means to be pro-Israel. But some people may still claim they want more evidence. So I present you with the smoking gun, so to speak, that proves J Street is openly aligned with Jihad. (and yes, I mean that literally)

J Street invited Salam al-Marayati from the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), and Trita Parsi from National Iranian American Council (NIAC) to come speak. See the full list of progressives and Islamists who will be speaking right here.

MPAC is the Muslim Brotherhood’s propaganda arm in the USA. NIAC is the Iranian regime’s lobby group in the USA. See this dossier on Salam al-Marayati.

NIAC is the Iranian regime’s propaganda arm in the USA. See this dossier on NIAC and Trita Parsi.

Other notable Jihad propagandists include: Ziad Asali from the American Task Force on Palestine, Robert Malley, Program Director for Middle East and North Africa, International Crisis Group, Oded Na’aman, Breaking the Silence (a blood libel organization), and Eli Pariser, Former Director, MoveOn.org (a George Soros organization).

This would make little sense until one examines J Street’s funding, and sees they are funded by Arabs and Jihadists.

They were told to disinvite the jihadists to their “Gala,” and openly ignored this advice.

J Street is inviting Jihad propagandists to its Annual Gala and is funded by Arabs and Jihadists. It cannot be legitimized through a large cadre of Senators/Congressmen and dignitaries.

Conclusion: J Street is Exhibit A on how the progressive movement is aligned with Islamists. It cannot be allowed to succeed.

What are you waiting for? Write a letter to your Congressman/Senator who is planning on attending the J Street Gala, today!

Update: Stand With Us on J Street – even more links and information on this progressive organization!

AND THIS IS CLASSIC: J Street complains that politicians are dropping out from their “Gala” like flies due to the scary neocons! We are getting to them! Poor babies!

Posted in Blogmocracy, Dhimmitude, Hate Speech, Iran, Islamists, Israel, Jihad, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Progressives, Tranzis | 283 Comments »

The Rush Limbaugh liberal media lynch mob

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

Interesting article from the London Daily Telegraph about the outright lies told about Rush during his attempt to purchase minority ownership of the St. Louis Rams. Of course, at Nancy’s pathetic liberal shithole, 99% of Nancy’s ass-kissing psycho-phants attacked Rush because Nancy did. A year ago they were all praising Rush, Hannity, and Beck. Now they’re the anti-Christ to those morons. They’re truly like Jim Jones and “Jonestown” in Guyana circa 1978. They all are really pathetic losers and fools over there…Now drink your Chuckles-flavored Kool-Aid, boys and girls, and don’t worry that it tastes funny.

Which public figure can be quoted as having said something bigoted and disgusting and it doesn’t matter whether he did or not because he might have? Who can Big Media brand a racist without checking the facts? Who has to prove he did not say something racist, rather than the accuser proving he did?

A pat on the back for anyone who guessed the answer: Rush Limbaugh (OK, the blog headline was a clue). From CNN to MSNBC to ABC, it’s been put about that Limbaugh said this:

I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.

It’s also been spread around that he said this, about the death of the man who assassinated Martin Luther King:

You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honour? James Earl Ray. We miss you, James. Godspeed.

Here’s CNN’s Rick Sanchez baldly stating at the 1.14 point that Limbaugh made the slavery comment:

(Click on the link below to see Rush being slandered by CNN- Bob)

Trouble is, he didn’t say either of these outrageous things. And it wasn’t difficult to check, as protein wisdom shows here. They originated from, er, Wikipedia and Wikiquotes. Both quotes ended up in this book – a hit job that doesn’t cite any sources. They’re also included in this internet list posted a year ago and endlessly ripped off ever since.

The irony is, of course, that the people reporting this as fact are the same types who are always denouncing bloggers and the internet as forces of evil intent on destroying proper journalism – proper journalism being the kind that involves checking facts. In the case of Rush Limbaugh, however, it seems to be enough that the intention (i.e. to show the talk radio host is a racist) is considered pure.

Even those who have been primary movers in spreading these malicious falsehoods – which would lead to payouts of hundreds of thousands in British libel courts if lawsuits were ever filed there – are brazenly unapologetic.

Thus, St. Louis Post-Dispatch columnist Bryan Burwell pens this column containing the slavery quote and then follows up with another column with a kind-of-sort-of-well-not-really-at-all mea culpa in which he states that the quote seemed “so in character with the many things that Limbaugh has said before that we didn’t verify it beyond the book”.

OK, so it sounded right and it was on the internet or in a book or something so it was fine to just go ahead and print it as stone-cold fact without any attribution? I wonder which journalism school teaches that?

And Burwell caps it off by implying – nudge, nudge, wink, wink – that Limbaugh’s really lying: “Fine, let’s play along for the time being and take him at his word that he was inaccurately quoted in the Huberman book.” I’m no fan of British libel laws but, again, if that had been printed in the UK it would have led to a hefty payout for aggravated damages.

Limbaugh is, understandably, on the war path because the smear of racism is one is very, very difficult to wipe clean:

When race is brought into it, that you can’t let stand. I mean, if you, if people are trying to destroy your reputation and your credibility, your life, and your career by attacking you as a racist, then you have to stand up and, like that.

Now we are in the process behind the scenes working to get apologies and retractions, with the force of legal action, against every journalist who has published these entirely fabricated quotes about me, slavery, and James Earl Ray.

I never said them. We have tracked them. We know where they came from. We don’t know the identity, but we know where they came from – a single blogger who posted the stuff on my Wikipedia page and Wikiquotes, unsourced.

Wikipedia says, ‘Well, this is in dispute.’ It’s not in dispute. They were never uttered. I never said them. And I’ve even told reporters I never said them.

As Mark Steyn points out, in this instance it’s for Limbaugh to prove the negative – an impossible task. And Dan Calebrese asks why if Limbaugh really is a racist then it takes bogus quotes to “prove” that he is?

What’s the term for those who are setting about “racist” Rush Limbaugh right now? Ironically, it seems to be “lynch mob”. And they’ve succeeded – word is that Limbaugh’s been dropped from the consortium seeking to buy the St Louis Rams.

Read the whole article here

Posted in Barack Obama, Democratic Party, Free Speech, Hate Speech, LGF, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Media, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Progressives | 372 Comments »

NBC:Rushing To The Exit!

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

The decline of NBC as a non-partisan broadcaster began long ago, the exact date is unknown to me. For the current era of “state run” media, NBC fought and clawed their way to the front of the line to be Øbama’s boot-lickers.

The best example, of course, was the absurdity that Chris Matthews of MSNBC bestowed on us in Feb ‘08:

I have to tell you, you know, it’s part of reporting this case, this election, the feeling most people get when they hear Barack Obama’s speech. My, I felt this thrill going up my leg. I mean, I don’t have that too often. No, seriously. It’s a dramatic event. He speaks about America in a way that has nothing to do with politics. It has to do with the feeling we have about our country. And that is an objective assessment.

Since that time, the same Chris Matthews made the following statement:

CHRIS MATTHEWS: Yeah, well, you know what? I want to do everything I can to make this thing work, this new presidency work, and I think that –

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Is that your job? You just talked about being a journalist!

MATTHEWS: Yeah, it is my job. My job is to help this country.

SCARBOROUGH: Your job is the make this presidency work?

MATTHEWS: To make this work successfully. This country needs a successful presidency.

That was then, this is now.

In the news ratings between FOX and the MSNBC news shows, the following are the latest Nielsen ratings available.

Glenn Beck vs. Chris Matthews; Sean Hannity vs. Rachel Maddow TV Ratings Through Thursday, September 24.

O’Reilly vs. Olbermann TV Ratings Through Thursday, September 24.

The numbers speak for themselves, as MSNBC is so far behind FOX in the ratings, they aren’t even trying anymore, just currying favor with the new administration. I don’t see that as business plan that will define success.

With all that, as if it weren’t enough, there is the matter of prime time NBC network shows. If it weren’t for college football, NBC wouldn’t win any time slots, but to fully illustrate the corrupt and maladaptive environment at NBC, there were two incidents on Friday, 25 Sep 09 that need mentioning.

The first was this outrageous email sent by an NBC “Dateline” producer.
“Bite Me, Jew Boy!”

Then, on Friday night, the season premiere of the series “Law and Order” added another voice to the howl of the moonbats, as evidenced in the following trailer.

Yes, that’s right, they are still pushing for the prosecution of members of the Bush administration.

They did have at least one positive review for the show, as evidenced here.

Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, wrote on the Huffington Post that “[w]hat McCoy understands is that in America, the rule of law applies to everyone. No one is above the law, not even (and some might say especially) the most powerful. … In real life, there has yet to be an investigation into the high-level authorization of torture, a crime that has stained the reputation of our nation at home and abroad.“

Of course, if the ACLU says our nations reputation is stained, then it must be anything but.

An actual voice of reason can be found at Gateway Pundit:

Hey Hollywood– This may came as a surprise but America is angrier today with the radicals in Washington than they were when Bush was in charge.
When will we see the Obama-bashing episodes?

The answer to GPs question will go unanswered, just as all requests from the NBC producer have been.

Posted in Anti-semitism, George W. Bush, Hate Speech, Media, Polls | 273 Comments »

Progressives use Race Card to deflect Criticism

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Good Morning Blogmocracy Netizens! As you have seen, we are experiencing some Technical difficulties. This is due to the tremendous support you have shown us and this has resulted in increase traffic! I would like to thank you all and bear with us. We will soon be moving to a new Host and will have a new design. We are planning on De-LGFing our site, so we can move forward into the future.

The Progressives, don’t want to move into the future. They want to live in the past by using one of their main weapons, The Race Card! With Obama being exposed as a failure and a pathetic nasty individual, his minions are now crying racism! This is desperation and divisive, but they don’t care. For the Totalitarian Progressive Movement, it’s all about control and they will do anything to maintain it.

C’mon, everyone knows the hullabaloo surrounding President Barack Obama is bigotry in action. The administration’s policy initiatives couldn’t possibly provoke any authentic anger or protest.

Proving this dastardly motive, on the other hand, has been problematic. But there are ways around this dilemma. Unearth some crazy outliers. Create caricatures. Recognize “code” words. Reduce to absurdity.
And presto!

“Surrounded by middle-aged white guys — a sepia snapshot of the days when such pols ran Washington like their own men’s club — Joe Wilson yelled ‘You lie!’ at a president who didn’t,” declared Maureen Dowd in her Saturday New York Times column. “But, fair or not, what I heard was an unspoken word in the air: You lie, boy!”

Of course, it’s fair. If inserting a racial epithet into a quote is wrong, I don’t wanna know what’s right. It is, moreover, common knowledge that middle-aged white men are bigots. If there’s a problem with Dowd’s premise, it’s that Wilson likely lacks the intellect to string together more than two words per sentence. He is from South Carolina, after all.

Read the rest.

This article is very sarcastic in tone, but it’s truthful. Progressives love to pigeon hole their opponents and stereotype them. This comes from the tactics of Saul Alinsky of  defining your enemy. The Race Card is their last defense, because their whole ideology is based on a false premise. They believe that the elite know what is better rfo the masses. When the people reject Progressivism, they use racism as an excuse.They just can’t concieve that people really just don’t agree with their Ideology.

This is another sign of weakness on the part of Progressives, that is why we must keep up the attacks on them. Alinsky himself, would advise “keep up the Pressure.” The Left is cracking and we must keep it up!

Update: Now Jimmy “The Dhimmi’ Carter chimes in. He claims any opposition to Obama is based on race!

Former President Jimmy Carter said Tuesday that U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson’s outburst to President Barack Obama during a speech to Congress last week was an act “based on racism” and rooted in fears of a black president.

“I think it’s based on racism,” Carter said in response to an audience question at a town hall held at his presidential center in Atlanta. “There is an inherent feeling among many in this country that an African-American should not be president.”

Read the rest.

Yeah Carter should know about Racism, he hates Jews.

(Update Hat Tip:Ed Mahmoud)

(Picture Update: Macker)

Carter

Tags: ,
Posted in Barack Obama, Free Speech, Hate Speech, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Progressives | 228 Comments »

Another Øbamanation!

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

A post at Atlas Shrugs on 8 Sep 09 served as another reminder as to why he is distrusted by so many in this nation.

Add another Obama insult to injury on 911, the national day of terrible grief and mourning. First he desecrated the memory of 911 with this: Obama’s 911 proclamation of his mandatory civilian service on 911. He means to erase the meaning of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks from the American psyche and convert Sept. 11 into a day of leftist celebration and statist idolatry, and an “interfaith day of service”.

If our current President, who is still searching for a church after nearly eight months in office, honestly believes that this executive order will ever erase events of 9 Sep 01 from our national psyche, he is not only mistaken, but deluded to the point that therapy would have no benefit.

No amount of executive orders or glad handing with those who would destroy us, will ever erase the memory of that day. While the pain may subside, the memory lives on, from ‘the day that changed everything.’

The voices of 9-11 are still being heard. No amount of appeasement can silence them, or drown their voices out, with ‘executive hate speech.’

Posted in Dhimmitude, Hate Speech, Islamic Terrorism, Leftist-Islamic Alliance, September 11 | 133 Comments »

The Van Jones Bad Crazy Gets Worse

Saturday, September 5th, 2009

More news about Van Jones.  This time, he has been linked to a radical Maoist group, the Revolutionary Communist Party of the USA, outed by Gateway Pundit. In this instance, he signed on as a supporter for a rally intended to “Stop Police Brutality, Repression and the Criminalization of a Generation” back in October 2006,

Van Jones and the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights

Check out the company he keeps, too. His name is listed right between the anti-Semitic ISO (International Socialist Organisation) and Justice4Palestinians. Other baddies who supported this bit of Communist agitation? ANSWER, American Muslim Voice, Code Pink, the local shop of the SEIU, and something called the “Centre for Tactical Magic,” whatever that is. Please note, before any of the 1.0 hyperventilators grab onto it, that the “Philip Berg” listed is NOT the Obama Birth Certificate guy (Philip J. Berg), but is a Bay area Libertarian and anti-war activist, Philip Z. Berg, who unsuccessfully ran for Congress in the CA-8 district last year.

All in all, a pretty classy and reasonable group of people to be hanging out with. NOT.

Of course, what do you expect from a guy who gives a speech and says, “…it’s just very, very hard for white people to hear the pain of the subjugated people in this country…”

Or “…it is literally impossible for most white people to hear people of color speak about our pain, just literally impossible. The only people who have a chance to pull it off, are people who have a spiritual practice, who have a meditation practice, who have a contemplative practice..”

Or, as Gateway Pundit pointed out, the guy has the “Ella Baker Centre for Human Rights” decorated with murals depicting evil white men shooting and enslaving People of Colour™ Because that’s what old white guys in business suits do all day, is walk around pointing guns at minorities and enslaving them to work on C++ plantations. Good grief.

One would almost get the impression that someone in the Obama administration, well, hates white people or something.

Tags: ,
Posted in Hate Speech, Leftists, Liberal Fascism, Racism | 83 Comments »

Van Jones: Green Jobs Czar, FOO (friend of Obama), Communist, 9/11 Troofer, and Racist Extraordinaire…

Friday, September 4th, 2009

Here’s a couple of links proving that Obama’s green jobs czar Van Jones, besides being a communist and 9/11 troofer (Get it Nancy?), is also an unrepentant and unapologetic racist and black nationalist…

VAN JONES: WE’VE NEVER SEEN A COLUMBINE DONE BY A BLACK CHILD, ONLY ‘SUBURBAN WHITE KIDS’ SHOOT UP SCHOOLS

Of course, the racist Jones fails to recognize, or most likely ignores the fact that thousands of black high school students are killed each year by other black students, mostly due to gang violence, which is many times more than white students killed by other white high school students, even though blacks make up only about 14% of our population, and whites are about 70%.

Then the racist swine scumbag compared George W. Bush to a crack addict trying to lick a crackpipe trying to get a fix:

VAN JONES USES ‘EBONICS’ TO DO LIVELY IMITATION OF GEORGE BUSH ON CRACK

And all the while, The mainstream Libtard media gives this ZERO coverage! Think this would have been ignored by the liberal/leftist media if George W. Bush was still President and a white appointee of his said this? Me neither…

Posted in Barack Obama, Communism, Democratic Party, Hate Speech, Leftists, Media, Multiculturalism, Political Correctness, Progressives, Racism | 60 Comments »

Van Jones IS a 9-11 Truther, After All

Friday, September 4th, 2009

Sorry for the now-semi redundant post, but this is one of the disadvantages of working for a company that specifically bans contributing to blogs, even on your free time.  I’d whipped this post up earlier off-line and emailed it to myself, but only now was I able to post it.  Sorry to all the nitpickers out there….

Anywise, the left-wing blogosphere has been all aflutter about Van Jones’ denial with an apology of any involvement in the 9-11 Truther movement, in which he claims that he didn’t really know what he was signing and didn’t agree with the Truther sentiment of the petition. Which is odd since, as the Washington Times’ Amanda Carpenter points out, Mike Berger, a spokesman for 911Truth.org, told the Times that each and every person who signed the petition had their signature and intention verified by that organization. As if the name “911Truth” didn’t give away the group’s beliefs or anything.

More damning for the credulous, nothing-to-see-here side of the blogosphere has surfaced today, however. Far from never having been a part of the 9-11 Truther movement, it turns out that as far back as January 2002, Van Jones was signing on with the movement,

 Tuesday, January 8th, 2002, at noon at Justin Herman Plaza, people will gather to march up Market Street to the office of Senator Feinstein (at Post St.) where a delegation will meet with the Senator’s staff to raise their concerns over the “War on Terrorism.” They will demand that the Senate launch an inquiry or hearings of the events of 9-11, and the U.S. government’s international and domestic response.

The 9-11 disaster has been used to justify a “War on Terrorism” which endangers the lives and liberties of millions of people everywhere. The U.S. bombing of Afghanistan has killed thousands of civilians; millions of Afghans have been displaced and face starvation this winter. The administration has condoned massive Israeli assaults on Palestine, and threatens to attack Iraq, Lebanon, Somalia, and other countries. Recent legislation is an attack on constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties, especially those of immigrants and people of color. The laws are mirrored in other countries which are outlawing dissent and increasing political repression. The administration has institutionalized racial profiling and is secretly rounding up thousands of Arab Americans and other people of Middle Eastern background. At the same time, it is giving billions to the military, offering huge bailouts and tax incentives to corporations and the wealthy, while ignoring the hundreds of thousands of laid off workers, and cutting social services. This appears to be part of a long-range strategy to turn the clock back on the hard earned gains of the civil rights’, womens’, and environmental movements, to consolidate U.S. global domination, and to serve the interests of transnational corporations.

[snip]

The delegation will demand that these questions (and others) be raised and answered publicly-

Who created, trained and funded the Al Qaeda Network? What is the relationship between Bin Laden, his family and the Bush family and the Carlyle Group? Why were no fighter planes dispatched to intercept the four hijacked planes on September 11h , in violation of standard procedures? Who actually was in control of the “hijacked planes”? What is the U.S. relationship with Pakistan, and especially with its intelligence service, the ISI? Why did the then director of the ISI have $100,000 transferred to the man whom the FBI now calls the ringleader of the Sept. 11th attacks, and why does the U.S. not pursue this question? Did the CIA have foreknowledge of the attack, who tried to profit with put options on American, United, Merrill Lynch stock just before the attack? Why were the FBI told to not investigate the Bin Laden family links in the US? If the CIA met with Bin Laden last July, why didn’t they try to arrest him? If the US is serious about ridding the world of terrorism, why do we continue to fund and train terrorists? Why are we bombing Afghanistan, when none of the alleged bombers actually came from there, could there be another reason for our presence in that region, like oil? Is the war against Afghanistan illegal? What are Bush’s, Cheney’s and Rice’s connections to the oil industry? What are Bush’s and Cheney’s connections to the drug industry? Why is the evidence being destroyed when an investigation of the World Trade Center collapse is needed? Why seal Presidential records? Why intimidate professors from speaking out against this war? Why has the U.S. military been establishing working relations with the Uzbek military for several years? What other military involvement does the U.S. have in the Central Asian Republics? Why are U.S. military personnel or material assistance going to the Philippines, Indonesia, and Colombia as well? What relationship did various U.S. agencies and their contractors have with the Taliban, either directly or through Pakistani or Saudi agencies or contractors? Why does the U.S. overlook Pakistani drug lords who refine and export half to two-thirds of the world,s heroin despite its avowed determination to rid the world of drugs? Why has the Dept. of Justice stopped its investigation of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International despite its admitted heavy involvement in laundering drug money?

 

And guess whose name appears on a list of the organisers of this event?

 Organizing Committee (organizations listed for identification purposes only):

Jan Adams, former associate director, Applied Research Center

Linda Burnham, executive director, Women of Color Resource Center

Max Elbaum, former managing editor, CrossRoads magazine

Adam Gold, STORM

Rebecca Gordon, Seminarians for Peace

Felicia Gustin, co-director, Speak Out

Van Jones, national executive director, Ella Baker Center for Human Rights

Elizabeth (Betita) Martinez, director, Institute for MultiRacial Justice

Steve Williams, executive director, POWER

Bob Wing, former executive editor, ColorLines magazine

Sounds like Trutherism to me, but who knows? Maybe Jones was asleep the whole time he was helping to organize an event calling for Congress to investigate George Bush for his links to al-Qaeda and Bin Laden and demanding to know what “really happened” to make the towers collapse. Note also, Jones’ other organization – STORM (Stand Together to Organise a Revolutionary Movement) also had a representative on the organizing committee for this event.

Another thing to note – all of the information cited above comes from a primary source. Not from FOX News. Not from Glenn Beck. Not from some conservative organization. It comes straight off of kook wacko Jeff Rense’s website promoting the event. In other words, from Van Jones’ perspective, this is a friendly source, one that’s on his side.

To make a long story short, yes, Van Jones IS a Truther. He IS one of those kooks who think George Bush planned 9-11 to give us justification for taking everybody’s oil and oppressing their civil rights. He’s apparently unsure of who was even really in control of those hijacked planes. And while the toxic cloud of smoke was still wafting its way out of the ruins at Ground Zero, this jerk was signing on to undermine our efforts against the people who did it. Sick, sick, sick.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Hate Speech, Leftists, Liberal Fascism | 151 Comments »

Obama Advocacy Site Calls People Who Oppose Obama “Domestic Terrorists”

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

Another day, another new low by the kook-wacko Left.  This time around, a “call for action” issued on the advocacy site Organizing for America, started at the behest of Barack Obama, urges people to “fight back” against our “right-wing domestic terrorists”,

President Obama’s grassroots advocacy group is coming under fire for a supporter who pulled the Sept. 11 attacks into the health care debate. 

The controversy stems from a notice on the Organizing for America Web site urging reform advocates to use the anniversary of the terror attacks to call on lawmakers to pass health care reform. 

“All 50 states are coordinating in this — as we fight back against our own Right-Wing Domestic Terrorists who are subverting the American Democratic process, whipped to a frenzy by their Fox Propaganda Network ceaselessly re-seizing power for their treacherous leaders,” the notice said in part. It has since been scrubbed from the Organizing for America site. 

Following criticism from the conservative Heritage Foundation, a spokesman for the Democratic National Committee told FOX News in a statement that anyone can post on the site and condemned the language. 

“We certainly don’t agree with these comments, nor do we condone them, just as I’m sure the Heritage Foundation or FOX don’t agree or condone some of the things posted in sections of their Web site,” the statement said. 

But the Heritage Foundation’s Rory Cooper said the call to action was actively distributed. 

“This was distributed to people in Illinois, Michigan and North Carolina. So yeah, the original posting was just an independent person who went too far. But when Organizing for America took the next step and invited people to the event, they became complicit in the language,” Cooper said. 

Cooper criticized Obama for pushing his message through both the official White House Web site and Organizing for America’s BarackObama.com. 

It’s interesting, really, to see just how insane the Left becomes when they are challenged.  It sort of puts the gulags and unaccountable “administrative courts” of the Soviet Union into perspective.  That’s the way the Left views things – dissent it patriotic when they do, but its subversive and terrorism when somebody else does it.  Retirees showing up at town halls and giving their ELECTED representatives the business are worse than al-Qaeda.  It’s rather scary that we have an administration willing to allow its name to be put on this kind of rubbish.  It’s rather scary that this administration’s “Green Jobs” Czar is a racist buffoon who thinks 9-11 was a Republican campaign ad.  It’s rather scary that this administration apparent thought it was acceptable to set up a website so people could “snitch” on their neighbours for holding the wrong political viewpoints, 1938-style.  It’s rather scary that this administration has an Attorney General who thinks our own CIA is more of a threat to us than Islamofascist terrorists.  It’s rather scary that we have an administration that is dead set on developing any more energy resources in America, but freely hands out billions to Brazil to develop theirs.  It’s rather scary that we have an administration that is setting up a system for harvesting personal data from social networking sites. 

The crazy is strong with this administration, no doubt about it.

Tags: , ,
Posted in Barack Obama, Free Speech, Hate Speech, Leftists, Politics | 6 Comments »

Olbermann Guest: Beck, Bachmann ‘Actively and Consciously’ Trying to ‘Get the President Killed’

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009

Just when you thought the Left’s bad crazy couldn’t get any worse, then you turn on Keith Olbermann’s show, and see Dan Savage getting air time,

“I really do think that the Michele Bachmanns of the world and the Glenn Becks of the world are actively and consciously, or subconsciously, trying to get – I’m just going to say it, trying to get the president killed. That’s why they’re setting this up as kill or be killed arguments. He’s going to kill your grandma, pull the plug on grandma, death panels that little children have to go in front of.”

Good grief.

It figures, however.  Generally speaking, the people attacking both Bachmann and Beck right now are a collection of unhinged kooks, wackos, and intellectually shallow malcontents.  

By the way, this Savage fellow isn’t our Savage.  Just so you’ll know.

As an aside, I find it interesting that this guy burbles on like a gossiping schoolgirl about the horrible, horrible Wepubwicans who “think God’s on their side” and who “claim to speak for God.”  The reason this is interesting is because the Republicans haven’t done that.  However, the Democrats have.  Bill Clinton’s the “voice of God?”  Health care “reform” is a spiritual imperative?  Left-wing pastors need to encourage their flocks to push for socialised medicine?  Misquoting Bible verses completely out of their natural context to try to support a public option?   What, are the Democrats closet theocrats or something?

Tags: , ,
Posted in Hate Speech, Leftists, Politics | 240 Comments »

« Older Entries