Let’s Have A Social Con-versation!

Below the surface of practically all of the pressing political and news worthy issues we discuss here is a brewing and exceptionally active “social war”.  Most of the issues we discuss here are just symptoms of a larger core social and moral problem in our Country, and throughout the world.  To ignore the actual causes, and solely concentrate on the symptoms will be to our detriment.

In this vein, I present the following articles, and issues.

For some Parents, Shouting Is The New Spanking

Spare the Rod or Swing the Paddle: How to Punish Students

Larry David Urinates on Jesus Painting; Catholics Not Enthused

Gray Hair “Cure” Available in 10 Years

So Blogmocracy, join the social Con-versation and get to the root of the problems.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

282 Responses to “Let’s Have A Social Con-versation!”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | October 29, 2009 11:17 am

    I like the idea of the gray hair cure. Should be available and fully tested by the time I really need it. If I need it.

    /might not be worried about gray hair then.


  2. Nevergiveup
    2 | October 29, 2009 11:17 am

    ON FOX TV: Obama opining about his visit to Dover Air Force Base last night. What a fuck.


  3. buzzsawmonkey
    3 | October 29, 2009 11:18 am

    Is the gray-hair cure radium based? Can we thank Hairy Curie?


  4. Speranza
    4 | October 29, 2009 11:19 am

    I would like tosee Larry David accidentally splash the Koran with urine and see what happens next.


  5. 5 | October 29, 2009 11:19 am

    re: #1 by PaladinPhil

    What is wrong with gray hair?


  6. buzzsawmonkey
    6 | October 29, 2009 11:20 am

    Gray hair is better than no hair at all.


  7. typicalwhitey
    7 | October 29, 2009 11:20 am

    And buzz knows!


  8. RickZ
    8 | October 29, 2009 11:21 am

    # 1 PaladinPhil

    /might not be worried about gray hair then.

    When it comes to hair, better gray than nay.


  9. 9 | October 29, 2009 11:21 am

    Progressivism/Port Modern Nihilism is the cause.


  10. snork
    10 | October 29, 2009 11:21 am

    re: #5 by WrathofG-d

    Gray is teh new ghey…


  11. Nevergiveup
    11 | October 29, 2009 11:21 am

    re: #5 by WrathofG-d

    Nothing if it’s on the other guys head


  12. 12 | October 29, 2009 11:21 am

    re: #5 by WrathofG-d

    Nothing but vanity. ;)


  13. 13 | October 29, 2009 11:21 am

    re: #4 by Speranza

    He wouldn’t have the balls to do it!


  14. snork
    14 | October 29, 2009 11:21 am

    re: #7 by typicalwhitey

    Is that what you call a buzzcut?


  15. vagabond trader
    15 | October 29, 2009 11:21 am

    Meh, with my expert colorist I already have an excellent cure for grey hair.

    :-)


  16. 16 | October 29, 2009 11:22 am

    re: #4 by Speranza

    I’d like to see Larry David, and all other liberals have respect for the difference of opinion called Religion.

    Yes, I understand that Larry David makes his money being offensive to “everyone” (there are always those they don’t attack – ie: Muslims) but pissin on Jesus just doesn’t sound funny to me.


  17. Incognito
    17 | October 29, 2009 11:24 am

    I got gray hair…what is left of it…LOL


  18. 18 | October 29, 2009 11:24 am

    re: #12 by PaladinPhil

    I find it interesting that humans would be bothered with something that happens to everyone. It is odd to me that as a society we have chosen to turn some natural behavior into physical pariahs, or something to be embarrassed about.

    It is ironic that this is done at the same time of societal guilt over unnatural things. You have to completely accept nose rings, drug addictions, blah, blah, blah, but gray hair and wrinkles are to be avoided at all cost?

    Stupid! I like when humans grow gracefully like humans.


  19. vagabond trader
    19 | October 29, 2009 11:25 am

    re: #2 by Nevergiveup

    What a despicable limp excuse for a potus. Using the blood of our heroes to score points with his phony reverence.Meanwhile in A-stan they have to ask permission to eliminate the enemy.

    **spit**


  20. RIX
    20 | October 29, 2009 11:25 am

    13. Rodan on 29 October, 2009 at 11:21 am reply re: #4 by Speranza

    He wouldn’t have the balls to do it

    Not only that, if larry David wrote anything including a Koran desecration HBO would never air it.


  21. buzzsawmonkey
    21 | October 29, 2009 11:25 am

    I do not countenance child abuse, but the notion that spanking is off-limits is child abuse.


  22. snork
    22 | October 29, 2009 11:25 am

    I think this thread’s already off the rails if we’re talking about balls and buzzcuts in the same thread. Maybe we should try a “safe” topic, like boobs?


  23. song_and_dance_man
    23 | October 29, 2009 11:25 am

    Gray hair isn’t gray at all. It is white. I’ve had it since I was a boy with a dime sized patch on the front top part of my noggin. It began to spread with I was about 15 and never stopped. As a consequence I’ve had premature ‘graying’ since I was about thirty. My son has the same patch but bigger. About the size of a quarter.

    I used to say my white hair was a sign of wisdom, but my X maintained it was a sign of dead roots.


  24. 24 | October 29, 2009 11:26 am

    re: #18 by WrathofG-d

    Yeah I hear you. To be honest even if there is a solution I doubt I would take it. Right now my hairline is losing the battle with my fore head. It can be annoying, especially in the winter, but I have grown used to it.


  25. buzzsawmonkey
    25 | October 29, 2009 11:26 am

    In my observation, if you are male you can dress fashionably or dye your hair. If you do both, you are identifying yourself as gay.


  26. GrandJunctionite
    26 | October 29, 2009 11:27 am

    re: #8 by RickZ

    Hair is over rated. Te USMC never let me have any and now my folicle less head is no maintanence.


  27. mfhorn
    27 | October 29, 2009 11:28 am

    re: #1 by PaladinPhil

    I don’t have to worry about gray hair. I’ll bring mine to my HS reunion in a box.


  28. RickZ
    28 | October 29, 2009 11:28 am

    # 18 WrathofG-d

    I find it interesting that humans would be bothered with something that happens to everyone. It is odd to me that as a society we have chosen to turn some natural behavior into physical pariahs, or something to be embarrassed about.

    Thank our fixation with ‘the youth culture’. Without it, most plastic surgeons might have to find real work.


  29. typicalwhitey
    29 | October 29, 2009 11:29 am

    re: #14 by snork

    There once was a poster named buzz
    Alas on his head was just fuzz
    I must hide my bald pate
    So I can get a date!
    Right now all the girls just LOLZ


  30. RickZ
    30 | October 29, 2009 11:30 am

    # 26 GrandJunctionite

    Hair is over rated. Te USMC never let me have any and now my folicle less head is no maintanence.

    Ah, the follicle-challenged. LOL! Well, I don’t look good in hats, and I sunburn easily, so gray hair is my pate’s sunscreen.


  31. snork
    31 | October 29, 2009 11:31 am

    re: #18 by WrathofG-d

    Stupid! I like when humans grow gracefully like humans.

    Damn straight! That’s why G-d invented beer guts.


  32. mfhorn
    32 | October 29, 2009 11:31 am

    re: #16 by WrathofG-d

    What would happen if I whizzed on a picture of Obama?


  33. GrandJunctionite
    33 | October 29, 2009 11:32 am

    Afetr watching that clip, all I know about Larry David is the jackass pisses all over the place and doesn’t wash his friggin hands.


  34. buzzsawmonkey
    34 | October 29, 2009 11:32 am

    re: #29 by typicalwhitey

    Sorry to disappoint you, but people come from miles around merely to gaze in awe at my luxurious waves.


  35. song_and_dance_man
    35 | October 29, 2009 11:32 am

    re: #32 by mfhorn

    Or Mohammed?


  36. RickZ
    36 | October 29, 2009 11:33 am

    # 32 mfhorn

    What would happen if I whizzed on a picture of Obama?

    A racist hate crime!

    /Kangaroo court of public opinion


  37. 37 | October 29, 2009 11:34 am

    re: #32 by mfhorn

    Some liberals would send the Secret Service out to investigate you for being racist, and making a threat of drowning against the President.

    ;)

    btw: I am all for corperal punishment against children when they deserve it. I find the evolution of “no hitting” to becoming “no raising voice” to be interesting (and frightening as these social demands are now backed up by the force of Law)


  38. snork
    38 | October 29, 2009 11:34 am

    re: #34 by buzzsawmonkey

    So you have a beach place?


  39. buzzsawmonkey
    39 | October 29, 2009 11:35 am

    re: #38 by snork

    It’s modest, but it surfs me just fine.


  40. typicalwhitey
    40 | October 29, 2009 11:35 am

    re: #34 by buzzsawmonkey

    Thats ok, I just love doing limericks LOL


  41. snork
    41 | October 29, 2009 11:36 am

    re: #37 by WrathofG-d

    btw: I am all for corporal punishment against children when they deserve it.

    Wow. That’s almost as tautological as some of the things selrehC says.

    /Not that I disagree with you “larger truth”…


  42. vagabond trader
    42 | October 29, 2009 11:36 am

    re: #32 by mfhorn

    Hate crime.


  43. snork
    43 | October 29, 2009 11:38 am

    re: #39 by buzzsawmonkey

    Watch out for global warming. On day you’re going to be paddling around in the surf, and the sea level is going to go up 200′. Dr. LVQ even said so.

    That’ll be a beach bum trip…


  44. mfhorn
    44 | October 29, 2009 11:39 am

    re: #37 by WrathofG-d

    Sometimes a swat or two on the backside is the only way to get through. Sure, you have to draw the line at swats that actually cause harm (bruise, broken bone) vs a swat that stings. Discipline is one thing. Abuse, and I know it happens far too often, is another.


  45. 45 | October 29, 2009 11:40 am

    re: #42 by vagabond trader

    No, THIS is a REAL hate crime…

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/10/shooting-at-la-synagogue-investigated-as-hate-crime-man-arrested.html


  46. 46 | October 29, 2009 11:41 am

    re: #41 by snork

    I don’t think so. I am surrounded by individuals who do not believe in corporal punishment in any circumstances – even when they do deserve it.

    Wait…ok…..I think i see you point about a tautological statement….

    it depends on what the definition of is is doesn’t it. …or should I say “deserves”


  47. buzzsawmonkey
    47 | October 29, 2009 11:41 am

    Modern parents, it seems, are so addled
    They refuse to let their kids be paddled
    But then too late they find
    That they are in a bind
    And with little monsters they’re saddled.


  48. Speranza
    48 | October 29, 2009 11:44 am

    re: #13 by Rodan

    “He wouldn’t have the balls to do it!”

    He would have no balls because they would cut them off and shove it in his mouth.


  49. 49 | October 29, 2009 11:44 am

    The three times my mother swatted me, twice she was 100% right and I KNEW it. The third, she was wrong and apologized for it. I am grateful to have a mother so strong.


  50. Speranza
    50 | October 29, 2009 11:45 am

    re: #23 by song_and_dance_man

    Speaking of which it is time for me to buy some Just For Men hair coloring (sandy blonde).


  51. vagabond trader
    51 | October 29, 2009 11:46 am

    OT:

    Oh how transparent big demturd gov is./

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/29/house-democratic-bill-ceremony-closed-public/


  52. Speranza
    52 | October 29, 2009 11:46 am

    re: #49 by Urban Infidel

    A mother apologizing? When I was a kid parents never would apologize or admit that they were wrong.


  53. GrandJunctionite
    53 | October 29, 2009 11:46 am

    OT
    Sorry for the OT.
    Rest in Peace Small Business in America. Ms. Pelosi’s 1900 page monstrosity will be the deathnell for us all.

    I’ve only been scanning it and from all I can gleen, We’re doomed.


  54. mfhorn
    54 | October 29, 2009 11:47 am

    re: #50 by Speranza

    That’s nothing like the ‘hair in a can’ that used to be advertized on TV is it?


  55. Speranza
    55 | October 29, 2009 11:47 am

    re: #44 by mfhorn

    I think swatting is more designed to humiliate (which is worse) then to do physical harm.


  56. Speranza
    56 | October 29, 2009 11:47 am

    re: #54 by mfhorn

    yeah and when it rains you look rather foolish.


  57. 57 | October 29, 2009 11:48 am

    re: #52 by Speranza

    She lost her temper and smacked me though it wasn’t my fault, –hard being a single parent–, and she admitted she was wrong. She earned my undying respect for that and for many other reasons.


  58. chickadee
    58 | October 29, 2009 11:48 am

    Well, I just came in and made myself a nice salad.
    I love salads, especially with roast pork on them.


  59. vapig
    59 | October 29, 2009 11:48 am

    re: #18 by WrathofG-d

    It still really all comes down to the PROGS rejection of God.

    To them there is no God and mankind is now god – gods don’t age and will live forever.

    Haven’t you listened to these healthnutz? Even when a cure for this and that is found, now they want to tell everyone what they can eat because, “We still have a long way to go!”

    Go where? On forever??? They seem to have forgetten that the biggist killer of humans is AGE!!!


  60. snork
    60 | October 29, 2009 11:48 am

    re: #46 by WrathofG-d

    Right. It’s like those people who don’t believe in the death penalty except when it’s justified. And the get to fill that blank in later.

    The hypocrisy if the left was on full display when the NAACP of Texas was running those ads saying that it was Bush’s fault that one of the three murderers of James Byrd didn’t get the death penalty.

    Aside from the obvious non sequitur about the governor having anything to do with prosecutions, they were getting upset about how they couldn’t get the death penalty for the guy who turned state’s evidence. And that was Bush’s fault.


  61. Nevergiveup
    61 | October 29, 2009 11:48 am

    re: #32 by mfhorn

    I hope not, if it is, I’m a fugative


  62. buzzsawmonkey
    62 | October 29, 2009 11:50 am

    re: #59 by vapig

    Worship of the Power of Man over the Power of G-d is what the story of the Tower of Babel is all about.


  63. mfhorn
    63 | October 29, 2009 11:50 am

    re: #53 by GrandJunctionite

    Does that surprise you?

    We’re all to bow down to Uncle Barack instead of relying on ourselves.


  64. chickadee
    64 | October 29, 2009 11:50 am

    re: #57 by Urban Infidel

    Hey Urban Infidel,
    You have a great Mom, no doubt about that.


  65. Speranza
    65 | October 29, 2009 11:50 am

    re: #57 by Urban Infidel

    Three cheers for your Mom! My parents could never admit they were wrong. I guess they took that as a sign of weakness.


  66. typicalwhitey
    66 | October 29, 2009 11:51 am

    re: #47 by buzzsawmonkey

    LOL
    My oldest son a long time ago came home and said “I got swats today for stealing” expecting me to sympathize with him.

    I said, son….bend over cuz you ain’t done yet!

    Anything that would be considered breaking the law got a spanking in my house.
    Otherwise, you got extra chores.
    Once I made the boys clean the bathroom including the toilet.
    Afterwards they said, mom could you just spank us next time?
    LOL


  67. 67 | October 29, 2009 11:51 am

    re: #60 by snork

    I’m not a Bush fan as everyone knows here. But it was so ridiculous seeing the Progressive blame Bush for everything. They couldn’t make up their minds whether he was an idiot or some all powerful being.

    On Leftist blogs they would blame Bush for everything, even their cars breaking down!


  68. Speranza
    68 | October 29, 2009 11:52 am

    re: #58 by chickadee

    “Well, I just came in and made myself a nice salad.
    I love salads, especially with roast pork on them”

    I guess you wont be having any Muslims over for lunch then?


  69. Nevergiveup
    69 | October 29, 2009 11:53 am

    re: #67 by Rodan

    That’s weird because when my car breaks down I blame my wife?


  70. GrandJunctionite
    70 | October 29, 2009 11:53 am

    From a Post over at Hot Air

    <A word search of the 1,990-page House healthcare bill (H.R. 3962) reveals that the term “tax” is used 87 times, “taxable” is used 62 times, and “excise tax” is used 10 times.
    Other terms of interest are as follows:

    House Healthcare Bill (H.R. 3962)
    Term

    Number of uses
    “Tax” – 87 times
    “Taxable” – 62 times
    “Excise tax” – 10 times
    “Taxes” – 15 times
    “Fee” – 59 times
    “Penalty” – 113 times
    “Require” – 118 times
    “Must” – 58 times
    “Shall” – 3,424 times


  71. 71 | October 29, 2009 11:53 am

    re: #69 by Nevergiveup

    Blame Obama!!!!!!!!!!

    LOL!!!!!!!!!!


  72. vagabond trader
    72 | October 29, 2009 11:54 am

    re: #66 by typicalwhitey

    Good for you.I know parents who would’ve been at the school threatening whoever it was that dared catch their “innocent” child doing something anti social.


  73. Nevergiveup
    73 | October 29, 2009 11:54 am

    Kurtz: Joe Lieberman, an Elected Senator Charged with Voting His Judgment and His Constituency’s Will as Their Representative, Is “Holding Democracy Hostage” by Refusing to Vote for ObamaCare
    —Ace

    http://ace.mu.nu/

    Liberals are rather undemocratic aren’t they?


  74. vapig
    74 | October 29, 2009 11:55 am

    re: #47 by buzzsawmonkey

    I agree with your first analysis that not disciplining your child is child abuse.

    It’s also a crime against society to turn the little beasts out to wreck havoc amongst the populuce.


  75. snork
    75 | October 29, 2009 11:55 am

    re: #67 by Rodan

    Or a hurricane.


  76. vagabond trader
    76 | October 29, 2009 11:56 am

    re: #73 by Nevergiveup

    Actually its the first time this constituent has agreed with Joe in a very long time.


  77. vapig
    77 | October 29, 2009 11:57 am

    55. Speranza on 29 October

    I’ve always hated that term by the progs – designed to “humiliate” children.

    The little heathens need to be taken down a peg or two. It’s healthy for them!


  78. buzzsawmonkey
    78 | October 29, 2009 11:57 am

    re: #74 by vapig

    An interesting exploration of this is the Kipling short story, “Thrown Away”:

    http://www.readbookonline.net/readOnLine/2476/


  79. 79 | October 29, 2009 11:58 am

    re: #75 by snork

    Yes they blamed him for every hurricane. Over at Think Progress, the Commentators claim that Bush used a Weather Machine to ethnic cleanse New Orleans.

    I am not joking.


  80. chickadee
    80 | October 29, 2009 11:58 am

    re: #68 by Speranza

    They are more than welcome if they are apostates.


  81. vapig
    81 | October 29, 2009 11:59 am

    62. buzzsawmonkey

    Mankind has evidently not learned the lesson!


  82. 82 | October 29, 2009 11:59 am

    re: #72 by vagabond trader

    Yup.

    Just yesterday I heard of a parent berating a teacher because her child was bitten. Only problem is that her child was bitten because he stuck his finger in the face of another student, multiple times, and 3 times after being told to stop.

    A normal parent would have told their kid they deserved it after that much instigation.

    The bitten child would have been punished by the teacher the 1st time he was caught (before the biting) but the school has a policy against punishing the students (pre-school) in any way.


  83. vagabond trader
    83 | October 29, 2009 11:59 am

    re: #79 by Rodan

    He blew up the levees near the black neighborhoods too.//


  84. Nevergiveup
    84 | October 29, 2009 12:00 pm

    re: #76 by vagabond trader

    Well Joe has pretty much always been with us on the War on Terror


  85. Nevergiveup
    85 | October 29, 2009 12:00 pm

    re: #76 by vagabond trader

    Oh and he did keep my base open


  86. buzzsawmonkey
    86 | October 29, 2009 12:01 pm

    re: #83 by vagabond trader

    He blew up the levees near the black neighborhoods too.//

    While blowing up the levis near the black neighborhoods, he was serving ice cream cohens to the whites.


  87. Russkilitlover
    87 | October 29, 2009 12:01 pm

    re: #74 by vapig

    It’s also a crime against society to turn the little beasts out to wreck havoc amongst the populuce.

    Or bring them anywhere near a nice restaurant without provding proof of excellent manners and the ability to be still and quiet for at least an hour! Any objections and parents can pick up my tab!

    Yeah, hubby went out to a nice restaurant last night. Table next to our booth had 2 parents on their Black Berrys the entire time and 3 little boys pretty much all over the place.


  88. Nevergiveup
    88 | October 29, 2009 12:02 pm

    re: #87 by Russkilitlover

    That’s why we has girls


  89. vagabond trader
    89 | October 29, 2009 12:04 pm

    re: #85 by Nevergiveup

    Mine is a personal gripe with him from years ago when his office refused to help my disabled vet brother. No matter, I found a congress critter who assigned his VA aid to the situation and all ended well, no thanks to Joe.Sadly,this congressmens seat was gerrymandered out of existence.Figgers.


  90. mfhorn
    90 | October 29, 2009 12:04 pm

    re: #79 by Rodan

    Parts of the Muslim world blamed the Tsunami in Thailand on the Jooooos and their earthquake machine.


  91. song_and_dance_man
    91 | October 29, 2009 12:04 pm

    There is a reason why we as humans can’t remember our early childhood. This is the time when parents must discipline a child with spanking to instill the notion that disobedience is wrong. And I don’t mean whipping a child or abuse, but merely 1 to 3 swats on the butt. My X had a real problem with me spanking our child when he was a toddler. But it worked and he obeys me and doesn’t have any idea how that came about.

    Back the the non recollection of early child hood. My son cannot remember his early discipline but subconsciously knows from it that he must obey me and he doesn’t know why. I stopped spanking him well before he was four and had to do it after that time only a handful of times. This no remembering also serves another purpose. There is no enmity between us because he can only remember being spanked a few times and does not consider it abuse. He knew he had done wrong and accepted the sentence.

    One more thing. I always talked to my son about the punishment he was to receive and after it was done I hugged him and told him I loved him and him receiving the punishment was not something I wanted to do, but was necessary since I will have to answer to God about the way he was raised and nurtured.

    Proverbs 22:6 Train a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not turn from it.


  92. vagabond trader
    92 | October 29, 2009 12:05 pm

    re: #86 by buzzsawmonkey

    Yes, but what color were those levis?

    :-)


  93. vapig
    93 | October 29, 2009 12:05 pm

    78. buzzsawmonkey

    YES!!! Exactly!

    Another reason why I hate PROGS! They are always trying to fix what’s NOT broken!


  94. 94 | October 29, 2009 12:07 pm

    re: #87 by Russkilitlover

    Back in the 70’s and early 80’s my parents would get compliments on how well behaved me and my younger brothers were in restaraunts. Of course my parents made sure we were properly behaved at the home dinner table as well. Eating out was not a right but a privilege growing up.


  95. Nevergiveup
    95 | October 29, 2009 12:07 pm

    re: #89 by vagabond trader

    Understand


  96. typicalwhitey
    96 | October 29, 2009 12:07 pm

    re: #72 by vagabond trader

    Well we felt that if it were something that they would be severely punished for in “real life” then that is what would have to happen at home.

    My middle boy was dating a seriously underage girl. We tried talking to him over and over about it. What worked though was when I graphically described what would happen to him in prison, if the girls parents wanted to prosecute him. I showed him how he would be defined the rest of his life by this one action.
    Don’t know if it was because of our talk, but the girl was gone…pronto!
    Every situation needs a different parental reaction it seems.

    As for my grandson though, it’s funny because nothing he does seems to merit any kind of discipline from me or the hubster. I would have to say that papa is even more lenient than grammy is lol. The second I leave the living room, he is into the cabinets etc because he knows papa doesn’t care. When grammy comes back in though, you should see the cute look on his face as he slowly…..closes…the….door.
    Or when he tears up the newspaper….papa thinks its funny, grammy worries he will eat it :)


  97. chickadee
    97 | October 29, 2009 12:08 pm

    Did anyone here Rushie today? He played a clip of Pelosi giving a speech about her retooled H.C. power grab to what she thought was a Republican free crowd. She got heckled, though as soon as she started, by a guy with a bull horn.
    He was shouting, “Nazi pelosi, Nazi pelosi, you will burn in Hell for this.”
    LOL


  98. 98 | October 29, 2009 12:08 pm

    Personally, my grudge with “no spanking laws” is that it is hypocritical. The “Progressives” will tell you that you have no right to tell them how to treat their body, or run their personal lives (abortion, homosexuality, etc) but they have absolutely ZERO problem telling you how to run yours (how you should discipline your children).

    If I wish to use physical punishment to discipline my child, that is my business. I don’t need someone who has never met me, my children, etc., to tell me what is right for my kids, or what I should do with them.

    Yes, of course, there is a limit to the liberty of how to hit your kids, but the laws don’t really address that are are hyper sensitive.


  99. vapig
    99 | October 29, 2009 12:11 pm

    87. Russkilitlover

    GROAN! Yes! Parents who will NOT dicipline their children (resurants/ planes/ etc) in public drive me crazy!

    If I’d acted like that in public my parents would have blistered my hide (just an expression, folks) right on the spot!

    My mother would often tell a story (that I do not remember by the way) of a shopper giving her grief about paddling me in the store. My mother’s response was that I wouldn’t remember what I had done wrong if she waited until we got home.


  100. vagabond trader
    100 | October 29, 2009 12:13 pm

    re: #97 by chickadee

    LOL, did you see how the most ethical madam speaker shut Americans out of the bill unveiling? They are going to try to pass this abomination in the dead of night or on a holiday.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/29/house-democratic-bill-ceremony-closed-public/


  101. Russkilitlover
    101 | October 29, 2009 12:15 pm

    re: #94 by PaladinPhil

    LOL! We had the same parents!

    We looked on going out to dinner as a special priviledge. Besides, if we didn’t get to go out, we would’ve had to eat mom’s cooking. She HATED to cook and…..it tasted like it.


  102. Nevergiveup
    102 | October 29, 2009 12:16 pm

    Report: Cash for Clunkers Auto Program Cost Taxpayers $24,000 Per Vehicle
    A report conducted by the automotive information firm Edmunds.com found that of the nearly 690,000 vehicles sold under the program, only 125,000 of the sales were incremental.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/29/report-cash-clunkers-auto-program-cost-taxpayer-vehicle/?test=latestnews

    And yeah lets allow the Federal Gov to run health care. Great idea.


  103. GrandJunctionite
    103 | October 29, 2009 12:16 pm

    re: #100 by vagabond trader

    I wonder what time saturday night the vote will be?
    //


  104. 104 | October 29, 2009 12:17 pm

    re: #101 by Russkilitlover

    I learned to cook in self defense. My mom could cook nutritous, sometimes though it was just edible.

    :)

    /still love her though


  105. chickadee
    105 | October 29, 2009 12:17 pm

    I have a friend with 4 daughters. All so beautifully behaved and never beaten. She just followed through on her ultimatums of going to their rooms for a specific time , having privileges taken away, including toys when they were younger and now getting grounded if need be. She also made them do chores and live up to responsibilities that were age appropriate.
    She set the tone for the family. Calm, loving, stern when she had to be. I always tell her I wish she was my Mom.


  106. song_and_dance_man
    106 | October 29, 2009 12:17 pm

    re: #94 by PaladinPhil

    Good sound parental discipline also brings early maturity as well as manners to children as you and the siblings are a testament of.


  107. snork
    107 | October 29, 2009 12:17 pm

    re: #93 by vapig

    Another reason why I hate PROGS! They are always trying to fix what’s NOT broken!

    They have an answer to that, too. Break it.

    Harry Browne said something like “the government will break your legs and then hand you a pair of crutches”.


  108. vagabond trader
    108 | October 29, 2009 12:19 pm

    Said it before, but I would give anything to be deservedly swatted by my mother and to have one more bowl of her matzo ball soup.

    :-)


  109. typicalwhitey
    109 | October 29, 2009 12:19 pm

    re: #99 by vapig

    So true.
    My youngest daughter was about 8 and wouldn’t quit acting up at the store. I warned her that if she didn’t she would have to stand in the corner.
    She didn’t believe me.
    She did it again in the check out aisle and then had to stand in the corner while I continued checking out and paying for my groceries (small town, small store)
    Thats when she learned, I only will say it once. MAYBE twice. NEVER three times.
    But I WONT wait until we get home lol.
    And she never repeated that behavior in the store again.


  110. song_and_dance_man
    110 | October 29, 2009 12:21 pm

    re: #101 by Russkilitlover

    Our family, in my youth, rarely dined out. If we did it was never in a restaurant. It was always the local 19 cent hamburger stand or Dairy Queen. And like yours, my mom could not cook. I learned to cook as a young boy from my grandmothers and did most of the cooking in our home. And I didn’t mind since I love to cook.


  111. chickadee
    111 | October 29, 2009 12:21 pm

    re: #100 by vagabond trader

    They are thieves and Nazi Pelosi is the ring leader.
    Rush was talking to day that what they are doing will make Madoff’s Ponzi scheme look like chump change.
    Pelosi is stealing billions and yet she gets to go free.


  112. RickZ
    112 | October 29, 2009 12:23 pm

    I had a cousin whose parents were split on punishment. My stay-at-home blood aunt would want to punish the girl when she was bratty (aqnd she could be bratty), but my lawyer uncle just didn’t want to be seen as the enemy, the heavy. So my cousin learned to play one against the other (as any child will if they can get away with it). Now in her 40’s, she’s done three stints in jail, divorced three times, and shacked up with I don’t how many guys. It seems she’s still looking for love thanks to no discipline as a child.


  113. wolfie
    113 | October 29, 2009 12:23 pm

    Every child is different. What works with one kid doesn’t necessarily work with another one.

    Any parent who categorically rules out ANY kind of corporal punishment is silly, IMO.

    As for these parents’ guilt about yelling, perhaps they wouldn’t be compelled to yell so much if their kids were better disciplined.

    Then again, perhaps they are setting absurdly high standards on their own behavior in an attempt to raise their darlings in a pure and perfect environment. Which pretty much ensures that the little brats will grow up to be capons and/or utopians.


  114. snork
    114 | October 29, 2009 12:24 pm

    Testosterone is the enforcer of justice.

    Somebody had to say it.


  115. song_and_dance_man
    115 | October 29, 2009 12:28 pm

    re: #114 by snork

    And what of Estrogen?


  116. snork
    116 | October 29, 2009 12:28 pm

    re: #113 by wolfie

    It’s even more basic. Anybody who’s ever had a litter of animals knows that the personalities are all different. The (probably moonbat) parent who struts around saying that he/she never had to use corporal punishment, if telling the truth, is lucky rather than superior.

    Telling a parent not to use every means available to control an unruly kid is like telling a dog owner to just let the dog run loose in the streets.

    And these same people will complain about the dog.


  117. buzzsawmonkey
    117 | October 29, 2009 12:28 pm

    re: #115 by song_and_dance_man

    He and Vladimir are waiting for Godot.


  118. song_and_dance_man
    118 | October 29, 2009 12:30 pm

    re: #117 by buzzsawmonkey

    I had no idea Susan Estrogen was a character in Waiting for Godot.

    /must be on leave from USC


  119. Speranza
    119 | October 29, 2009 12:31 pm

    re: #77 by vapig

    “The little heathens need to be taken down a peg or two. It’s healthy for them!

    I do not consider spanking to be healthy for them. just my opinion, and it is designed to humiliate them, that is undeniable.


  120. orangecrush
    120 | October 29, 2009 12:31 pm

    re: #4 by Speranza

    Larry David pisses on the Koran at Hollywood party. That is all the seethers needs to go crazy.


  121. Nikis Knight
    121 | October 29, 2009 12:32 pm

    re: #113 by wolfie

    Any parent who categorically rules out ANY kind of corporal punishment is silly, IMO.

    Kind of like a president who categorically rules out military force when negotiating with an enemy?

    Come to think of it, that’s pretty much Obama to a T–he wants to be the “cool parent” to the world, have all the kids love him.
    And child experts will tell you, merely saying “don’t do that” or “Hey guys, knock off that uranium enrichment, okay?” over and over again won’t end up doing much.


  122. buzzsawmonkey
    122 | October 29, 2009 12:33 pm

    re: #114 by snork

    Now you’ve done it:

    The Female of the Species
    —Rudyard Kipling, 1911

    When the Himalayan peasant meets the he-bear in his pride,
    He shouts to scare the monster, who will often turn aside.
    But the she-bear thus accosted rends the peasant tooth and nail.
    For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    When Nag the basking cobra hears the careless foot of man,
    He will sometimes wriggle sideways and avoid it if he can.
    But his mate makes no such motion where she camps beside the trail.
    For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    When the early Jesuit fathers preached to Hurons and Choctaws,
    They prayed to be delivered from the vengeance of the squaws.
    ‘Twas the women, not the warriors, turned those stark enthusiasts pale.
    For the female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    Man’s timid heart is bursting with the things he must not say,
    For the Woman that God gave him isn’t his to give away;
    But when hunter meets with husband, each confirms the other’s tale—
    The female of the species is more deadly than the male.

    Man, a bear in most relations—worm and savage otherwise, —
    Man propounds negotiations, Man accepts the compromise.
    Very rarely will he squarely push the logic of a fact
    To its ultimate conclusion in unmitigated act.

    Fear, or foolishness, impels him, ere he lay the wicked low,
    To concede some form of trial even to his fiercest foe.
    Mirth obscene diverts his anger—Doubt and Pity oft perplex
    Him in dealing with an issue—to the scandal of The Sex!

    But the Woman that God gave him, every fibre of her frame
    Proves her launched for one sole issue, armed and engined for the same;
    And to serve that single issue, lest the generations fail,
    The female of the species must be deadlier than the male.

    She who faces Death by torture for each life beneath her breast
    May not deal in doubt or pity—must not swerve for fact or jest.
    These be purely male diversions—not in these her honour dwells.
    She the Other Law we live by, is that Law and nothing else.

    She can bring no more to living than the powers that make her great
    As the Mother of the Infant and the Mistress of the Mate.
    And when Babe and Man are lacking and she strides unclaimed to claim
    Her right as femme (and baron), her equipment is the same.

    She is wedded to convictions—in default of grosser ties;
    Her contentions are her children, Heaven help him who denies!—
    He will meet no suave discussion, but the instant, white-hot, wild,
    Wakened female of the species warring as for spouse and child.

    Unprovoked and awful charges—even so the she-bear fights,
    Speech that drips, corrodes, and poisons—even so the cobra bites,
    Scientific vivisection of one nerve till it is raw
    And the victim writhes in anguish—like the Jesuit with the squaw!

    So it cames that Man, the coward, when he gathers to confer
    With his fellow-braves in council, dare not leave a place for her
    Where, at war with Life and Conscience, he uplifts his erring hands
    To some God of Abstract Justice—which no woman understands.

    And Man knows it! Knows, moreover, that the Woman that God gave him
    Must command but may not govern—shall enthral but not enslave him.
    And She knows, because She warns him, and Her instincts never fail,
    That the Female of Her Species is more deadly than the Male.


  123. wolfie
    123 | October 29, 2009 12:33 pm

    re: #109 by typicalwhitey

    The only reason you could apply that remedy is that your daughter was already sufficiently disciplined to stay in the corner when you ordered her to do so.

    I have seen parents who cannot use time-outs and the like because the child will not comply.
    And the parent is then helpless. Sad.


  124. Speranza
    124 | October 29, 2009 12:35 pm

    re: #120 by orangecrush

    Liberals are too cowardly to do that.


  125. 125 | October 29, 2009 12:36 pm

    re: #119 by Speranza

    Yes, the “Greatest generation” who were swatted by their parents often (as it was typical) turned out so horribly; much better than the coddled generation X & Y we see today.

    /
    :D


  126. mfhorn
    126 | October 29, 2009 12:36 pm

    re: #122 by buzzsawmonkey

    Sexist!

    (Sorry, couldn’t resist)


  127. buzzsawmonkey
    127 | October 29, 2009 12:37 pm

    Did somebody say “Hollywood Party?”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcSPYrqZy-c


  128. Nikis Knight
    128 | October 29, 2009 12:38 pm

    re: #119 by Speranza

    I do not consider spanking to be healthy for them. just my opinion, and it is designed to humiliate them, that is undeniable.

    I deny it. Or rather, that it must be so. I don’t see how swatting a child’s rear in private, with no one else in the room, is humiliating. Slapping their face in front of their friends? Sure, that’s designed for humiliation and will probably make them bitter, but applying some temporary pain to teach a lesson, if important, is another thing. And if it is unhealthy it is less so than neglecting the lesson.

    I was spanked, more than once, though I don’t remember any particular incident or why at this point I consider myself perfectly healthy, mentally and emotionally.
    (I know, I know, that’s what they all say.)


  129. Speranza
    129 | October 29, 2009 12:38 pm

    re: #125 by WrathofG-d

    I do not believe in corporal punishment except under the severest of circumstances. I also remember my teachers screaming at me and others over the most minor infractions – o mean screaming and humiliating for things like not being able to tell time proeprly (I was in the 3rd or 4th grade), yeah a real miscreant I was. Fucking douche bag Mrs. Domsky (3rd grade teacher).


  130. vapig
    130 | October 29, 2009 12:38 pm

    re: #119 by Speranza

    You and I are not going to agree on this.

    While not all children need pain reinforcement, most do and not to do so is child abuse of the worst kind, guaranteed to lead them into a truly miserable life.

    Letting children run around like a bunch of wild animals is not condusive to their physical or mental health.

    It’s not humiliating to be taught to survive!


  131. snork
    131 | October 29, 2009 12:39 pm

    This is a perfect example of what I’ve been biotching about:

    Einstein Wins the Great Race

    Science | Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:02:26 am PDT

    A race between gamma rays across 7.3 billion years of time and space has resulted in a virtual tie, confirming Einstein’s theory of relativity once again.

    So we have a thread getting all worked up over a confirmation of the uncontroversial.

    I don’t get it. Next thread: water is wet!!!!11 OMGponies11ty!!!!11

    If Chuck thinks this stuff makes him look smart, he’s partially right. He looks smart to idiots. Is that his new target market?


  132. Speranza
    132 | October 29, 2009 12:39 pm

    re: #128 by Nikis Knight

    Yo don’t see nothing humiliating about being whacked on your bare ass?


  133. Ed Mahmoud
    133 | October 29, 2009 12:40 pm

    TORNADO WARNING
    TXC365-292000-
    /O.NEW.KSHV.TO.W.0075.091029T1928Z-091029T2000Z/

    BULLETIN – EAS ACTIVATION REQUESTED
    TORNADO WARNING
    NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SHREVEPORT LA
    228 PM CDT THU OCT 29 2009

    THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN SHREVEPORT HAS ISSUED A

    * TORNADO WARNING FOR…
    CENTRAL PANOLA COUNTY IN NORTHEAST TEXAS…
    THIS INCLUDES THE CITY OF CARTHAGE…

    * UNTIL 300 PM CDT

    * AT 227 PM CDT…NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE METEOROLOGISTS DETECTED A
    SEVERE THUNDERSTORM CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A TORNADO NEAR CARTHAGE…
    MOVING NORTHEAST AT 50 MPH.

    * THE TORNADO WILL OTHERWISE REMAIN OVER MAINLY RURAL AREAS OF THE
    INDICATED COUNTY.


  134. Speranza
    134 | October 29, 2009 12:41 pm

    re: #131 by snork

    He really is fishing for thread topics. Oh well Beck is still around.


  135. Empire1
    135 | October 29, 2009 12:41 pm

    re: #15 by vagabond trader

    So do I — ColorSilk works just great!


  136. Speranza
    136 | October 29, 2009 12:42 pm

    re: #131 by snork

    How quick did that topic go off thread – 10 posts?


  137. Ed Mahmoud
    137 | October 29, 2009 12:42 pm

    OK, she is a liberal moonbat, and an Obama supporter, but for a woman pushing 40, there is nothing wrong with Sarah Silverman. Her looks anyway.

    The mind, like I said, Obama supporter.


  138. 138 | October 29, 2009 12:42 pm

    re: #129 by Speranza

    My point (although sarcastically and I apologize for that) is that we need to look at the results.

    When I look at the totality, I believe society in general is getting worse. There is a reason we call the greatest generation the Greatest Generation. We need to look at what worked in producing such a generation. The way I see it, we have taken everything that worked, wuss-ified it, turned it on its head, and now wonder why it is that things are going to heck in a hand basket.

    The Greatest Generation was not coddled, were spanked, were screamed at, were expected to act responsibly, and were punished if they weren’t/didn’t. This stayed with them.

    I know how you feel about it, and I know how I feel about it -but what is important is the results!


  139. mfhorn
    139 | October 29, 2009 12:49 pm

    re: #134 by Speranza

    Maybe he’s just bored with running 1.0 and wants to shut the site down by driving everyone off.


  140. buzzsawmonkey
    140 | October 29, 2009 12:50 pm

    re: #126 by mfhorn

    The interesting section of the poem is the following:

    She can bring no more to living than the powers that make her great
    As the Mother of the Infant and the Mistress of the Mate.
    And when Babe and Man are lacking and she strides unclaimed to claim
    Her right as femme (and baron), her equipment is the same.

    She is wedded to convictions—in default of grosser ties;
    Her contentions are her children, Heaven help him who denies!—
    He will meet no suave discussion, but the instant, white-hot, wild,
    Wakened female of the species warring as for spouse and child.

    If you note the dour yet vicious pursuit of alleged sinners against the Primal Sins of “sexism,” “racism,” “homophobia”—or “anti-science-ism” for that matter—at certain locations, you can see the operation of these stanzas in real life.

    What Kipling refers to as “the barren women” in his short story “One Side of the Question” do in these instances is substitute their political convictions, however arrived at, for human ties, and war viciously on their behalf.


  141. Nikis Knight
    141 | October 29, 2009 12:51 pm

    re: #132 by Speranza

    I’m not a child, for one. For another, humiliation is about one’s standing in the eyes of his peers. It would be more humiliating for a child to have a tale of his punishment (and reation to ie) spread than to experience it privately.

    Yes, spanking can be done in a way designed to humiliate, but it can also be done in a way designed to mitigate humiliation, as I described. Children do not usually come with complex moral reasoning and a desire for virtue and capability for reason to rule emotion. While this is being inculcated, something must connect wrong doing with being undesireable–and pain is the method that nature uses to teach us what not to do, after all. Pain teaches not to piece your skin or touch fire; no reason not to use it teach not to steal, or bully, or lie, if reasoning and cajolling do not work.

    Of course, any punishment can be used improperly and accidently teach the opposite lesson. It’s not easy to do perfectly, which is why parents should have a certain measure of humility and be willing to apoligize when wrong, and certainly I don’t claim to have all or any answers, other than to know from experience that a bit of spanking won’t harm a normal child’s psyche.


  142. snork
    142 | October 29, 2009 1:01 pm

    re: #122 by buzzsawmonkey

    Chucky would do well to read and understand that, given some of the hissing and growling coming out of his basement.


  143. vapig
    143 | October 29, 2009 1:03 pm

    re: #129 by Speranza

    Right – so because you had an insane teacher who didn’t know how to teach, we’re all supposed to just toss the entire diciplinary structure as flawed.

    That’s prog thinking!


  144. m
    144 | October 29, 2009 1:04 pm

    re: #130 by vapig

    I’m with you on this one. If nothing else, my kids are polite and respectful to others.

    I put the fear of ma in them!

    (j/k… kinna… after the first couple you really don’t have to do it daily or anything, gaah!)


  145. vapig
    145 | October 29, 2009 1:06 pm

    Parents in England banned from watching their children in playgrounds… in case they are paedophiles

    These people started out with the no dicipline meme, too! How long before their children are somple taken from them and raised by the state?


  146. vagabond trader
    146 | October 29, 2009 1:07 pm

    re: #135 by Empire1

    Empire!

    :mrgreen:


  147. 147 | October 29, 2009 1:08 pm

    [deleted by request of the commenter- m]


  148. 148 | October 29, 2009 1:10 pm

    Dammit I don’t know how that happened. Please delete it. Heck I thought I copied four posts. Sorry


  149. vapig
    149 | October 29, 2009 1:13 pm

    144. m

    Yes – I believe that! And I believe your children are well trained polite little dolls.

    It’s also probably correct that if they aren’t already trained by the time they are seven then you – as a parent – are in deep doo-doo!


  150. song_and_dance_man
    150 | October 29, 2009 1:14 pm

    re: #148 by Grimcargo

    Good thing 2.0 didn’t allow all 600. I would be scrolling for 15 minutes.


  151. 151 | October 29, 2009 1:14 pm

    re: #147 by Grimcargo

    Grim, DO NOT do that again please. We do not need the entire thread placed here like that.

    If you have something to say about the thread, go right ahead and give examples. If you feel some need to post every stupid comment then do it in parts.


  152. 152 | October 29, 2009 1:14 pm

    M if you or Roden are here. Please delete that dang thing I posted. Sorry I never knew I copied all that.


  153. 153 | October 29, 2009 1:15 pm

    My mother wasn’t a yeller. It was the look in her steely, pale blue Irish eyes that did it.


  154. song_and_dance_man
    154 | October 29, 2009 1:15 pm

    re: #151 by WrathofG-d

    Read his 148


  155. 155 | October 29, 2009 1:15 pm

    re: #151 by WrathofG-d

    I already said I am sorry. I NEVER thought I copied that whole thing.


  156. 156 | October 29, 2009 1:16 pm

    re: #154 by song_and_dance_man

    Yes, I saw that after I posted my comment.

    I personally am NOT going to delete it because I don’t like deleting things. I like to let the record stand.


  157. mfhorn
    157 | October 29, 2009 1:16 pm

    re: #145 by vapig

    You can’t watch your own CHILDREN? And just how the hell are you supposed to prevent a REAL paedofile from taking them?!

    Good GOD!


  158. mfhorn
    158 | October 29, 2009 1:17 pm

    re: #157 by mfhorn

    Oh I see. Government approved playground supervisors.

    (eyeroll) What a crock.


  159. 159 | October 29, 2009 1:17 pm

    re: #157 by mfhorn

    In the U.K. you are not allowed to have a child without the Governments permission.

    Meaning, if you decided you wanted to birth a child in your own home, you would have to invite a Government official to come monitor the birth.

    I believe the punishment for not having a Government official present is jail.


  160. vapig
    160 | October 29, 2009 1:18 pm

    153. Urban Infidel

    I inherited “The Look” from my mother. I once used it on a rambunctous child in line at the grocery store. He shut up as though I’d struck him!

    His mother, instead of getting mad, grabbed my arm and asked me if I could teach it to her!


  161. buzzsawmonkey
    161 | October 29, 2009 1:18 pm

    re: #155 by Grimcargo

    What is the purpose in posting even a fragment of that?

    If I want to see a dead hand reaching up from the grave, I can add something to my Netflix queue.


  162. vagabond trader
    162 | October 29, 2009 1:20 pm

    re: #138 by WrathofG-d

    Too bad the “greatest generation”perhaps due to their own childhood deprivations coddled their own kids,the baby baby boom generation. We boomers have certainly made a mess out of things.


  163. snork
    163 | October 29, 2009 1:20 pm

    The Israelis are at it again…


  164. Ed Mahmoud
    164 | October 29, 2009 1:21 pm

    Oil City and Plain Dealing, LA.

    Noted hook echo approaching. Should miss Shreveport and the casinos…


  165. 165 | October 29, 2009 1:21 pm

    re: #161 by buzzsawmonkey

    Well you can be sure I won’t do it again.
    But I did have a purpose which if I have to explain wouldn’t mean anything to you anyway.


  166. 166 | October 29, 2009 1:22 pm

    OT:

    So I just saw a picture of the most recent Public Ownership Through Health Bill, and….well..

    …I find it funny that the Founding fathers were able to set the entire Countries fouding up on one page, but the current morons need thousands to do one aspect of Governance…..


  167. 167 | October 29, 2009 1:23 pm

    re: #160 by vapig

    It was also that I thought my mother embodied everything that was good and right. I respected her from the start, so that LOOK was enough. It went right through me. It said it all. She never put up with whining, complaining or any nonsense whatsoever.


  168. mfhorn
    168 | October 29, 2009 1:23 pm

    re: #159 by WrathofG-d

    Sounds like they’re even more screwed than we are! In a decades time, under the Bamster, we could top that, though…


  169. buzzsawmonkey
    169 | October 29, 2009 1:24 pm

    re: #165 by Grimcargo

    To tell you the truth, the way most of those importations splay out on the screen here, it is like deciphering the Dead Sea Scrolls (except not as spiritually uplifting) to figure out which is the post that is being replied to, and which is the reply–and whether the recorded dingies are up or down.


  170. Empire1
    170 | October 29, 2009 1:24 pm

    re: #122 by buzzsawmonkey

    Upding! I love Kipling’s poetry.


  171. 171 | October 29, 2009 1:25 pm

    re: #162 by vagabond trader

    I cannot blame the “Greatest Generation” for the result, insofar that at that point they didn’t know what the result would be. Any acts on their part which were guided by emotions were understandable at that point in time -again, they hadn’t seen the destructive effects.

    Today, however we do not have that excuse.


  172. vagabond trader
    172 | October 29, 2009 1:25 pm

    re: #169 by buzzsawmonkey

    You summed up Bedlam very nicely.

    :-)


  173. Incognito
    173 | October 29, 2009 1:25 pm

    re: #160 by vapig

    Oh…I am expert at “the look” and I am a guy!


  174. 174 | October 29, 2009 1:28 pm

    OT:

    Wow, not too long ago, I mentioned here that there is a growing left-wing movement against Lou Dobbs of CNN because of his stance on illegal immigration.

    I had heard about it – “Basta Dobbs” – on Pacifica Radio.

    Today, I see this: CNN’s Lou Dobbs Claims Shot Fired at Home, Wife

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/10/29/cnns-lou-dobbs-claims-shots-fired-home-wife

    Left-Wing Crazies At It Again!


  175. 175 | October 29, 2009 1:28 pm

    re: #169 by buzzsawmonkey

    HAHAHa I know. I would point out the one but I be a SKEERED now. but it was about Irish Rose and The assweesil.


  176. vagabond trader
    176 | October 29, 2009 1:28 pm

    re: #171 by WrathofG-d

    Then along that line you cannot blame the child for a response of entitlement fueled by overly indulgent parents.


  177. Nikis Knight
    177 | October 29, 2009 1:28 pm

    re: #169 by buzzsawmonkey

    Yeah, when people post from other sites, they need to add notation to clarify who is speaking where.


  178. Rancher
    178 | October 29, 2009 1:29 pm

    http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjM3OWEwMjUxNTVhODAzZjc1NWY1YzVhZWJhMzYxZmQ=

    …Democrats are trying to block a requirement that the census inquire whether respondents are American citizens. At the same time, the Mexican government is interfering in our census by urging Mexican nationals to get themselves counted so they can grab bigger slices of hundreds of billions in social-welfare spending…


  179. mfhorn
    179 | October 29, 2009 1:29 pm

    re: #169 by buzzsawmonkey

    I’d like to see the ‘replied-to’ postings on here maybe clustered together, too.


  180. vagabond trader
    180 | October 29, 2009 1:30 pm

    re: #178 by Rancher

    Then we should ALL respond that we are not citizens.That’ll really screw up their utopian fantasies.


  181. tuffy
    181 | October 29, 2009 1:30 pm

    re: #161 by buzzsawmonkey

    Speaking of which, Netflix rocks. I got stuck on watching four back to back different Frontline docs from my puter the other night, and probably could’ve kept going if not for the need of sleep. There’s so much to see and so little time!!


  182. 182 | October 29, 2009 1:31 pm

    re: #174 by WrathofG-d

    I have a feeling that or something like it has happened to Glenn Beck from just a short comment I heard him make. It’s too bad that was reported because it’ll just draw more nuts.


  183. tuffy
    183 | October 29, 2009 1:31 pm

    re: #175 by Grimcargo

    We’re they fighting to impress Master Ponytail?


  184. mfhorn
    184 | October 29, 2009 1:32 pm

    re: #178 by Rancher

    It might be a little early, but I might as well bring it up now:

    When you get your census form and you get to the question on ‘race’, check ‘other, and write in ‘Human’. If you were born here, you could also check ‘Native American’.


  185. 185 | October 29, 2009 1:32 pm

    re: #176 by vagabond trader

    No, I imagine I wouldn’t. As a society however, we can see the results and have to …CHANGE our way of doing things, and revert back to a manner of raising children the results in another Great generation.


  186. tuffy
    186 | October 29, 2009 1:32 pm

    re: #183 by tuffy

    *Were*, lol.


  187. snork
    187 | October 29, 2009 1:32 pm

    re: #148 by Grimcargo

    Are they trying to compete with me? I’d be hard pressed to write satire more ridiculous that some of that.

    I may have to hang it up, when they start doing that. Maybe that’s how Chuck’ll keep his traffic. Round-the-clock self-satire.


  188. buzzsawmonkey
    188 | October 29, 2009 1:32 pm

    re: #181 by tuffy

    They’re very good—except that there is a whole stack of early ’30s films that they do not seem to have.

    You think that independent women, homosexual subtext, and hot sex are new to the movies? You need to look at the stuff from 1929 to 1934.


  189. 189 | October 29, 2009 1:33 pm

    ‘Desecrated flag’ video is DNC finalist

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28848.html


  190. snork
    190 | October 29, 2009 1:33 pm

    re: #156 by WrathofG-d

    But maybe you can trim the first 80% or so?


  191. m
    191 | October 29, 2009 1:33 pm

    re: #148 by Grimcargo

    Gotcha!

    /you’re not the first :}


  192. 192 | October 29, 2009 1:34 pm

    Ok Mandy Manners post #578 she got some nerve for a change. from there you can see the ongoing exchange.


  193. ms.p.henry
    193 | October 29, 2009 1:34 pm

    Larry David is so NOT cutting edge. Larry if you want to be cutting edge with your humor nothing lends itself to funny situations like islam. It’s so funny you would loose your head by laughing it off. Oops, I meant to say having it hacked off. I’m sure you see the humor there Larry, like a fellow Jew, Daniel Pearl or the thousands who died because of a few stupid cartoons. Come on Larry, how about a piss Mohammed, you little weasel. It’s so easy to make fun of Christians but you’re too chicken shit to make fun of Mohammed. Maybe it’s time for those who have HBO to discontinue their service and let HBO know why…put your money where your beliefs are.


  194. snork
    194 | October 29, 2009 1:36 pm

    re: #177 by Nikis Knight

    re: #169 by buzzsawmonkey

    I try to use nested blockquotes to do that. If done correctly, it’s usually clear who’s saying what.


  195. 195 | October 29, 2009 1:36 pm

    re: #183 by tuffy

    No it was actually Irish Rose calling out Weesil and of course sharmuta and Mandy joined.


  196. m
    196 | October 29, 2009 1:37 pm

    re: #149 by vapig

    Little dolls might be pushing it a bit ~:D
    They’re young teens now ~ and we all survived!

    :D :D :D

    They used to be quite the little dolls, though ~:)


  197. vagabond trader
    197 | October 29, 2009 1:37 pm

    re: #189 by WrathofG-d

    This potus has the nerve to salute our dead as their remains are returned in flag draped coffins.


  198. Eliana
    198 | October 29, 2009 1:38 pm

    Update:

    One of three people sought by the FBI was captured in Canada Thursday and two were still on the loose after a federal raid and deadly shooting of a radical Islam leader whose goal authorities say was to take down the U.S. government.

    Federal authorities in Detroit said the son of 53-year-old Luqman Ameen Abdullah, who was killed in Wednesday night’s shootout with FBI agents, was arrested across the border in Windsor, Ontario.

    The Royal Canadian Mounted Police took 30-year-old Mujahid Carswell, who was considered armed and dangerous, into custody Thursday. No other details were released.

    Carswell was among 11 people charged Wednesday in a criminal complaint in federal court in Detroit.

    Two guys from this group still being sought.


  199. song_and_dance_man
    199 | October 29, 2009 1:38 pm

    re: #195 by Grimcargo

    Sounds like a Cat e gory 5 fight.


  200. Poteen
    200 | October 29, 2009 1:38 pm

    re: #144 by m

    re: #130 by vapig

    I’m with you on this one. If nothing else, my kids are polite and respectful to others.

    I put the fear of ma in them!

    Key word there ,fear. Kids these days don’t have enough growing up and sometimes they learn too late. As to parenting, not abject fear of bloodletting, but the component of respect that begins as fear in small chidren.
    I hope this is coming across right.
    When my middle daughter was 12, we went to the store. On the way out the beepers in the door started dinging. She was trying to lift some makeup. Now, theft is something thats a very sore subject with me and she knew it.
    I whacked her in the back of the head right there in the store. I regretted it but I lost it for a second. The only time I ever hit one of my kids.
    Fast forward 12 years and she’s writing an essay for a college course and tells this story. And a little more. Turns out she had been shoplifting for a couple of years, right up until the moment I cuffed her. She never did it again. Fear of getting hit and mostly fear of disappointing me again.
    The fear component of respect. Kids are taught so much ’self respect’ these days that they never learn the true meaning of the word until life teaches them the hard way.


  201. vagabond trader
    201 | October 29, 2009 1:38 pm

    re: #196 by m

    Adorable,just like their Ma!

    :grin:


  202. vapig
    202 | October 29, 2009 1:38 pm

    178. Rancher

    It’s insane. Do the Mexican even realize they are sabotaging their built-in steam-releaser by over-burdoning our already crippled system?

    What happens to them when they can’t send their poor to us anymore because we are worse off than them?


  203. 203 | October 29, 2009 1:39 pm

    re: #196 by m

    Somali who claims to be centenarian marries teen

    http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/oct/29/somali-who-claims-to-be-centenarian-marries-teen/


  204. GrandJunctionite
    204 | October 29, 2009 1:39 pm

    re: #197 by vagabond trader

    As much as I dislike the CIC, it is his suty to salute in such cases. He’d be blasted for not saluting.
    The fact that he used the entire trip for a photo op is what’s truly disgusting.


  205. tuffy
    205 | October 29, 2009 1:39 pm

    re: #188 by buzzsawmonkey

    Yeah, there have been a “few” things I haven’t been able to find. But they are slowly gobbling up every video on the planet, so they’re gettin’ there. Hollywood Video, who?? It’s like a ghost town in there these days, and I wonder how much longer they will be able to survive. They tried to jump on the “online/mail videos” bandwagon, but alas, they were too late. Netflix really got ahead of the curve there. We only go to Hollywood Video as a last, for something spontaneous. That’s something Netflix CAN’T do. I hope neither of them go anywhere to fulfill my every need. :)


  206. 206 | October 29, 2009 1:40 pm

    re: #197 by vagabond trader

    I think it is nice for the President of the United States to show respect for our fallen soldiers.

    If I need to find a place to be bothered, it would be the classlessness of him allowing the press to photo it.


  207. Nevergiveup
    207 | October 29, 2009 1:41 pm

    re: #204 by GrandJunctionite

    I think that is what she meant. He was using the bodies, their scarifice, and the moment for his personal political advantage. Like the scumbag he is.


  208. tuffy
    208 | October 29, 2009 1:41 pm

    re: #187 by snork

    Wow, it looks like they really WERE trying to define butthurt?!? *YAAAAAAWWWN*


  209. buzzsawmonkey
    209 | October 29, 2009 1:41 pm

    re: #205 by tuffy

    I’m not familiar with Hollywood Video, but will have to check it out.

    In the meantime, check out the “Hollywood Party” link I provided upthread.


  210. Nikis Knight
    210 | October 29, 2009 1:43 pm

    re: #202 by vapig

    What happens to them when they can’t send their poor to us anymore because we are worse off than them?

    Then the progressives of the world join hands and sing in praise of the equality they brought forth.


  211. vagabond trader
    211 | October 29, 2009 1:44 pm

    re: #204 by GrandJunctionite

    I am referring to the flag desecration on his re-election website that Wrath linked and comparing it to his supposed respect for our flag.


  212. vapig
    212 | October 29, 2009 1:44 pm

    196. m

    Wow! You’re not kidding! They are (were – but I’m sure still ARE) adorable!

    You are indeed blessed!


  213. Nikis Knight
    213 | October 29, 2009 1:44 pm

    re: #203 by WrathofG-d
    Hopefully we have a viagra embargo on such nations?


  214. GrandJunctionite
    214 | October 29, 2009 1:45 pm

    re: #207 by Nevergiveup

    Hence my disdain for the photo op.
    GWB was there many times quietly. But he didn’t let the press in, BHO did that.


  215. 215 | October 29, 2009 1:46 pm

    re: #189 by WrathofG-d

    That ‘desecrated flag’ was so incredibly boring. Graffiti is ugly and boring. The left’s constant desecration of our symbol of everlasting freedom is ugly and boring.

    So tedious, all of them. Just garbage.


  216. wolfie
    216 | October 29, 2009 1:46 pm

    About that UK law that won’t let parents (i.e., adults not certified by the state) into the park with their own children. This is purportedly being done to meet the threat of pedophiles.

    Why are we so terrified about pedophilia today?
    Has it increased greatly since, say, the 50’s?

    Why are we so concerned about our kids’ innocence when we bombard them with sexual material through the media and the schools?

    Why would anyone (in their right mind) think that parents are more likely to be pedophiles than the average certified kiddie-park monitor?


  217. Nikis Knight
    217 | October 29, 2009 1:46 pm

    re: #208 by tuffy

    I think it has to do with so many commenters who are a pain in the ass.


  218. 218 | October 29, 2009 1:47 pm

    re: #206 by WrathofG-d

    And the fact that he looks like a fish out of water doesn’t make it better.


  219. vagabond trader
    219 | October 29, 2009 1:47 pm

    re: #206 by WrathofG-d

    Jeesh Wrath, ya think the fact that he just HAD to use it for a photo op might cancel out so called good intentions? Puhleeze!

    Meanwhile, when he is he going to stop fcking around with the lives of our troops in A-stan? Respect indeed.


  220. Nevergiveup
    220 | October 29, 2009 1:47 pm

    re: #214 by GrandJunctionite

    Actually I read he was NOT ever at Dover. He was at Walter Reed and Bethesda Naval many many times, but never allowed it to be photographed for publication. Some people have class and dignity and some don’t.


  221. GrandJunctionite
    221 | October 29, 2009 1:47 pm

    re: #211 by vagabond trader

    Oh. I better go find that link. If that is that the video with the flag being desecrated on a wall? Then all I can say is

    *Spit*


  222. Nevergiveup
    222 | October 29, 2009 1:50 pm

    Judge Rejects Call for Long Sentence in Case of Al Qaeda Agent

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,570305,00.html

    This is why it’s suicidal to try these terrorist scumbags in Civilian Courts.


  223. Nikis Knight
    223 | October 29, 2009 1:50 pm

    re: #216 by wolfie

    Because the government wouldn’t harm the kids.

    Oh, you said right mind. I dunno.

    I don’t think it is so much a terror of pedophilia as it is a necessity for a government solution to every problem. Look at our Consumer Product Safety Act, aka throw out every childs toy and book made before the 80’s (or so) and cripple industries with new regulations to solve an isolated problem.


  224. GrandJunctionite
    224 | October 29, 2009 1:50 pm

    Sorry. I missed the video at #189 after scrolling through that long copy and paste job.


  225. vagabond trader
    225 | October 29, 2009 1:51 pm

    re: #221 by GrandJunctionite

    That is the one and it is apparently being given the blessing of potus and the DNC. wtf?


  226. Rancher
    226 | October 29, 2009 1:52 pm

    The GDP grew 3.5% so the administration is calling the recession over. GDP is based on government spending, consumer spending, and commercial investment. The growth is mainly due to massive government spending and an increase in consumer spending due to artificial incentive like Cash for Clunkers and the homebuyers tax credit. Business investment fell 2.5%. It’s an entirely fake recovery, based on spending money the government doesn’t have to spend. Rush likened it to getting a $10,000 advance on your credit card and telling your wife you got a $10,000 raise.
    See KEYNESIAN FALLACY: http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/2009/02/04/keynesian-fallacy/


  227. GrandJunctionite
    227 | October 29, 2009 1:53 pm

    re: #225 by vagabond trader

    They will do anything to promote their O-Care bill. Thats what it boils down too.


  228. 228 | October 29, 2009 1:55 pm

    OT:

    and the Muslim monster gets chills…

    http://www.daylife.com/photo/0gfqbNC7Cj4Sm?q=Israel


  229. GrandJunctionite
    229 | October 29, 2009 1:55 pm

    re: #222 by Nevergiveup

    The link doesn’t say whether the POS is a naturalized American. I wonder what his citizenship status is? Anyway, we can look forward to about 300 more stories like this if BHO gets his Gitmo wish.


  230. Poteen
    230 | October 29, 2009 1:57 pm

    re: #215 by Urban Infidel

    re: #189 by WrathofG-d

    That ‘desecrated flag’ was so incredibly boring. Graffiti is ugly and boring. The left’s constant desecration of our symbol of everlasting freedom is ugly and boring.

    So tedious, all of them. Just garbage

    /Hey it’s symbolism at it’s most refined and you should be happy for it.
    When the revolution comes its hard to be hurt by a symbolic rifle./


  231. m
    231 | October 29, 2009 1:57 pm

    {Vapig}! {Vagabond Trader}! Thanks y’all! I am blessed. They’re good kids.


  232. Rancher
    232 | October 29, 2009 1:58 pm

    re: #222 by Nevergiveup

    But U.S. District Judge Michael Mihm said he doesn’t think former Bradley graduate student Ali al-Marri has renounced the terrorist group and was likely to attack the U.S. if given the chance.

    But what the hell, he’s suffered enough. Can this Judge be fired? Should a conservative win for POTUS he can fire who he wants, right?


  233. Iron Fist
    233 | October 29, 2009 1:58 pm

    re: #223 by Nikis Knight

    Isn’t it just amazing that the human race didn’t go extinct before we had evolved enough to realize how many laws are required to protect us from the harsh environment? And to protect the environment from the harsh, evil humans, too? Yesss, lots of lovely laws to regulate and control…


  234. Speranza
    234 | October 29, 2009 1:58 pm

    re: #196 by m

    Future babe magnets – if not already by now!


  235. wolfie
    235 | October 29, 2009 1:59 pm

    re: #223 by Nikis Knight

    I am still reeling over what I call the great book-burning. Mustn’t have anything pre-1985, unless the Enlightened Ones choose to re-publish it. Sooooo many great children’s books from 50 years ago. So few now.

    Ah well. At least I am comforted by the fact that 2 yr olds ingesting 6 whole books will not get a (barely)traceable amount of lead in their system.


  236. vagabond trader
    236 | October 29, 2009 1:59 pm

    How long before their tax exempt status is challenged?

    http://www.catholic.org/politics/story.php?id=34735


  237. tuffy
    237 | October 29, 2009 2:00 pm

    re: #209 by buzzsawmonkey

    My cat is sitting right here next to me and she was really intrigued with the beginning of the vid when all the chicks are singing and throwing their limbs around.
    Are you into old movies?

    /Stupid question, huh?


  238. Speranza
    238 | October 29, 2009 2:00 pm

    re: #143 by vapig

    Don’t ever call me a “progressive”.


  239. Nevergiveup
    239 | October 29, 2009 2:00 pm

    re: #232 by Rancher

    He was nominated by Ronnie?


  240. Iron Fist
    240 | October 29, 2009 2:01 pm

    Glen Beck is back! Solely for the purpose of tormenting Charles! It is so funny!


  241. GrandJunctionite
    241 | October 29, 2009 2:03 pm

    re: #232 by Rancher

    IIRC U.S. District judges are lifetime appointments


  242. Nikis Knight
    242 | October 29, 2009 2:04 pm

    re: #233 by Iron Fist

    Heck, if I were a secularist who was fascinated with evolution I’d have to be a libertarian on grounds that the nanny-state is breeding out all of our common sense and survival instinct.

    As opposed to being pro freedom because humans have a God-given right to liberty.


  243. Nevergiveup
    244 | October 29, 2009 2:05 pm

    re: #241 by GrandJunctionite

    Well they can be impeached


  244. Rancher
    245 | October 29, 2009 2:10 pm

    re: #233 by Iron Fist

    Yesss, lots of lovely laws to regulate and control…

    Yesterday I was typing up a disciplinary report on a hearing I had held on an inmate assault. I was trying not to dismiss the charge against this POS that had stabbed another inmate in the back but some procedures weren’t followed during the investigation and concerning key evidence. I’m still new at this and asked the Disciplinary Officer, an old hand, about my concerns. She pointed out the differences in policy that said “should” as opposed to “shall”. “Shall left no wiggle room, it had to be done that way. Everything that was done wrong was in the “should” category so I nailed the guy to the wall. Today Rush was saying that the new health care bill had the word “shall” in it 3425 times. Tell me that isn’t a major erosion of our freedom. Now we all can be in prison.


  245. mfhorn
    246 | October 29, 2009 2:11 pm

    re: #243 by WrathofG-d

    I wonder how that’ll be used as an excuse for seething in the Middle East by the Religion of Pieces.


  246. GrandJunctionite
    247 | October 29, 2009 2:12 pm

    I hope they put Mr. Al-Marri in a federal Pen with the general population.
    I also hope his cell mates name is Bubba.


  247. CloudyDay
    248 | October 29, 2009 2:13 pm

    Re: “Larry David Urinates on Jesus Painting; Catholics Not Enthused”

    As a Baptist, I’m not enthused or amused by that, either.

    But how many Catholics, Protestants and Baptists rioted in the streets once that story came out?


  248. mfhorn
    249 | October 29, 2009 2:14 pm

    re: #245 by Rancher

    I also saw a report somewhere that they’re pushing to make it possible to sign up for ObamaCare at places like the Drivers License office.

    Yet photo ID is a way to keep ‘the poor’ from voting.


  249. GrandJunctionite
    250 | October 29, 2009 2:14 pm

    re: #245 by Rancher

    Yep. Good post. See my #70

    Number of uses
    “Tax” – 87 times
    “Taxable” – 62 times
    “Excise tax” – 10 times
    “Taxes” – 15 times
    “Fee” – 59 times
    “Penalty” – 113 times
    “Require” – 118 times
    “Must” – 58 times
    “Shall” – 3,424 times


  250. wolfie
    251 | October 29, 2009 2:14 pm

    re: #236 by vagabond trader

    As long as they aren’t endorsing a candidate or party, they’re okay. (Unless they are lefties, in which case they can do whatever they damned well please.)

    How long before Catholic hospitals have to shut down?


  251. mfhorn
    252 | October 29, 2009 2:15 pm

    re: #248 by CloudyDay

    And if it had happened, you can bet we’d hear about it for the next 6 months.

    And Chuckles would have a dozen threads about it.


  252. wolfie
    253 | October 29, 2009 2:21 pm

    re: #245 by Rancher

    Good post!

    Folks, I think Rancher is uniquely qualified to tell us what to expect in the New! Improved! Fundamentally Changed! America.


  253. 254 | October 29, 2009 2:21 pm

    re: #246 by mfhorn

    Rachel’s tomb is Judaism’s “third holiest shrine”.

    Thus it would be the equivalent to the Temple Mount for the Muslims.

    Just something to think about.


  254. Rancher
    255 | October 29, 2009 2:22 pm

    re: #242 by Nikis Knight

    See Idiocracy.

    http://www.cinemablend.com/reviews/Idiocracy-1775.html


  255. Iron Fist
    256 | October 29, 2009 2:22 pm

    re: #245 by Rancher

    They’ll tell us all how to live, what to eat, when to breathe, and when to die. It is all about power and control. It is amazing the liberty that has been lost in the last 100 years, most of it in the name of making our lives better.


  256. snork
    257 | October 29, 2009 2:25 pm

    re: #256 by Iron Fist

    And it started just about 100 years ago, too.


  257. Rancher
    258 | October 29, 2009 2:27 pm

    re: #250 by GrandJunctionite

    Good Lord I’m glad I’m old. I had the Reagan years, the good old days. I’m ashamed at what I’m leaving my kids.


  258. 259 | October 29, 2009 2:30 pm

    Photo Essay: A Visit to the Matriarch Rachel´s Fortified Tomb

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/114866


  259. buzzsawmonkey
    260 | October 29, 2009 2:30 pm

    re: #235 by wolfie

    That law banning any book printed before 1985 is one of the greatest acts of cultural vandalism and literature/literacy suppression ever promulgated.

    And it was passed off as a safety measure.

    I do not believe in book burning—and for that reason I would burn alive the promulgators of this abomination.


  260. GrandJunctionite
    261 | October 29, 2009 2:31 pm

    re: #258 by Rancher

    I have spent the better part of the day trying to go through this 1990 page disaster. I don’t consider myself a to be of superior intelect, but I’m no dummy either and I can understand very little of what I have read.

    I know this much, Federal Funding of Abortions IS contained in this bill.


  261. buzzsawmonkey
    262 | October 29, 2009 2:31 pm

    re: #237 by tuffy

    “Old movies” = the record of America before it became a PC wasteland.

    Am I “into” them? Yes.


  262. Nikis Knight
    263 | October 29, 2009 2:34 pm

    re: #260 by buzzsawmonkey

    Hugh Hewitt spent a lot of time in the summer tallking about that absurdity. It’s just painful to think about. 2nd had stores and charities are basically going to need to dump all their childrens goods.

    It’s like a cash for clunkers program without the cash.


  263. Rancher
    264 | October 29, 2009 2:34 pm

    re: #247 by GrandJunctionite

    I hope they put Mr. Al-Marri in a federal Pen with the general population.

    Just did a Google search for “Illinois Muslim prison conversions”, (without the quotes). 22,900,000 hits.


  264. 265 | October 29, 2009 2:35 pm

    re: #242 by Nikis Knight

    As one of the resident secularists who likes to read about genetics and dinosaurs and stuff…

    There are good reasons to be pro-liberty which don’t rely on God. I can think of two.

    Ayn Rand had one: morality can be constructed from the axiom “human life == good”. Liberty allows humans to live their lives; oppression does not. That’s sort of a mathematician’s libertarianism. It’s kind of… cold, but that’s Ayn Rand for you.

    There’s also the school of thought that people have two innate drives: to avoid being crushed under someone else’s boot, and to be the person crushing others under your own boot. Libertarians understand that there are a limited number of job openings for boot-crusher. They also understand that even if they got to be one of the boot-crushers, they would no longer be able to enjoy the society of their peers; it’s a life of fear. So, liberty is better because it’s just easier and more fun to live that way.


  265. buzzsawmonkey
    266 | October 29, 2009 2:39 pm

    re: #263 by Nikis Knight

    It’s not the money. It’s the fact that nobody ever experienced any problem prior to 1985 because of “lead” or whatever in the fucking ink of children’s books.

    And there are literally thousands of fantastic books prior to 1985 which are out of print, which have beautiful illustrations and brilliant and non-PC stories which are now consigned to the dumps because some asshole got this garbage in his head.


  266. Nikis Knight
    267 | October 29, 2009 2:40 pm

    re: #265 by Zimriel

    There are good reasons to be pro-liberty which don’t rely on God. I can think of two.

    Yeah, I’ll quickly acknowledge that. I was more meaning to point out that protecting people from needing to think about their lives whatsoever might not be a good idea if one were obsessed with an evolutionary point of view.

    Rather than say that that is the only reason to want freedom.


  267. Rancher
    268 | October 29, 2009 2:41 pm

    re: #265 by Zimriel

    human life == destroying the planet and harming other creatures that have just as much right to live as us.


  268. Nikis Knight
    269 | October 29, 2009 2:42 pm

    re: #266 by buzzsawmonkey

    Right, but in the same way the Cash for Clunkers requirement that the trade-ins be immediately destroyed is similar to this draconian bill in that it is taking useful goods out of the economy for reasons related to hysteria.


  269. buzzsawmonkey
    270 | October 29, 2009 2:44 pm

    re: #269 by Nikis Knight

    True.


  270. 271 | October 29, 2009 2:44 pm

    Church officials: 15,000 Bibles seized in Malaysia

    KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — Malaysian authorities have confiscated more than 15,000 Bibles in recent months because they referred to “God” as “Allah,” a translation that has been banned in this Muslim-majority country, Christian church officials said Thursday.
    he alleged seizure of the Bibles, imported from neighboring Indonesia, is certain to reignite complaints by religious minorities that their right to practice their faiths freely has come under threat as the government panders to the Muslim majority.

    A growing sense of discrimination among the minorities is chipping away at Malaysia’s reputation as a harmonious multiethnic nation that practices a moderate brand of Islam.

    The Rev. Hermen Shastri, general secretary of the Council of Churches of Malaysia, said authorities seized a consignment of 10,000 copies sent from Jakarta to Kuching in Sarawak state on Sept. 11 because the Indonesian-language Bibles contained the word “Allah.”

    Indonesian language is similar to Malaysian language, both of which use “Allah” as translation for God in both Islamic and Christian traditions.

    Another 5,100 Bibles, also imported from Indonesia, were seized in March, said an official from the Bible Society of Malaysia, who asked not to be named for fear of angering the government.

    A Home Ministry official said he was not aware of the seizures. He said he couldn’t be named without his superiors’ clearance.

    Malaysia has banned non-Muslims from using the word “Allah” in their texts, saying the word is Islamic and may upset Muslims.

    Interesting no?


  271. 273 | October 29, 2009 2:52 pm

    re: #268 by Rancher

    But if I were a secular humanist I would never say that another species has as much right to live as I do. I would support human life as far and as long as it may be sustained.

    Both my arguments (maybe more explicitly Rand’s) were pro-human. (Rand’s problem is she doesn’t really know WHY she is pro-human. I find her writing to be cold.)

    The hardcore environmentalists you mention are advocating human self-genocide. I don’t much like the idea of saying X is evil, Y is evil etc but… the E word really fits for the environmentalists. Again a true secular humanist would never ally himself with such an enemy.

    When you see an allegedly “secular humanist” group in coalition with a pro-death group, then you know Something Else Is At Work. I find a lot of “secular humanists” to be phonies, and not humanist at all…


  272. 274 | October 29, 2009 2:57 pm

    re: #271 by WrathofG-d

    What’s strange here is that this is the translation that the Middle Eastern Churches demand of their Bibles, ever since they moved away from Aramaic.

    I somewhat agree with the Malaysians in that “Allah” is too Qur’anic for use as the name for God. I’d prefer al-Ilah to stand in for the Hebrew El. (And al-Rabb for Lord / Adonai / the four letters.)

    That said, it’s obvious that Something Else Is At Work in the Malays’ anti-Bible drive. I seriously doubt they’ve sponsored a conference considering exactly what word they should use in Malay Bibles.


  273. Rancher
    275 | October 29, 2009 2:59 pm

    re: #273 by Zimriel

    I did not mean to equate leftist environmentalists to secular humanists, I was just giving their rebuttal of the human==good argument. Your argument is extremely sound.


  274. 276 | October 29, 2009 3:01 pm

    re: #274 by Zimriel

    I found it interesting that Muslims are controlling what Christians use in their Bibles, that there is fear that using Allah would cause violence, and that the Muslims admit that Allah is not the same as the Christian G-d.

    When non-Muslims make this claim they are called Islamophobic.
    /cue Keith Ellison & CAIR


  275. Ed Mahmoud
    277 | October 29, 2009 3:02 pm

    I missed a spotted tornado inside the loop in Shreveport earlier while I was working out.

    But more tornadic cells training that way. Arklatex is in for an exciting evening.

    Closer to home:

    SEVERE WEATHER STATEMENT
    NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE HOUSTON/GALVESTON TX
    453 PM CDT THU OCT 29 2009

    TXC339-292215-
    /O.CON.KHGX.TO.W.0042.000000T0000Z-091029T2215Z/
    MONTGOMERY TX-
    453 PM CDT THU OCT 29 2009

    …A TORNADO WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 515 PM CDT FOR
    MONTGOMERY COUNTY…

    AT 448 PM CDT…NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE DOPPLER RADAR INDICATED A TORNADO. THIS TORNADO WAS LOCATED NEAR LAKE CONROE DAM…OR 10 MILES WEST OF CONROE…AND MOVING NORTHEAST AT 40 MPH. THE TORNADO IS EXPECTED TO MOVE ACROSS THE SOUTHERN PORTIONS OF LAKE CONROE.

    * LOCATIONS IN THE THE TORNADO WARNING INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO WILLIS…PANORAMA VILLAGE AND MONTGOMERY


  276. 278 | October 29, 2009 3:06 pm

    re: #275 by Rancher
    re: #267 by Nikis Knight

    To both: I didn’t mean to sound snippy. My social skills suck.

    Sorry for writing very long lectures if they made you feel on the defensive. I was testing out these essays on a little drive before I tossed them onto my own blog. Thanks for the compliment on my argument, as well.


  277. Geogrunt
    279 | October 29, 2009 3:06 pm

    My Dad was a single parent of 3 for a while, then he met my step mother. Discipline was quick and harsh in our house. Spankings till about 6-7, then a belt till about 12, then grounding after that. Then when I was about 10 we adopted my step mothers niece. She was 4 and from Hondurous. She was spoiled rotten from day one, always getting things her way, was always spoiled.

    Well it was the 70’s and all 4 of us experimented with drugs a bit. Only my step sister seemed to like them just a bit too much. She became a crackhead, then a tweeker on Meth,then prison, then back to meth and died this year of a meth overdose, she was 41 homeless, alone way out in the desert living in a tent. I got the call from the Los angeles coroners office. I guess she had my number with her at the time. WE all tried to help her, rehab 3 times, let her live with myself and my family, but she was always on meth, so I had to kick her out. Too bad, she was a nice person when she wasn’t on drugs.

    I often wonder if she had been traeted the same as the rest of us if she would have turned out different. I can’t help but wonder if the coddling and spoiling her at a young age into her teens didn’t ruin her for life.

    So I say spankings are a good thing, beatings are a bad thing, and slapping or punching faces is also a bad thing, although possibly needed at times. I know I had a big mouth as a teen. Dad shut me up with a quickness on more than one occasion.

    My 2 natural sisters are fine, well adjusted adults, got spanked, the one who didn’t get spanked is dead.

    I learned at 15 I could take a punch from a full grown man. It gave me confidence later in life, especially in dealing with assholes in the Army. I was not afraid to fight for what i belived in, and took many punches but was never knocked out.


  278. Incognito
    280 | October 29, 2009 3:28 pm

    Ed the weatherman is back! The world is all right!


  279. Nikis Knight
    281 | October 29, 2009 3:32 pm

    re: #274 by Zimriel

    I am personally very critical of the idea that Allah should be used as a generic for God. It’s like saying we should call Obama the King because that is the word for head of state in English. Well, maybe, but it’s got very different connotations, enough that a new word is needed for president.

    Likewise, the God of the Bible is quite different from Allah, and Allah came from more sources than the bible–it was originally the name of the Arabic mood god.

    But I wouldn’t argue with middle eastern Christians about it, who may see things different from me and are likely more knowledgeable about it. Of course, the example in question is a form of the muslims exerting dominance and attempted to curtail Christian evangelism.


  280. davehm
    282 | October 29, 2009 4:22 pm

    I think that using God in the bible instead of allah is a good thing and I can see God’s hand in this. By allowing this to happen, the true and living God of the bible will not be confused with the fake, satanic, pagan moon god allah of the koran.


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David