Just when you thought the mouthbreathing subhumans who make up the worldwide Islamofascist terrorist movement couldn’t sink any lower, then we find this out,
A link between terrorism plots and hardcore child pornography is becoming clear after a string of police raids in Britain and across the Continent, an investigation by The Times has discovered. Images of child abuse have been found during Scotland Yard antiterrorism swoops and in big inquiries in Italy and Spain.
Secret coded messages are being embedded into child pornographic images, and paedophile websites are being exploited as a secure way of passing information between terrorists.
British security services are also aware of the trend and believe that it requires further investigation to improve understanding of terrorists’ methods and mindsets. Concerns within the Metropolitan Police led to a plan to run a pilot research project exploring the nature of the link. One source familiar with the proposal said that this could eventually lead to the training of child welfare experts to identify signs of terrorist involvement as they monitor pornographic sites.
Concerns have already been expressed at Cabinet minister level about the risk of vulnerable Muslim youths being exploited by older men.
It is not clear whether the terrorists were more interested in the material for personal gratification or were drawn to child porn networks as a secure means of sending messages. In one case fewer than a dozen images were found; in another, 40,000.
British security sources confirmed that such a link had been discovered in several cases. They noted the contradiction between people supposedly devoted to theocracy and Islamic fundamentalism and their use of child pornography. “It shows that these people are very confused,” a source said. “Here they are hating Western decadence but actually making use of it and finding that they enjoy this stuff.”
It’s not necessarily a contradiction – just take a look through the ahadith and see what they have to say about Mohammed and Ayesha. Note that they make a point to say that she was still playing with her dolls, which is as far as I’m going to elaborate on the subject.
Remember – the 9-11 hijackers were the guys who spent the night of 10 Sept. 2001 partying it up at stripper bars, so we can see that spiritual consistency isn’t exactly a prerequisite for being a radical, fundamentalist Muslim.
Tags: Hypocrisy, Islamic Terrorism, Terrorism
just say no
Let’s see… if there was something I didn’t want the police to find I think I’d more likely embed it in cookbook pictures or some such.
Islamonutz aren’t too bright. (i know, understatement of the year)
re: #2 by m
Or post it on 1.0. Nobody ever look there for anything.
re: #3 by snork
If cj posted it, he’d get updinged.
/johnsontown rules.
can the religion of the depraved get any worse?
Could Congresswoman be the next one to endorse Doug Hoffman? Who knows.
http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2009/10/michele-bachmann-to-endorse-doug.html
Mo raped a child and called it marriage. They are just following his lead
Why am I not surprised?
Now, here’s the question: There’s that kid who supposedly has Koran verses magically appearing on his hide. Is he really a font of kiddieporn kaptions?
re: #9 by song_and_dance_man
One, two, three, four
I declare a tongue war
re: #6 by mawskrat
sshhh… they’ll take it as a challenge.
m, do you know if Savage is going to get that Nancy up tonight?
Islamic traditions promise that men who die in jihad receive 72 virgins as their reward. his does not come from the Koran, it comes from Hadith Al-Tirmidhi in the Book of Sunah, a very important part of the hadith.
But wait! there IS more. It also says they will receive 28 supple young boys.
Now folks, does that answer your questions? does that put it all to gether for you? Islam says pedophelia is A-OK. Its alright to molest young boys according to islam. If its good in heaven, or rather their version of heaven, its ok on earth, so go ahead and make some jkids life a living hell. That appears to be their motto.
Maybe that is why princess is so bent on not allowing attacks on islam on his lame ass blog anymore.
As for me, take the perverts out and gut shoot em some where that wolves or bears will find em.
re: #13 by snork
I haven’t seen him on, so I’ll go ahead and create it and schedule it.
re: #11 by buzzsawmonkey
A French Jihad.
Just another form of Child Abuse.
Dressing kids up in suicide belts gets boring after awhile.//
re: #15 by m
The Nightly Nancy!!!!!!!!
Haven’t had one of those in a few days!
While I was in the ME I heard from several sources that Male/Boy pedophilia was a problem of epidemic proportions. Apparently back during the era they were raiders, young males were more “convenient” in the field than trying to track down women. After raids captured boys were handed out as awards to the best raiders, if they “served” well they were given the opportunity to become raiders themselves eventually.
Now non-halal panties on jihadi heads is immoral torture advocated by blasphemous infidels.
It should also be understood, children are not people in Islam, they are property until a certain age. To be used in whatever manner the caretakers deem appropriate.
How do they square this away with their vow that homosexuals must be killed? Or does some vague passage in the Koran make it A-OK if you are doing it to attack infidels?
re: #22 by livefreeor die
With them it is a matter of “style”
Mars: It should also be understood, children are not people in Islam…
Nor are women, Jews, apostates, Jews, non-NAMBLA-eligible homosexuals, women, infidels, people named “Bob”, or Jewish women.
re: #2 by m
I’m still trying to figure that out too.
re: #15 by m
You know that he has one written up, don’t you?
I hear kevin jennings is a fan and is planning to write an intro to the next edition of the koran. And they are going to join nambla in the near future.
spit
Ew. Just ew.
re: #19 by Mars
As I understand it, that or something a bit like it also happened with the Spartans.
…Jews, atheists, women, people who insult Mohammed, people who merely depict Mohammed, people who have unkind thoughts about Mohammed, people who actually speak the truth about Mohammed, Jewish lesbians, anyone in a public place in Israel…
re: #24 by JamesTKirk
re: #22 by livefreeor die
Very true.
While I was there I was on post with a Saudi. He said flat out “Women are for marriage, boys for fun.” This was dead serious, it took all my restraint not to draw down on him right then and there.
…people who eat pork, men who shave their beards, women who show their faces in public, women who don’t show their faces in public, women who want to keep their genitalia (clitoris) intact, women who fail to keep their genitalia (hymen) intact, women who have genitalia, women, even more Jews…
re: #9 by song_and_dance_man
Quote from the story:
“It is not clear whether the terrorists were more interested in the material for personal gratification or were drawn to child porn networks as a secure means of sending messages. In one case fewer than a dozen images were found; in another, 40,000.”
Again. Ew.
Sick bastages. I don’t have any kids of my own, but if anyone tried anything like that with my friends kids, or the child I sponsor down in Brazil, they’d regret it.
re: #22 by livefreeor die
A young man who left izlam said that while his uncle was using him sexually something about gay marriage came on the radio and his uncle flew into a rage over it. Maybe they are born without a hypocrisy detector?
…dhimmis who pay the jizya, dhimmis who don’t pay the jizya, American servicemen, Americans, anyone in an American building, people who object to muslims having nukes, people who object to being nuked by muslims, people muslims just want to nuke, prostitutes, people who use prostitutes without getting a three-hour marriage first, homosexuals, homosexual prostitutes, people who use homosexual prostitutes, Barney Frank…
33. mjazz
“I don’t want to marry ‘em. I just want to f*** ‘em.”
I read about this a while ago.
I guess pedophiles have spent a lot of time and money creating super-secret chat rooms that are difficult to trace and infiltrate.
Gee, I wonder how the jihadis first stumbled across their sicko sites, then? It must have been a lucky accident.
/
O.T., but good news on round 1 of the Obambacare debate.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34072
re: #22 by livefreeor die
I know in some cultures the one iniating is okay but the one recieving is seen as demeaning himself. Maybe the same holds true here.
Or maybe it’s allowable with children but not with adults?
Damn, the whole situation is messed up beyond belief.
36. Josephine
FTFY
37. mfhorn
I think we’re well past round 1.
re: #39 by JamesTKirk
Blech. Brain bleach needed. Blechy blechy blech blech.
“Yes, I like ewe,” he said sheepishly.
Look at the bright side; if we can’t bust them on terrorism charges, we’ll get them on kiddie porn.
Did Queeg get a new crack pipe? He’s ranting like a frothing idiot about how CO2 hasn’t been this high in 15 million years.
And this means precisely what, Queegs?
re: #24 by JamesTKirk
What about people named Dave?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmQRmHgExV0
re: #43 by snork
…and he was on he other side of the argument only a couple of years ago. Either he was wrong then, or wrong now.
re: #43 by snork
And the water level was 120 feet higher!
41. Josephine
Don’t forget the mental floss.
re: #45 by calcajun
I don’t get the argument. This has got what to do with what? It was higher in the past, therefore his strawberries are missing?
How much CO2 is produced by his ranting?
re: #46 by waldensianspirit
Things had to become ‘climate change’ since it was ‘a new ice age’ in the mid 70’s, AlGore’s hysteria over ‘global warming’ in the early 00’s, and I just saw something in the last week or so about… a new ice age!
re: #49 by JamesTKirk
Competes with:
http://images.google.com/images?q=baked+beans&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi
Ice age, global warming, ice age, global warming…
Can’t they come up with something new, like “If you don’t let us impose a 40% VAT and confiscate your cars and guns, giant mutant space-goats from Jupiter will eat the entire planet Earth!”
“…in less than 50 days, guv’na!”
Re: #49
And we all know who’s fault that is, amirite?
re: #52 by JamesTKirk
Well, shit. Only 50 days, eh? Might as well party; the globe goes up in a ball of fire when Santa’s supposed to come.
The stores will have a good Christmas season this year. Too bad they won’t be around to enjoy it next year.
re: #47 by JamesTKirk
Now, that conjures up an image.
Found a clip of LVQ talking AGW!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXod1JglqdU
Night, folks. Be safe.
Night. I’m gone too.
re: #56 by waldensianspirit
Where’s the smoke? There’s supposed to be smoke!
re: #59 by snork
Isn’t the smell bad enough?!
re: #60 by Lost
It’s not Ludwig, if he’s not blowing smoke up your ass.
Here’s a hockey stick for the climate genius.
re: #60 by Lost
This is what I get for talking. Two children in diapers and both just filled them!
LOL.
re: #26 by snork
I didn’t see one in drafts, or scheduled. And he didn’t email one around.
I’d say it’s pretty safe for me to create one.
~:)
re: #33 by mjazz
That isn’t homosexuality. It’s pederasty. Evidently, that’s a-otay.
re: #43 by snork
I just saw a British ad on O’Reilly that shows a guy reading to his little girl out of a kids book and it shows all the animals drowning because of the CO2 the grownups were putting into the air. At one point O’Reilly is laughing saying “that kid’s going to be traumatized for life.” Taken out of context it could show what a mean dude he is.
re: #39 by JamesTKirk
And they thought I was weird when I made fun of someone beginning a post with “Shit fist” the other night.
Islamodouchebags using child porn to communicate? No surprise here, given Uncle Mo’s marrying a SIX year old child. He did wait until she was 9 to “consumate” the marriage, though. What a paragon of virtue, eh?
By the way, my first post at LGF2, so a big howdy to The Legions Of The Banned. I never registered at LGF so I’ll never be one of you honored folks.
You never know when Islamists will reach for a new bottom.
re: #69 by Proud Infidel
WELCOME to The Blogmocracy!
Great to have you, enjoy the fresh air. Share the cotton candy.
Enjoy the laurel.