Castro Praises Fellow Progressive Obama’s Noble Prize Win

Progressive Dictator of Cuba Fidel Castro has praised Obama in the past. He started the the talking  point that criticism of Obama is racism. Since then Progressive Media outlets and blogs have been using the racism charge. I also have documented the fact that Obama and Castro are connected. Therefore it is no surprise that Castro praises his fellow Progressive Barack Hussein Obama.

fidel-castro-4

HAVANA — Count Fidel Castro among those in favor of the Norwegian Nobel Committee’s controversial choice of U.S. President Barack Obama for the Nobel Peace prize.

The former Cuban leader said Saturday that he thought the choice was a “positive step,” though he added it was more a repudiation of Obama’s predecessors than a recognition of anything concrete Obama has done.

“Many believe that he still has not earned the right to receive such a distinction,” Castro wrote in a column published in state media. “But we would like to see, more than a prize for the U.S. president, a criticism of the genocidal policies that have been followed by more than a few presidents of that country.”

The Cuban revolutionary said he was often at odds with the choices of the Nobel committee, “but I must admit that in this case, in my opinion, it was a positive step.”

Read the rest.

Castro has the audacity of calling calling past American policies as genocidal! This man has committed murders and is a criminal thug. This man once bragged that he could be an effective terrorist. Therefore his praise of Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize should wake people how Progressives all over the world support each other.

(Hat Tip: Keefe)

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

313 Responses to “Castro Praises Fellow Progressive Obama’s Noble Prize Win”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | October 11, 2009 12:04 pm

    Well, whaddya know? Progressives stick together, don’t they?


  2. Flyovercountry
    2 | October 11, 2009 12:05 pm

    I think this should be a GOP campaign poster for 2010 and 2012. This is a certain sign of the times and what direction we are headed in. this and pictures of life in Cuba plastered all over the place.


  3. DEZ
    3 | October 11, 2009 12:07 pm

    They were right, America is loved again since we elected a Obama as president.
    To bad its by the scum of the Earth!


  4. 4 | October 11, 2009 12:09 pm

    Funny thing is that I have a few friends that are a little left. Not full blown moonbats but a little to a lot left of me. I mentioned FCBBHO winning the peace prize and their reactions were “What for?”

    I think a lot of people are starting to wake up to the empty suit in the White House.


  5. 5 | October 11, 2009 12:13 pm

    re: #4 by Knightwatch

    Even IrishRose was scratching her fat head about that.


  6. vagabond trader
    6 | October 11, 2009 12:16 pm

    Along that line, why in hell didn’t Fidel get one,huh, huh?


  7. DEZ
    7 | October 11, 2009 12:17 pm

    re: #5 by savage

    Sure it wasn’t just fleas that had her scratching?


  8. JeremyR
    8 | October 11, 2009 12:26 pm

    re: #7 by DEZ

    Fleas have better taste.


  9. 9 | October 11, 2009 12:29 pm

    re: #7 by DEZ

    lol!


  10. 10 | October 11, 2009 1:25 pm

    President Obama: Supported by more Tyrants and Communists than Michael Moore.

    Vote Conservative in 2010 until forever.


  11. DEZ
    11 | October 11, 2009 1:26 pm

    re: #8 by JeremyR

    Good point!


  12. 12 | October 11, 2009 1:27 pm

    re: #4 by Knightwatch

    what is extra confusing is that nominations were closed less than 2 weeks after he was in office.


  13. snork
    13 | October 11, 2009 1:30 pm

    Well you see, it’s like this. Bama’s gunna talk to his bud Fidel. And Fidel is gunna talk to his bud Hugo. And Hugo’s gunna talk to his bud Mahmoud, and Mahmoud will see the light, and shut his nuke program down, and give his oil away for free as penance.

    Brilliant, no?


  14. 14 | October 11, 2009 1:32 pm

    re: #13 by snork

    heh, let me know how that goes…


  15. mawskrat
    15 | October 11, 2009 1:38 pm

    from the 1.0…………………………..

    I agree with Charles………………….

    who posted that.lol only one guess now and it starts with a S


  16. mawskrat
    16 | October 11, 2009 1:40 pm

    re: #13 by snork

    I’m a Bama fan…that’s Alabama.


  17. vagabond trader
    17 | October 11, 2009 1:43 pm

    Yeah, whatever you say Fidel. Hows that bud of yours and Husseins, Zeyala? Is he still holed up in the Brazilian embassy getting bombarded by toxic Joooooorays?


  18. kansas
    18 | October 11, 2009 1:49 pm

    Hey, gunfight at the douchebag corral. Looks like Sattv, brooklyn red, and tony c are tired of being the weasel’s bitches. But I smell the banning stick.


  19. jakee308
    19 | October 11, 2009 1:51 pm

    re: #1 by Morgan

    Well, whaddya know? ProgressivesSocialist Ego Maniacs stick together, don’t they?

    FTFY

    :D


  20. jakee308
    20 | October 11, 2009 1:53 pm

    re: #15 by mawskrat

    When CJ turns around too fast, Sharmie gets a nose bleed.


  21. kansas
    21 | October 11, 2009 1:55 pm

    re: #18 by kansas

    Never mind, weasel wins.


  22. snork
    22 | October 11, 2009 1:57 pm

    re: #18 by kansas

    And tradewind:

    249 tradewind Sun, Oct 11, 2009 1:53:21pm replyquote

    * 0
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #243 asswhistle

    You’re entitled to your own opinions… not your own set of facts.
    /that’s a fact/

    Hsssssssss!


  23. 23 | October 11, 2009 1:59 pm

    Is Fidel trying to dress up as Waldo (Where’s Waldo?) for Halloween? He’s missing the hat and glasses.


  24. snork
    24 | October 11, 2009 2:01 pm

    233 Charles Sun, Oct 11, 2009 1:44:52pm replyquote

    * 2
    * down
    * up
    * report

    Here we go AGAIN.

    OMG ponies, Nancy. Can’t you keep that blog of yours under control?


  25. kansas
    25 | October 11, 2009 2:02 pm

    re: #24 by snork

    If Assweasel was gone, the whole place would smell better.


  26. DEZ
    26 | October 11, 2009 2:07 pm

    re: #25 by kansas

    The group arguing with assweael are right.
    The libtard cant reply to anyone with an opinion that’s not hers are verbally abused.


  27. Scrat
    27 | October 11, 2009 2:12 pm

    re: #22 by snork

    “268 Charles
    Sun, Oct 11, 2009 2:05:28pm replyquote 0downupreport

    Unless this sniping back and forth stops now, I’m going to start handing out timeouts.”

    Good grief.


  28. kansas
    28 | October 11, 2009 2:13 pm

    re: #26 by DEZ
    The group arguing with assweael are right.
    The libtard cant reply to anyone with an opinion that’s not hers are verbally abused.

    Its almost a repeat of my last day over there, arguing with the Assweasel who kept sniping, and insulting, calling butthurt and stupid crap like that. Yet see what happens. Assweasel wins.


  29. Scrat
    29 | October 11, 2009 2:14 pm

    Snork, how do you get that green quote thingy to show up?


  30. vagabond trader
    30 | October 11, 2009 2:15 pm

    re: #27 by Scrat

    Jeesh, maybe a few diaper changes would calm everyone down.

    What a shockingly awful blog.


  31. DEZ
    31 | October 11, 2009 2:15 pm

    re: #28 by kansas
    Chuckles can’t ban an abusive libtard, the Koslings would rip him apart.


  32. Carolina Girl
    32 | October 11, 2009 2:17 pm

    re: #28 by kansas

    What did assweasel say that got the group to give her a smackdown?


  33. 33 | October 11, 2009 2:17 pm

    re: #29 by Scrat

    <blockquote>The thing you want to quote</blockquote>


  34. kansas
    34 | October 11, 2009 2:18 pm

    Oh this is rich,
    swamprat Sun, Oct 11, 2009 2:16:28pm replyquote

    * 0
    * down
    * up
    * report

    Predict sattv4u and brooklyn red are not long for this world.

    Argghhhh mateys, I smell blood in the water.


  35. teacake
    35 | October 11, 2009 2:19 pm

    Lamer and lamer and boring too.


  36. snork
    36 | October 11, 2009 2:20 pm

    re: #29 by Scrat

    Snork, how do you get that green quote thingy to show up?

    Google ‘html tags’ (for usage). It’s blockquote.


  37. Scrat
    37 | October 11, 2009 2:21 pm

    “282 swamprat
    Sun, Oct 11, 2009 2:16:28pm replyquote 0downupreport

    Predict sattv4u and brooklyn red are not long for this world.”

    ———————————-

    Why would that be swamprat? People can’t have even minor disagreements with asswhistle w/out getting the boot?


  38. Carolina Girl
    38 | October 11, 2009 2:21 pm

    re: #34 by kansas

    Predict sattv4u and brooklyn red are not long for this world.

    So Chaz gets to execute people now?


  39. teacake
    39 | October 11, 2009 2:21 pm

    Really, these days if you haven’t been banned its embarrassing to be associated with that place.


  40. 40 | October 11, 2009 2:22 pm

    re: #28 by kansas

    I have to say that Brooklyn red showed some conjones; took no crap from the Weasel creature.

    Charles threatening “a timeout” clearly shows his attitude that his remaining commentors are “children to be scolded”.

    What an asshat.


  41. snork
    41 | October 11, 2009 2:22 pm

    re: #30 by vagabond trader

    I think Nancy used Bengay instead of diaper cream.

    /This actually happened once. Kid wasn’t a happy camper.


  42. Scrat
    42 | October 11, 2009 2:23 pm

    re: #33 by archonix

    re: #29 by Scrat

    The thing you want to quote

    Thanks arch and snork. And I see #34 kansas beat me to it.


  43. teacake
    43 | October 11, 2009 2:23 pm

    People used to attack me on a regular basis and viciously too…. CJ never stepped in, until I started to speak up about it. THen…. blam! hahah I got banished.


  44. snork
    44 | October 11, 2009 2:23 pm

    re: #35 by teacake

    The banality of junior high.


  45. vagabond trader
    45 | October 11, 2009 2:25 pm

    re: #41 by snork

    LOL!

    ER, boy or girl?


  46. snork
    46 | October 11, 2009 2:26 pm

    re: #40 by MacDuff

    Charles threatening “a timeout” clearly shows his attitude that his remaining commentors are “children to be scolded”.

    And then they wonder why we don’t respect them. If they had any respect for themselves, they’d flounce out of that cult. Even the few I used to like have lost my respect. How long can you humiliate yourself?


  47. snork
    47 | October 11, 2009 2:26 pm

    re: #45 by vagabond trader

    Boy (yes, that makes it harder to undo).


  48. vagabond trader
    48 | October 11, 2009 2:27 pm

    <blockquote testing/


  49. kansas
    49 | October 11, 2009 2:27 pm

    re: #32 by Carolina Girl

    In the McCain Palin thread there are a lot of comments that you would have to follow, but generally one of the posters asked weasel to stop being insulting. I got banned when i was sniping at the weasel for bashing buzzsawmonkey, and zombie I believe.


  50. vagabond trader
    50 | October 11, 2009 2:27 pm

    re: #48 by vagabond trader

    nope that didn’t work, hmmm.

    <blockquotetesting/


  51. Carolina Girl
    51 | October 11, 2009 2:28 pm

    I need to send Dan Rather a thank you card for filing a lawsuit against CBS that caused me to self-ban two years ago. Seems to have saved me a lot of trouble.


  52. quiet man
    52 | October 11, 2009 2:28 pm

    re: #43 by teacake

    If the correct attack you *read snipe* then it is okay in chuckieland


  53. vagabond trader
    53 | October 11, 2009 2:28 pm

    re: #50 by vagabond trader

    oh well, maybe one day we’ll get the lazy html back.

    :D


  54. vagabond trader
    54 | October 11, 2009 2:29 pm

    re: #47 by snork

    Good thing he was too young to remember.

    :-)


  55. quiet man
    55 | October 11, 2009 2:29 pm

    re: #53 by vagabond trader

    I miss my avatar

    I had a good one.


  56. Beltfed
    56 | October 11, 2009 2:30 pm

    re: #8 by JeremyR

    Zing


  57. Carolina Girl
    57 | October 11, 2009 2:30 pm

    re: #49 by kansas

    Ah yes – what was it Sharmuta called it the other day – “the premium place for political discourse.” Wonder how well that’s working out for them?


  58. vagabond trader
    58 | October 11, 2009 2:30 pm

    re: #55 by quiet man

    Those too. It took me forever to get one due to technical problems, then wham! lol.


  59. Beltfed
    59 | October 11, 2009 2:31 pm

    re: #15 by mawskrat

    Skank ho ??


  60. vagabond trader
    60 | October 11, 2009 2:31 pm

    re: #43 by teacake

    Hi teacake!


  61. quiet man
    61 | October 11, 2009 2:31 pm

    re: #57 by Carolina Girl

    political discourse at 1.0??

    Ha ha ha ha
    ha ha Ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha

    As if!


  62. snork
    62 | October 11, 2009 2:32 pm

    re: #51 by Carolina Girl

    Me too. I left just about the time the dings were installed. Good time to get out of there.


  63. kansas
    63 | October 11, 2009 2:33 pm

    re: #49 by kansas

    re: #57 by Carolina Girl

    Ah yes – what was it Sharmuta called it the other day – “the premium place for political discourse.” Wonder how well that’s working out for them?

    If political discourse means agreeing with CJ and Weasel, then yeah, it is premium all right.


  64. quiet man
    64 | October 11, 2009 2:33 pm

    re: #58 by vagabond trader

    at least we can have true political discourse here…I can live without the bells and whistles if we have that


  65. quiet man
    65 | October 11, 2009 2:33 pm

    re: #62 by snork

    well..you are smarter than I am,


  66. vagabond trader
    66 | October 11, 2009 2:34 pm

    re: #64 by quiet man

    and no time outs or didee changes.

    :D


  67. kansas
    67 | October 11, 2009 2:34 pm

    They have political intercourse over there.


  68. quiet man
    68 | October 11, 2009 2:35 pm

    re: #63 by kansas

    Political discourse ala Saddam’s inner sanctum.


  69. snork
    69 | October 11, 2009 2:35 pm

    re: #65 by quiet man

    So you inhaled?


  70. vagabond trader
    70 | October 11, 2009 2:35 pm

    re: #67 by kansas

    eeeewwww.

    Jimmah meet icehole.


  71. Beltfed
    71 | October 11, 2009 2:36 pm

    re: #27 by Scrat

    I’m going to start handing out timeouts

    Good grief, is this romper room or what.

    I’d slap that peckerchecker up one side of his head and down the other, if he ever said that to me. In person.

    //Is this considered a violent act against cj


  72. Scrat
    72 | October 11, 2009 2:36 pm

    Chuck:

    despite the fact that the song performed by the children was a school project created by the children themselves.

    Does he have any evidence of this? Any netizens know if he’s correct here?


  73. quiet man
    73 | October 11, 2009 2:36 pm

    re: #69 by snork

    I cant say “I sucked” but I did inhale deeply


  74. quiet man
    74 | October 11, 2009 2:37 pm

    re: #71 by Beltfed

    sharmuta..wack his peepee


  75. quiet man
    75 | October 11, 2009 2:38 pm

    72. Scrat
    that dipshit should know..recall he said “if it could not be found on the net, it did not exist.”


  76. snork
    76 | October 11, 2009 2:39 pm

    re: #70 by vagabond trader

    If my suspicion is true, that would be hermaphroditic.


  77. Scrat
    77 | October 11, 2009 2:40 pm

    re: #71 by Beltfed

    I’d slap that peckerchecker up one side of his head and down the other, if he ever said that to me. In person.

    The guy simply has no respect for his own commenters. What a prick.


  78. Speranza
    78 | October 11, 2009 2:40 pm

    re: #3 by DEZ

    Actually Obama is loved, America is not.


  79. quiet man
    79 | October 11, 2009 2:40 pm

    re: #76 by snork

    It’s all greek to them


  80. snork
    80 | October 11, 2009 2:40 pm

    re: #73 by quiet man

    I guess I’ll just never comprehend the ecstasy of the ding. Oh, well…


  81. vagabond trader
    81 | October 11, 2009 2:41 pm

    re: #76 by snork

    Saw your comment and I’ve been saying the same thing.Maybe we could run the musings through our own corollary tool.


  82. teacake
    82 | October 11, 2009 2:42 pm

    Hi Vagabond! Its good to see some familiar names again.

    And I guess it was all about who did the attacking. They were just so arrogant about it too.


  83. Speranza
    83 | October 11, 2009 2:42 pm

    re: #77 by Scrat

    “The guy simply has no respect for his own commenters. What a prick.”

    Actually I have no respect for anyone, and I mean anyone, who posts at that insane asylum.


  84. quiet man
    84 | October 11, 2009 2:43 pm

    77. Scrat Loss of Respect is the missing link in the evolution of 1.0

    78. Speranza He is loved by tyrants, thugs, and anti-life leaders of the world. The very same people I do not want to love this country…I would like them to fear us, not cheer us.


  85. vagabond trader
    85 | October 11, 2009 2:43 pm

    re: #82 by teacake

    So little to be arrogant about too.


  86. 86 | October 11, 2009 2:43 pm

    re: #46 by snork

    It’s an environment soley inhabited by truly vile and malevolent creatures, and misguided “ding” addicts who don’t recognize it’s no longer 2008.

    It’s all rather pathetic; sad little people, living in a virtual dictatorship and jockying for position while victimizing hapless souls who haven’t noticed the changing landscape.

    If there has ever been a microcosm of of what the Left actually is, it is LGF. “Liberal Fascism”? Thy name is LGF.


  87. Speranza
    87 | October 11, 2009 2:45 pm

    re: #63 by kansas

    Sharmuta’s favorite words are still “disingenuous” and “obfuscate”.


  88. vagabond trader
    88 | October 11, 2009 2:46 pm

    re: #87 by Speranza

    constrain and its various forms.


  89. quiet man
    89 | October 11, 2009 2:46 pm

    re: #83 by Speranza

    That is what has happened to me…when I pop over to see the trainwreck..now all I feel is contempt.

    That happens less and less now. Nothing to see worth opening ones eyes for.


  90. teacake
    90 | October 11, 2009 2:46 pm

    found these comments a long time ago at Amazon.com Some of them are hilarious.

    http://www.amazon.com/Little-Green-Footballs/product-reviews/B000U8RC12/ref=sr_1_1_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1


  91. IslandLibertarian
    91 | October 11, 2009 2:46 pm

    drive by……….
    Our country is sinking into the absurd position of being turned into a Euro-Socialist-Less than Super Power with leaders being praised by tyrants and manipulated by Academia-Nobel Prize-giving WEENIES!
    MAN UP AMERICA! “0″(pronounced zero) is leading you to slaughter.
    This is happening now, right before our eyes!


  92. song_and_dance_man
    92 | October 11, 2009 2:47 pm

    What is all this then?


  93. quiet man
    93 | October 11, 2009 2:47 pm

    86. MacDuff and “environment soley inhabited by truly vile and malevolent beans”

    I am going with It’s all pure malevolent myself


  94. 94 | October 11, 2009 2:48 pm

    re: #87 by Speranza

    Sharmuta’s favorite words are still “disingenuous” and “obfuscate”.

    Oddly enough, two of the Left’s favorite tactics. Coincidence? I don’t think so.


  95. song_and_dance_man
    95 | October 11, 2009 2:49 pm

    I’m digging Castro’s groovy semi US flag motif on his shirt.


  96. quiet man
    96 | October 11, 2009 2:49 pm

    re: #91 by IslandLibertarian

    But Oprah says manly men do not turn on the chicks anymore.

    I still prefer women who prefer men, myself..**got a good one, too.**


  97. Rightside
    97 | October 11, 2009 2:50 pm

    re: #67 by kansas

    More like mutual masturbation.


  98. quiet man
    98 | October 11, 2009 2:50 pm

    94. MacDuff Laughs

    so true..lets not forget projection and denial


  99. teacake
    99 | October 11, 2009 2:51 pm

    Another thing that drove me crazy was when I made some comments about something I read long ago, or saw on an interview, some of them would demand I provide a link.

    The one that caused so much chaos was when CJ in his all-knowing about everything, claimed as if he had first hand knowledge that Aurthur C Clark was not a pedophile. But I saw a documentary of him sitting in a group of young boys in Sri Lanka explaining that his lifestyle is illegal in England and was the reason he lived where he did. That caused a total riot!


  100. vagabond trader
    100 | October 11, 2009 2:51 pm

    re: #90 by teacake

    LOL, missed those tidbits. “A mouthpiece for incestuous boredom.” Ouch!

    Have you seen the Lizard Lounge vids?


  101. Speranza
    101 | October 11, 2009 2:52 pm

    re: #27 by Scrat

    “Time outs” – Holy Fucking Shit has he gone totally bonkers? never mind!


  102. song_and_dance_man
    102 | October 11, 2009 2:53 pm

    re: #99 by teacake

    Another thing that drove me crazy was when I made some comments about something I read long ago, or saw on an interview, some of them would demand I provide a link.

    That is a hold over from the ‘fact check your ass’ days.

    snork, you wade through that moonbat blog. Do they even say fact check your ass anymore?


  103. teacake
    103 | October 11, 2009 2:53 pm

    Some of those Vagabond are hilarious! Very creative. But the one of the fat German boy as Charles, was disturbing. Had no idea if the boy was taping himself or if it was acting.


  104. Speranza
    104 | October 11, 2009 2:54 pm

    re: #30 by vagabond trader

    It is a dreadful blog – pedantic, boring, and bullying. Ignorance, cant, and folly prevail. The lizards would have made court jesters at Edward IV’s court.


  105. vagabond trader
    105 | October 11, 2009 2:54 pm

    re: #92 by song_and_dance_man

    Hi S&DM!Check this out from American Thinker. The author filled out our list.A keeper.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/ship_of_fools_obamas_intimates.html


  106. Beltfed
    106 | October 11, 2009 2:55 pm

    I wonder if CJ has a chart hanging on the wall with gold and red stars under the asslickers names.

    Gold = good
    Red = banning time


  107. Speranza
    107 | October 11, 2009 2:55 pm

    re: #103 by teacake

    teacake yo soud familiar with that nic. Was that your nic at LGF?


  108. teacake
    108 | October 11, 2009 2:57 pm

    Yep. Thats still me. Is your name the same?


  109. vagabond trader
    109 | October 11, 2009 2:57 pm

    re: #104 by Speranza

    Ed enjoyed a good laugh but methinks he would have sent a few of them to the Tower for their time outs.


  110. Speranza
    110 | October 11, 2009 2:58 pm

    re: #105 by vagabond trader

    A scary bunch of rogues that’s for sure.


  111. DEZ
    111 | October 11, 2009 2:58 pm

    CJ opened the gate, fresh meat for the grinder.


  112. song_and_dance_man
    112 | October 11, 2009 2:58 pm

    re: #105 by vagabond trader

    Too cool. Out list is longer, but as you said, they have given info on each one cited.

    Frank Marshall Davis (an admitted communist and pedophile)
    William Ayers
    Rev. Wright and his radical Black Liberation theology)
    Rezco and Auchi (Auchi being a former Saddam henchman)
    Henry Louis Gates
    Van Jones
    parents
    grandparents
    Father Pflegar
    Rashid Khalidi
    Farrakhan
    Soros
    Cass Sunstein
    John Holdren
    Cornel West
    Bernardine Dohrn
    Chicago New Party
    ACORN
    Samantha Power
    Susan Rice
    Robert O’Malley
    Emanuel twins
    Mark Lloyd
    Devil Patrick
    Reid
    Pelosi
    The Clintons
    Ted Kennedy
    Hilda Solis-sec of labor
    Janet Napolitano-Homeland Security
    Tim Geitner-sec of Treas.
    SEIU, NEA,unions
    Michelle Obama
    Ali Abunimah
    Axelrod
    The Biden Crime Family
    Eric Holder
    Valerie Jarret
    Carol Browner


  113. teacake
    113 | October 11, 2009 2:59 pm

    I stopped looking at the blog until recently when I found out how many people got banned. My word! Hilarious. On the times I do, it seems CJ is always there, glued to the blog. Sad. Wonder if he gets around to brushing his teeth any more.


  114. Speranza
    114 | October 11, 2009 2:59 pm

    re: #88 by vagabond trader

    I wonder what her Dad really thinks of her.


  115. vagabond trader
    115 | October 11, 2009 3:00 pm

    re: #112 by song_and_dance_man

    Maybe they’ll do a follow-up.Please add Stephen Chu,energy secretary, G-d help us.


  116. teacake
    116 | October 11, 2009 3:00 pm

    Hey Song and dance man! I’m a bit lost, what is that list in reference to?


  117. vagabond trader
    117 | October 11, 2009 3:01 pm

    re: #114 by Speranza

    Daddy selrahC or the bio one?


  118. IslandLibertarian
    118 | October 11, 2009 3:01 pm

    re: #96 by quiet man

    drive by #2 (waiting for GF to get ready to go out….)
    Chicks, women, ladies all dig power.
    Anyone tells you different is full of shit.
    Oprah eliminated the middle man by getting her own power.


  119. Sparky
    119 | October 11, 2009 3:01 pm

    The dresser drawer is now open for anyone missing a sock.


  120. Speranza
    120 | October 11, 2009 3:02 pm

    re: #108 by teacake

    No mine changed because I sitll have an active account there (as well as a sock) but I have not posted since December 2008.


  121. song_and_dance_man
    121 | October 11, 2009 3:02 pm

    re: #115 by vagabond trader

    Done

    re: #116 by teacake

    B. Hussein’s associations. Past and present.


  122. Speranza
    122 | October 11, 2009 3:03 pm

    re: #117 by vagabond trader

    The bio one. We all know that selrahC probably feels pity mixed with contempt for her.


  123. teacake
    123 | October 11, 2009 3:04 pm

    Thanks. At first I thought this was a list of pedophiles. Not a good thought to have off the bat.


  124. Scrat
    124 | October 11, 2009 3:04 pm

    teacake, that amazon link is hilarious! thanks!


  125. Speranza
    125 | October 11, 2009 3:04 pm

    re: #108 by teacake

    I used to be good friends with Colt and Geepers, neither of whim I have herd from in a long time.


  126. snork
    126 | October 11, 2009 3:05 pm

    re: #102 by song_and_dance_man

    Can’t say I’ve seen that phrase recently.


  127. shadowman
    127 | October 11, 2009 3:06 pm

    The liberal fool is attacking Michelle Malkin again

    Door is open (again) by the way


  128. song_and_dance_man
    128 | October 11, 2009 3:06 pm

    re: #126 by snork

    Thought so. bbiab, it’s beer thirty and today is my Friday.


  129. teacake
    129 | October 11, 2009 3:07 pm

    I remember Geepers and vaguely Colt. Pam Geller was always very nice to me. It was amazing to see how she took off.


  130. vagabond trader
    130 | October 11, 2009 3:07 pm

    re: #122 by Speranza

    When I first “saw” her in action always pegged her for an untreated bipolar.Grandiose,hyper, labile.I know nothing about her except the bits from others.


  131. blueiris
    131 | October 11, 2009 3:07 pm

    OT: so I went to a movie yesterday – The Ivention of Lying. At first I wasn’t sure how I felt about it. It had it’s moments, but now I feel rather disappointed that the easy target of Christianity has been struck once again. And, I think the undercurrent of pro-atheism was lost on a lot of movie-goers.
    It attacks Judeo-Christianity pretty strongly, implying that such a religion can only exist in a world where youc an tell lies.
    I’m curious, has anyone here seen it?


  132. teacake
    132 | October 11, 2009 3:08 pm

    I recall when Michell Malkin first showed up there and how cool that was. Now all he does is attack everyone who has the success he never got, or I guess feels he deserves.


  133. blueiris
    133 | October 11, 2009 3:09 pm

    re: #131 by blueiris

    Crap: make that The Invention of Lying.


  134. Incognito
    134 | October 11, 2009 3:09 pm

    re: #99 by teacake

    I found this http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4161/is_19980201/ai_n14474888/


  135. snork
    135 | October 11, 2009 3:09 pm

    re: #111 by DEZ

    It’s still wall-to-wall socks under his bed. Why’s he opening a new package?


  136. vagabond trader
    136 | October 11, 2009 3:10 pm

    re: #123 by teacake

    LOL, a few of them may very well be!


  137. snork
    137 | October 11, 2009 3:11 pm

    re: #112 by song_and_dance_man

    Jezuz Frezuz, that’s a long list of assholes.


  138. DEZ
    138 | October 11, 2009 3:11 pm

    re: #135 by snork

    Looks like he wants to meet the Farkers!


  139. teacake
    139 | October 11, 2009 3:11 pm

    Hey Incognito. As sickening as that is, its a good reference to have around for people who refuse to believe that.


  140. Speranza
    140 | October 11, 2009 3:12 pm

    re: #111 by DEZ

    Someone (not me by the way) told me that he will post the info at Free Republic. I would not even bother doing that.

    Funny but he really needs the posters since he bans so many.


  141. snork
    141 | October 11, 2009 3:12 pm

    re: #129 by teacake

    Pam didn’t “take off”. She was chased out by a lynch mob with tar and feathers.


  142. Scrat
    142 | October 11, 2009 3:13 pm

    36 Charles
    Sun, Oct 11, 2009 2:40:40pm replyquote 5downupreport

    My ears are burning. The Farkers are talking about me again:

    [Link: http://www.fark.com...

    What does he do, spend all day googling his own name? Dude!?


  143. teacake
    143 | October 11, 2009 3:13 pm

    Anyone who still has an active account at you know where should post that article. Charles will LOVE that!


  144. Speranza
    144 | October 11, 2009 3:15 pm

    re: #129 by teacake

    Pam Geller did not post much on LGF. She always credited Charles with being her inspiration to start her own blog and his vicious turning on her was not very pleasant.


  145. snork
    145 | October 11, 2009 3:15 pm

    re: #138 by DEZ

    Oh, lord. He’s going to have socks named Fred and Fanny Farkel and Mark and Sparkle Farkle and Simon and Gar Farkle. And Ferd Burfel.

    /Let’s see who can remember that reference…


  146. Macker
    146 | October 11, 2009 3:15 pm

    re: #118 by IslandLibertarian

    I hear harpO is a carpet muncher….


  147. Speranza
    147 | October 11, 2009 3:16 pm

    re: #142 by Scrat

    Farkers? What that??


  148. teacake
    148 | October 11, 2009 3:17 pm

    Speranza – she posted quite a bit I think in 04 or 05? I was having a nervous breakdown back then and she gave me very good advise for a very horrible “romance” situation.


  149. snork
    149 | October 11, 2009 3:17 pm

    re: #142 by Scrat

    Could you imagine how many hits you get if you google “Charles Johnson”? It’s like the scene out of Blazing Saddles where everybody in town is Howard Johnson.


  150. snork
    150 | October 11, 2009 3:17 pm

    re: #147 by Speranza

    What the Fark?


  151. Speranza
    151 | October 11, 2009 3:18 pm

    re: #132 by teacake

    He used to post Caroline Glick articles,not any more


  152. teacake
    152 | October 11, 2009 3:18 pm

    Yeah, CJ is a vicious douch


  153. DEZ
    153 | October 11, 2009 3:18 pm

    Someone should warn the new arrivals at LGF, that once the door closes the fangs come out!


  154. Speranza
    154 | October 11, 2009 3:18 pm

    re: #148 by teacake

    I hope that you overcame that situation.


  155. teacake
    155 | October 11, 2009 3:18 pm

    Nice to see you all. Need to get back to a project.


  156. blueiris
    156 | October 11, 2009 3:19 pm

    re: #149 by snork

    Love that film. :)


  157. teacake
    157 | October 11, 2009 3:19 pm

    Sort of. Thanks. Had to move. IT got worse than anything I ever imagined was possible… a few meddlers entered into it.


  158. song_and_dance_man
    158 | October 11, 2009 3:20 pm

    re: #142 by Scrat

    Linky no worky


  159. snowcrash
    159 | October 11, 2009 3:21 pm

    re: #153 by DEZ

    Howdy DEZ!


  160. song_and_dance_man
    160 | October 11, 2009 3:22 pm

    re: #145 by snork

    Hiiii!

    Laugh In

    Do I get the Flying Fickle Finger of Fate award now?


  161. Speranza
    161 | October 11, 2009 3:22 pm

    Holy Moley

    A dear frind of mine snet me this

    153 Charles Sun, Oct 11, 2009 1:07:07pm replyquote

    * 12
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #137 mich-again

    Extremism breeds extremism and I think the GOP’s lurch to the right has pretty much mirrored the Dems lurch to the left.

    Can’t agree. In fact, I see the Democratic Party as going substantially more toward the center, especially in the policies Obama has instituted since his election. One of the big reasons Obama was elected at all is because his campaign was very much not a radical campaign — he was actually very centrist. And he was helped enormously by the DNC’s deliberate push to marginalize the extremists like ANSWER and Code Pink.

    I see the GOP moving much farther to the right than the Dems ever moved to the left, because there’s a leadership vacuum in the GOP, and the extremists and religious right fanatics have moved in and seized control.


  162. DEZ
    162 | October 11, 2009 3:22 pm

    re: #159 by snowcrash

    Hey Snow, hows the world treating you?


  163. Speranza
    163 | October 11, 2009 3:23 pm

    re: #161 by Speranza

    If that is true Chaz – how the bloody hell did they wind up with McCain?


  164. vagabond trader
    164 | October 11, 2009 3:23 pm

    re: #160 by song_and_dance_man

    Used to love that show. How come I didn’t remember. Oh-oh.


  165. song_and_dance_man
    165 | October 11, 2009 3:23 pm

    If I was inclined to get a 1.0 sock it would be Sally Field and my first comment would be,

    “You like me, you really like me!”


  166. Centaur
    166 | October 11, 2009 3:24 pm

    “Unless this sniping back and forth stops now, I’m going to start handing out timeouts.”

    Oh Good God.

    Now playing: The Replacements, Pleased to Meet Me

    ashtray floors
    dirty clothes and
    filthy jokes.

    Hell Yes,


  167. song_and_dance_man
    167 | October 11, 2009 3:24 pm

    re: #164 by vagabond trader

    One hit too many?

    ;-)


  168. vagabond trader
    168 | October 11, 2009 3:25 pm

    re: #161 by Speranza

    WTfoxtrot? Hussein is a centrist? Yeah center of his own Marxist universe. What a tool.


  169. vagabond trader
    169 | October 11, 2009 3:26 pm

    re: #167 by song_and_dance_man

    Those were the days my friend.

    :D


  170. snowcrash
    170 | October 11, 2009 3:26 pm

    re: #162 by DEZ

    All is well, Cowboys win! What more can you ask for on a Sunday afternoon. Oh yeah, and its only 58 degrees in Dallas. LOL


  171. Scrat
    171 | October 11, 2009 3:26 pm

    re: #158 by song_and_dance_man

    Sorry. Here


  172. song_and_dance_man
    172 | October 11, 2009 3:26 pm

    re: #161 by Speranza

    His analytical skills are clearly wanting.


  173. Speranza
    173 | October 11, 2009 3:26 pm

    re: #168 by vagabond trader

    He lives in a bizarro world. Hussein is a left wing Socialist (redundancy) who is weakening this country beyond belief. IS he on pot?


  174. Speranza
    174 | October 11, 2009 3:28 pm

    re: #172 by song_and_dance_man

    He is a prisoner of his own ideological rigidty. In his eyes the enemy and the threat is the Religious Right.


  175. vagabond trader
    175 | October 11, 2009 3:28 pm

    re: #173 by Speranza

    The guy is not right. No pun intended.


  176. song_and_dance_man
    176 | October 11, 2009 3:28 pm

    re: #166 by Centaur

    lol

    Soon they will have a demerit button.


  177. Beltfed
    177 | October 11, 2009 3:28 pm

    re: #142 by Scrat

    My ears are burning

    Pecker friction ???


  178. jimmytheclaw
    178 | October 11, 2009 3:28 pm

    a cpmment at AT sums it up

    http://comments.americanthinker.com/read/42323/446945.html

    Federalist 59. Power of Congress to Regulate Election of Members … Alexander Hamilton
    “… it ought never to be forgotten that a firm union of this country, under an efficient government, will probably be an increasing object of jealousy to more than one nation of Europe; and that enterprises to subvert it will sometimes originate in the intrigues of foreign powers and will seldom fail to be patronized and abetted by some of them. …”

    Federalist 62. The Senate … James Madison
    “The qualifications proposed for senators … by the nature of the senatorial trust … requiring greater extent of informatioj and stability of character … participating immediately in transactions with foreign nations, ought to be exercised by none who are not thoroughly weaned from the prepossessions and habits incident to foreign birth and education.”

    Federalist 68. The Mode of Electing the President … Alexander Hamilton
    “… cabal, intrigue, and corruption …(the) most deadly adversaries of republican government might … make their approaches from more than one quarter, but chiefly from … foreign powers … (gaining) … an improper ascendant in our councils. HOw could they better gratify this than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?”

    Federalist 75. Treaty-Making Power of the Executive … Alexander Hamilton
    “A man raised … to the rank of Chief Magistrate … might sometimes be under temptations to sacrifice his duty to his interest …An avaricious man might be tempted to betray the interests of the state to the acquisition of wealth. An ambitious man might make his own aggrandizement, by the aid of a foreign power, the price of his treachery to his constituents.

    But hey, who reads the Federalist Papers anyway?


  179. Speranza
    179 | October 11, 2009 3:29 pm

    re: #170 by snowcrash

    At the sports bar in Bradenton there as a bunch of Cowboys fans there and I was warmly welcomed.


  180. Speranza
    180 | October 11, 2009 3:30 pm

    re: #178 by jimmytheclaw

    Your nic is familiar from LGF days.


  181. Centaur
    181 | October 11, 2009 3:30 pm

    re: #176 by song_and_dance_man

    And notes home to mom and dad.


  182. blueiris
    182 | October 11, 2009 3:31 pm

    re: #161 by Speranza

    One of the big reasons Obama was elected at all is because his campaign was very much not a radical campaign — he was actually very centrist.

    Obama’s rhetoric is far from centrist, and his fundamental views are more radical than any Democrat president in memory. The only thing that makes him centrist is the fact that he is basically an impotent leader and none of his radical views have of yet been translated into policy. Even with a majority in both houses he has failed to implement the changes liberals have long-desired.


  183. DEZ
    183 | October 11, 2009 3:32 pm

    re: #140 by Speranza

    New grateful fools to hit the tip jar.
    Thats my guess.


  184. Speranza
    184 | October 11, 2009 3:33 pm

    re: #182 by blueiris

    There was nothing centrist at all about Barack Obama. If I recall, Chaz supported (allegedly) McCain so why did he not support Obama if O was such a centrist?


  185. snowcrash
    185 | October 11, 2009 3:33 pm

    re: #179 by Speranza

    I googled, is that FL?


  186. Speranza
    186 | October 11, 2009 3:34 pm

    re: #185 by snowcrash

    Yes it is

    Lee Roy Selmon’s 6510 Cortez Rd, Bradenton, FL


  187. taxfreekiller
    187 | October 11, 2009 3:34 pm

    oops

    Down to about one post per min. on lgf’s .00001
    nice work Charles.


  188. Speranza
    188 | October 11, 2009 3:35 pm

    re: #183 by DEZ

    That whole blog ahs been turend on its head.


  189. snork
    189 | October 11, 2009 3:35 pm

    re: #160 by song_and_dance_man

    Wow. You’re an old pfart.


  190. song_and_dance_man
    190 | October 11, 2009 3:35 pm

    re: #174 by Speranza

    And none of us believed his denial at the time that he was purging people of faith that spoke for their beliefs.

    He is a god hater and his posts and comments confirm it.


  191. DEZ
    191 | October 11, 2009 3:36 pm

    re: #188 by Speranza

    Yuppers, and thats why I walked away!


  192. Moe Katz
    192 | October 11, 2009 3:36 pm

    Is this a designated Nancy thread or are we off the wagon again?


  193. song_and_dance_man
    193 | October 11, 2009 3:36 pm

    re: #189 by snork

    I prefer seasoned phart, but old works too.


  194. vagabond trader
    194 | October 11, 2009 3:37 pm

    re: #178 by jimmytheclaw

    That could have been written yesterday. Unbelievable.


  195. vagabond trader
    195 | October 11, 2009 3:37 pm

    re: #189 by snork

    and I am a proud old biddie!

    :D


  196. song_and_dance_man
    196 | October 11, 2009 3:37 pm

    re: #192 by Moe Katz

    Get off our blog!

    boy, you are soooo lucky I don’t have a ding button.

    ;-)


  197. Speranza
    197 | October 11, 2009 3:38 pm

    re: #191 by DEZ

    It is a blog that is viciously hostile against people of Judeo-Christian faith and are politically conservative. I would be more welcomed at the Daily Kos than LGF.


  198. Speranza
    198 | October 11, 2009 3:40 pm

    re: #190 by song_and_dance_man

    He was deliberately provocative on the threads hopin gto draw out dissenters and long term conservative posters so he could unceremoniously humiliate them by banning them and then deleting all their posts.


  199. Moe Katz
    199 | October 11, 2009 3:40 pm

    re: #196 by song_and_dance_man

    Shaddup you. Yer on time out.


  200. song_and_dance_man
    200 | October 11, 2009 3:40 pm

    re: #188 by Speranza

    .pɐǝɥ sʇı uo pǝuɹnʇ uǝǝq sɐɥ bo1q ǝ1oɥʍ ʇɐɥʇ

    Why? Yes it has.


  201. vagabond trader
    201 | October 11, 2009 3:40 pm

    re: #192 by Moe Katz

    We could whip out our weapons for show and tell if you really want to start something.

    :mrgreen:


  202. DEZ
    202 | October 11, 2009 3:40 pm

    re: #197 by Speranza

    I wish not to be welcome at either.


  203. Moe Katz
    203 | October 11, 2009 3:41 pm

    re: #201 by vagabond trader

    Redneck!


  204. blueiris
    204 | October 11, 2009 3:41 pm

    re: #174 by Speranza

    He is a prisoner of his own ideological rigidty. In his eyes the enemy and the threat is the Religious Right.

    That is an excellent way of looking at it. Anything that doesn’t fit into his template is summarily thrown out.


  205. Speranza
    205 | October 11, 2009 3:41 pm

    re: #192 by Moe Katz

    There is only so much one can say about Castro’s love for Obama.


  206. vagabond trader
    206 | October 11, 2009 3:41 pm

    re: #203 by Moe Katz

    They call us swamp yankees where I live!


  207. Speranza
    207 | October 11, 2009 3:42 pm

    re: #204 by blueiris

    He now is very solicitous of the feelings of the Islamic world which is hilarious if you look at any threads from 2001 -08.


  208. snork
    208 | October 11, 2009 3:42 pm

    re: #192 by Moe Katz

    Yes.


  209. Moe Katz
    209 | October 11, 2009 3:42 pm

    re: #205 by Speranza

    Maybe we could have a haiku contest on the subject or something?


  210. jimmytheclaw
    210 | October 11, 2009 3:42 pm

    180. Speranza on 11 October, 2009 at 3:30 pm reply

    re: #178 by jimmytheclaw

    Your nic is familiar from LGF days.

    yep


  211. davehm
    211 | October 11, 2009 3:42 pm

    I wonder? with the nations lurch to the left do any of you think that disco will make a comeback?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFz2WkVAk38


  212. song_and_dance_man
    212 | October 11, 2009 3:42 pm

    re: #197 by Speranza

    I would be more welcomed at the Daily Kos than LGF.

    Now that is an amazing and true statement. Kinda puts things in perspective.


  213. Moe Katz
    213 | October 11, 2009 3:42 pm

    re: #208 by snork

    You’re on timeout too!


  214. Speranza
    214 | October 11, 2009 3:43 pm

    re: #202 by DEZ

    “I wish not to be welcome at either.”

    And you ain’t!


  215. Moe Katz
    215 | October 11, 2009 3:44 pm

    re: #206 by vagabond trader

    How are things in King Arthur’s Court these days?


  216. DEZ
    216 | October 11, 2009 3:45 pm

    Pot, meet kettle!

    38 Charles Sun, Oct 11, 2009 3:35:24pm replyquote

    * 1
    * down
    * up
    * report

    (Stalker blog saw the open registration in about 2 minutes, BTW. Obsess much?)

    How long did it take for Chuckles to know we knew?


  217. song_and_dance_man
    217 | October 11, 2009 3:45 pm

    re: #198 by Speranza

    He was deliberately provocative on the threads hopin gto draw out dissenters and long term conservative posters so he could unceremoniously humiliate them by banning them and then deleting all their posts.

    And that is exactly what he did to me. He sought me out on an open thread (which is where I posted things about God) and started in with his faith denial creation spiel.


  218. Moe Katz
    218 | October 11, 2009 3:45 pm

    Hotel Charlifornia: You can check out anytime but you can never leave.


  219. Rightside
    219 | October 11, 2009 3:46 pm

    re: #178 by jimmytheclaw

    /Those are just a bunch of dead racists.

    /The constitution is a breathing document, to mean whatever we think it does at the time.

    Leftard progressive thinking.


  220. DEZ
    220 | October 11, 2009 3:46 pm

    re: #214 by Speranza

    I have made my dreams come true.

    ;)


  221. Rightside
    221 | October 11, 2009 3:46 pm

    Hey hippie, fuck you!


  222. DEZ
    222 | October 11, 2009 3:47 pm

    re: #221 by Rightside

    What he said!


  223. vagabond trader
    223 | October 11, 2009 3:47 pm

    re: #215 by Moe Katz

    This ain’t Camelot I tells ya. Hard frost in them northern hills tonite.


  224. davehm
    224 | October 11, 2009 3:47 pm

    re: #216 by DEZ

    Ha, good call.


  225. taxfreekiller
    225 | October 11, 2009 3:48 pm

    What will be fun to watch is when iceweasle dumbs lgf’s.


  226. blueiris
    226 | October 11, 2009 3:48 pm

    re: #182 by blueiris

    I guess what I was trying to say was that while he’s very radical in his beliefs, he has been unable to implement (thankfully) much in the way of radical change. I still think he’s extremely dangerous.
    But you get my drift I think.


  227. song_and_dance_man
    227 | October 11, 2009 3:48 pm

    re: #216 by DEZ

    Yup, right after he noticed the Farkers were talking about him. CJ is a master projectionist in the Ironic Theater.


  228. jimmytheclaw
    228 | October 11, 2009 3:49 pm

    a little humor

    HOW THE FIGHT STARTED….

    My wife and I were watching “Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?” while we were in bed. I turned to her and said, “Do you want to have sex?” “No,” she answered.

    I then said, “Is that your final answer?” She didn’t even look at me this time, simply saying “Yes.”

    So I said, “Then I’d like to phone a friend.”

    And that’s when the fight started….

    ********************************************************************
    I asked my wife, “Where do you want to go for our anniversary?” It warmed my heart to see her face melt in sweet appreciation.
    “Somewhere I haven’t been in a long time!” she said.

    So I suggested, “How about the kitchen?”

    And that’s when the fight started….

    *************************************************************************

    Saturday morning I got up early, quietly dressed, made my lunch,
    grabbed the dog, and slipped quietly into the garage. I hooked up the boat to the truck, and proceeded to back out into a torrential downpour.

    The wind was blowing so I turned on the radio, and the wind was blowing 50 mph and I discovered that the weather would be bad all day. I went back into the house, quietly undressed, and slipped back into bed.

    I cuddled up to my wife’s back, now with a different anticipation, and whispered, “The weather out there is terrible.”

    My loving wife of 10 years replied, “Can you believe my stupid husband is out fishing in that?”

    And that’s when the fight started….

    **************************************************************************
    A man and a woman were asleep like two innocent babies.. Suddenly, at 3 o’clock in the morning, a loud noise came from outside.

    The woman, bewildered, jumped up from the bed and yelled at the
    man, “That must be my husband!”

    So the man jumped out of the bed, scared and naked, and jumped
    out the window. He smashed himself on the ground, ran through a thorn
    bush and to his car as fast as he could go.

    A few minutes later he returned and went up to the bedroom and
    screamed at the woman, “I AM your husband!”

    The woman yelled back, “Yeah, then why were you running?”

    And that’s when the fight started….
    *********************************************************************
    I tried to talk my wife into buying a case of Miller Light for $14.95. Instead, she bought a jar of cold cream for $7.95.

    I told her the beer would make her look better at night than the
    cold cream.

    And that’s when the fight started….
    **************************************************************************
    A woman was standing nude, looking in the bedroom mirror.

    She was not happy with what she saw and said to her husband, “I
    feel horrible; I look old, fat and ugly. I really need you to pay me a
    compliment.”

    The husband replies, “Your eyesight’s damn near perfect.”

    And that’s when the fight started….
    **************************************************************************
    I took my wife to a restaurant. The waiter, for some reason, took my order first.

    “I’ll have the strip steak, medium rare, please.”

    He said, “Aren’t you worried about the mad cow?”

    “Nah, she can order for herself.”

    And that’s when the fight started….
    ***********************************************************************
    My wife and I were sitting at a table at my high school reunion, and I kept staring at a drunken lady swigging her drink as she sat alone at a nearby table.

    My wife asked, “Do you know her?”

    “Yes,” I sighed, “She’s my old girlfriend. I understand she took to
    drinking right after we split up those many years ago, and I hear she hasn’t
    been sober since.”

    “My God!” said my wife, “who would think a person could go on
    celebrating that long?”

    And that’s when the fight started….

    ***************************************************************************
    After retiring, I went to the Social Security office to apply
    for Social Security. The woman behind the counter asked me for my driver’s license to verify my age.

    I looked in my pockets and realized I had left my wallet at home. I told the woman that I was very sorry, but I would have to go home and come back later. The woman said, ‘Unbutton your shirt.’ So I opened my shirt revealing my curly silver hair. She said, “That silver hair on your chest is proof enough for me”, and she processed my Social Security application.

    When I got home, I excitedly told my wife about my experience at the Social Security office.

    She said, ‘You should have dropped your pants. You might have gotten disability, too.’

    And that’s when the fight started….
    *************************************************************************
    When I got home last night, my wife demanded that I take her someplace
    expensive…. so, I took her to a gas station.

    And that’s when the fight started….

    ****************************************************************************
    My wife was hinting about what she wanted for our upcoming 20th
    anniversary. She said, “I want something shiny that goes from 0 to 200 in about 3 seconds.”

    I bought her bathroom scales.

    And that’s when the fight started….

    *******************************************************************

    My wife sat down on the couch next to me as I was flipping channels.

    She asked, “What’s on TV?”

    I said, “Dust.”

    And that’s when the fight started…..


  229. vagabond trader
    229 | October 11, 2009 3:49 pm

    re: #218 by Moe Katz

    rotflol.

    He got lot of pretty pretty boys he call friends.


  230. Speranza
    230 | October 11, 2009 3:49 pm

    re: #168 by vagabond trader

    My friend sent me this

    “His logic is incredibly flawed. McCain was exactly what he wants the entire
    Republican party to morph into and he got his
    ass kicked by Obama.”


  231. DEZ
    231 | October 11, 2009 3:49 pm

    Well, I am gonna cook a few chops.
    I will obsess over the Leftist Goofy Fucktards another day,

    ;)


  232. taxfreekiller
    232 | October 11, 2009 3:50 pm

    Charles, does not matter what you did to most of us, just two bit crap with us,,

    the low class shit you did to Realwest puts you
    on the unforgiven list for life, rat bastard.


  233. snork
    233 | October 11, 2009 3:51 pm

    re: #221 by Rightside

    Upding.


  234. Moe Katz
    234 | October 11, 2009 3:51 pm

    Okay, well if this is a de facto Nancy thread, the news is Hotel Charlifornia has hit record low occupancy yesterday; 28,300 pages served US and 34,900 globally. That’s the lowest since his very early years. (Quantcast)


  235. blueiris
    235 | October 11, 2009 3:51 pm

    re: #216 by DEZ

    It’s so refreshing to be able to say what I’ve always wanted to say, to not be deleted, and to know that Charles is eating up every world. Now who’s the stalker, eh?


  236. snork
    236 | October 11, 2009 3:52 pm

    re: #225 by taxfreekiller

    Dang, dude. Keep it under the Cone of Silence™.


  237. goddessoftheclassroom
    237 | October 11, 2009 3:53 pm

    re: #228 by jimmytheclaw

    {jimmytheclaw}

    I’ve missed you and your jokes!


  238. rain of lead
    238 | October 11, 2009 3:53 pm

    test


  239. snork
    239 | October 11, 2009 3:54 pm

    re: #230 by Speranza

    Whiskey Tango Fiddlestix?


  240. Moe Katz
    240 | October 11, 2009 3:54 pm

    re: #223 by vagabond trader

    Cold rain here. And the days grow short….


  241. vagabond trader
    241 | October 11, 2009 3:54 pm

    re: #234 by Moe Katz

    Wondering how long these clicks stay at teh Bedlam.Are there stats?


  242. Speranza
    242 | October 11, 2009 3:54 pm

    Now Chaz has adopted the whole leftwing lexicon – particularly the use of the term “wingnut”. When was the last time he used the term “moonbat”?


  243. rain of lead
    243 | October 11, 2009 3:54 pm

    test


  244. song_and_dance_man
    244 | October 11, 2009 3:55 pm

    re: #228 by jimmytheclaw

    LOL.

    What does Bill say to Hillary after sex?

    “I’ll be home in 20 minutes!”


  245. rain of lead
    245 | October 11, 2009 3:55 pm

    whoo hoo!


  246. snork
    246 | October 11, 2009 3:55 pm

    re: #234 by Moe Katz

    I’m melting! Meeeeeelting! What a world, what a world…


  247. Iron Fist
    247 | October 11, 2009 3:56 pm

    re: #27 by Scrat

    Be QUIET! The Den Mother has spoken, kids…


  248. Speranza
    248 | October 11, 2009 3:56 pm

    re: #234 by Moe Katz

    Most of those are us looking in at the train wreck.


  249. snork
    249 | October 11, 2009 3:57 pm

    re: #242 by Speranza

    He agrees with Monbiot (the original moonbat). Monbiot is one of the shriller climate alarmists.


  250. Iron Fist
    250 | October 11, 2009 3:58 pm

    Oh, my. Registration is open at the Zoo. I don’t know nuttin’ ’bout nobody named “Sock”…


  251. blueiris
    251 | October 11, 2009 3:58 pm

    re: #244 by song_and_dance_man

    Remember, if you smoke after sex you’re doing it too fast. ~Woody Allen


  252. vagabond trader
    252 | October 11, 2009 3:59 pm

    re: #230 by Speranza

    The regression is complete.


  253. lobo91
    253 | October 11, 2009 3:59 pm

    re: #230 by Speranza

    Well, his logic is only flawed if you assume that he wants Republicans to win.


  254. vagabond trader
    254 | October 11, 2009 4:00 pm

    re: #250 by Iron Fist

    Would mittens be too obvious you think?


  255. song_and_dance_man
    255 | October 11, 2009 4:00 pm

    re: #250 by Iron Fist

    It’s always open nowadays. Not what does this tell us, class?


  256. song_and_dance_man
    256 | October 11, 2009 4:01 pm

    re: #254 by vagabond trader

    Or ‘Socks the Clinton cat.’


  257. song_and_dance_man
    257 | October 11, 2009 4:03 pm

    re: #251 by blueiris

    Ha. Haven’t heard that one in a long time.


  258. snork
    258 | October 11, 2009 4:03 pm

    re: #250 by Iron Fist

    Is Queeg saying “sockitoome”?


  259. song_and_dance_man
    259 | October 11, 2009 4:05 pm

    re: #258 by snork

    Another Laugh In reference. POTUS Nixon said it.


  260. LoFlyer
    260 | October 11, 2009 4:06 pm

    Evening mates! Goddess, you are a sight for sore eyes! Jimmy your jokes were hilarious! Are you a married with children fan too?


  261. Iron Fist
    261 | October 11, 2009 4:06 pm

    re: #230 by Speranza

    It isn’t just that. IIRC, Charles was pretty unhappy with McCain as the nominee for the same reasons I was unhappy with it. Now he thinks the magical mushy center is where we need to be? All jokes and laughing aside, there is something just wrong when someone switches that radically for no apparent reason. He’s had some kind of “Road to Damascus” conversion experience only from an anti-Christian, anti-Republican direction.


  262. lobo91
    262 | October 11, 2009 4:12 pm

    re: #261 by Iron Fist

    He’s had some kind of “Road to Damascus” conversion experience only from an anti-Christian, anti-Republican direction.

    Given that he’s neither a Christian nor a Republican, I think that would be more of a reversion than a conversion.


  263. Moe Katz
    263 | October 11, 2009 4:13 pm

    re: #241 by vagabond trader

    ???


  264. LoFlyer
    264 | October 11, 2009 4:15 pm

    re: #261 by Iron Fist
    Iron I noticed Charles was starting to lose it six months before I got canned, I told him publically that he needed a vacation, and to get some help running the blog. Charles probably has the most technically correct blog on planet. He is a computer geek and I suspect he does not interface well with humans on a face to face basis. I noticed that Charles did not support any attempt have local LGF meets around the country. I always thought that was odd. By the way, what happened to Real?


  265. Moe Katz
    265 | October 11, 2009 4:16 pm

    re: #241 by vagabond trader

    Oh, you mean, of those loading pages now, how many will stay? You can only watch the declining totals and chortle with diabolical Schadenfreude.


  266. Moe Katz
    266 | October 11, 2009 4:20 pm

    re: #248 by Speranza

    Makes one feel even guiltier for stalking, doesn’t it?


  267. snork
    267 | October 11, 2009 4:20 pm

    re: #264 by LoFlyer

    He landed over at the country club.


  268. vagabond trader
    268 | October 11, 2009 4:21 pm

    re: #265 by Moe Katz

    Just thinking on how long each looker lingers.Not very long is my guess.


  269. goddessoftheclassroom
    269 | October 11, 2009 4:21 pm

    re: #260 by LoFlyer

    {LoFlyer}


  270. Godzilla
    270 | October 11, 2009 4:24 pm

    The problem with Charles is that jealousy and envy has wormed into his brain. In the old days, the right blogs were few, and geeky Charles vaulted to the top because of his programming skills. These skills drew commenters, and LGF for a while was a hotbed of scintillating, intelligent discourse, and also a clearing house for links which fed the commentary. He got lucky with Rather.

    However, the right has caught up, and Charles cannot compete with the Michelle Malkins, the Hot Airs, Ace, etc. Charles is a cut and paster, a sniper, nothing more. This is the bare truth. To put this is biblical terms, Michelle Malkin’s (and HA’s, and Ace’s, etc) offerings have been well received, but not Charles’s. And so Cain takes his brother out into the field and kills him out of envy.


  271. Moe Katz
    271 | October 11, 2009 4:24 pm

    re: #268 by vagabond trader

    The blog wars gave him a bit of a spike in September but he seems to be losing that now and falling to a new, lower plateau.

    So what’s your psych dx for Sharmuta? I’m thinking possible BPD…


  272. DEZ
    272 | October 11, 2009 4:26 pm

    re: #264 by LoFlyer

    I can shed some light on Realwest.
    He and a few others decided that LGF had taken a very nasty turn.
    So they started a new blog with the idea to simply walk away from LGF, no flouncing, no fighting and no blog wars.
    They put in place strict rules prohibiting any bad mouthing of any site or members.
    They were immediately banned and labeled as stalkers buy Chuckles and his merry band of miscreants.
    Charles missed me in the initial banning of the rouge members that dared to walk away from his now libtard love orgy, so I let him know about it.
    And today when members asked why I had been banned, he simply stated I was at the stalker site.
    Funny how thats not the reason I was banned, but I hardly expect that brainless douche to come up with anything remotely original.


  273. Moe Katz
    273 | October 11, 2009 4:27 pm

    re: #270 by Godzilla

    “And so Cain takes his brother out into the field and kills him out of envy.”

    Heh, nice biblical metaphor.


  274. snork
    274 | October 11, 2009 4:27 pm

    re: #270 by Godzilla

    But the flipside of that is that he can’t compete with Huffpo and Kos, either.


  275. Moe Katz
    275 | October 11, 2009 4:28 pm

    re: #274 by snork

    That’s because he isn’t Abel.


  276. jimmytheclaw
    276 | October 11, 2009 4:30 pm

    260. LoFlyer on 11 October, 2009 at 4:06 pm reply

    Evening mates! Goddess, you are a sight for sore eyes! Jimmy your jokes were hilarious! Are you a married with children fan too?

    yes


  277. Rightside
    277 | October 11, 2009 4:30 pm

    re: #274 by snork

    I still think he is trying to ingratiate himself with those leftards. Not necessarily compete with, but more like augment those sites. A link here, a hat tip there, next thing you know…


  278. Godzilla
    278 | October 11, 2009 4:32 pm

    re: #274 by snork

    And that’s what’s so pathetic. Charles will eventually turn on anyone he aligns himself with.


  279. Beltfed
    279 | October 11, 2009 4:32 pm

    re: #209 by Moe Katz

    Cato “service dog” is named Haku


  280. LoFlyer
    280 | October 11, 2009 4:33 pm

    re: #269 by goddessoftheclassroom

    {Aaaarrrr!) How are the kids this year?


  281. Moe Katz
    281 | October 11, 2009 4:34 pm

    re: #279 by Beltfed

    I do wonder what he uses that service dog for. Or do I really want to know….


  282. snork
    282 | October 11, 2009 4:34 pm

    re: #277 by Rightside

    Snot zactly working out too well, according to the meters.


  283. Moe Katz
    283 | October 11, 2009 4:36 pm

    Nancy reminds me of the gypsy fortune teller who gave up crystal ball gazing because she couldn’t see any future in it.


  284. DEZ
    284 | October 11, 2009 4:36 pm

    re: #281 by Moe Katz

    Peanut butter comes to mind….


  285. Moe Katz
    285 | October 11, 2009 4:37 pm

    re: #284 by DEZ

    Eeew.


  286. Godzilla
    286 | October 11, 2009 4:37 pm

    re: #273 by Moe Katz

    Thanks. I think the metaphor is very apt. To extend it a little, Charles has now been marked, and is settling into the land of Nod.


  287. LoFlyer
    287 | October 11, 2009 4:37 pm

    re: #272 by DEZ

    I always liked Real. He is a very real and good-hearted person. Sorry to see him getting trashed by LGF. What’s his blog, I’ll look him up!


  288. vagabond trader
    288 | October 11, 2009 4:39 pm

    re: #271 by Moe Katz

    Yup. Maybe mixed? Even with all the ridicule, very sad.


  289. LoFlyer
    289 | October 11, 2009 4:40 pm

    re: #276 by jimmytheclaw
    I have always been a big Bundy fan! The most dysfunctional family ever! I only see the re-runs at 2 AM on odd occasions nowadays…..


  290. snork
    290 | October 11, 2009 4:40 pm

    re: #286 by Godzilla

    If you look at his overnight threads, there’s been a lot of nodding off going on. And then in the day, they all nod in agreement. It’s nod around the clock there. Nod that there’s anything wrong with that…


  291. Moe Katz
    291 | October 11, 2009 4:41 pm

    re: #288 by vagabond trader

    Yes, indeed. But she’s so nasty it’s hard to have too much sympathy.


  292. Beltfed
    292 | October 11, 2009 4:42 pm

    Welcome new hatchling, don’t forget to clean up the egg shells.

    Why, thank you, thankyouverynuch. lol


  293. Rightside
    293 | October 11, 2009 4:43 pm

    re: #287 by LoFlyer

    I’m not sure of the addy, but if/when you register there, please do not mention “the site that shall remain nameless”


  294. vagabond trader
    294 | October 11, 2009 4:44 pm

    re: #291 by Moe Katz

    That was never my fave malfunction.Too disruptive in a reasonably stable community.Once they started to escalate I usually got the shrink to sign papers for the big house up the hill.


  295. vagabond trader
    295 | October 11, 2009 4:46 pm

    re: #287 by LoFlyer

    Correspondence Committee.


  296. Moe Katz
    296 | October 11, 2009 4:48 pm

    re: #294 by vagabond trader

    Manipulative as hell.


  297. LoFlyer
    297 | October 11, 2009 4:50 pm

    re: #295 by vagabond trader
    Thanx! I’ll be back in a while….


  298. LoFlyer
    298 | October 11, 2009 4:51 pm

    re: #293 by Rightside

    As Shults always said “I KNOW NOTHING!”


  299. vagabond trader
    299 | October 11, 2009 4:54 pm

    re: #296 by Moe Katz

    Big time. A touch of the bipolar too? Grandiose,labile.


  300. Moe Katz
    300 | October 11, 2009 4:56 pm

    re: #299 by vagabond trader

    Hard to Dx without more on her personal habits, eating behaviors, sleeping, sexuality, etc.


  301. vagabond trader
    301 | October 11, 2009 5:02 pm

    re: #300 by Moe Katz

    Hey you’re the pro,I work cheap and the assessments match my payscale!Nurse Ratchets job was to observe, record, report. Some stuff you could put money on, but you are absolutely correct.Lots of factors.

    :-)


  302. goddessoftheclassroom
    302 | October 11, 2009 5:02 pm

    re: #280 by LoFlyer

    I have TERRIFIC students this year–among my best yet!


  303. LoFlyer
    303 | October 11, 2009 5:05 pm

    Well they threw me out over at Reals Blog!

    Nah! Just kidding, but I do need to register and I will do that when I feel like it. A lot of NIC’s I haven’t seen in a long time…


  304. LoFlyer
    304 | October 11, 2009 5:13 pm

    re: #302 by goddessoftheclassroom

    Great! Maybe they can help me with my homework! (Like do the dishes, mow the lawn, clean the tub, stuff like that!) It must be really satisfying to teach kids, something to think about when I retire….


  305. Incognito
    305 | October 11, 2009 5:28 pm

    another find for Arthur C Clarke’s Paedophilia

    http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3587168.ece


  306. 306 | October 11, 2009 5:29 pm

    re: #19 by jakee308

    (sounds of uncontrollable laughter)

    Thanks for the rewrite.


  307. Incognito
    307 | October 11, 2009 5:34 pm

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFgKXAphIlc&feature=related

    It would have been funny but really it is like…too uncanny…


  308. LoFlyer
    308 | October 11, 2009 5:35 pm

    I see what you mean about Real’s blog, My first reply was from Bar Wench asking I read the rules. I doubt she will like my answer…..


  309. snork
    309 | October 11, 2009 5:37 pm

    re: #307 by Incognito

    What’s funny is that it’s not that old, and two of the three “insiders” listed there are banned.

    Kilgore, you paying attention?


  310. Incognito
    310 | October 11, 2009 5:41 pm

    re: #261 by Iron Fist

    There is The Iron Fist! I just saw the video about you! I posted the link just before…


  311. goddessoftheclassroom
    311 | October 11, 2009 5:57 pm

    Good night, y’all!


  312. Moe Katz
    312 | October 11, 2009 6:51 pm

    re: #301 by vagabond trader

    “Nurse Ratchets job was to observe, record, report.”

    So for Charmuta, an enema?


  313. least
    313 | October 11, 2009 6:59 pm

    Interesting how many of the Farkers mention how 1.0 has suddenly become reasonable and rational [meaning seriously moonbattish]


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David