~Open Thread: Monday “Guernica” Edition~

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

296 Responses to “~Open Thread: Monday “Guernica” Edition~”
( jump to bottom )

  1. typicalwhitey
    1 | October 19, 2009 12:00 pm

    Is that a jazz guitarist?


  2. 2 | October 19, 2009 12:00 pm

    Again….Obama betrays Israel.

    Obama Won’t Veto Goldstone Report

    http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1121713.html


  3. typicalwhitey
    3 | October 19, 2009 12:04 pm

    re: #2 by WrathofG-d

    Didn’t he win most of the Jewish vote in the election?
    Why?


  4. snork
    4 | October 19, 2009 12:06 pm

    I think that’s a dingbat, jonesing for a ding…

    ***precious***


  5. Bumr50
    5 | October 19, 2009 12:08 pm

    I’m going to stay on your thread Wrath!

    I enjoyed the piece – sort of. I’d like to give our lead some Motrin though.


  6. Speranza
    6 | October 19, 2009 12:09 pm

    I posted this on Rodan’s thread but it deserves repeating.

    Two new threads within 5 minutes of each other. We need better coordination.


  7. vagabond trader
    7 | October 19, 2009 12:14 pm

    re: #3 by typicalwhitey

    About 74%.

    **spit**


  8. 8 | October 19, 2009 12:14 pm

    re: #3 by typicalwhitey

    Because people (Jewish and otherwise) believed the hype.

    Also, many Jews are confused on the term “Pro-Israel”.


  9. vagabond trader
    9 | October 19, 2009 12:23 pm

    re: #8 by WrathofG-d

    52% of Americans were willfully ignorant. Any Jew who is ok with the “church” Barry attended for 20 years needs their head examined.


  10. snork
    10 | October 19, 2009 12:23 pm

    Some people are just too dumb to pretend to blog at real science sites (taken from ClimateAudit):

    xxxxxxx xxxxxxx:
    October 19th, 2009 at 2:55 am

    Daily oil production was 74,298,000 bbs in May of 2005. It has not been that high again in the following 4+ years. Some people think we have already passed peak oil production and will never again produce at that rate.

    F me. Is it too much to ask people to know the difference between capacity and demand???


  11. snork
    11 | October 19, 2009 2:09 pm

    nok nok…


  12. vagabond trader
    12 | October 19, 2009 2:10 pm

    re: #11 by snork

    Who dere?


  13. Flyovercountry
    13 | October 19, 2009 2:14 pm

    re: #3 by typicalwhitey

    A bunch of us Jewish Conservatives were discussing that here just the other day. I don’t know how or why, but I suspect it has to do with political momentum more than anything else. All I can tell you is that family get togethers are hard sometimes. My family members will make some comment dripping with BDS, and before I have a chance to breath, they all scream in unison, Shut up John. It is maddening. It also hurts that the Jewish Religion stands for most everything in the conservative movement today. Hopefully, my relatives will wake up for 2010, and 2012.


  14. Iron Fist
    14 | October 19, 2009 2:14 pm

    re: #10 by snork

    Damn, man, pickey, pickey. Capacity, demand, production, oh, my! domestic production, damn, these are confusing! OMG!! Ponies!!11ty!! Barack Hussein Obama MMM, MMM, MMMM. Barack Hussein Obama!!! 11ty!!


  15. snork
    15 | October 19, 2009 2:15 pm

    re: #12 by vagabond trader

    This thing on?


  16. 16 | October 19, 2009 2:19 pm

    Israeli-Muslim Indicted For Throwing Molotov at Jews in Silwan on Yom Kippur

    If you want to try to understand the twisted logic of an Arab-Israeli, and why they “must” attack Jews, read the following- the second paragraph of the article.

    According to the indictment, which was submitted by Attorney Shmuel Herbest, the motive behind the incident was the sale of the Kak family home to a group of Jews in 2003 by the Mohammad Kak’s father. Kak reportedly was embittered towards his father for the sale and towards the residents of the house and decided to target them on Yom Kippur.

    Get that? The Israeli-Muslim attempted to commit arson against Jews, because their own Muslim father sold property to the Jews back in 2003. (six years ago) Of course, being of the overwhelming sensitivity of Islamists towards other religious, the ROP waited to attack the Jews on their holiest day of the year.

    Now the article:

    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3792281,00.html


  17. snork
    17 | October 19, 2009 2:21 pm

    Meanwhile at ClimateAudit, another alarmist steps on his dick:

    http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=7374

    If Steve really wants to invalidate the Yamal chronology, he would have to find another set of cores that also gave good correlation with the instrument record, but indicated a previous climate comparable or warmer than that seen today.

    So Steve proceeds to do just that, and the result is a graph with an even warmer WMP.

    D’oh!


  18. 18 | October 19, 2009 2:26 pm

    Are We Fighting a “cold war” Against Iran?
    (maybe Obama isn’t as big as an idiot as we all though?)

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133939

    Hamas To Kids: Learn English & Hebrew, the Languages of your ENEMIES.
    (ahhhhhh, the future peace makers. Remember when Israel left Gaza for peace, ethnicly cleansing it of anything Jewish? Wow, how did that work out? Let’s do it again in Judea/Samaria)

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133918

    PA Arabs Using Israelis Humanitarian Easing of Restrictions For “Olive Harvest” To Commit Attacks On Jews
    (this is also a big activity/thing for the ISM)

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133937


  19. Iron Fist
    19 | October 19, 2009 2:29 pm

    re: #16 by WrathofG-d

    [DELETED]

    You wouldn’t have really liked what that post made me write. It involved high energy partical physics and Mecca, and combining those two is always enlightening to all the nations.

    I had to hide the thought or peace might break out. But only after the high-energy physics event…


  20. 20 | October 19, 2009 2:34 pm

    re: #19 by Iron Fist

    I am not too much of a fan of the Israeli-Muslims/Arabs. Too often they as a group (of course there are great Israeli-Arabs) cause too much trouble, and are a threat to Jews.

    I don’t see a need to nuke mecca, but a peaceful separation between the Jews and the Muslims would be acceptable.

    I should emphasize that this was in Silwan, in Jerusalem, ISRAEL (an Israeli-Arab/Muslim town however)


  21. bellamags
    21 | October 19, 2009 2:39 pm

    re: #19 by Iron Fist

    he he he…

    Hey everyone. Today has turned out to be a pretty good day. Its beautiful outside, cool, sunshine, low humidity good hair day, half day of work, shopped online, screwing around on 2.0, what could be better? (a steaming mug of hot chocolate would be better actually.)


  22. typicalwhitey
    22 | October 19, 2009 2:41 pm

    re: #21 by bellamags

    Hi Bella!!


  23. 23 | October 19, 2009 2:42 pm

    ….another environmentally forward invention by Israel that will be ignored by the blinder’d Anti-Israeli International left.

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/133913


  24. song_and_dance_man
    24 | October 19, 2009 2:46 pm

    Well that was a strange vid. Was that Halibut man the missing link?


  25. 25 | October 19, 2009 2:46 pm

    Just Another Way Obama Is “Going Green” – Feds To Issue New Medical Marijuana Policy

    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20091019/D9BE5D2G0.html

    (thread worthy?)


  26. bellamags
    26 | October 19, 2009 2:47 pm

    re: #22 by typicalwhitey

    Hey typicalwhitey… You know what I remember most about you from the other place…? Being online the night of the election and we were crying together. (and Kilgore Trout was gloating)


  27. 27 | October 19, 2009 2:50 pm

    YOUR WHITE HOUSE

    Sotamayor Admits That White House Even Picked Out Her Clothing.

    http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/politics/Justice-Sotomayor-says-White-House-Left-Nothing-to-Chance-64724512.html

    White House boasts: We ‘control’ news media

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=113347


  28. song_and_dance_man
    28 | October 19, 2009 2:52 pm

    re: #26 by bellamags

    I was banned before the election and so missed all that. Too bad. I would have had much to input on that conversation.


  29. 29 | October 19, 2009 2:57 pm

    Italian dictator Benito Mussolini was once on the payroll of British Intelligence?

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091014/od_nm/us_mussolini;_ylt=Ahw5Zpp64GZvo61XeDuYtKjtiBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTJoMG9uMTFkBGFzc2V0A25tLzIwMDkxMDE0L3VzX211c3NvbGluaQRwb3MDOARzZWMDeW5fYXJ0aWNsZV9zdW1tYXJ5X2xpc3QEc2xrA2hvd211c3NvbGluaQ–

    The mainstream evolution-theory scholar who fell in love and now believes that we’re all controlled by shape-shifting reptilian

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20091018/od_notw/nwx091018xml


  30. Iron Fist
    30 | October 19, 2009 2:58 pm

    re: #20 by WrathofG-d

    If the problem is Islam (and Mohammedans have gone far out of their way to convince me that it is) vaporizing Islam’s so-called Holiest city seems to take the enemy out in one quick blow. Allah ain’t god,Mohamhead ain’t his profit, because we just nuked hiscapital city on earth, blowing up his space rock and pissing off mohammedans all over the world. Tough shit for them. We’ve just demonstrated that their alledged god is impotent. If he couldn’t stop Mecca from getting nuked, he ain’t going to be producing the celestial babes for the ’splodeydopes, either. Oops. Major FAIL, Mohammedans.

    Shake something up. Whatever else happened, I dare say that Palestinian-Israeli conflict is no longer top of Mohammedan’s priorities.


  31. taxfreekiller
    31 | October 19, 2009 2:58 pm

    The climate change feek-out at lgf’s 1.0
    knows no limits,, off the charts, off the mark,
    mad as hatters, borg cult, and more.

    Each thread that goes up freetoken, iceweasle and Ludwidgvonquackquack go on a one up over
    the hill post after the other, end times X’s 1,000.

    All of it urged on by head dunce king Charles.

    If they belive any of that trash, how the hell do they go to sleep and expect to wake up any thing but 200 feet under water and dead from drowning.

    not even smart enough to be kooks… IMO


  32. song_and_dance_man
    32 | October 19, 2009 3:00 pm

    re: #27 by WrathofG-d

    White House boasts: We ‘control’ news media

    They feel so entrenched and safe in their role to socialize America it appears they have no problem admitting what we knew all along.


  33. NoThreat2U
    33 | October 19, 2009 3:01 pm

    If someone here sees Goddess before I do, could you please have her add my stepson to the prayer list. he is leaving for A-stan on Saturday. Thanks guys : )


  34. bellamags
    34 | October 19, 2009 3:01 pm

    re: #28 by song_and_dance_man

    http://afrocityblog.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/accentuate-the-positive-eliminate-the-negative-and-blame-the-rest-on-bush/crazy-obot/

    We were all telling him to go *uck himself..

    I recently saw the above image on ALS – Afrocity’s blog and immediately thought of him and how he must have looked on election night.


  35. song_and_dance_man
    35 | October 19, 2009 3:01 pm

    re: #31 by taxfreekiller

    Is that a hook in their mouths I see, and a line and a sinker?


  36. LGoPs
    36 | October 19, 2009 3:02 pm

    re: #31 by taxfreekiller

    I don’t get too worked up over Global Warming because the world is going to end in 2012 anyway.

    Hell, I’m going to run my credit cards up to their limit and live large…….

    Heh.
    /


  37. 37 | October 19, 2009 3:05 pm

    re: #32 by song_and_dance_man

    Who watches the watchmen?


  38. Nevergiveup
    38 | October 19, 2009 3:07 pm

    re: #37 by WrathofG-d

    We do


  39. song_and_dance_man
    39 | October 19, 2009 3:08 pm

    re: #34 by bellamags

    Ha. He went from cello to the pipe.


  40. 40 | October 19, 2009 3:09 pm

    re: #38 by Nevergiveup

    If we were even able to vote out horrible politicians then I might still believe that.

    Nancy Pelosi only has a 34% approval rating, yet is 3rd in line to be POTUS, and I assume will not lose her seat in her next election.

    There was a silent coup; we were sleeping.

    Right & Left are to blame!


  41. vagabond trader
    41 | October 19, 2009 3:10 pm

    re: #31 by taxfreekiller

    LOL!


  42. Nevergiveup
    42 | October 19, 2009 3:10 pm

    re: #40 by WrathofG-d

    I was awake but surrounded by morons


  43. song_and_dance_man
    43 | October 19, 2009 3:11 pm

    re: #37 by WrathofG-d

    Ditto what Never said.


  44. 44 | October 19, 2009 3:11 pm

    re: #37 by WrathofG-d

    We do. WE MUST.


  45. Iron Fist
    45 | October 19, 2009 3:13 pm

    Hey, do you think the White House goal for their war with Fox involves victory? No V-word for A-stan, but V-word v. Fox?


  46. RIX
    46 | October 19, 2009 3:17 pm

    re: #36 by LGoPs

    A guy posting as Captain America over at LGF made a fair observation , that there has been glacial melting in episodes over millions of years without CO2.
    Ludwig chiped in, “Wrong thinking, this one is CO 2 Driven.”
    Really, why?


  47. LGoPs
    47 | October 19, 2009 3:17 pm

    re: #45 by Iron Fist

    Good point. Libs can only get their testosterone up when fighting us eeeevil conservatives.

    When it comes to fighting real enemies they’re all a bunch of pussies.


  48. 48 | October 19, 2009 3:18 pm

    OT (even for an open)

    Haim Moshe – TODA

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69BYnseEiKA&feature=PlayList&p=E529A163893244E1&index=17

    Everybody sababa!


  49. bellamags
    49 | October 19, 2009 3:18 pm

    re: #45 by Iron Fist

    Is the white house completely oblivious to the sheer numbers of people that watch Fox? What will really happen if they shut that news organization down?


  50. typicalwhitey
    50 | October 19, 2009 3:18 pm

    re: #26 by bellamags

    I remember.
    I just could not believe it!

    I am so glad to find you again!


  51. 51 | October 19, 2009 3:19 pm

    re: #45 by Iron Fist

    Without Fox news…who would call out this (or any other D) Administration?


  52. LGoPs
    52 | October 19, 2009 3:19 pm

    re: #46 by RIX

    Because Ludwig says so, that’s why.

    Which is also the reason that I think exactly the opposite……


  53. Nikis Knight
    53 | October 19, 2009 3:20 pm

    re: #46 by RIX

    More like, “So what?” It doesn’t matter why, if the temp goes up, it’ll have similar effects to warm periods before, i.e., not the end of the world.


  54. typicalwhitey
    54 | October 19, 2009 3:20 pm

    re: #33 by NoThreat2U

    No thank you.
    And your son!


  55. bellamags
    55 | October 19, 2009 3:21 pm

    re: #50 by typicalwhitey

    Me too – you were one of my faves. Always made me laugh.


  56. IslandLibertarian
    56 | October 19, 2009 3:22 pm

    A riddle:
    If the total area of land: 57,268,900 square miles (148,326,000 km²), equals 29% of the total surface of the Earth, and the total area of water: 139,668,500 square miles (361,740,000 km²), equals 71% of the total surface of the Earth, how much water would it take to raise the ocean levels 200 feet, AND, WHERE THE FUCK IS ALL THAT WATER? In all the ice and snow on 29% of the earth surface?


  57. typicalwhitey
    57 | October 19, 2009 3:22 pm

    re: #34 by bellamags

    I also remember posting about 9/11 and what happened to my nephew.
    I never told you thanks for listening…but thanks for listening.


  58. Iron Fist
    58 | October 19, 2009 3:23 pm

    re: #49 by bellamags

    For people who are supposed to be so damned smart, Democrats sometimes do the absolute dumbest things. This would appear to be a case in point.


  59. Nevergiveup
    59 | October 19, 2009 3:24 pm

    re: #58 by Iron Fist

    You’d think so wouldn’t you?


  60. typicalwhitey
    60 | October 19, 2009 3:24 pm

    re: #55 by bellamags

    Remember when I changed my nic to typicalwhitey? An admitted sockpuppet but the name was so great that he let me do it LOL


  61. NoThreat2U
    61 | October 19, 2009 3:24 pm

    ((((((typicalwhitey)))))


  62. bellamags
    62 | October 19, 2009 3:25 pm

    re: #57 by typicalwhitey

    No need to thank me – but you’re welcome. ; )


  63. Nikis Knight
    63 | October 19, 2009 3:25 pm

    re: #36 by LGoPs

    I was wondering the other day what would happen if there was some demonstrable proof that the world would end in some short period of time (massive asteroid or such), like 1 month or something. Many people would likely quit their jobs and try to enjoy their last days; unfortunately, there would be no one working in restaurants, shipping, gas stations, grocery stores, sewage treatment, etc. ’cause they’d all have the same thought. Might be a few heroes in law enforcement, but not enough.

    I wonder at what point, though, if the disaster was going to happen we would see a semblance of civilization remain. 2 years? 10?

    Any way, just an idle though you reminded me of.


  64. RIX
    64 | October 19, 2009 3:27 pm

    re: #52 by LGoPs

    re: #53 by Nikis Knight

    As I see it , the Earth warms & cools in cycles, the evidence is clear.
    The planet has always done rhat before man entered the scene & will continue after we are gone.
    Do we conribute? Probably to a degree, but an inconsequential degree.
    What I do resent is pseudo-scientists like Chuckie & this Ludwig guy screamibng & demanding acceptance of their view.
    Boys, the Earth isn’t flat cause you say so.


  65. Rightside
    65 | October 19, 2009 3:27 pm

    re: #49 by bellamags

    a one term president, and a new republican majority in both houses of congress.


  66. song_and_dance_man
    66 | October 19, 2009 3:27 pm

    re: #47 by LGoPs

    It’s more than that. They see our enemies engaged in the same struggle. To dominate and control the humanity they govern.


  67. typicalwhitey
    67 | October 19, 2009 3:28 pm

    re: #58 by Iron Fist

    I honestly believe that they have too many “advisors” who are telling them that trying to marginalize Fox will convince people that they are just a tool of the dreaded Republicans.

    They absolutely do not believe that independents and dems watch it also.

    I believe when you get in the “zone” you have too hard of a time seeing anything else.

    If I were ever elected President, one of my czars would be my Dad. He wouldn’t hesitate to tell me to straighten my act up and quit acting like an idiot.


  68. Nevergiveup
    68 | October 19, 2009 3:28 pm

    re: #63 by Nikis Knight

    As soon as the end is announced it will be dog eat dog and every man for himself. Stock up on the ammo and kiss your ass good bye.


  69. bellamags
    69 | October 19, 2009 3:30 pm

    re: #60 by typicalwhitey

    vaguely..what was it before?


  70. Nevergiveup
    70 | October 19, 2009 3:31 pm

    And the end is near. Angels just tied up the Yanks at 3 in the 6th


  71. typicalwhitey
    71 | October 19, 2009 3:32 pm

    re: #61 by NoThreat2U

    Hey how are you?!?!


  72. Nevergiveup
    72 | October 19, 2009 3:33 pm

    The parents of an Eagle Scout who was suspended from his upstate New York high school for a month over a 2-inch pocketknife he kept locked in his car have retained a lawyer to appeal their school district’s zero-tolerance policies and demand that their son’s record be cleared.

    Education lawyer Victor DeBonis is working pro bono for the family of 17-year-old Matthew Whalen, who has been banned from Lansingburgh High School for 20 school days.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,568572,00.html

    Kudos to Education lawyer Victor DeBonis and good luck


  73. snork
    74 | October 19, 2009 3:35 pm

    re: #52 by LGoPs

    Yesterday, Ludwig admitted to being a female psychology freshman having a tryst with asswhistle.


  74. song_and_dance_man
    75 | October 19, 2009 3:35 pm

    re: #73 by bellamags

    It sounds like child abuse to me.


  75. bellamags
    76 | October 19, 2009 3:36 pm

    re: #75 by song_and_dance_man

    my thoughts exactly.


  76. typicalwhitey
    77 | October 19, 2009 3:36 pm

    re: #69 by bellamags

    ArmyAunt


  77. typicalwhitey
    78 | October 19, 2009 3:37 pm

    re: #69 by bellamags

    ArmyAunt

    But I HAD to change it when O called his grandmother a typical white person LOL


  78. 79 | October 19, 2009 3:37 pm

    re: #73 by bellamags

    Ok, that is odd. Interesting that the “doctor” states that he is sure that no one is writing them on the kids skin, but can’t tell you how they get there.


  79. RIX
    80 | October 19, 2009 3:40 pm

    re: #79 by WrathofG-d

    Wait! What if Allah Is the true god & Islam is the answer?
    Nah, I’m just efen with ya.


  80. typicalwhitey
    81 | October 19, 2009 3:40 pm

    Does anyone think this is racist?

    There is a saying that the Jews who are wealthy got that way not by watching dollars, but instead by taking care of the pennies and the dollars taking care of themselves. By not using earmarks to fund projects for South Carolina and instead using actual bills, DeMint is watching our nation’s pennies and trying to preserve our country’s wealth and our economy’s viability to give all an opportunity to succeed


  81. BuddyG
    82 | October 19, 2009 3:41 pm

    Octomatics

    Nifty numbering system with new symbols


  82. bellamags
    83 | October 19, 2009 3:41 pm

    re: #77 by typicalwhitey

    I don’t remember that too well. That was a good nic, but I totally like typicalwhitey the best. Keeps that “typical white person” BS in the front of the mind.


  83. song_and_dance_man
    84 | October 19, 2009 3:42 pm

    re: #79 by WrathofG-d

    Unless others have witnessed the writing appearing as it happens I call BS. This child is being abused and is another balloon boy.


  84. IslandLibertarian
    85 | October 19, 2009 3:42 pm

    re: #76 by bellamags

    Didn’t words appear on Regans body, along with the pea-soup puking and the head spinning?

    /speshul efecks!


  85. typicalwhitey
    86 | October 19, 2009 3:43 pm

    re: #83 by bellamags

    I didn’t have it very long.


  86. RIX
    87 | October 19, 2009 3:43 pm

    re: #81 by typicalwhitey

    Well they sure do over at the landfiil.
    They are imlying that DEDmint is guilty, although he said nothing.
    I do hope that the guy who said it is Jewish.
    Anybody know?


  87. song_and_dance_man
    88 | October 19, 2009 3:43 pm

    re: #82 by BuddyG

    It reminds me of Predator symbols.


  88. waldensianspirit
    89 | October 19, 2009 3:44 pm

    re: #80 by RIX
    My al-Dajjal shall kick his ass!


  89. RIX
    90 | October 19, 2009 3:46 pm

    re: #89 by waldensianspirit

    How can Allah & Obama be god at the same time?
    One of them is a fraud.


  90. Eliana
    91 | October 19, 2009 3:46 pm

    re: #27 by WrathofG-d

    White House boasts: We ‘control’ news media

    What they’re admitting is that most of America’s media has become an ole Soviet-style Pravda Collective.

    When they say that Fox News is not a real news network, what they’re really telling us is that Fox is the only real news network left.

    This has a lot to do with why Fox News is so popular.


  91. song_and_dance_man
    92 | October 19, 2009 3:46 pm

    re: #81 by typicalwhitey

    It sounds racist to me ala penny pinching?


  92. bellamags
    93 | October 19, 2009 3:47 pm

    re: #84 by song_and_dance_man

    re: #85 by IslandLibertarian

    I think it is also another balloon boy incident. The article was taken from The Sun which is the British equivalent to The Enquirer. The scary thing about it is the ignorant people who will believe it and further encourage the parents reprehensible behavior.


  93. waldensianspirit
    94 | October 19, 2009 3:47 pm

    Hey folks. It wasn’t that profound that you needed to pause so long in posting.


  94. waldensianspirit
    95 | October 19, 2009 3:47 pm

    re: #90 by RIX

    Ever hear of Mini-me?


  95. song_and_dance_man
    96 | October 19, 2009 3:48 pm

    re: #89 by waldensianspirit

    With the help of the jinns.


  96. BuddyG
    97 | October 19, 2009 3:48 pm

    re: #88 by song_and_dance_man

    Yunno, in a real fight, I think that Predator would kick Alien’s ass.


  97. bellamags
    98 | October 19, 2009 3:50 pm

    re: #88 by song_and_dance_man

    Totally one of my favorite movies ever. Do you know who played the predator?


  98. 99 | October 19, 2009 3:52 pm

    re: #84 by song_and_dance_man

    My thoughts exactly.

    re: #91 by Eliana

    I really don’t have much of an opinion of whether Fox news is right or not, but what I do know is that at this point where we are Fox News is necessary. Without it, we are stuck with the “controlled’ media only.


  99. RIX
    100 | October 19, 2009 3:52 pm

    re: #91 by Eliana

    Imo the White House is making a serious mistake regarding FNC.
    On the one hand they insult the intellect of FNC viewers.
    On the other hand they make it forbidden fruit to those who don’t watch & will go there.
    Seriously, how many started lurking over here & eventually registered because CJ would not stop whining?


  100. waldensianspirit
    101 | October 19, 2009 3:53 pm

    I did some illegal penny pinching as a kid. Railroad tracks are great for it.


  101. BuddyG
    102 | October 19, 2009 3:53 pm

    re: #98 by bellamags

    Oprah Winfrey ?


  102. RIX
    103 | October 19, 2009 3:54 pm

    re: #95 by waldensianspirit

    Ok, but who is the real deal & who is the junior deity?


  103. song_and_dance_man
    104 | October 19, 2009 3:56 pm

    re: #97 by BuddyG

    Ha. That reminds me of the scene in Stand by me where the kids were arguing over who would win in a fight between Superman and Mighty Mouse. The conclusion was Superman was a real guy.


  104. typicalwhitey
    105 | October 19, 2009 3:56 pm

    re: #100 by RIX

    You know what Rix? You are very correct on this.
    I found this site because I saw it referred to on 1.0


  105. song_and_dance_man
    106 | October 19, 2009 3:57 pm

    re: #98 by bellamagss

    I don’t know but I’m sure it can be googled.


  106. waldensianspirit
    107 | October 19, 2009 3:57 pm

    re: #103 by RIX

    Now you’ve reached the tough questions


  107. song_and_dance_man
    108 | October 19, 2009 3:58 pm

    re: #100 by RIX

    As Rodan likes to say. 1.0 is our best recruiter.


  108. bellamags
    109 | October 19, 2009 3:59 pm

    re: #100 by RIX

    The Obama administration is making a huge mistake I agree with you.

    Obama has never been criticized, EVER. He can’t handle it and his cronies circle the wagons to protect their Messiah. Makes me effing sick.


  109. song_and_dance_man
    110 | October 19, 2009 3:59 pm

    re: #102 by BuddyG

    Ha. More like Whoopi Goldberg.


  110. bellamags
    111 | October 19, 2009 3:59 pm

    re: #106 by song_and_dance_man

    Jean Claude Van Damme. (sp?)


  111. RIX
    112 | October 19, 2009 4:00 pm

    re: #105 by typicalwhitey

    I think that is true for a lot of us.
    CJ’s comments & those of his minions were so over the top that I had to see for myself.
    I discovered that the people that I like & enjoy are here,.


  112. Eliana
    113 | October 19, 2009 4:00 pm

    re: #100 by RIX

    Imo the White House is making a serious mistake regarding FNC.
    On the one hand they insult the intellect of FNC viewers.
    On the other hand they make it forbidden fruit to those who don’t watch & will go there.
    Seriously, how many started lurking over here & eventually registered because CJ would not stop whining?

    If not for CJ, I wouldn’t know about this place OR about Glenn Beck. Last year, I had no idea who Glenn Beck was (aside from a hilarious Obama National Anthem song that he’d released on YouTube). I don’t watch CNN so I’d never seen him and I’d never heard much about him.

    Then CJ started freaking out about Glenn Beck and I started watching Beck on Fox. The advertiser boycott episode also brought Beck a much bigger audience.

    It took some time one evening to find Blogmocracy after watching CJ whining about it.

    Liberals have no idea how much they help us sometimes when they whine.

    Glenn Beck presents the Obama National Anthem


  113. BuddyG
    114 | October 19, 2009 4:00 pm

    re: #104 by song_and_dance_man

    Alien vs Predator

    Superman vs Mighty Mouse

    Obama vs FoxNews


  114. bellamags
    115 | October 19, 2009 4:01 pm

    re: #111 by bellamags

    Oh never mind, he was fired. I probably should have googled that myself. damn, sorry.


  115. RIX
    116 | October 19, 2009 4:01 pm

    re: #109 by bellamags

    Bho has a thin skin, but propping up FNC & that is what he is inadvertently doing is a mistake.


  116. song_and_dance_man
    117 | October 19, 2009 4:02 pm

    re: #111 by bellamags

    Now that is interesting. I rarely look at the credits for flicks but next time I watch it I will be looking.


  117. RIX
    118 | October 19, 2009 4:02 pm

    See ya!


  118. typicalwhitey
    119 | October 19, 2009 4:03 pm

    re: #109 by bellamags

    Obama believes if he just SAYS something, everyone will believe him.

    Because that is what has happened his whole life!


  119. bellamags
    120 | October 19, 2009 4:05 pm

    re: #119 by typicalwhitey

    poster boy for affirmative action


  120. CloudyDay
    121 | October 19, 2009 4:08 pm

    OT/ Pentagon man arrested on Israel spy attempt charge

    Scientist charged with improperly passing on classified information

    What Did The Moon Scientist Spy Tell The Israelis? Some Clues

    Scientist who worked for gov’t accused of spying

    A Maryland scientist who worked for the Defense Department, a White House space council and other agencies was arrested Monday on charges of passing along classified information to an undercover FBI agent he believed was an Israeli intelligence officer.

    Stewart David Nozette, 52, of Chevy Chase, was charged in a criminal complaint with attempting to communicate, deliver and transmit classified information, the Justice Department said. The complaint does not allege that the government of Israel or anyone acting on its behalf violated U.S. law.

    Nozette was arrested by FBI agents.


  121. Carolina Girl
    122 | October 19, 2009 4:09 pm

    re: #32 by song_and_dance_man

    It does give one pause as to just how the “media” will react to being told outright they’re a bunch of stooges for the government of Zero and the Donks.

    At least Larry, Moe and Curley were entertaining.


  122. bellamags
    123 | October 19, 2009 4:10 pm

    re: #117 by song_and_dance_man

    I was incorrect. After you said google, I did. He started off the part but was fired. I have believed that for 20 years. That blows.


  123. mawskrat
    124 | October 19, 2009 4:11 pm

    Large Hadron Collider ‘Being Sabotaged from the Future’
    ……………………………………….

    Scientists claim the giant atom-smashing Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being jinxed from the future to save the world.

    In a bizarre sci-fi theory, Danish physicist Dr Holger Bech Nielsen and Dr Masao Ninomiya from Japan claim nature is trying to prevent the LHC from finding the elusive Higgs boson. Called the “God particle,” the theoretical boson could explain the origins of mass in the universe — if physicists can find the darn thing.
    ………………………………….

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,568528,00.html?test=latestnews


  124. 125 | October 19, 2009 4:12 pm

    re: #81 by typicalwhitey

    Racist? Seems like good sense.

    Oh, Typicalwhitey, enjoy som music from the Average White Band

    Good stuff 8)


  125. song_and_dance_man
    126 | October 19, 2009 4:12 pm

    re: #122 by Carolina Girl

    I’m inclined to think they accept and cherish the role. They are on the same team after all.


  126. song_and_dance_man
    127 | October 19, 2009 4:12 pm

    Well the kitchen and my sons tummy beckons. BBL


  127. BuddyG
    128 | October 19, 2009 4:14 pm

    O.T.

    From Russia with Love


  128. waldensianspirit
    129 | October 19, 2009 4:14 pm

    re: #124 by mawskrat

    Great drama!

    /scaling to the LHC dimensions wouldn’t have anything to do with it.


  129. 130 | October 19, 2009 4:15 pm

    re: #113 by Eliana

    It’s called “the Law of Unintended Concequences”.


  130. typicalwhitey
    131 | October 19, 2009 4:19 pm

    re: #125 by MacDuff

    Thats what I thought too Mac.
    And thanks for the link :)


  131. typicalwhitey
    132 | October 19, 2009 4:19 pm

    Bass player is yummy!


  132. snork
    133 | October 19, 2009 4:20 pm

    I’m surprised this didn’t get eleventy downdings:

    69 SixDegrees Mon, Oct 19, 2009 1:55:12pm

    [Pedant Mode On]

    Charles – statements like

    in the past two years the extent of the polar icecap has reached its lowest points in history by a very large margin

    ought to be avoided. For one thing, this statement is incorrect – the current ice sheets covering both the north and south polar regions are relatively recent phenomena that have not always been present in the past, and have varied widely in size. The northern ice sheet only seems to be about 5 million years old, and plant fossils have been found in both Greenland and Antarctica demonstrating their past, more temperate climate. In more recent times, the northern ice sheet has changed dramatically in size, as little as 15,000 years ago covering most of North America and Europe. [Hyper-Pedant Mode On] Technically, there were several northern ice sheets separated by various features [Hyper Pedant Mode Off] but it’s more convenient and not horribly wrong to consider them as a single planetary “ice cap.”

    For another, it’s precisely this sort of absolutist statement that winds up causing all sorts of problems, a point which seems to be lost on Ludwig. It gives opposition a handy hook on which to hang objections when even the slightest discrepancy is noted. Saying “The climate models are totally right!” opens the door to those raising objections to point out statements by scientists saying “The new data suggests that heating is happening differently than models predict” as proof of inaccuracy or outright lying on the scientist’s part. And there’s some validity to this: climate models are, at best, capable only of statistical predictions, and are based on both incomplete data and on mathematical models of processes that are not completely understood. Making an absolute declaration that the models or anything else in science is certain beyond doubt is foolish and fundamentally unscientific. A quick look at similar absolutist statements from “consensus” scientists that emanated when Wegener introduced his theory of continental drift would be worthwhile; I’ll see if I can locate some.

    In the meantime, though, please be careful. You’ve already seen how a couple of demonstrably wrong statements – in the Limbaugh case – can wind up tainting everything else. The same is true here: accuracy is important, including accuracy over all timescales and about the limitations of climate modeling.

    [Pedant Mode Off]

    Short version: stop saying teh stupid. It makes you look dumb.

    Looks like there are still a few functioning neurons over there.


  133. mawskrat
    134 | October 19, 2009 4:21 pm

    re: #125 by MacDuff

    I have white trash tune for ya.lol

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0aqPjnrosA


  134. vagabond trader
    135 | October 19, 2009 4:23 pm

    As if we need another reason to oppose Gov healthcare.They already have our kids minds now they want their bodies.This is monstrous.

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=109450#


  135. snork
    136 | October 19, 2009 4:23 pm

    So two comments later, LVQ steps right in it:

    71 LudwigVanQuixote Mon, Oct 19, 2009 1:56:12pm

    [...]

    By the way, the assertions that you are making have been completely debunked. Orbital cycles are well understood. They have been conclusively ruled out as the driving factor.

    Hey Ludwig. Psst!!! ^^#69^^


  136. typicalwhitey
    137 | October 19, 2009 4:24 pm

    re: #133 by snork

    Has he been banned?
    Anyone see spacejesus posting over there? No?
    Hahaaha


  137. vagabond trader
    138 | October 19, 2009 4:25 pm

    re: #136 by snork

    Wiggie should go for a swim off a short pier into that 200 foot high surf.


  138. waldensianspirit
    139 | October 19, 2009 4:25 pm

    re: #133 by snork

    Well since ya wrote it;-)


  139. snork
    140 | October 19, 2009 4:26 pm

    Another one smells the BS:

    78 tradewind Mon, Oct 19, 2009 1:59:12pm

    re: #71 LudwigVanQuixote

    LVQ… with all due respect, your statements are invariably absolutely, positively imbued with the Voice of Climate Science Certainty… do you work for NOAA?


  140. typicalwhitey
    141 | October 19, 2009 4:27 pm

    Oh Walter…how ya gonna spin this one….

    If you don’t mind me asking a question, may I opine? You say that your atheism has everything to do with science. By definition, an atheist is someone who “denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.” May I ask how science has proven to you that God does not exist?


  141. snork
    142 | October 19, 2009 4:29 pm

    And right on cue, in the next comment, in full frontal blowhard mode:

    79 LudwigVanQuixote Mon, Oct 19, 2009 1:59:36pm

    re: #69 SixDegrees

    Scientist mode on.

    Please cut the crap. Obviously any statements about this are in reference to the current cycle. At that point Charles is accurate.

    As to the certainties of the science. Watch the video again. Just because you foolishly think that science never actually knows what it claims to know, does not make that the case.

    We know full well that the Earth orbits the sun. We know full well that anthropogenic causes are driving the current cycle. We know full well that the feedbacks are real. We know full well that if left unchanged this currently leads to a much different earth. We also know full well that this happened in the past, only this time we are doing it.

    Oh, lordy. Oh, lordy, lordy.


  142. 143 | October 19, 2009 4:29 pm

    re: #136 by snork

    God save us from these psuedo-scientific types! Back in the 60s and 70s society listend to “college students” as though they had the answer, that thinking has delivered us to where we are today.

    “Science” can be a false god, for it’s ever changing. There are few theories that were in vogue even 20-30 years ago that are still relevant.


  143. vagabond trader
    144 | October 19, 2009 4:30 pm

    re: #101 by waldensianspirit

    We used to do that too, great fun. Some other stuff too that thank G-d my parents never found out about.

    :D


  144. waldensianspirit
    145 | October 19, 2009 4:31 pm

    re: #142 by snork

    That is not the writings of a scientist


  145. buzzsawmonkey
    146 | October 19, 2009 4:31 pm

    re: #73 by bellamags

    I don’t understand why heavenly manifestations need to appear in tacos or slices of toast.

    I don’t understand why verses from the Koran need to appear on children’s skin or the scales of fish.

    Cheap vaudeville tricks trump the ever-present wonders of creation?


  146. waldensianspirit
    147 | October 19, 2009 4:32 pm

    re: #146 by buzzsawmonkey

    It’s a Baal thing


  147. 148 | October 19, 2009 4:32 pm

    re: #143 by MacDuff

    Hey didn’t you know? For the only intellectuals post 1960, science is god and hope is prayer.


  148. snork
    149 | October 19, 2009 4:33 pm

    I think LVQ is losing some of his cred:

    92 SixDegrees Mon, Oct 19, 2009 2:06:47pm

    re: #79 LudwigVanQuixote

    Thanks for providing an excellent example of precisely the sort of over-the-top non-answer I was talking about. You’ve successfully removed the “di-” from “discussion,” as is your habit.

    Please look up the definition of “abrasive asshole” and ponder it. You’re not doing your cause a single bit of good with an attitude like yours.

    When you’re done, maybe you could take the time to actually read what I’ve said, here and in the past, and note that I have never, even once, disagreed with your precious “science,” although whatever it is you’re practicing has little resemblance to the real thing. What I’ve consistently objected to is your incredibly arrogant, self-centered presentation of it and the self-defeating nature of such an approach.

    You can’t even recognize you allies anymore, staring at the world through a toilet paper tube.

    And that got 4 updings! Ladies and gentlemen, there is some evidence of intelligent life at 1.0. Stay tuned.


  149. Rule303
    150 | October 19, 2009 4:33 pm

    Never cared for Picasso or Dali myself.


  150. 151 | October 19, 2009 4:33 pm

    re: #141 by typicalwhitey

    The funny thing is that Albert Einstein, likely the greatest mind of the last 200 years was quite an introspective and spirtual man, and an avid believer in God.


  151. mawskrat
    152 | October 19, 2009 4:33 pm

    meanwhile…Back in the USA

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyBIfgj2jrY&feature=related

    ……………………………………….

    //I just don’t hink 50 cent can come close.lol


  152. 153 | October 19, 2009 4:34 pm

    re: #146 by buzzsawmonkey

    I have a few thoughts about vaudeville tricks and the Bible…but I think I’ll keep the few friends I have around here.


  153. buzzsawmonkey
    154 | October 19, 2009 4:34 pm

    re: #147 by waldensianspirit

    All I can say is, it’s a racket, Baal.


  154. Carolina Girl
    155 | October 19, 2009 4:34 pm

    I knew AGW was a bullsheet theory the minute they had to begin calling it “climate change” when the temperatures began to drop.

    Still wondering where all those Category 5 hurricanes Goracle was predicting went to. And let’s not forget Goracle saying we were going to burn up in 10 years – I think that ws 6 years ago.

    Do I believe we should recycle, that we should conserve resources where we can? Absolutely. Do I believe we should legislate behavior, mandate cars be unsafe due to CAFE standards, that order mercury laden light bulbs in homes? Absolutely not.


  155. snork
    156 | October 19, 2009 4:35 pm

    re: #145 by waldensianspirit

    Really?

    :P


  156. 157 | October 19, 2009 4:35 pm

    re: #150 by Rule303

    WHAT? You don’t like my Art?

    Get off my blog!

    /

    How about my music?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKky80QxR0Q&NR=1

    (wish I could find a better recording online)


  157. 158 | October 19, 2009 4:36 pm

    re: #148 by WrathofG-d

    Heh, well phrased, Wrath!


  158. snork
    159 | October 19, 2009 4:36 pm

    re: #151 by MacDuff

    Dr. Einstein was also a champion of skepticism.


  159. Rule303
    160 | October 19, 2009 4:36 pm

    re: #146 by buzzsawmonkey

    LOL. Indeed, preach Brother!


  160. Carolina Girl
    161 | October 19, 2009 4:36 pm

    re: #149 by snork

    And that got 4 updings! Ladies and gentlemen, there is some evidence of intelligent life at 1.0. Stay tuned.

    I wonder if the updings came from our sockpuppets lurking over there.


  161. waldensianspirit
    162 | October 19, 2009 4:38 pm

    re: #156 by snork

    The poor guy doesn’t know you can compute the orbit of the sun around the earth.


  162. typicalwhitey
    163 | October 19, 2009 4:40 pm

    And here we have Walter’s baffle ‘em with bullshit…must conform to cj’s mindset…answer:

    First off, science has proven to me G-d doesn’t exist. I can only speak for myself.

    How. Because, putting “feelings” aside (”I know G-d exists because I feel, believe… etc”), the ONLY foundation Judaism and Christianity has is the hebrew and greek scriptures.

    And peer reviewed science (archeologist, geologists, textual critics, linguists and so on) have proven that the text is a combination of myth, fictional history, borrow older stories from other cultures, mistaken archeology and some fact.

    Yet this is the “proof text” that is studied every day in theological schools, discussed every Sunday (or Shabbat), turned to for all sorts of information about ones religious roots, and faulty book has been used to wage war, this is it, the roots of all knowledge of G-d.

    Nope. As much as science speaks to the facts of AGW, the universe, evolution and so on, it also speaks to the absense of facts when it comes to the myths and miracle of the biblical text.

    If you believe G-d exists, fine, I can’t deny your belief if my life depended on it. But if you tell me you know G-d exists, than we have a debatable position to work from.

    That’s the only proof I need.


  163. snork
    164 | October 19, 2009 4:41 pm

    Then we have this:

    99 Charles Mon, Oct 19, 2009 2:11:21pm

    re: #89 kittysaidwoof

    The answer to your points is: if you’re really interested in understanding the science behind climate change, don’t take anyone’s word for it. Go out and find the sources, read the books, and make the effort to form your own opinions.

    That’s what I did, starting more than a year ago, because I realized that this topic was becoming important, and I began to distrust the talking points circulated by the right wing. After quite a bit of reading and research, I came to the conclusion that my previous skepticism had been drastically mistaken, that there really is a dangerous problem that needs to be addressed, that the science is very sound and convincing, and that the Republican Party is deliberately trying to confuse people and cloud the issues for political reasons.

    Oh, really Chuckles? Realclimate is a lily pure font of scientific purity and righteousness and truth and beauty and sweetness and light? And they have no political connections, and no political ax to grind? And Exxonsecrets is the same? No political ax to grind at all, right?

    And and refresh my memory about your statements about ExxonMobil “front groups”, you conspiracy theorizing hippy freak.


  164. Rule303
    165 | October 19, 2009 4:41 pm

    re: #157 by WrathofG-d

    Hmmm, yes, well, I always appreciated Escher. Will that do? ;-)


  165. 166 | October 19, 2009 4:43 pm

    Woooooo whooooooooooo

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urfVLXBzvl8


  166. bellamags
    167 | October 19, 2009 4:43 pm

    re: #146 by buzzsawmonkey

    I wondered the same thing when David Blaine visited Africa.


  167. Godzilla
    168 | October 19, 2009 4:44 pm

    re: #136 by snork

    71 LudwigVanQuixote Mon, Oct 19, 2009 1:56:12pm

    [...]

    By the way, the assertions that you are making have been completely debunked. Orbital cycles are well understood. They have been conclusively ruled out as the driving factor.

    Seems that Ludwig doesn’t get it that “it’s precisely this sort of absolutist statement that winds up causing all sorts of problems, a point which seems to be lost on Ludwig.” [courtesy of SixDegrees, to whom Ludwig was responding]

    Arguing with Ludwig might be fun for a while, but like lasering ants with a magnifying glass, it would quickly get boring.


  168. CloudyDay
    169 | October 19, 2009 4:45 pm

    Oh barf. There’s even a photo on the page of the “couple” kissing. BARF.

    8-O Woman claims child-parent sex not always incest

    An Australian woman who had two children with her father says people suffering from “Genetic Sexual Attraction” need help, not condemnation.

    A fed-up Jennifer Deaves is insisting people should embrace GSA — the condition she says most child-parent sex couples suffer from.

    Deaves, who revealed last year on 60 Minutes that she shared two children with her father John, said incest and GSA were entirely different.


  169. buzzsawmonkey
    170 | October 19, 2009 4:45 pm

    re: #167 by bellamags

    I missed that one. When did he go, and why? Did he find an epiphany at the Sphinx, or delving about the Olduvai Gorge?


  170. Carolina Girl
    171 | October 19, 2009 4:47 pm

    re: #162 by waldensianspirit

    IIRC, let’s see….oh yeah, 365 days, give or take. Did I get it right?


  171. Russkilitlover
    172 | October 19, 2009 4:50 pm

    re: #81 by typicalwhitey

    Actually, it’s from a Russian saying: Take care of the kopeks and the rubles will take care of themselves.


  172. Canoe Convoy
    173 | October 19, 2009 4:50 pm

    Good Lord Almighty. “Please Put Your Shirt On, Sir” does not come anywhere near what has to be said to that man. It is time that man stopped playing the recorder and started going more to the Y. If he put at least four times the effort into exercise as he did into playing his Pan Flute (or whatever the Hell that pipe is), he might actually lose some of that gut. Otherwise, get that man a Muumuu, or some drapes or something.

    re: #34 by bellamags


  173. apachegunner
    174 | October 19, 2009 4:51 pm

    re: #169 by CloudyDay

    a new word, a new language, how orwellian.


  174. waldensianspirit
    175 | October 19, 2009 4:51 pm

    re: #171 by Carolina Girl

    For back-of-the-envelope, that is the time of the orbit.


  175. Canoe Convoy
    176 | October 19, 2009 4:51 pm

    re: #173 by Canoe Convoy
    Plus, I would not be anywhere near as anxious as he is when advertising his, um, shall I say, “shortcomings.” So, some pants, too, along with the shirt.


  176. Carolina Girl
    177 | October 19, 2009 4:52 pm

    Odd that Chuck would come to believe in AGW right around the same time many who had originally believed it were questioning the science it was based on.

    You know, like the guy who OWNS the Weather Channel and probably had read up on the subject more than anyone else.

    Oh c’mon Chuck, what “Right-Wing” talking points did you get your panties in a bunch about? NAME them.


  177. typicalwhitey
    178 | October 19, 2009 4:55 pm

    Hey Bella.

    Didn’t the threads over there have a lot more posts than they do now?

    I remember them getting to a thousand, am I remembering correctly?


  178. buzzsawmonkey
    179 | October 19, 2009 4:56 pm

    re: #172 by Russkilitlover

    Actually, it’s from a Russian saying: Take care of the kopeks and the rubles will take care of themselves.

    You kom down to kopek shop and we run off stack of rubles on kolor kopier, yes?


  179. 180 | October 19, 2009 4:56 pm

    re: #169 by CloudyDay

    Why not? Its all about love and equal rights isn’t it?

    /


  180. buzzsawmonkey
    181 | October 19, 2009 4:58 pm

    re: #169 by CloudyDay

    I understand “Oedipussy” is playing at the local pornoplex.


  181. snork
    182 | October 19, 2009 5:00 pm

    re: #168 by Godzilla

    TFK likes to pee in his general direction. I think it’s kind of like squirrel hunting for him.


  182. bellamags
    183 | October 19, 2009 5:02 pm

    re: #170 by buzzsawmonkey

    I am just not on my game tonight. It was Haiti, not Africa. Here is a vid.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOC-4mMrrZI

    I remember watching the whole show and thinking “These people must think he is the second coming”. They were freaked out – voodoo freaked


  183. buzzsawmonkey
    184 | October 19, 2009 5:02 pm

    As regards global warming/global cooling, I’ve got my two-tone shoes and I’ve got my cashmere overcoat.

    I’m good whichever way it breaks.


  184. 185 | October 19, 2009 5:03 pm

    Progress & change is not always good:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpqAHfGwBLQ

    awwwwwwwwwwww


  185. waldensianspirit
    186 | October 19, 2009 5:03 pm

    I doubt Ludwig ever saw an error bar in his life. His eyes maybe saw them but he never did.


  186. snork
    187 | October 19, 2009 5:06 pm

    re: #186 by waldensianspirit

    Error bar? Is that where fuckups like him go to drown their sorrows after getting pw3ned like that?


  187. snork
    188 | October 19, 2009 5:09 pm

    re: #185 by WrathofG-d

    Oh, lordy. “The happy organ”? Is that racist?


  188. Number6
    189 | October 19, 2009 5:18 pm

    Ludwig is an utterly clueless shithead. I would be mortified to ever find him on the same side of an argument as me.


  189. bellamags
    190 | October 19, 2009 5:18 pm

    Is something wrong with the site? or did everyone stop posting?


  190. bellamags
    191 | October 19, 2009 5:19 pm

    OK – time for me to close up shop and go home to the pups. see ya’ll in a while.


  191. 192 | October 19, 2009 5:22 pm

    re: #188 by snork

    Not sure if intentional, but every time you say lordy-lordy, it reminds me of Blazing Saddles.


  192. mawskrat
    193 | October 19, 2009 5:30 pm

    and now some Klaus Nomi

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuSrsGzhD9U&feature=related


  193. tommy torquemada
    194 | October 19, 2009 5:34 pm

    re: #185 by WrathofG-d

    Oooh, ginchy happy American music!

    My I throw in a random favorite?:

    Stevie Ray Vaughan and Dick Dale doing surfer music.


  194. Eliana
    195 | October 19, 2009 5:37 pm

    Wow, Angels just beat Yankess in 11th Inning.


  195. 196 | October 19, 2009 5:37 pm

    hi kids


  196. 197 | October 19, 2009 5:39 pm

    re: #195 by Eliana

    Hurrah!


  197. Eliana
    198 | October 19, 2009 5:39 pm

    Long game!


  198. Flyovercountry
    199 | October 19, 2009 5:41 pm

    re: #164 by snork

    Here is the thing about Charlie’s statement. He is not a scientist. He can read all he wants, but lacks the actual capacity to understand anything but somebody’s talking points. That is why I also read, but make it a point to talk to actual scientists. I have learned that the Climate Change crowd have gone to great lengths to create their own branch so to speak. they have taken the trouble to create their own peer publications separate from any other branch of scientific research. Every Chemist, Physicist, Astro Physicist, that I have spoken to has said without a moments hesitation, Climate Change is Bull Shit, their words. That Charlie actually believes he could possibly weigh in on the merits of science here is astounding. Being a jazz guitarist must prepare you for a helluva lot beyond music.


  199. wolfie
    200 | October 19, 2009 5:44 pm

    Wow! The Angels looked like they were going to boot this game too. Good rally!


  200. Iron Fist
    201 | October 19, 2009 5:55 pm

    re: #163 by typicalwhitey

    He is almost touching in his childlike faith in science that it has proven to him that the very God Who created it does not exist. Whence comes science, then? Is it a construct of man? It was not seen so until recently. Scientists sought to determine the Laws of nature, not to deny the existance of the Lawgiver. Whence comes this curious science that it answers questions unanswerable? From the mind of man, no more, no less. He declares that since proves no god. Logic denys such proof is possible. You cannot prove a negative, only accept it on faith.

    Thus there is no difference between atheism and theism – both are faiths about the existance of god. The difference? One denies the existance of the trancendental while the other glories in it.


  201. song_and_dance_man
    202 | October 19, 2009 6:04 pm

    re: #195 by Eliana

    1-1


  202. buzzsawmonkey
    203 | October 19, 2009 6:05 pm

    re: #199 by Flyovercountry

    I’m sure he understands G String Theory.


  203. mawskrat
    204 | October 19, 2009 6:05 pm

    Christafari….Selah

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2N-h62clfyk&feature=related


  204. bellamags
    205 | October 19, 2009 6:07 pm

    re: #203 by buzzsawmonkey

    probably not, but I wouldn’t fret over it.


  205. wolfie
    206 | October 19, 2009 6:08 pm

    Well said, Iron Fist. And your argument is right to the point, too!

    Walter does not seem to realize that his introductory proposition,”science has proven G-d doesn’t exist,” is completely contradicted by his conclusion:
    “If you believe G-d exists, fine, I can’t deny your belief if my life depended on it.”

    He has repeated that same spiel over there sooooo many times, as if by rote, and yet every single time he does the same thing:
    1. proposition
    2. blah blah blah
    3. conclusion contrary to proposition


  206. wolfie
    207 | October 19, 2009 6:10 pm

    re: #205 by bellamags

    Please don’t start picking on each other.


  207. song_and_dance_man
    208 | October 19, 2009 6:10 pm

    That must explain his twang.


  208. taxfreekiller
    209 | October 19, 2009 6:11 pm

    uh!

    That is why we humans invented the elevator,
    that is why we fight to remain free of commies like Obama, that is why we now think of putting Jimmy Carter in for the last three years of the Obama time we do know there is life after that old fool, not so sure what this commie loon fool Obama has up his dirty littlegreenfootball sleeve. Bottom of the deck dealer this Obama commie IMO.


  209. Moe Katz
    210 | October 19, 2009 6:11 pm

    re: #203 by buzzsawmonkey

    “I’m sure he understands G String Theory.”

    Plain or wound?


  210. coldwarrior
    211 | October 19, 2009 6:13 pm

    re: #201 by Iron Fist

    science and faith are mutually exclusive. when they mix, you get bad science, or really goofy religions.


  211. snork
    212 | October 19, 2009 6:13 pm

    re: #207 by wolfie

    He ain’t got the plectrum to do that.


  212. snork
    213 | October 19, 2009 6:14 pm

    re: #211 by coldwarrior

    Or really goofy religions comprised of bad science.


  213. Moe Katz
    214 | October 19, 2009 6:14 pm

    Pun thread! Life at 2.0 is now complete.


  214. bellamags
    215 | October 19, 2009 6:14 pm

    I would rather believe in God, feel good about going to Heaven when I die and live with a purpose. If I’m wrong – well, I’ll die happy.

    If I don’t believe in God, life has no meaning and I have nothing to look forward to when I die. If I’m wrong about His non-existence, I am going to burn in hell for eternity.

    I’ll take my chances and believe.


  215. Moe Katz
    216 | October 19, 2009 6:15 pm

    re: #215 by bellamags

    Sounds like Pascal’s Wager….


  216. buzzsawmonkey
    217 | October 19, 2009 6:16 pm

    re: #215 by bellamags

    I always tell people that the level of my belief in G-d varies—which it does—but never my belief that G-d believes in me.


  217. Moe Katz
    218 | October 19, 2009 6:17 pm

    This is the kind of subject matter where Chairman Charlie was hopelessly out of his depth.


  218. snork
    219 | October 19, 2009 6:17 pm

    re: #214 by Moe Katz

    Well, first we took the funny, then we took the punny.


  219. wolfie
    220 | October 19, 2009 6:17 pm

    re: #213 by snork

    You don’t think he’s plucky enough?


  220. buzzsawmonkey
    221 | October 19, 2009 6:18 pm

    re: #211 by coldwarrior

    Shameless post pimp:

    http://www.littlegreenfootballs2.com/2009/10/19/the-invisible-undergraduate/#comment-140701


  221. Moe Katz
    222 | October 19, 2009 6:19 pm

    re: #220 by wolfie

    I’d cross that bridge when I come to it; anyway, he’s a nut.


  222. bellamags
    223 | October 19, 2009 6:19 pm

    re: #217 by buzzsawmonkey

    sweet………: )


  223. coldwarrior
    224 | October 19, 2009 6:19 pm

    re: #213 by snork

    and nothing good can come of that


  224. snork
    225 | October 19, 2009 6:19 pm

    re: #216 by Moe Katz

    Would you take a bet called Python’s wager?

    /Let’s see if we have any computer nerds who will get that…


  225. snork
    226 | October 19, 2009 6:21 pm

    re: #218 by Moe Katz

    Until the ocean rises 200′. Then he’ll be hopelessly in his depth…


  226. song_and_dance_man
    227 | October 19, 2009 6:21 pm

    re: #215 by bellamagsThat entails much of what I said right before I was banned for asking Cj if he believed in God in an open thread after he brought the subject up. I said this:

    Death will be the determining factor whether or not which side is correct. Will we pass into nothing or will we, as conscience beings, live on (without the flesh that we inhabit now).

    Let’s hope we make the right choice for which side we agree with now.

    If I make the choice that God created, or did not, and I die into nothing then nothing is lost, but If I reject the Creator then die and transcend into another realm that reveals I was wrong about the Creator then I will become liable for believing a lie and rejecting the truth of it all.

    And then I asked him once again if he believed it God.

    My banning was his way of answering the question. It is NO.


  227. wolfie
    228 | October 19, 2009 6:21 pm

    re: #222 by Moe Katz

    So noted.


  228. bellamags
    229 | October 19, 2009 6:22 pm

    re: #216 by Moe Katz

    I just looked that up — cool!


  229. Moe Katz
    230 | October 19, 2009 6:22 pm

    re: #226 by snork

    He needs an intellectual lifeguard to make sure he stays in the shallow end of the children’s pool.


  230. song_and_dance_man
    231 | October 19, 2009 6:23 pm

    re: #216 by Moe Katz

    It is indeed.


  231. Moe Katz
    232 | October 19, 2009 6:23 pm

    re: #229 by bellamags

    I think you just reinvented it :)


  232. Iron Fist
    233 | October 19, 2009 6:23 pm

    re: #201 by Iron Fist

    I want to follow that up a bit. While we all know that Liberals famously don’t think they feel (or more acurately, emote), how awful must the world of someone like Walter be where there is nothing transendental. People with no emotions are not to be envied, but to be pitied. The can’t even begin to taste the fullness of the human experience. What is life without love? Love (like God) can not be touched, not be measured, quantified, counted, nor stored. It is no more scientific than angles wings, yet what more nourishing balm for the wounded soul (another “thing” with neither form nor quantifiable component).

    As I said, people with no emotions are to be pitied. Science, cold as it is, can classify them. They are called sociopaths, and are deemed to be a diseased mind (another imperfectly quantifiable entity that can be, to a degree, measured and classified. No one disputes the existance of the mind, nor that the mind appears to be an artefact of the brain (at least to the degree such a thing can be quantified), but you can butcher the brain and destroy the mind, but you cannot cut the mind free from the brain nor take the measure of its weight, texture, or taste.

    I could go on for some time. Those who deny the existance of things we cannot quantify, taste, touch, bottle, preserve, or otherwise deal with in a “scientific” manner are manyfold. That one such entity is what people of faith call “God” is not a mark against them. Rather it is the cold “rationalist” who, when confronted with the many things that cannot be quantified, nor touched, nor tasted, nor felt in the physical sense of touch, denies thei importance when he cannot deny their existance all together. Such a man is to be pitied, but never trusted. He is crippled in ways his fundamental handicap precludes him from realizing, let alone compensating for or overcomming.

    In short, he is damned to a poor existence in this world, and not even that in the next.


  233. bellamags
    234 | October 19, 2009 6:24 pm

    re: #227 by song_and_dance_man

    you probably scared him and he banned you cuz he couldn’t deal.


  234. 235 | October 19, 2009 6:24 pm

    re: #163 by typicalwhitey

    Translated Wig’s post is approximately:

    Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah…

    ..the absence of evidence constitutes proof of absence.

    This is
    1. a sophmoric fallacy and
    2. a standard he does not apply to AGW or other myths in which he chooses to believe.

    Did someone say he claims to be a scientist?


  235. snork
    236 | October 19, 2009 6:24 pm

    re: #228 by wolfie

    Where’d you pickup that amp?


  236. Moe Katz
    237 | October 19, 2009 6:25 pm

    re: #235 by Crusader Rabbit

    Yes, I noted that—he thinks you can prove the null hypothesis.


  237. coldwarrior
    238 | October 19, 2009 6:25 pm

    re: #221 by buzzsawmonkey

    well done!!!

    your dad gets a ‘well reasoned’.

    as the representative and chair of the awards committee here at the 2.0 country club, i am pleased to inform you that your father has been awarded the “well reasoned” award.

    “well reasoned”! hoorah!

    the cc has spoken!


  238. wolfie
    239 | October 19, 2009 6:28 pm

    re: #221 by buzzsawmonkey

    That’s a really good one. Well worth the pimpery!


  239. coldwarrior
    240 | October 19, 2009 6:28 pm

    re: #237 by Moe Katz

    prove a null hypothesis?

    nope…one can try….and one would look awfully foolish.


  240. 241 | October 19, 2009 6:28 pm

    re: #237 by Moe Katz

    That is the claim made by atheists in general. It is the basis of solipsism.

    What I’d like to know is this: If I refuse to look at a solipsist, will he go away?


  241. taxfreekiller
    242 | October 19, 2009 6:31 pm

    re: #121 by CloudyDay

    this just could be a diversion to misdirect from the fact they got the info some other way
    they do know Obama and his will not allow tha air strike on the Iran nukes so the best way to get the job done is know what the Obama cult is up to, they know from prior spy work this is just to throw Obama’s commies off the trail

    good work this

    Iran is done for, Dead Country Walking.


  242. snork
    243 | October 19, 2009 6:34 pm

    re: #233 by Iron Fist

    Except that these people don’t, in general, deny things that they can’t see. The problem is the opposite; they insist that so many things are beyond controversy when they aren’t. We saw a perfect example of this upthread from that other place. My bigger problem with atheist “scientists” isn’t that they don’t know anything, but that they’re too cocksure of things they don’t know.

    Kinda like what Reagan said; “the problem with our liberal friends isn’t that they’re ignorant, but that they know so much that isn’t so”.


  243. wolfie
    244 | October 19, 2009 6:35 pm

    re: #236 by snork

    Amp? I don’t do electric. Too easy. It makes my finger board.


  244. bellamags
    245 | October 19, 2009 6:36 pm

    re: #244 by wolfie

    That was a whammy.


  245. Kitteh
    246 | October 19, 2009 6:37 pm

    re: #114 by BuddyG
    MegaShark vs Giant Octopus.


  246. wolfie
    247 | October 19, 2009 6:38 pm

    re: #245 by bellamags

    You can steel it, if you’ve got the guts!

    (PS- Didn’t you use to have a cute little vampire or something as an avatar?)


  247. Iron Fist
    248 | October 19, 2009 6:38 pm

    re: #215 by bellamags

    It is a simple proposal really. If there is no God then the universe is purposeless, essentially as without form and void as anything that preceeded its existance or will follow its demise. Religion doesn’t preclude this. There are schools of Buddhist philosoiphy that posit the universe as distraction, life as futile and painful, with the greatest attainable goal (no-goal, really) being the dissapation of karma and the attainment of nothingness of being. Thus, even there there are religious precepts hat one can adopt and live by. That they are no t mine does not make them invalid.

    Whatever gets you through,. gets you through. But not even these an-atman schools of Buddhist thought deneis the existance of the unseen, the unquantifiabl, or the impact of these things on the human psyche.

    My belief in the non-physical costs me little, really. At it’s most blunt, yes, there are people who are alive only because murder is viewed as such a terrible sin. Even there, it is well that murder is unlawful, lest it become an overwhelming temptation to sin. After all, if there is no God, then there is really no practical reason not to murder if you can get away with it.


  248. snork
    249 | October 19, 2009 6:40 pm

    re: #241 by Crusader Rabbit

    Oh, no. Are we entering the realm of Quantum Mysticism?


  249. snork
    250 | October 19, 2009 6:42 pm

    re: #244 by wolfie

    Your finger won’t be bored if you have a ground fault…


  250. Iron Fist
    251 | October 19, 2009 6:42 pm

    re: #243 by snork

    I mentioned that earlier in conjunction to this same thing. Ignorance is educatable. Stupidity is confirmed in its errors, and thus difficult if not impossible to educate. I don’t know what you do in answer to that problem. You can’t convince people of their ignorance. They will look at cold, hard evidence in front of them and refuse to see it’s existance, let alone the validity any conclusions based upon it.

    You can’t fix stupid.


  251. snork
    252 | October 19, 2009 6:46 pm

    re: #251 by Iron Fist

    You can’t fix delusional. Or stupid. But I’ve experienced delusional up close and personal, and it’s as invincible as stupid. Trust me on this one.


  252. Kitteh
    253 | October 19, 2009 6:49 pm

    re: #149 by snork
    I don’t he ever had an cred except with the uber-faithful.


  253. coldwarrior
    254 | October 19, 2009 6:50 pm

    re: #250 by snork

    these puns are giving my bad vibrations, i am just going to tune them out.

    ;)


  254. wolfie
    255 | October 19, 2009 6:50 pm

    re: #250 by snork

    LOL! Okay, I give up!


  255. wolfie
    256 | October 19, 2009 6:51 pm

    re: #254 by coldwarrior

    I give up! I give up! :) :)


  256. snork
    257 | October 19, 2009 6:55 pm

    In honor of the recently pw3ned climatologist of 1.0, I will present this without comment:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8311000/8311373.stm


  257. nil stooge
    258 | October 19, 2009 6:55 pm

    re: #124 by mawskrat

    I saw that – it takes CYA to a whole new level doesn’t it? Props to that guy.

    Kinda the same idea – I recently ran across the proposition that time travel won’t be found because any time/space with time travel ultimately settles into the stable, equilibrium condition where time travel doesn’t exist (picture time travel into the past eventually, coincidentally hosing things up such that time travel is never invented in that future).


  258. coldwarrior
    259 | October 19, 2009 6:56 pm

    re: #256 by wolfie

    stick a fork in him! he’s done!

    tuning fork…get it…tip your waitress!

    i quit too!

    :)


  259. Iron Fist
    260 | October 19, 2009 6:57 pm

    re: #211 by coldwarrior

    I disagree. I am a scientist, working as a R&D programmer in a company that produces cutting-edge medical technalogical solutions dealing with blood-volumne measurments in humans. I’m not a research physician, but my job entails being conversant enouigh in the medical concepts to be able to design the software that supports our product line.

    None of this precludes my being a fairly religious man (although I do not attend worship services or anything like that; my faith doesn’t require constant reffirmmation). I am perfectly capable of finding amazement at radioactive decay in measurable radioactive sources and in configuring the gamma detectors to be properly able to acurately and effectively determine the energy output in desired regions of interest on measured spectrums, and use that data from simple source level reporting to graph curve fitting to determine the radioisotopes present (I’m just getting into that area of detection. Testing for trace contaminents mostly).

    So far, my belief in a supreme being hasn’t been any appreciable detrimate to my job or my ability to preform it. I don’t find that religion precludes science, and I certainly find that science precludes belief. People who say that “Science has disproven the existence of God” simply are ignoring the evidence in front of them for the existence of God.


  260. nil stooge
    261 | October 19, 2009 6:57 pm

    re: #225 by snork

    I give up – what is it?

    /Python the language is an abomination.


  261. orangecrush
    262 | October 19, 2009 6:59 pm

    re: #163 by typicalwhitey

    If science has proven God doesn’t exist there is a proof somewhere then. otherwise it’s still faith projected out from the best instruments possible. one would think quantum mechanics has proven that what we observe is not really what we think it is.


  262. snork
    263 | October 19, 2009 7:00 pm

    re: #261 by nil stooge

    Python’s great!

    /As long as you’re not in a hurry…


  263. nil stooge
    264 | October 19, 2009 7:04 pm

    re: #263 by snork

    No whitespace like I want it is a FAIL for me. YMMV.

    So anyway, what’s Python’s Wager?


  264. coldwarrior
    265 | October 19, 2009 7:04 pm

    re: #260 by Iron Fist

    your missing my point.

    faith has a set of belief structures bereft of the NEED for proof

    science has a set of proof structures bereft of the NEED for faith

    they are exclusive.


  265. snork
    266 | October 19, 2009 7:07 pm

    re: #264 by nil stooge

    The updated Pascal’s wager.


  266. nil stooge
    267 | October 19, 2009 7:08 pm

    re: #263 by snork

    Gad, you’re not talking about BEGIN/END Pascal are you? I’ll take Python any day vs. that exercise in typing.


  267. snork
    268 | October 19, 2009 7:12 pm

    re: #267 by nil stooge

    You must be one of those APL geeks.


  268. snork
    269 | October 19, 2009 7:14 pm

    re: #267 by nil stooge

    And for the record, it’s not exactly rocket science to use keyboard macros to make begin, end, etc into one stroke. Most APIs have that built in, anyway.

    C is for people who type with their toes.


  269. waldensianspirit
    270 | October 19, 2009 7:16 pm

    re: #187 by snork

    I doubt he ever titrated either.

    “Mother” earth titrates the hell out of most every things.


  270. nil stooge
    271 | October 19, 2009 7:17 pm

    re: #266 by snork

    Yeah (lol) I got it before I saw your comment but after we both submitted (at least in this particular frame of reference).


  271. nil stooge
    272 | October 19, 2009 7:25 pm

    re: #269 by snork

    Someone (smarter than me) described Pascal as “a voluntarily worn straight jacket”. Sure you could use {} and just do a global replace, e.g., but that still doesn’t answer “BEGIN/END – wtf were they thinking, how many trees died because of that?”.

    I prefer Perl – nice and terse and powerful.


  272. waldensianspirit
    273 | October 19, 2009 7:29 pm

    First appearance of Java on this page. What up?


  273. coldwarrior
    274 | October 19, 2009 7:31 pm

    in my first computer class (honors program in the early 80’s) in jr high many years ago, we had to program using puch cards so we would understand the process.

    then came pascal

    then came the headaches

    then we discovered girls. pascal was easier.


  274. nil stooge
    275 | October 19, 2009 7:33 pm

    re: #269 by snork

    C is for people who type with their toes.

    And … if I can’t swap Vim into the IDE for my editor, I might as well type with my toes


  275. waldensianspirit
    276 | October 19, 2009 7:35 pm

    NetBeans swaps with nobody.


  276. nil stooge
    277 | October 19, 2009 7:47 pm

    re: #276 by waldensianspirit

    NetBeans swaps with nobody.

    Visual Studio does, but even then not well enough to really bother.

    Hey I haven’t given up the goal of the throbbing CJ Criswell quotes, but now I’m thinking Perl and Image::Magick to make a GIF (which should animate well enough and not require JVM). But lately the prospect has seemed more like digging a long, extremely straight ditch and less like writing a poem, so I’ve managed to find other things to do.

    What’s up with the nic? A Thoreau fan?


  277. nil stooge
    278 | October 19, 2009 7:50 pm

    re: #274 by coldwarrior

    Python seems like it’s made for punch cards. What language were you doing with them – Fortran?


  278. coldwarrior
    279 | October 19, 2009 8:04 pm

    re: #278 by nil stooge

    yes, fortran…

    now i have a headache. punchcards….mmmmm


  279. Eliana
    280 | October 19, 2009 8:09 pm

    re: #211 by coldwarrior

    science and faith are mutually exclusive. when they mix, you get bad science, or really goofy religions.

    Judaism’s greatest philosopher Maimonides who was also a rabbi and a medical doctor established around 900 years ago that it is impossible for science and the Jewish Bible to contradict each other.

    Therefore, he established the position that knowledge of the existence of G-d isn’t based on faith for Jews. It’s based on logic. He built an entire argument around this and it still makes sense in the 21st Century.

    Jews are required to know logically that G-d exists rather than taking it on faith. There have been many prominent Jewish scientists and doctors in the world for quite a few centuries now and this argument has a lot to do with why this is the case.


  280. coldwarrior
    281 | October 19, 2009 8:17 pm

    re: #280 by Eliana

    i knew i was going to get into trouble with the jews on this site when i typed that. it would either be you or wrath that called me on it.


  281. nil stooge
    282 | October 19, 2009 8:20 pm

    re: #280 by Eliana

    Interesting.

    It’s hard to imagine a proof that doesn’t somehow stray into the meta-logical and thus introduce faith by another name.

    Care to provide a ‘Cliffs Notes’ version? (I’m not looking to argue, just curious…)


  282. theTarCzar
    283 | October 19, 2009 8:22 pm

    (56. IslandLibertarian on 19 October, 2009 at 3:22 pm reply

    A riddle:
    If the total area of land: 57,268,900 square miles (148,326,000 km²), equals 29% of the total surface of the Earth, and the total area of water: 139,668,500 square miles (361,740,000 km²), equals 71% of the total surface of the Earth, how much water would it take to raise the ocean levels 200 feet, AND, WHERE THE FUCK IS ALL THAT WATER? In all the ice and snow on 29% of the earth surface? )
    I really had to pee after reading that


  283. Eliana
    284 | October 19, 2009 8:29 pm

    re: #281 by coldwarrior

    i knew i was going to get into trouble with the jews on this site when i typed that. it would either be you or wrath that called me on it.

    :-)


  284. snork
    285 | October 19, 2009 8:47 pm

    re: #283 by theTarCzar

    And that raised the oceans by how much?


  285. Eliana
    286 | October 19, 2009 8:53 pm

    re: #282 by nil stooge

    It’s hard to imagine a proof that doesn’t somehow stray into the meta-logical and thus introduce faith by another name.

    Care to provide a ‘Cliffs Notes’ version? (I’m not looking to argue, just curious…)

    I couldn’t do it justice, but here’s a hint as to the validity of his logic on this matter…

    The fact that the universe had a beginning has been part of the Jewish Bible for 3300 years.

    Maimonides stated in the 12th Century that G-d invented TIME along with the universe and that G-d exists outside of time.

    It’s only been within the last 60 years that scientists have recognized that the universe did indeed have a beginning (which is something Jews have been saying for 3300 years).

    Einstein was the one who said that if you put the universe in a suitcase, time and space would be in the suitcase along with all the stars and everything else. Time and space are part of the universe. The universe had a beginning.

    Maimonides knew in the 12th Century that time was part of the creation of the universe. As mentioned, he was a rabbi and a medical doctor (a scientist) at the time. He knew that time was part of the universe and created along with the universe 800-900 years ago.

    Scientists have been catching up with Jews on this and it’s taken a long, long time to reach what Jews knew 3300 years ago: the universe had a beginning.


  286. theTarCzar
    287 | October 19, 2009 8:53 pm

    re: #285 by snork

    well it was at least a gallon(lots of coffee today) i think madagascar got wiped out : ( sorry dudes!


  287. Eliana
    288 | October 19, 2009 8:54 pm

    re: #286 by Eliana

    Correcting my sentence…

    He knew 800-900 years ago that time was part of the universe and created along with the universe.


  288. nil stooge
    289 | October 19, 2009 9:13 pm

    re: #286 by Eliana

    Thanks!

    Wikipedia’s entry on Maimonides has a whole sub-section on Maimonides’ “13 principles of faith” (and the first one is “the existence of ..”).

    Is that egregiously wrong enough to be edited, or … ?

    /I know ... it's Wikipedia


  289. Eliana
    290 | October 19, 2009 9:29 pm

    re: #289 by nil stooge

    Maimonides has the “13 Principles of Faith” which is a summary of the belief system of Judaism. It’s an excellent summary of the basis of Judaism.

    He also wrote “The Guide for the Purplexed” which is an explanation of his philosophy including why Jews are required to know that G-d exists rather than simply accepting it on blind faith.

    Human beings have brains that make it possible for human beings to think rationally. Maimonides said that Jews are required to use our brains to think rationally about G-d.

    We are not allowed to make leaps of faith.

    We have to think rationally about why the Jewish Bible doesn’t contradict science and also why we can know (rationally) that G-d exists.

    Jews are required to know this rationally.


  290. Eliana
    291 | October 19, 2009 9:32 pm

    “The Guide for the Perplexed,” that is.

    PIMF.


  291. nil stooge
    292 | October 19, 2009 9:50 pm

    re: #290 by Eliana

    Thanks!

    And … I like ‘purple-xed’, gonna use it in the next rebus I design. Maybe it could be my super-hero costume in Race Detective, a big purple ‘X’ on my chest ;)


  292. Eliana
    293 | October 19, 2009 9:53 pm

    re: #292 by nil stooge

    :-)


  293. deleted
    294 | October 19, 2009 11:33 pm

    ‘We have to think rationally about why the Jewish Bible doesn’t contradict science and also why we can know (rationally) that G-d exists.’

    This is a loaded statement. You should first think rationally about whether or not the scriptures contradict science and then make your conclusion.


  294. Eliana
    295 | October 20, 2009 1:02 am

    re: #294 by deleted

    ‘We have to think rationally about why the Jewish Bible doesn’t contradict science and also why we can know (rationally) that G-d exists.’

    This is a loaded statement. You should first think rationally about whether or not the scriptures contradict science and then make your conclusion.

    Realizing rationally that the Jewish Bible doesn’t contradict science is part of the process.

    Realizing rationally that G-d exists (instead of taking it on blind faith) is another part of the process.


  295. aussie_dave
    296 | October 20, 2009 3:33 am

    Here is one for you cultural relativists:

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,26237279-12377,00.html


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David