Progressive-Islamic Alliance seek to silence Global Media

Barack Hussein Obama is attempting to control and silence the opposition media here in America. However, what he is doing is not unique to America. Progressive and Islamic regimes throughout the world are attempting to silence the media. This is ironic since the Global Media sympathizes with with Progressives and Islamic movements. Our Crypto Dictator Obama is just copying what his International Progressive and Islamic allies are doing.

The Obama administration’s un-American attempt to vilify Fox News only increased the network’s popularity. But this White House debacle can’t be judged in isolation: There’s a global leftwing assault on the freedom of information.

Intense leftist sentiment in most of the international media isn’t enough. Extremists seek total control.

The one thing leftists just can’t bear is criticism. (Mass murder’s fine, but don’t stray from the party line.) As early as the French Revolution, the left grasped that a free press is inherently subversive to its doctrines.

Read the rest.

America is currently under Progressive Occupation. This alien Un-American movement is attempting to seize total control. To achieve this, they must silence people. The Media has for years supported the Islamic-Progressive Coalition and did everything in their power to elect Barack Hussein Obama. However, there are outlets like Fox News that call out the Totalitarians.

As Americans we must be aware that Obama is the 1st Anti/Post American president. He really hates what this nation is about and is a Radical. It is no shocker he is doing what his buddies Chavez and Ahmadinejad are doing in their nations. They are all Totalitarian Radicals that seek to reshape their world in their evil image.

Progressivism and Islam are both Totalitarian Ideologies that must be defeated!

Tags:

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

74 Responses to “Progressive-Islamic Alliance seek to silence Global Media”
( jump to bottom )

  1. RIX
    1 | November 1, 2009 5:09 am

    Good morning. if Obama could ,l don’t doubt that he would close down some median oulets ala Hugo Chavez.


  2. Speranza
    2 | November 1, 2009 5:31 am

    Well they certainly want one world government. The first thing they will do is do away with national sovereignty. The second thing will be to delegitimize and set the ball rolling in ending Israel’s existence. After that it will be Europe and then North America.


  3. RIX
    3 | November 1, 2009 5:32 am

    HelloooooOOOO. Anybody here?
    Raise your hands if you’re not here.


  4. mawskrat
    4 | November 1, 2009 5:33 am

    I’m just back from a time warp in the previous thread.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yarYjuN-m8I


  5. RIX
    5 | November 1, 2009 5:43 am

    “If Hoffman takes the election, expect the social cons to really start consolidating their hold on the GOP, and expect the centrist purge to accelerate.”

    This is a quote fom CJ re New York 23rd Cong. Dist.
    So he disapproves of purges?


  6. Possum
    6 | November 1, 2009 5:45 am

    I am eating supper at a very distorted time because Obama made the clocks fall back…

    It is Dawn!!!! Whooott!

    Where is my bed?


  7. Iron Fist
    7 | November 1, 2009 5:47 am

    re: #2 by Speranza

    You have the gist of it, although I disagree with some of the timing. I think there will be a nuclear war in the Middle East before the get their withering away of the “State” and creation of a One World Totalitarian Dictatorship of peace, love, puppy dogs, and, OMG! Ponies!!11ty!!

    After the nuclear war, there will be the push to get rid of State Soverignty, like there was after WWI under Wilson and the victorious European powers. Probably some new iteration of the UN with expanded police powers and its own courts to enforce its will. Oh, and a private mercenary army to be the Iron Fist behind the tattered, worn velvet glove…


  8. Iron Fist
    8 | November 1, 2009 5:49 am

    re: #6 by Possum

    I need to go crawl back into my coffin. Sees ya later…


  9. Rightside
    9 | November 1, 2009 5:56 am

    Morning everybody.


  10. RIX
    10 | November 1, 2009 5:58 am

    This ties into this thread. FNC is doing a segment on Peter Gadial, the father os a son who was killed in the Towers on 9/11.
    His hometown of Kent Connecticut wants to erect a memorial , But refuse to include ‘murdered by Muslim Terrorists” per his wishes.
    The father will not back off, so no memorial.


  11. chickadee
    11 | November 1, 2009 6:05 am

    re: #10 by RIX

    The truth is vulgar and offensive if it puts Islam in a bad light.
    How enlightened it that?
    I wonder what the town is proposing?
    Something like “He lost his life on the “National Day of Service.”


  12. RIX
    12 | November 1, 2009 6:13 am

    re: #11 by chickadee

    The truth is vulgar and offensive if it puts Islam in a bad light.
    How enlightened it that?

    A town offical was interviewed, might have been the mayot & her explanaton is that Kent is an inclusive community.
    There is a Muslim family in town & they would find the inscription on the memorial offensive.


  13. mawskrat
    13 | November 1, 2009 6:18 am

    re: #12 by RIX

    but Muslims can say Jesus was just a man and we can’t be insulted by that.


  14. RIX
    14 | November 1, 2009 6:22 am

    re: #13 by mawskrat

    but Muslims can say Jesus was just a man and we can’t be insulted by that.

    Christians seem to be fair game & Muslim sensibilities are protected.
    Look at what goes on over at the Swamp as an example. Christians are portrayed as a threat while the other day Muslims were lauded for their patriotism & restraint from committing violence.


  15. vagabond trader
    15 | November 1, 2009 6:27 am

    re: #10 by RIX

    Her name was Epstein if I heard it correctly.Ms Epstein should ask that one muslim family how they feel about Jews and Israel.

    Good morning!

    :D


  16. chickadee
    16 | November 1, 2009 6:30 am

    I think it’s offensive that “Muslim terrorists” killed 3000 people on 9-11. Muslims living here need to be offended by that too. And STFU that we call these killers Muslim terrorists. This is how they proudly identify themselves as they jihad in the name of Islam.


  17. vagabond trader
    17 | November 1, 2009 6:31 am

    re: #16 by chickadee

    Good morning chickadee.

    :D


  18. RIX
    18 | November 1, 2009 6:33 am

    re: #15 by vagabond trader

    Good Morning Trader. The truth is the truth & no amount of misguided political correctness changes the facts.
    The man’s son died along with almost 3,000 others that day at the hands of murderous Islamists. A lone Muslim family in kent should not have this kind of impact.
    As a matter of fact that family should join in the sentiment.


  19. vagabond trader
    19 | November 1, 2009 6:36 am

    re: #18 by RIX

    The muzz are a selected minority of victims in the US. To hell with real victims.That is the new reality of PC Marxism.


  20. RIX
    20 | November 1, 2009 6:37 am

    re: #16 by chickadee

    Exactly. Eye witnesses, including a friend of mine recounted a spontaneous Muslim street party in Patterson NJ on 9/11.
    I am offended by that.


  21. RIX
    22 | November 1, 2009 6:43 am

    re: #19 by vagabond trader

    I recall very well that within days of 9/11 Muslim spokespeople took to the air & proclaimed this a ‘teachable moment”. This was our chance to learn about Islam.
    Their co-religionists just murdered 3,000 people & they wanted us to be warm & fuzzy?
    The apprporiate response would have been for them to condemn the attack.


  22. vagabond trader
    23 | November 1, 2009 6:50 am

    re: #22 by RIX

    I know, still waiting for that apology. Gad how I despise that teachable moment bs. It ALWAYS means we ignorant wingnut raaaaacists must be re educated.


  23. 24 | November 1, 2009 6:51 am

    OT
    The timestamps are not on daylight standard time. Fall back!


  24. 25 | November 1, 2009 6:56 am

    In 1933, the word for this was Gleichschaltung
    The media, the press, life in general was standardized and made to conform.
    History is trying to repeat itself and we know where that ended up.


  25. RIX
    26 | November 1, 2009 6:56 am

    re: #23 by vagabond trader

    You got it, we must get out heads straight. I still want a National Muslim organization to apologize.
    See ya later


  26. Bumr50
    27 | November 1, 2009 7:04 am

    Mornin’ all!

    It sucks that there’s no “America” to stop this leftist takeover.


  27. chickadee
    28 | November 1, 2009 7:04 am

    re: #17 by vagabond trader

    Good Morning {vt}.
    How are you doing today?


  28. Truck Monkey
    29 | November 1, 2009 7:06 am

    re: #23 by vagabond trader

    Gawd I HATE that term “teachable moment”. 999 times out of 1000 it is just an opportunity for some pious liberal to shoot off his mouth.


  29. Bumr50
    30 | November 1, 2009 7:07 am

    Newt doesn’t see a rift in the Republican party.

    He says NY-23 is a ‘unique’ situation.

    I disagree, based on conversations I’ve had here and MANY other places.

    Perhaps he’s trying to be a bridge.


  30. chickadee
    31 | November 1, 2009 7:08 am

    re: #20 by RIX

    Horrifying. . . isn’t it? They are fcking animals or less.
    Celebrating the worst attack ever on this country.


  31. Bumr50
    32 | November 1, 2009 7:08 am

    re: #29 by Truck Monkey

    Ironically it’s almost always the “shooter” that needs to learn the lesson presented.


  32. vagabond trader
    33 | November 1, 2009 7:12 am

    re: #28 by chickadee

    Hey chic, look at this pic of the WH Halloween festivities. Wonder who the wookie is? Obviously a raaaaacist!!!! LMAO!!!!

    http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/first-lady-Michelle-Obama-President-Barack-Obama/photo//091031/480/5dde83335706464ebfec3b24076a5421//s:/ap/20091101/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obamas_halloween


  33. Truck Monkey
    34 | November 1, 2009 7:12 am

    Rush on Fox News Sunday right now.


  34. davehm
    35 | November 1, 2009 7:14 am

    a little OT, this guy made it all the way to the U.K. before being turned back.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,570852,00.html


  35. vagabond trader
    36 | November 1, 2009 7:16 am

    Sorry Newt,you have diminished yourself by supporting a leftist and are hereby irrelevant.imho.


  36. vagabond trader
    37 | November 1, 2009 7:17 am

    re: #35 by davehm

    Good,glad they captured the wild beast.


  37. Bumr50
    38 | November 1, 2009 7:18 am

    re: #34 by Truck Monkey

    Not on my Fox News. I’m recording it, but it’s not on until 2 pm here.


  38. Bumr50
    39 | November 1, 2009 7:21 am

    re: #36 by vagabond trader

    Yeah, I agree.

    The again, I’ve never really been a big GOP aficionado. I started as a Dem, then started paying attention.

    I think that there is a lot of nostalgia for the Republican party at play here.


  39. vagabond trader
    40 | November 1, 2009 7:24 am

    re: #39 by Bumr50

    Independent here.If you are fiscally conservative, small gov minded,respect the Constitution, keep the sexual politics and abortion out of schools and tax rolls you’ll have a good chance of getting my vote.


  40. chickadee
    41 | November 1, 2009 7:24 am

    re: #29 by Truck Monkey

    LOL, You’re right, anytime some jerk is spouting off about a
    “teachable” moment, they are just saying. ‘Shut up and see how right I am.”


  41. Bumr50
    42 | November 1, 2009 7:27 am

    re: #40 by vagabond trader

    I HAVE to be registered GOP (or Dem) in order to vote in primaries here in PA.

    I yell about it every chance I get.

    It’s the same feeling I get when I take a job and am forced to sign up for a union that’s really not going to do anything for me but take money.(not all unions)


  42. Truck Monkey
    43 | November 1, 2009 7:30 am

    re: #36 by vagabond trader

    He lost me when he sat on the same couch with Blinky and talked about global climate change.


  43. chickadee
    44 | November 1, 2009 7:30 am

    re: #33 by vagabond trader

    She should have just gone as herself, Sasquatch and saved us the price of her ‘costume.’


  44. Bumr50
    46 | November 1, 2009 7:31 am

    Uh-oh.

    Racism alert over at AT.

    The progs are gonna HATE this piece.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/before_dreams_there_was_roots.html


  45. vagabond trader
    47 | November 1, 2009 7:32 am

    re: #42 by Bumr50

    Same here, but at the risk of being cynical, its CT so my primary vote doesn’t matter one bit. Its a cold day in he11 when we even consider a proper conservative. All our Rs have been and always will be Rinos capital R.


  46. vagabond trader
    48 | November 1, 2009 7:33 am

    re: #44 by chickadee

    Hussein should have worn the big pussy costume.

    :-)


  47. bellamags
    49 | November 1, 2009 7:33 am

    Read the comments.

    http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/22/mark-lloyd/


  48. chickadee
    50 | November 1, 2009 7:34 am

    re: #35 by davehm

    I heard on the radio that the pos is being returned to AZ to face charges of “aggravated assault.”
    How about Attempted Murder. The bastards, themselves call it
    ‘Honor KILLING.’


  49. davehm
    51 | November 1, 2009 7:35 am

    re: #41 by chickadee

    “Teachable moment” unfortunately most libs are unteachable, this is why they constantly have “teachable moments” because they fail to retain anything they have learned in the past.


  50. vagabond trader
    52 | November 1, 2009 7:36 am

    re: #49 by bellamags

    Same old head up arse cognitive dissonance leftist drivel.Lloyd also wuvs Chavez and what HE has done with HIS media.Just don’t you dare call them marxists.Charming.


  51. vagabond trader
    53 | November 1, 2009 7:39 am

    Seems a good spot to repost this little giggle.

    http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/your-whiny-leftist-crybaby-pic-o-the-day/


  52. Canoe Convoy
    54 | November 1, 2009 7:40 am

    re: #4 by mawskrat

    Really? I looked at the Time Tunnel, myself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yP2TEdOAldQ


  53. chickadee
    55 | November 1, 2009 7:43 am

    re: #36 by vagabond trader

    I agree, I just look at Newt as some kind of old fuddy duddy now. How can he not see that this reach across the aisle approach is a losing proposition. How could he not have backed Hoffman on principle? He looks foolish and is now running after the conservative band wagon.


  54. chickadee
    56 | November 1, 2009 7:46 am

    re: #48 by vagabond trader

    LOL, perfect.


  55. Iron Fist
    57 | November 1, 2009 7:48 am

    re: #30 by Bumr50

    You saw the rift in how McCain treated Sarah. After picking her (and getting a little boost in the polls) he hung her out to dry. He was more protective of his opponant’s dignity that he was his running-mate’s. That is because they are fundamentally different people. A Party tent that is big enough to hold both of them may be too large. Just as in war you cannot become your enemy in order to win, you can’t simply opt in to the Democrat’s platform and then pull Democrats away from their Party. First, you have to recognize that it isn’t a cost-free decision. Leaving aside the question of moral turpitude in that strategy, consider the fact that you will lose some votes on the right. Nowhere is that more true than the abortion debate. Any moderation away from a strong pro-Life stance will lose votes.

    How many votes will it gain you? That is the real question, but it appears to be not many. People who will make their choice with pro-abortion issues foremost in their mind are unlikely to seriously consider the Republicans for other issues that, while not theoretically paramount, are nevertheless important. Especially because someone like that isn’t going to be mildly pro-abortion. Any “Republican” who changes his or her position on abortion so much that it would make someone like that consider voting for them is going to be hemmorhaging votes on the Right. Terminally hemmorhaging, because why would such an individual change their vote, anyway. It isn’t like the Republican will be running against a pro-Life Democrat. By “moderating” (which always means giving in to the Democrats) him/herself, the Republican has just pissed away his base to draw no distintion between himself and his opponant.

    Everyone see the problem with that scenario?


  56. Canoe Convoy
    58 | November 1, 2009 7:52 am

    re: #53 by vagabond trader

    Hahaha! LOL!


  57. vagabond trader
    59 | November 1, 2009 7:53 am

    re: #55 by chickadee

    Exactly!He also could have simply kept his mouth shut. Plus the global warming bs as Truck Monkey #43 pointed out.


  58. bellamags
    60 | November 1, 2009 7:55 am

    re: #52 by vagabond trader

    Yeah. I think the strategy of the Obama Administration is “Shock and Awe”. The amount of change he is trying to impose is shocking.


  59. davehm
    61 | November 1, 2009 7:57 am

    re: #51 by davehm

    Aggravated assault will get you how much time?


  60. RickZ
    62 | November 1, 2009 7:57 am

    # 30 Bumr50

    Newt doesn’t see a rift in the Republican party.

    He says NY-23 is a ‘unique’ situation.

    I disagree, based on conversations I’ve had here and MANY other places.

    Perhaps he’s trying to be a bridge.

    To Newt and the RNC, NY-23 is a teachable moment.

    /Apologies to Truck Monkey


  61. bellamags
    63 | November 1, 2009 7:57 am

    “Progressive and Islamic regimes throughout the world are attempting to silence the media. This is ironic since the Global Media sympathizes with with Progressives and Islamic movements. Our Crypto Dictator Obama is just copying what his International Progressive and Islamic allies are doing.”

    I’m wondering if the progressive and Islamic regimes are working together on this -they seem to move along the same agenda – is there really a difference between the two?


  62. Bumr50
    64 | November 1, 2009 7:58 am

    re: #57 by Iron Fist

    I most definitely see the need for the GOP to either rebrand itself as more conservative and absorb those of us who have been clamoring for this to happen, or simply go away. It’s folks like Newt that are hampering the transition it whichever direction it takes.
    Using the tent illustration, he, McCain, Graham, et al. are holding on to one corner tentpole and not letting go.
    The longer it takes for the right to organize ourselves, the more dangerous it becomes for the Republic.
    I’m sure folks like Obama, Emanuel(s), Axelrod, and Soros take delight at Newt’s attempts at friendly discourse and are ABSOLUTELY willing to “sit down and come together in a bipartisan fashion.”
    They’re the ones with the power, and they’re more than willing to lie, cheat, and steal to achieve their ends.


  63. vagabond trader
    65 | November 1, 2009 7:58 am

    re: #62 by RickZ

    LOL! We’ll see, what ought to be and what is…..


  64. chickadee
    66 | November 1, 2009 7:59 am

    re: #57 by Iron Fist

    Well said. I think it is very difficult for a lot of people to keep their principles when they get in office, especially Rino, inclined pols like McCain. The fcking MSM set him up and he fell for it, like a High School kid in love. He really needed the attention and praise. The Right is always attacked by the lib media. It must wear them down. McCain learned too late, if he learned at all, that the scum media didn’t give a shit about him and in fact used him to get a commie pos grifter in office.
    We need candidates who so fundamentally understand conservatism that it is a philosophy of life for them. And candidates who aren’t needy fools, pining for positive statements from the parasite media of the left.
    I think they are out there. Most likely they are not career politicians.


  65. Bumr50
    67 | November 1, 2009 8:00 am

    re: #47 by vagabond trader

    Hmm.

    I’ll have to give that some thought.

    It just makes me feel so powerless come primary season if I can’t at least get my vote counted.


  66. vagabond trader
    68 | November 1, 2009 8:05 am

    re: #67 by Bumr50

    Yeah, I was ticked off also but it made no difference in this election. I could change if the correct candidate comes along.

    :-)


  67. vagabond trader
    69 | November 1, 2009 8:09 am

    re: #58 by Canoe Convoy

    Keep it in my favorites. Timely.

    :-)


  68. RIX
    70 | November 1, 2009 9:11 am

    Where do you click on reply?


  69. Truck Monkey
    71 | November 1, 2009 9:13 am

    Cool. I want an avatar.


  70. calcajun
    72 | November 1, 2009 9:47 am

    I like the new look.

    …and this is one of the few points where I agree with the ACLU– absolute freedom of the press.

    BTW, can I used my old avatar from LGF1?


  71. mjazz
    73 | November 1, 2009 10:53 am

    President Bush leaned over at Ground Zero and gently placed a flower on the memorial, while you nonchalantly tossed your flower onto the pile without leaning over.

    …and then you bowed to the Saudi King.


  72. Aussie Infidel
    74 | November 1, 2009 5:42 pm

    @ Bumr50:

    By the way, the “good Republican” the GOP national committee and local machine picked as their candidate without even the courtesy of a primary, is now telling her remaining supporters to vote for the Democrat.

    Sheeeeesh …..
    Who’d have thunk???? :)

    Where do they breed these idiots?


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David