This guy and his cesspool of a blog are no different than Daily Kos, HuffPo, and DU. He’s nothing more than a tool (fool?) of the left. Let’s take a look at what Nancy said Limbaugh said, and what Limbaugh actually said. We’ll start with Nancy’s distortion, which is no different than what you’d hear from the state-controlled media, Kos, HuffPo, DU, etc. Here’s what Nancy said about Limbaugh from his cesspool AKA LGF:
Limbaugh: ‘We Need Segregated Buses’
POLITICS | Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:06:51 am PDT
A lot of lefty blogs are calling for a boycott of Rush Limbaugh after he indulged in blatant, ugly race baiting. I’m not joining that call, because I don’t believe boycotts are a good thing, in general. People like Rush Limbaugh should be allowed to say this kind of stuff; it makes it easier to see what they’re really advocating, and who really supports it.
I searched, and found not a single right wing blog denouncing this vile rant. As far as I can tell, nobody on the right seems to think there’s anything with this.
Since I’m being excommunicated from the ranks of the faithful anyway, I’ll come out and say it: this is absolutely disgusting. Where was Michael Steele? What the hell is wrong with the right?
Now, let’s look at what Rush actually said:
RUSH: During the break Mr. Snerdley showed me a website that a friend of his had alerted him to. Apparently it has taken hold out there that when discussing Obama’s America as it relates to the school bus incident — where was that? That was in Belleville, right? Belleville, Illinois — playing off the Newsweek story of, you know, all white kids are born racists. I did a whole routine here on, “Well, maybe we need to segregate the buses and so forth,” in a joking fashion. And this guy at the Southern Poverty Law Center, this Mark Plotkin… Is that his name? What…? Mark Potok. Mark Potok says that I want to segregate buses! We’re going to get to what he said and what I said but I want to preface it or precede it with Howard Dean last night on MSNBC. He was asked if he shares Pelosi’s concerns over the wave of violence we all know is just waiting to break out.
DEAN: There’s a lot of money to be made in passing out hate of the kind that Rush Limbaugh is just doing. Rush Limbaugh, look, he’s always an entertainer, but he’s way over the line. And this is a long — there’s a long, unfortunate American tradition of this, going back to Father Coughlin and people before that. Just in… They appeal to the very worst in people. They appeal to the — to, uhh, the side of all of us that is about anger and fear and hatred, and they empower it, and it is an evil thing to do, and it’s very, very bad for the country. But for a long time these people have put themselves and their wallets way ahead of America. They pretend to be patriots, but they’re not patriotic at all.
RUSH: There you have it. (laughing) Dr. Howard Dean, the former leader of the Democrat National Committee. See, they’re setting this up. They’ve been desiring to write this story for 18 or 19 years now. They do it. Even when it’s not true, they write it. “Limbaugh! Limbaugh inspires violence, angry white men.” Yeah, to oppose health care, not only is it racist now, it’s unpatriotic to oppose socialized medicine. (laughing) These people are kooks. They’re nuts. Now let’s go to this Potok kook. This guy is a genuine, off-the-wall lunatic. He’s at the Southern Poverty Law Center. He was on Hardboiled last night with Chris Matthews. And this guy Potok is an embarrassment of a human being. He’s claiming that I actually want segregation on buses. (laughing) Matthews said, “What is it in the atmosphere allows a person to feel comfortable showing up at a political event carrying a gun? Maybe two guns, letting people know they’re armed? What is it in the atmosphere that let’s a person bring a sign that compares the president to an animal or to a Nazi?” Chris, Pelosi got the Nazi thing going, dude! “What is it that makes them feel comfortable doing that kind of crap in public, Mark? I wonder if it isn’t the atmosphere of language that’s being used today. Your thoughts, sir, Mark Potok?”
POTOK: Yesterday Rush Limbaugh was on the air talking about an incident in which black kids attacked a white kid on a school bus, an incident the police said was not racially motivated and saying that what we need are segregated buses — that this is the only way, I suppose, that white people can be protected from black people. I think when we have characters like Limbaugh saying that on the air to millions of Americans, many of whom actually revere the man, you know, it’s not surprising that people feel that, uh, you know, the race wars around the corner and that, uh, we’re allowed to say these kinds of things.
RUSH: It’s incredible. (laughing) This whole race tumult is being orchestrated and run out of the White House straight out of Rahm Emanuel and Axelrod’s office. They are promoting it; they are encouraging it. Isn’t it amazing? You have black kids who beat up a white kid on a school bus. That’s not racism. You have half the country criticizing a socialist health care plan, and that is racism. Okay, so you there heard this despicable embarrassment of a human being, Mark Potok, from the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Project. Now, here’s the comment I made in context, in response to a caller, obviously not a call for segregation.
CALLER: Hi, Rush. Hey, I just was commenting on the Belleville incident with the kids on the bus. You’re right. They did report that last night as being racially motivated, but I just heard the news before your show started and the police chief over — I think he was a police chief, some law enforcement — there said that after further investigation of it would be not racially motivated. He said he should have been more professional before he commented on it and investigated it more before he decided and stated that it was racially motivated.
RUSH: Well, did he say why, in Obama’s America, that incident with the white kid getting beat up on the black school bus was not racially motivated?
CALLER: I didn’t hear him comment about that. No, sir.
RUSH: Because we’ve seen the videotape. Have you seen the videotape?
CALLER: Oh, yeah, sure.
RUSH: We can’t hear what’s being said.
CALLER: No.
RUSH: So we don’t know what obvious taunts this lone white student was dishing out to the whole bus.
CALLER: Right.
RUSH: We don’t know what obvious taunts.
CALLER: Right.
RUSH: Worse than the obvious verbal taunts, we all know the racism that was in the kid’s mind. I mean Newsweek magazine says he was born a racist. So you know the white kid is sitting there thinking N-word and all kinds of things being surrounded by these black students. They knew that. They knew that and so they just descended on the kid and beat him up. We’ve seen the videotape. What did the police chief investigate?
CALLER: He did not comment on anything other than he said more investigations shows that it was not racially motivated.
RUSH: I think the guy is wrong. I think not only was it racism, it’s justifiable racism.
CALLER: True.
RUSH: I mean, that’s the lesson that we’re being taught here today. Kid shouldn’t have been on the bus anyway.
CALLER: Right.
RUSH: We need segregated buses. It was invading of space and so forth. This is Obama’s America.
Now, if you can’t figure out, after reading the entire transcript, that what Rush said was obviously sarcasm, you’re no different than the washed-up, pony-tailed ukulele player, Howard Dean or that other pathetic libtard clown from the Southern Poverty Law Center
Defenseman’s Identity is exposed!
http://www.littlegreenfootballs2.com/2009/07/16/progressives-eugenics-holdren-and-lgf/
Sorry, this is the right link!
http://avideditor.wordpress.com/2009/09/21/defenseman-exposed/
next at 1.0
Rush limbaugh buys his mother a new can opener so she can eat dog food!
CJ is actually Patsy Schroeder. I knew it all along
re: #3 by Doppelganger
I think Charles is just DNC hack. He just repeats their talking points.
Although my listening to Rush Limbaugh has been very sporadic, I’ve listened to him long enough to know he does NOT race-bait, and only an idiot (I mean you, Charlie; hi, by the way) would buy into the peddled horse manure.
re: #3 by Doppelganger
Doppelganger- Actually, that Patsy Schroeder part about the can opener was included in the transcript from Rush’s website, but since it had nothing to do with Chuckle’s lie, I omitted it…
re: #4 by Rodan
Willing idiot is the term I prescribe; actually, make that chief willing idiot.
With this step into absurdity, I am almost convinced Charles if performing some sort of psychological research on the Stockholm Syndrome to see just how far he can lead his Cult.
Or he is just fucking out of it.
He used to mock such leaps of fancy.
Ch_rles:
“Do not quote the flouncers.”
(”Anti-Abortion Activist: Abortions Should Be Done in the Public Square” #219)
re: #8 by IslandLibertarian
I think the 9/11 effect wore of on him. He is back into Progressive politics. He was a Leftist B4 9/11. Look at the Early LGF, he used to call Bush: Shrub.
Work’s been very slow so I’ve had time to grind through a number of 1.0 threads, mainly looking for class-act door slamming. The best one by far was a great work of banter by freedomplow. I’m sure he’ll be here soon.
The threads here are getting better and better.
Tonight I flounced. Regarding abortions. He said the Tea Partiers had pictures of DEAD BABIES, tonight they are
CELLS. I called him on it in this exchange.
Charles Johnson 9/14
Video: Bad Craziness in Washington DC
US News | Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 7:11:16 pm PDT
Open talk of revolution, Hitler, Hitler Hitler, pictures of dead babies with a fanatic screaming “Repent,” and more people with signs that say, “We came unarmed … this time.”
Charles Johnson 9/21
The VAST majority of abortions performed in the United States are done when the so-called “baby” is nothing more than a few cells. Not even close to a “baby.”
Which is it babies or cells? Everyday a new mind contortion.
And thus I flounce, and you’re nothing like my daddy, he was not mean.
re: #11 by Bunk X
He nailed them all. He went out in a blaze of glory. he made SHarmuta crack and Iceweasal go ballistic.
Charles is performing the role of bigot here.
Hello everyone!
I was following the previous thread and popped over to Drudge to scan the headlines.
How’s this for an awful thing to happen:
Mother will be forced to give up her baby at birth because the IVF clinic implanted someone else’s embryos!
http://tiny.cc/rUVpl
As a side note, it’s bad enough that CJ bans those who challenge him, but it’s very poor form to delete all the banee’s prior comments. Jes’ sayin’.
re: #12 by treesarie
Welcome. I wouldn’t call it flouncing… You resigned or liberated yourself, don’t constrain yourself with his childish terms and labels.
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one who regards or treats members of a group (e.g. a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance. Bigotry is the corresponding mindset or action.
That describes LGF 1.0 pretty well these days. It describes IceWeasel to a T.
re: #13 by Rodan
Did you get any transcriptions? It was an excellent smackdown.
Owl B back in a few.
re: #12 by treesarie
CJ has the OBama/Atheism view here of life. The majority of the world probably believes life begins on or around conception. IMO
re: #12 by treesarie
Wow – great points to CJ and excellent flounce!!
I saw where he’d described flouncers earlier as people who want to say “I hate you daddy” to him before they leave LGF. Oh brother!!!
Meanwhile, it was the liberal school board in Omaha Nebraska that actually resegregated schools.
Oops.
I should have quoted “flounce”. I have not posted there in over a year, but he infuriated me on that abortion thread.
I was too shy in there, all the personalities were so strong, so I did not post much.
re: #6 by Bob in Breckenridge
I know. I listened to that show live the other day. He illustrated the stupidity of people who take him out of context by playing Patsy’s speech on the house floor.
CJ makes the mistake many liberals make with regards to Limbaugh : they don’t actually listen to the show before they get their pony tails twisted in knots about what limbaugh said.
naive fools
OT/ Glenn Beck tells Katie Couric: “I think John McCain would have been worse for the country than Barack Obama”
You Tube video:
[Glenn] Beck: McCain Would’ve Been Worse
From Ace of Spades:
It’s On: Mark Levin Goes After Glenn Beck
Beck V. Limbaugh
Irony alert:
498 Charles
Sun, Sep 20, 2009 5:48:38pm replyquote 12downupfavoritereport
It’s kind of pointless to worry about the political views of musicians.
Trust me. I speak from experience.
Most of them are a lot like idiot savants — they know everything about music and have strong opinions based on reality. But when it comes to politics they almost invariably go along with the prevailing groupthink.
Just dig the music, and forget about their opinions.
re: #12 by treesarie
Welcome and belly up to the bar, drinks are on savage, he just got engaged. (Wait until he gets back and finds the tab)!
re: #11 by Bunk X
Bunk- All of us here are working at making this site better. We’re more interested in growing our readership, even if they disagree with us, than banning those who disagree.
I should have added when I posted this thread that it’s also an overnight open thread to comment about whatever anyone wants to.
We’ve all decided, those of us who post the threads here, that we would use only the overnight open threads to point out how liberal Charles Johnson and LGF has become.
The rest of the time our threads will be about whatever is newsworthy.
re: #12 by treesarie
The train wreck continues
I joined so I could post this for my friends left at LGF1. I heard it took 16 seconds for Charles to delete my comment. Not a true flounce by any means, I walk away.
556
jorline Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:08:50pm replyquote • 0
• down
• up
• favorite
• report
re: #425 iceweasel
Oh fuck…I forgot we linked HuffPoo here now.
I give up…you win weasel. Who could win an argument against a story out of Austin from Hufftard.
Do you have any links coming from KOS?
Hey Charles are we officially quoting Media Matters and Huffington Post here as fact.
LGF has gone to shit…bye bye!
I w
Charles has no problem at all with the idea of lying about Rush Limbaugh to try to win over the moonbats whose love he craves.
Rush is very open about the fact that liberal scum like Charles take his individual words out of context on a regular basis.
Everything Rush says is archived on his web site so that everyone who needs to know what he’s talking about can see that liberals are lying about him when they take his words out of context.
Charles is Daily Kos II these days, except that they’ll never accept him. They see him as a traitor to the right wing but they’ll never take him in since he started out as a traitor to the left wing in September 2001.
re: #27 by CloudyDay
I think it’s true. Electing John McCain would have justified the leftward slide of the REpublicans and would have majorly increased it.
The HOPE is that the RNC learns, from the constant losses in 06 and 08, that the leftward slide = loss and starts to move to the right.
The Conservative voices raised since Obama took office should hopefully prove that the rnc needs to be the conservative party.
In THAT respect, obama has done more for conservativism than McCain would have.
Much like Jimmy Carter brought us Reagan.
Is ice weasel an admin for Chuckster now?
This is the thread that got me blocked from LGF. I rarely ever posted over there, but after listening to the audio link for corroboration I felt his interpretations was off. But that wasn’t what got me to post…it was his whining about being ‘excommunicated’. My post went something like this:
“What Rush says on the link doesn’t jive with what you posted.
And Charles, you haven’t been excommunicated. You have changed. Reading LGF today is like reading DailyKOS. It is full of posts that do nothing but ridicule republicans. While they do things worthy of ridicule at times, so do the democrats. But the fact is that what we need right now is gridlock, and you’re not helping.”
So I got blocked for that. But the bright side is that if he hadn’t blocked me, I wouldn’t have found this site. I found it by googling “banned by lgf”. So I guess I should say, “Thanks Charles. But you’re still a prick.”
Anyway, here I am and this is my first post. You will soon be able to revel in my glory as I provide you with my glorious and knowledgeable insights.
re: #32 by FishOrCutBait
Don’t forget that Charles and others there have been quoting SPLC.
re: #2 by Rodan
I see more photos here and here
LGF has become the island in “the Lord of the Flies” ( LGF=LotF…what can that G be used for?)
Mob rule and all of us are the kids with the glasses…Piggy, trying to speak reason but being drowned out and banished.
His attack on Limbaugh is so ridiculous and intellectually dishonest that he has flounced away any modicum of credibility he might have claimed persisted.
We know CJ hates Glen Beck. I am no great fan but Media Matters simply smeared him and Fox with this video they released yesterday regarding the lack of proper reporting into the ACORN employe who claimed to kill her husband. They absolutely selectively edited the video saying no one at Fox is interested in looking into the facts when the very next words out of Glen Becks mouth (which is precisely where the editing occurred) were asking for additional reporting to corroborate the facts. A lie so blatant on Media Matters end that they should have NO CREDIBILITY the next day when they release a tape of Limbaugh that King Charles declares as fact.
Read about it and watch the video’s here http://hotair.com/archives/2009/09/19/media-matters-dishonest-editing-in-support-of-their-smear-argument-exposed/
It is like LGF proving that Dan Rathers memo is false and that CBS lies and the very next day CBS producing a memo that Limbaugh or Glen Beck were draft dodgers and accepting that as fact since it fits your narrative.
It is so intellectually dishonest on Charles part that he has made himself into a laughingstock.
Again…watch the video edited and unedited and then decide if you would trust another video or audio produced the next day by this organization and accept their narrative as fact.
CJ did and he looks like a bigger fool for doing so.
re: #17 by CynicalConservative
Absolutely, the use of that term not very apropos. While the word “flounce” can mean “to go with sudden determination” according to Webster, as in “he flounced out in a huff”, it really doesn’t describe what these posters are doing — it is generally not sudden and usually not in a huff.
Generally, one associates “flounce” with the following two definitions: 1 a : to move with exaggerated jerky or bouncy motions ; also : to move so as to draw attention to oneself — Again from Webster’s.
Those definitions seem to apply more to a couple of Chuckie’s sycophants than to those resigning with determination from the LGF wreck.
I’m beginning to wonder if LGF isn’t some grad student’s project like the infamous experiment in the 50’s (?) that demonstrated how far people would go in obedience to someone in authority.
re: #25 by treesarie
Knock your self out here. No need ot be shy.
re: #12 by treesarie
Good catch (the baby v. cell stuff).
I think my favorite part, though, was the “you’re not like my daddy, he wasn’t mean!” line
re: #37 by LanceKates
SPLC?
re: #43 by RightMinded
Southern Poverty Law Center.
re: #32 by FishOrCutBait
Nice
re: #36 by poppycock
Welcome!!
Charles is dead wrong about what Rush Limbaugh said, as you pointed out to him.
Charles is off his rocker.
re: #44 by LanceKates
Ah, thanks for that!
Aren’t they the same outfit that said that there are a ton of “homeless children” when in fact they included kids living with relatives/friends etc…?
re: #40 by AZfederalist
Nicely clarified!
re: #47 by RightMinded
They’re also the ones that rail against those evil christian pro-file folks.
re: #32 by FishOrCutBait
Good one!!
Thanks for letting us know about this here!
re: #23 by LanceKates
This is even better:
Race-based discipline in Tucson schools
re: #37 by LanceKates
It’s the iceweasel, jimmah and cato show now. If someone read LGF a year ago and went back today they would be blown away.
Charles…people don’t go to LGF for you…it’s your bloggers they come to read. It’s like Coke reinventing itself in the 80’s…hey everyone, lets be #2.
re: #49 by LanceKates
I guess they wouldn’t like me then.
Hello Refugees, the new island has great beaches, beautiful weather, no cannibals and somewhere here, is an open bar.
re: #36 by poppycock
Anyway, here I am and this is my first post. You will soon be able to revel in my glory as I provide you with my glorious and knowledgeable insights.
POPPYCOCK!
/kidding……….
re: #49 by LanceKates
that should be pro-life, not pro file.
I think we’re all pro file.
except taxes.
He made a public fucking fool of himself tonight. Even his own people were trying to rationalize it away.
re: #51 by spidly
yup, clearly a joke by Rush is more evil than actual racist acts by liberals.
That’s also what got him kicked out of announcing football, if I recall.
re: #32 by FishOrCutBait
Hey jorline, I remember you well, from my daze at LGF, before it became the cesspool it is. Welcome aboard!
re: #36 by poppycock
Welcome aboard also! If you don’t mind disclosing it, what was your nic at LGF? Mine were this one and also Ozark Mountain Daredevil.
re: #53 by RightMinded
They don’t like me either.
NOt only am I a white straight male, but I also own guns and eat meat.
Poll
Which of LittleGonadsFondlers drank the most FLAVORAID tonite?
re: #57 by Moe Katz
Charles Johnson’s wisdom on abortion is now immortalized, along with his blinding crystal clarity regarding the cell-embryo-fetus axis.
re: #35 by Jerry
Yes.
At Hot Air:
Your Unofficial ‘Ongoing Self-Destruction of LGF’s Charles Johnson’ Thread
re: #60 by LanceKates
I’m sure you’re at the top of their watch list, lol.
It’s the same here. In addition, we homeschool, which is another touchy subject.
re: #52 by FishOrCutBait
Welcome aboard, feel free to speak your mind. We have free opinions here and even have Sports threads. Enjoy and make it your blog!
re: #32 by FishOrCutBait
Welcome Jor… I mean Fish.
re: #65 by RightMinded
oh man, if you like American Flags and the Constitution, you might as well paint a target on your backside.
re: #64 by CloudyDay
Damn, Robert S McCain keeps nailing selrahC/Icarus!
re: #59 by Bob in Breckenridge
Poppycock, same as here.
re: #68 by LanceKates
Patriotism is racism you know!
/
The Progressive Propaganda!
Any yet Rush *STILL* links to LGF on his ’stack of stuff’ page. Who the hell is the webmaster there? I just emailed him again, suggesting that he de-link LGF.
re: #64 by CloudyDay
I was pleased to see LGF has been moved to their “Left Channels” links.
re: #71 by Rodan
well, I do what I can.
I’m just glad they notice.
ok, I’m out.
Tomorrow is my friday for my 4 day work week.
ha.
re: #68 by LanceKates
Yep. My sons are also in Scouts, so our days could be numbered.
But, we’re in AZ, so the atmosphere isn’t too toxic, yet.
re: #36 by poppycock
Welcome
re: #76 by RightMinded
G’Night!
re: #72 by Godzilla
Where exactly is the link to LGF on Rush’s website?
I’m a member but I don’t see it.
Thanks!
nite
re: #59 by Bob in Breckenridge
Thanks Bob, I remember you well also.
Funny thing is Charles and the ButtBoys are passing my leaving as a flounce on abortion…that wasn’t the debate. I called theweasel bluff on her statement that Rick Perry was advocating succession at several tea parties.
She never provided shit. Someone else produced 3 links. I used those links to prove Perry never promoted succession.
Hey WTF, I’m just another crazy right winger who probably has a gun.
Now watch theweasel clip my last comment to read, He has a gun!
re: #47 by RightMinded
It’s no different than that Bullshit lie SeeBS report that half the children in America go to bed hungry.
What they actually asked the kids was did you ever go to bed when you were hungry in the past year. About 50% said yes, they did.
SeeBS took that and ran with it saying that half the kids in America go to bed hungry.
It’s obvious these libtard swine hate our country.
re: #30 by Bob in Breckenridge
Good decision.
re: #22 by Eliana
lol so Charles sees himself as a Dad to Sharmuta and Irish Rose?
LGF down the road with Sharm at guard
re: #84 by orangecrush
CJ sees himself as everyone’s “daddy” on LGF.
He’s vying with Obama for the Most Inflated Ego of the Solar System Award.
re: #32 by FishOrCutBait
Friend of Realwest ? It’s is getting slim around 1.0 parts.
re: #28 by Lily
Heh! That should be a banner quote here!
I heard the original broadcast of Rush’s sarcastic take. As I said on another sit, I was sitting in my car having a smoke and by the end of that riff I was spitting Diet-Coke out my nostrils.
That was Rush at his sarcastic best! And the sarcasm dripped off of every word!
Then again to understand sarcasm one must have a sense of humor, that lets Chuckles out!
610 Cato the Elder Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:27:26pm replyquote
* 1
* down
* up
* report
re: #503 jorline
Jorline took the big vacuum gulp?
I saw that coming.
Cato, your head is so far up your ass you couldn’t see your own shit.
re: #82 by Bob in Breckenridge
Yes they do want to bring the country down.
The worst thing is that Obama uses their numbers. Then the MSM will quote him and the left will take it as gospel without doing any research on their own.
re: #81 by FishOrCutBait
Shame on you, you should have at least two. I’ll make up for it and designate one of mine as yours by proxy.
You were all talking about abortion earlier; I just came across this article, and it breaks my heart….got to share it somewhere, so here it is:
_________________________________
UK Nat’l Healthcare Lets Preemie Die Because Was Born 2 Days “Under Limit”
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/sep/09090901.html
re: #58 by LanceKates
Naw. Rush, a football aficionado, described a mediocre quarterback who happened to be black, as a darling of the media. That’s not racism.
re: #90 by FishOrCutBait
LOL, oh that is great. That asstard would have to be my least favorite person there. Well, actually now that I think of it, it would be a pretty tough contest. LQV, IceQueen, and Bloodnok could easily be added.
By the way. Hey everybody!
Last one…I promise. HEEHEE
615 Jimmah Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:28:58pm replyquote
* 0
* down
* up
* report
re: #605 Bagua
Was the jorline flounce the typical “farewell you’ve changed” message or the angry insult variety? I’ve not seen so many of the frequent posters with good karma flounce.
I’ve seen quite a few posters with ‘good karma’ flouncing. Don’t forget that many posters with ‘good karma’ got that karma from people who are now banned agreeing with their wingnutty bollocks.
Jimmah, we finally agree. I got my karma from people who have left LGF in droves and some who still remain.
LGF is now a left wing moonbat blog.
re: #87 by orangecrush
Good friends.
Good night to all you right wing moonbats. My GOD bless you and keep you.
re: #96 by FishOrCutBait
Hey, you are Jorline right? My nic at LGF was WestTexas, not sure if you remember me. I lurked a lot though.
re: #90 by FishOrCutBait
I’m not sure why anyone sensible would be adding a character count to a thread at LGF anymore. It’s gone perverse.
Charles – Bigot
Kilgore – Major Racist
Sharmuta – groveler
Cato – Kapo
Iceweasel – certifiable far left.
A field of weeds.
re: #92 by Jerry
Thanks
re: #99 by linoleumknife
Sure I remember you…hope all is well.
re: #93 by Ma Sands
Thanks for posting that. The link line alone was heartbreaking enough, I couldn’t bring myself to click on it…
re: #79 by Eliana
Log on, go to the daily stack of stuff page. LGF is linked along with Powerline and HA.
re: #70 by poppycock
Oh okay, I didn’t see you on Kirly’s list of those of us banned by the washed-up ukulele player at his cesspool. Maybe you’re not on her list yet. There’s so many of us banned, it’s hard to keep track, ya know!
re: #100 by orangecrush
Irish Rose and Defensman /Honorary Yooper = KKK
re: #100 by orangecrush
Oh and don’t forget jimmah.
re: #102 by FishOrCutBait
I am just peachy, thank you.
Hope you enjoy it here. It is a welcome change of pace. You can put your feet up, mix a drink, and breathe.
re: #104 by Godzilla
Oh – I’ve found it!
Thanks!
re: #79 by Eliana
Look on his “Total Stack of Stuff” page, in the gray box, “These are resources that I have added to everything else that I use for
show prep. Show prep is, of course, an ongoing and never-ending thing. “
Time to call it a night. Thanks for letting me post my farewell to LGF.
re: #96 by FishOrCutBait
LGF is Tranzi Progressive.
re: #108 by linoleumknife
TY…see you soon.
re: #105 by Bob in Breckenridge
Most of the anti flouncer commenters at LGF are unable to call Charles on his BS. That’s a major weakness in the blog. They’ll become guilt associated as a creationist, fascist, racist.
And crapweasel isn’t really a debater. She has set ideas about propaganda and how to stick to them regardless of any facts thrown at her. She uses the vitriol and vile style to avoid ceding points in a debate. Brings new meaning to the word airhead. She needs to get a real job.
re: #106 by Rodan
Take the high road.
re: #81 by FishOrCutBait
Actually Fish, what Governor Perry was talking about was Texas’s state sovereignty underr the tenth amendment, NOT secession, but that idiot iceweasel is too stupid to know the difference. The stupidity over there never fails to amaze me.
re: #111 by FishOrCutBait
welcome. People should just post their LGF farewell here instead of there. More readers.
re: #111 by FishOrCutBait
Goodnight.
Glad to see you’re here. I enjoyed reading your posts at the “other place”.
re: #115 by Bunk X
I do, but sometimes I need to take a dump on the trash!
You know I’ve been thinking about it, and I have come up with a good comparision between 1.0 and here. When you move to a new area, you try to find a bar or lounge to relax at. 1.0 is like a yuppie bar your new co-workers drag you to one Friday night. It’s flashy, there are cliques that the patrons have. The drinks are expensive, and at the end of the night you feel kind of empty. Here it is like that cozy corner bar. You know most everyone, there are never any serious fights, and the price is right. You could spend a weeknight or a holiday there. Eventually the smarter ones find the smaller bar, and the yuppie bar is left with the d-bags. Atleast that’s how it feels.
Hi, All! What’s shakin’?
Anyone so obtuse as to not see that Rush was being sarcastic is too stupid to be allowed anywhere near sharp objects.
re: #110 by AZfederalist
Yes, I see it. I was looking at his Stack of Stuff Quick Hits Page. I see the Daily Stuff now.
Thanks!
re: #106 by Rodan
yah i forgot those. Irish Rose doesn’t seem that important to the flow at LGF. She is just noisy.
Gus and Yooper I seemed to not have noticed their comments much in all the comments I read at LGF. and I read a lot.
Jimmah is iceweasel’s b**tch lol I am sure he likes it.
re: #106 by Rodan
I thought defenseman was hoosier hoops.
re: #121 by Number6
Howdy!
Dark_Falcon Mon, Sep 21, 2009 9:15:24pm replyquote
* 6
* down
* up
* report
re: #556 jorline
And this one really sucks. Jorline was someone who I relied on for sympathy and advice. To see him flounce like that is just sad.
This war on LGF sucks. alot. So I make my plea:
Please read what Charles and iceweasel post. Don’t flounce simply because they won’t stone the infidel. Give them a chance. Please my friends, don’t leave. If you disagree, do so respectfully and sanely.
/impassioned plea for sanity ended
re: #114 by orangecrush
“And crapweasel isn’t really a debater. She has set ideas about propaganda and how to stick to them regardless of any facts thrown at her. She uses the vitriol and vile style to avoid ceding points in a debate. Brings new meaning to the word airhead.
She needs to get a real job. ”
I thought that was the sharmutant. Or was that irish rose? Or ice weasel? It’s very difficult to keep track of all the pathetic unemployed welfare-collecting female stalkers at nancy’s cesspool these daze…I need a scorecard or something!
re: #126 by Calostintx
Well there is the problem. So many have tried to debate selrahC in a calm and respectful manner just to be banned.
re: #120 by linoleumknife
Great analogy, best I’ve read!!!
Sharmuta is unique in her manipulative and histrionic behavior. I think she is a borderline, and a fairly bright one.
re: #126 by Calostintx
Some of those at LGF will never understand what’s going on.
CJ/LGF has been waging a war against the right for almost two years now (including against his own members that he spends all day every day banning).
Someone should ask Dark Falcon if he/she can name any other famous blog that bans people (including long time posters!) all day every single day.
Charles started a war that he can not win.
re: #121 by Number6
That was obviously my point also, Number6.
re: #119 by Rodan
Vent all you want, dude. Just sayin’ that it’s not productive, and won’t help your site in the short run, let along the long run.
Allow us obnoxious commenters the opportunity to call iceweasel a lump in the lower intestine. Allow us to call Kilgore Trouser a leg-humping moby asshole. Allow us to call Honorary Humper a meth-addicted pig fucker, and to make him deny it. Allow us the satisfaction of knowing that Irish Rose is taking time from recharging her Steely Dan to track us down with inebriated threats of litigation.
Then you can chastise us for being uncivilized.
Just a thought. =)
re: #129 by Bob in Breckenridge
Thank you.
/takes a deep bow, lol
The hot meme among the lizards right now seems to be that there’s a war against LGF. Hmmm, who started that?
re: #127 by Bob in Breckenridge
That’s one reason it reminds me of a cult. The 3 harpies.
re: #135 by Moe Katz
People would have stayed at LGF if Charles had respected the community. Or if the debate had remained honest. Sadly neither happened.
It was Charles who widened his guilt by association net and broadly leftly defined creationsim, racism, and fascism.
Maybe indeed a war of ideas has erupted. My view is that his net and definitions are not scientifically based but mostly his personal opinion.
re: #133 by Bunk X
I think the best replies to LGF antics come from the newly departed there. They always have a unique perspective.
re: #138 by orangecrush
Agreed. But iceweasel is still a lump.
re: #137 by orangecrush
And they change like the weather. He makes it up as he goes along—he’s just thrashing about trying to get his blog popular again by repositioning it in a way that he thinks more promising.
He’s like the gypsy fortune teller who gave up crystal ball gazing because she couldn’t see any future in it.
re: #117 by orangecrush
Also, the farewell won’t be dumped into the bit bucket. It will live on, in posterity, to eternally torment selrahC.
re: #126 by Calostintx
To dark falcon: Dude you’d have to call Charles and Iceweasel out on their continuous errors if you want people to stay.
re: #128 by linoleumknife
At least 100 times, I thought about sending a private message to Charles on his top page direct message feature (no longer there, apparently) to send him an anonymous message from a friend’s IP address to tell Charles that he has been going overboard.
I thought of 100 nice ways to put it (with the caveat that I wasn’t sending him hate email so that I wouldn’t end up in one of his “We’ve Got [Hate] Mail” threads).
I thought of 100 nice ways to tell him that he is doing what he had accused the left of doing for years and years. I thought I could reach him if I just wrote it nicely enough.
After awhile, I knew there was no way to reach him.
Awhile after I gave up, I went poof on LGF.
Charles is lost. It’s permanent.
re: #127 by Bob in Breckenridge
Yes a regular job would do them good. Cut a lot of the BS out of their lives.
re: #130 by Moe Katz
re: the sharmutant…I have to disagree Moe.
As Dirty Harry Callahan (Clint Eastwood) once said about his Lieutenant when he asked Harry “Do you know my record?” and Harry responded “Yeah, you’re a legend in your own mind”…
re: #145 by Bob in Breckenridge
I think she’s effective in her dissembling, manipulative way.
I’ve been using Rogaine and it’s been surprisingly effective. Should I change my name to Moe Hair?
re: #126 by Calostintx
Dark Falcon shows the unfortunate success of the lying and cover-ups that Charles and his chief cohorts engage in, in order to misrepresent the decency with which people *do* leave that blog.
Dark Falcon, if you are reading this, and you and I have had friendly exchanges there in the past — there are many people who were banned while being NOTHING BUT “respectful and sane.”
I am living proof. I threatened no one, was neither abusive nor nasty when I disagreed with the site’s vilifaction of tea party attendees. I awoke the next day to find my posting privileges revoked after 4 1/2 years anyway.
Dark Falcon, the most respectful and sane commenters ARE the ones leaving LittleGreenFootballs.com. They either left on their own volition or were banned simply for disagreeing, even in a polite and dignified way.
You are swimming in a cesspool, Dark Falcon, and your eventual respectful and sane disagreement with Charles will get you banned sooner or later despite your pleas to everyone else.
re: #141 by Bordm
Do both- I did…
re: #88 by Bunk X
I was wondering when someone would notice that!
The irony of it all!
re: #147 by Moe Katz
People running here
People running there
Everybody lookin’ for
A little Moe Hair?
re: #151 by Number6
Ha!
re: #143 by Eliana
Hell, he banned me with out provocation. I was in the 9/11 thread just reading comments. Did not down ding anyone. LOL, I really should thank him though. I feel so much better here. He has lost his mind though, and it is sad to watch. He had a great blog that had actually made an impact on the world. It’s all gone now.
512 Charles Mon, Sep 21, 2009 8:55:32pm replyquote
* 5
* down
* up
* report
re: #508 Throbert McGee
Having said THAT, I must likewise insist: don’t ever drag the conversation into the gutter by saying that an abortion before 12 weeks “kills a baby.” (Let alone shit like “murdering unborn children.”) It kills an organism that’s biologically human, yes, but it’s not yet a “baby.”
And in fairness to Charles, HIS misleading hyperbole (”nothing more than a few cells”) was in response to misleading hyperbole from jamgarr. But as the blog owner, he’s the one who’s supposed to be setting a better example for Lizard behavior, right?
————-
“I totally stand by my statement that the vast majority of abortions in this country are performed long before there is anything more in the womb than a few cells. It’s a fact.”
————-
I can’t speak for Chuck, but I’m glad that my few cells weren’t sucked out.
re: #146 by Moe Katz
“I think she’s effective in her dissembling, manipulative way.”
And still umemployed and still posting 24/7/365 at Chuckle’s cesspool…Unless maybe Chuckles gives her a weekly stipend from his pimping pathetic jeans from Amazon.com, and speaking of Amazon, how has irish rose’s job search been going?
/Any idea?
re: #154 by Bunk X
Chuck is biologically human. But he is not a man.
re: #155 by Bob in Breckenridge
Irish Rose’s job search? I’m 404 on that page, boss.
Does Irish Rose have any sort of job skills?
There’s an ad for Glen Beck’s “Arguing with Idiots” on Cf’nJ’s front page now. He must be having a shit hemmorage!
re: #147 by Moe Katz
See if the makers of Rogaine will use you in their commercials and call it “moegaine”- Like moegaines moe hair from moegaine, and so could you!
I wonder if we could get an ad for 2.0 on his front page.
“Does Irish Rose have any sort of job skills?”
Sucking up.
re: #160 by Bob in Breckenridge
LOL!
re: #162 by Number6
That’s a fairly useful one.
Good morning everyone. I’m kinda new here. I hope in the right place.
re: #162 by Number6
By the way, I was meaning to ask if you ever found out who Number 1 was?
re: #164 by Moe Katz
It “comes in handy”.
re: #161 by Moe Katz
THAT would be hilarious.
Morning, Bat Guano. Of course you’re in the right place. This is THE place to be.
re: #159 by The Osprey
Haha, I thought it was pricless when the book came out, and Chucky flipped out over the photo on the cover.
re: #168 by Bunk X
Yeah, I wonder if you could pull that off, somehow.
Sometimes the blog wars remind me of high school and trying to get the opposing school’s goalposts.
re: #165 by BatGuano
Are you BatGuano Crazy? Then no. Otherwise you’re in the right place at the right time.
Hi and welcome, BatGuano!
Moe Katz: Blog wars remind my of high school cliques as well.
grr typos
re: #165 by BatGuano
Welcome BatGuano
Thank you for the welcome.I just came from 1.0. It left me a few months back.
re: #158 by Moe Katz
“Does Irish Rose have any sort of job skills?”
Many- Cashier at 7-11, flipping burgers at MickeyD’s, night janitor at the local grade school, professional dog walker, bagging groceries at her local Wal-Mart, cleaning bedpans at her local old folks homes…Her opportunities are endless!
re: #178 by BatGuano
Heh, heh. Charlie give this place so much free publicity, can’t thank him enough.
re: #178 by BatGuano
That seems to be the common observation. Once the few remaining sensible people leave there i won’t have a need to read it.
re: #178 by BatGuano
BG– Did you walk or were you given the stick?
re: #179 by Bob in Breckenridge
Strumpet has a higher skill level than that.
re: #165 by BatGuano
Welcome aboard Bat! Are you a banned ex-LGF’er like most of us here? It’s not required, of course!!!
re: #178 by BatGuano
Bat Guano! You’re the Colonel from Dr Strangelove, aren’t you
re: #154 by Bunk X
Charles saying it is just a few cells and that is a fact.
/Well he is wrong. Again.
re: #178 by BatGuano
It’s breath taking how much difference there is between now and a year ago. This time last year it was a place to get coverage on the war on terror, and to find out things about Obambi the media would not touch. Now it is a left wing whore house.
re: #172 by Moe Katz
Or that Brady Bunch episode where they stole the other high school’s mascot, a goat, and hid it in Greg Brady’s room. Remember that?
re: #182 by Bunk X
I posted the truth, “Goodbye, I love you all”, or words to that effect. It was probably deleted.
Ah, I see we have another refugee from Bedlam.
Welcome BatGuano!
On behalf of 2.O, I offer you this laurel and hearty handshake!
re: #187 by linoleumknife
Without the benefits.
re: #185 by Edouard
Yes, Edouard (if that’s you’re real name.)
re: #189 by BatGuano
Well hopefully the ones you meant it for got to see it.
Wondering if the wide latitude given Throbert McGee could be because as an openly gay man he serves as a token for Charles to advertise his tolerance and inclusiveness….
re: #189 by BatGuano
Classy. Some have spun out, a few have gone out with style. The whole meltdown is a soap opera for me.
A lot of people feel like they have lost their online home as a result of Charles’ current Reign of Terror.
re: #189 by BatGuano
I figured I’d say welcome quickly before I bust a hole in this iMac because there is a damn mosquito flying around p-ssing me off because I can’t kill it as it passes the bright monitor (I’m in the dark otherwise).
WELCOME!!!!!!!!!!!!
I also wonder if the dingbullies have been instructed to cut down on the piling on and the incestuous updinging. That thread tonight had very little dinging.
re: #154 by Bunk X
Charles:
“I totally stand by my statement that the vast majority of abortions in this country are performed long before there is anything more in the womb than a few cells. It’s a fact.”
There should be a constitutional amendment that prohibits that idiot from making any comments about the reproductive cycle ever again.
re: #187 by linoleumknife
Today’s threads made up my mind for me to post here. To borrow an LGF term, “It is bad crazy over there”. I would like to add there are many good people there and I already miss them.
re: #194 by Moe Katz
Most posters would have been banned for that.
Thorbet got a pass just like KT. Even Thorbet believes a baby is a baby and not just a few cells. Thorbet is getting a taste of the real cj.
846 Bagua Mon, Sep 21, 2009 11:28:02pm replyquote
* 0
* down
* up
* report
re: #788 Dark_Falcon
And jorline has now shown up at Rodan’s place, posting as FishOrCutBait. My sorrow grows deeper.
Is this a confirmed stalker mutation?
Big LGF moving if BatGuano and Jorline appear here.
re: #196 by Number6
Yeah, as a psychologist I’m thinking of developing a deprogramming and loss counseling package for new ex-lizards.
re: #191 by Bunk X
Very true, and even if there where benefits, I would not want them. Not to be tacky, but I just do not see the Sharm or IceQueen doing it for me.
re: #194 by Moe Katz
Well I wouldn’t mind seeing him make his way over here. His posts were usually thought provocative and humourous.
re: #190 by Bordm
Thank you!
re: #201 by Lily
Yeah, he stands outside the social system with a kind of teflon protection like a court jester.
re: #196 by Number6
Charles Johnson is the Sean Michaels of blogging. His users are Marty Jannetty. For awhile, LGF was like The Rockers. Until ole CJ kicked his users in the face.
Yeah yeah…WWF/WWE reference probably won’t be caught by many. Hey: It isn’t real. It is entertainment, and I don’t even watch anymore!
re: #195 by Bunk X
Bunk X they (the posters) are jumping off a sinking ship at record pace.
re: #194 by Moe Katz
I wouldn’t mind him here either but his stuff often comes as a real non-sequitur. He’s really egocentric and tuned out of the dynamics of the posting.
re: #200 by BatGuano
I agree here. There are still many people there a lot of us like to read. Just it felt oppressive to be there.
re: #204 by Moe Katz
Not a bad idea at all!
I can see a lot of hurt and trauma in some of the long-term posters that got the axe or who had to leave.
re: #176 by Number6
We used to have an “edit” button for fixing typos, but we shut it down for awhile because it slowing down the site to a crawl due to our servers here being ridiculously slow.
We’re moving to GoDaddy as our webhost, and once that happens, all the bells and whistles will be up and running. Give us a week or so.
re: #188 by Bob in Breckenridge
Didn’t see that episode, Bob, but that’s the idea. Exploits against the other side, big laugh.
re: #198 by Moe Katz
I didn’t read 1.0 today. 2.0 kept my attention in the free time that I had. Plus some people posted the gossipy stuff here for me.
re: #213 by Bob in Breckenridge
Good to hear!
re: #212 by Number6
You bet. I know I experienced it.
re: #183 by Moe Katz
Okay, I have to ask: Who’s Strumpet?
re: #213 by Bob in Breckenridge
I read up on bluehost and looked at the CEO blog. he seemed to be pretty positive sites wouldn’t go down. But my experience was otherwise. I chatted with them for a bit as I was also looking to change hosts and the chat crew didn’t have an opinion on slowness or an outage.
re: #215 by orangecrush
I really need to type “blogmocracy.com” into my browser because I left off the 2 on accident and wound up going to LGF to see him spew the stuff mentioned in this article…. Something I cared less to really see.
I could also go to google and type “LGF2″.
Oh yeah: I’m weird. I don’t put websites in “favorites”. Never have. I guess I suffer a little OCD on that issue.
re: #218 by Bob in Breckenridge
Slut.
re: #200 by BatGuano
I agree, but there is a tipping point. I’m not sure if I would have left sometime soon or later, but I was feeling out of place more and more everyday. It was really getting to me. I used to read just about every thread, then less and less as time passed. It got to where I was going through the archives to find stuff I had missed. I just don’t see Glenn Beck and Tea Parties as the biggest threat to our freedom since the Crown or Hitler.
This from ABC linked via HotAir:
Woman admits to 15 abortions in 16 years.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/ReproductiveHealth/abortion-addict-admits-multiple-abortions-suicide-attempts/story?id=8594347
re: #209 by Lily
Lily–
Earlier today there was talk about voting on a mascot for 2.0, and someone suggested “BlogRats.” I liked it for the obvious reasons.
re: #218 by Bob in Breckenridge
Probably Sharmuta
re: #193 by orangecrush
I do too, but last posts have a short shelf life. I did not want to embarrass Charles on his own website, but I thought a heartfelt goodbye was not too much. I also chose a time when he was present so he could do as he wished.
Charles:
Having said THAT, I must likewise insist: don’t ever drag the conversation into the gutter by saying that an abortion before 12 weeks “kills a baby.” (Let alone shit like “murdering unborn children.”) It kills an organism that’s biologically human, yes, but it’s not yet a “baby.”
BTW, Charles, isn’t a baby ‘biologically human’? Or is the prenatal bilogical human not yet a real human?
re: #223 by RightMinded
Probably Sharmuta, too!
re: #225 by The Osprey
Bingo
re: #187 by linoleumknife
“Now it is a left wing whore house.”
You owe an apology to whores and houses!
re: #197 by Bill Jenkins
Thanks, Jenks!
re: #217 by Moe Katz
I wasn’t there long enough to be that invested. I had to wait 2 years to catch an open registration, then a year later the blog owner decidse to go scorched earth. But I had a long term online home, non political, elsewhere.
re: #221 by Moe Katz
You are so banned now for using that word!
/;)
re: #212 by Number6
Get Rodan (or one of the other admins) to set up a decompression chamber.
I’d like to do a study on Sharmuta. I’d title it “The Strumpet Shall Sound.”
re: #228 by Bill Jenkins
Well, apparently she’s married and has 2 kids now, so Sharmuta is out of the running. There’s actually a pic of this “lady” in the article.
re: #224 by Bunk X
Yeah I saw that….like rats jumping off a sinking ship?
re: #233 by Lily
LOL.
re: #190 by Bordm
Lol.!
re: #227 by Godzilla
That is an odd point of view. When couples want to get pregnant. They try and make a baby. They treat it as human life from conception. They don’t use a clinical sterile interpretation.
For political operatives to try and dehumanize the life process is plain wrong.
re: #213 by Bob in Breckenridge
The edit function was a nice crutch, but not necessary IMO.
re: #194 by Moe Katz
I read that in one of our earlier threads. Personally, I look at it as whatever floats your boat. Oh, and as it was when I was in the military- Don’t ask, don’t tell.
re: #236 by RightMinded
It seems like a bogus story. I wonder if she provides proof to back up her wild claim. Seems like a quick way to make a buck and then mock the people most offended by her BS.
re: #192 by BatGuano
At least I know you’re one person who’ll never go into combat with loose change in his pocket.
re: #232 by Number6
That’s good. Some people really have deep roots. I was more miffed by the repressive treatment than devastated by the loss.
re: #230 by Bob in Breckenridge
LOL, well maybe it would be more appropriate to compare it to our betters on capital hill.
These ‘venting threads’ help. So does the support the newbies find here. But a lot of the refugees have some mourning and healing ahead of them. That will take time.
re: #242 by Bob in Breckenridge
Dunno, Bob. This ain’t the military. If I were gay I think I’d want to be ‘out’ in any online community I participated in. But maybe that’s naive, maybe the homophobia would make it not worthwhile.
re: #243 by Bill Jenkins
Yeah, I read through the comments and there were some good points. The woman claims fear of “fundamentalists” outrage, but does nothing to hide her identity. Apparently the book came out in May with no sales. Nothing like claiming the right wing is out to get you to bump up your worth.
re: #240 by orangecrush
A batshit crazy point of view is more like it. Charles has, tonight, called the developing embryo and fetus everything but late for dinner.
re: #247 by Number6
And we have so much fun deconstructing them in real time on threads like that abortion one tonight! That was great spectator sport!!
re: #235 by Moe Katz
Moe since the change to the left she has gotten more shrill and ugly with her wording. And if anyone starts to debate her or say something ugly to her…Charles chimes in real quick.
Plus if you do corner her with facts…her retort is simply “I’m not going to spoon feed you. Do your own research.”
Time for some sleep. Catch y’all in a few hours.
re: #253 by Number6
Good night.
I’m out too. Night all.
re: #2 by Rodan
Rodan,
Sometimes I prefer to know posters by their nics and and forget that there are real persona’s behind those monikers. That being said, Charles started it!
What really, really interests me about Honorary Yooper is that he is a highway geek. What on earth is a Highway Geek? What do they do? I was always under the impression that a person was run over or arrested if they geeked on a highway.
re: #219 by orangecrush
Exactly, which is why we’re moving.
re: #214 by Moe Katz
Commie!!!
/Just kidding!
re: #237 by Lily
Some folks were pushed, including myself, but the idea is the same. The thread was at about noon today, can’t remember which post.
re: #199 by Godzilla
Abortion is the taking of a potential life, not the removal of a few cells. Charles is an idiot.
Originally, I thought I was pro-choice and then after hearing a bunch of nasty lesbians protest and people brag about the right to abortion as if it was as honorable as free speech…I began to rethink my views.
re: #244 by Edouard
Ah! A doctorstrnangeloveophile. A Neo-logism.
re: #252 by Lily
I haven’t watched her lately but that rings true, Lily. She’s certainly more faithful to CJ than to the facts. I was thinking she is attached to him in a classically female way, having no other males in her life to attach to.
re: #256 by Bob in Breckenridge
Hopefully with godaddy we’ll get some Danica Patrick speed. Or a shower scene would be ok also.
re: #2 by Rodan
FOR THE RECORD:
I do not agree with this. Outing people is just darn wrong. It was wrong with LGF did it, and it is wrong when you do it.
re: #257 by Bob in Breckenridge
Did you guys go to the other school’s football field to steal their goal posts or is that just a Canadian custom?
re: #250 by Godzilla
BatGuano just escaped from The Village. Show some respect.
re: #261 by Moe Katz
I think so too. She is on 24/7.
re: #263 by WrathofG-d
I’m not in favor of it also, but I can see why Rodan did it. Charles and his blogmates are being petty about 2.0. At some point both sides should just back off that. I’ve mentioned it to Irish Rose. She can’t control herself and Charles approves of her behavior. I don’t see them as being able to not stalk.
What that does probably is just lessen peoples enjoyment of 1.0.
I would suggest that the personal part of the blogwars occur somewhere like defenseman or some other neutral blog.
re: #266 by Lily
Sad, really.
re: #263 by WrathofG-d
I don’t mind the outing, but perhaps it should have been done more anonymously?
re: #227 by Godzilla
Never argue with an idiot, Just move out of the way and let him or her expose their stupidity or lack of knowledge.
/Works 99% of the time, if you’ll give the chance.
re: #265 by Bunk X
Thank you, Bunk, “It’s a stereotype and I find it offensive”. ROTFLMAO!
re: #270 by Bob in Breckenridge
/Works 99% of the time, if you’ll givethem the chance.
I’m off to bed. See y’all later.
re: #264 by Moe Katz
Must be Canadian.
/But I thought all you Canucks did was play hockey.
I am brand new here but I have scanned these threads before and you should all know I have had good relations with Sharmuta and Iceweasal. They have both been nice to me on a personal level and I will not criticize either on a personal level.
re: #271 by BatGuano
Aren’t you glad you don’t have to go through the “Hey Look! A Hatchling” gauntlet crap here? Now go fuckin’ get a beer… for yourself. =)
re: #159 by The Osprey
I sent Beck a message pointing out how Chuck celebrates every time a sponsor withdraws support for his show, and suggested perhaps he shouldn’t advertise there. No reason for him to be giving money to someone who hates his guts.
I’m outta here. Goodnight all. To all our new posters, welcome aboard, and invite your family, friends, etc.
re: #275 by BatGuano
Now, on issues that is another matter, but I will be respectful.
re: #275 by BatGuano
There are others who’ll disagree with your assessment, but no worries. It’s all mockery from here on in.
Joliet is one of the most sh-tty cities in the entire USA.
re: #276 by Bunk X
Yeah, I did have to that when I first posted there. (Sumbitches).
re: #277 by poppycock
It is my understanding that the ads are randomly placed to a certain extent and keyword driven to a certain extent. It’s how all those “Muslim dating service” ads show up on anti-jihad sites.
I’m sure Johnson is not amused and is trying to find a way to block it. Glen would probably get a laugh out of the fact that his ad is showing up on the “Jazz Musicians” site.
re: #259 by Bill Jenkins
Abortion is killing, a willful ending of life, and calling the developing prenatal organism an embryo or a fetus doesn’t change that one bit. Those terms have real scientific value, but the pro-abortionists rely on them because it puts a semantical distance between the organism’s status as an embryo/fetus and its eventual postnatal identity as a human being. We are all organisms, however, and the fetus will eventually emerge complete and independent from its mother, becoming human in every sense of the word. This is an inescapable fact. Killing the embryo or fetus will end its potentiality.
There’s no soft pedalling this. If one has intellectual integrity, that is.
Some folks have commented that the threads here are kinda like LGF circa. 2003 or so, but I wasn’t following the comments that much then.
BTW, the comments run in spurts here, and I have yet to see any serious flaming going on. Whenever anyone gets irritated, everyone aims their angst at CJ & Co.
I’m signing out. Nice to meetcha.
re: #275 by BatGuano
In the past, I recall cordial exchanges with Sharmuta. The night I was banned, however, she turned against me even though I was not being disrespectful or out of line. She conducted an inquisition against me on Charles’s behalf, asking questions about what I thought of Charles personally, once she saw that I was disagreeing with him — even though I followed through on my purpose not to get personal in that discussion. Her inquisition directly led to my banning.
So while I’m aware that it is possible to have civil exchanges with her, I’m afraid that my experience is that good will toward Sharmuta is not repaid in kind.
re: #276 by Bunk X
What? The standard LGF2 “We’re watching you” threat didn’t pop up at login?
Rodan didn’t have to check your credentials before allowing you access? I mean, he has his computer crunch numbers for hours with very technical software that crosschecks IP addresses along with scans for users registering on proxies trying to avoid their banning.
Ugh. I am going to have to tell him he’s going to have to increase his security checks and only let 30 users in at a time or someone might say something that he doesn’t approve of.
re: #280 by Bunk X
“There are others who’ll disagree with your assessment, ”
I know that. To me it is a natural impulse not to bash people who have been nice to me. Sharmuta, Iceweasal and I disagree on many, many, issues I just won’t make it personal.
WOW!!!
I can’t believe how the comment count has just exploded here.
Guess that maybe, as someone mentioned earlier, the tipping point has been reached, and LGF 1 will go to its well deserved grave. The owner drove it into the ground with no less skill than the current president is doing to our country. Read that how you will.
Just a thought – we all know that there were a few undesirables at LGF 1 that – while not “classic” trolls, logged on for the sole purpose of cliquing and piling on – for thuggery, in short.
Some of us LGF 1 vets will recognize the nics, or hopefully at least the poison pens if they arrive to join the “new cool thing” here and start forming the new cliques. No one needs this kind of immature and destructive schooling of immature fish.
Certainly we don’t want to see this excellent growing blog devolve into the non-stop vindictive flaming that was a key factor 3 or so years ago that destroyed the old site. Just saying let’s all keep our eyes open for these recycled LGF 1 trolls and enjoy 2.0!!!
re: #287 by Bill Jenkins
heh– See I fooled you just like I did Rodan. Thought I went to bed, didja? It was just one of my sock puppets that went to bed, and you’ll never know which sockie, either.
Besides that, paying ACORN for a 13 year-old El Salvadoran prostitute to give Rodan a b.j. has it’s privileges.
See y’all tomorrow.
re: #288 by BatGuano
Well I agree..don’t know either personally.
And iceweasel came after I left. But I have seen Sharms tactics. And will point them out if mentioned.
re: #283 by The Osprey
I’ve purchased online ads before, including the type you mention. I have never seen an instance where I couldn’t exempt certain sites from showing my ads. Most of the providers of this service recognize that advertisements on a site can be construed as supporting the content of that site, and provide their customers a way to prevent that from happening.
re: #290 by Bunk X
G-nite.
re: #288 by BatGuano
I think that everyone here will respect that, but some of us have been burned and the emotional level is high. For the most part though it stays fairly civil. They generally try not to take it to far. Atleast from what I have seen.
I had been registered at LGF since January of this year. I used to post on all the threads as I was able to. I once had three comments in the top ten (my claim to fame), but as time passed I posted less on the main threads and stayed with LNDT’s. Because of my work schedule it was convenient and fun. The reason I shied away from the main threads was because Charles would intervene and set everyone straight on what we were to believe.I respected his right to do so and that is why I said goodbye.
re: #293 by Bill Jenkins
Nite, Bill
Hello banned friends!
I recognize many of your names(fondly,I might add!)
LGF used to be the first site I went to after 9/11. I thought it was the best site for years.Really enjoyed the bloggers…
then about a year and a half ago, I noticed some changes: over-focus on “creationists”,bashing Pamela Geller,Sarah Palin,Glenn Beck…couldn’t believe it! Then with the banning of all who dare disagree, I decided not to bother posting anymore,especially since my favorite people were the ones being banned.
SOoooo…Glad to be here with you all again!Great website! My LGF name was “Desertbrat”
re: #294 by linoleumknife
I understand entirely. I was just trying to be upfront on where I stood. I respect the opinion of everyone on this site.
re: #288 by BatGuano
It’s ok!!
No one here is compelled to join in when people are letting off steam about LGF or any of its inhabitants.
The venting will subside here after awhile, anyway.
It will just take some time.
Welcome!!
re: #297 by BettsAZ
Welcome and stay awhile!
re: #298 by BatGuano
Indeed still a lot of venting..
but it is changing….
re: #299 by Eliana
Thank you!
re: #297 by BettsAZ
Welcome!
re: #297 by BettsAZ
Willkommen, grab a beer.
re: #298 by BatGuano
I know, just wanted to be up front too. LOL, I am glad that there are good people from 1.0 finding their way here. Charles has done an excellent job designing the site, but the posters are what made it so great. It is a blessing that so many of them have moved on. Even if most of it was through force.
re: #297 by BettsAZ
Hi, I remember you, desertbrat!
re: #305 by BatGuano
And I remember you feces deposit of a nocturnal flying mammal. Hi Bat!
re: #306 by Lightning
Hi, Lightning.
He says as a voice inside is going “Who da F is this guy?” – Panhandler
Morning, everybody!
BG! Welcome aboard!
Sad. I just looked at my old place at the lndt, at 1.0. According to one I am a piece of excrement. To another, I am damned. I did nothing to either. I guess I shouldn’t look at that site anymore.I just said, “goodbye”, and they think it is flounce. Yes, I am over it!
re: #311 by BatGuano
{RIGHTSIDE}
Thank you.
re: #311 by BatGuano
I was hoping you’d show up here.
Breathe deep, the air of freedom, and enjoy your stay.
I walked away yesterday afternoon. I have seen comments there expressing nervousness at the steady flow of resignations.
Good to see you.
re: #313 by Rightside
Great to see you, rightside. I’ve enjoyed my stay so far. The deciding factor to come here was 1.0’s threads today. It is the same as everyday.
I feel as if I am in Galt’s Gulch, now.
Oh Oh, it looks like there’a a new chink in the MSMs armor
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090921/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_health_insurance_tax_fact_check
re: #314 by BatGuano
Ohh, I like that. Maybe instead of a lizard our mascot could be a $
re: #314 by BatGuano
I was going to (still may) do a photoshop of a wheel spinning, with the same subjects over and over again.
there’s very few themes left, it seems.
I’ve noticed they are starting to panic a bit.
GOOD NI
re: #316 by linoleumknife
Yeah, I’d like a pack of cigarettes with a dollar sign on them.
New thread!!!
re: #318 by BatGuano
Hell, I would like an engine that runs on static electricity.
re: #320 by linoleumknife
Er, if it runs on electricity it’s a “motor”
re: #321 by Lightning
My apologies, lol, I work at a railroad and we use electric motors. I should know these things, but I get overexcited.
re: #317 by Rightside
Charles should panic, he are losing posters daily. Jorline is gone and Jacksontn. There will be more to come. I can almost predict them.
re: #322 by linoleumknife
Well, perhaps it’s the electrical field that surrounds you. Have you checked to see if you have a good ground?
re: #324 by Lightning
Haha, well I should be ok. I work in the office doing rail tracking and other assorted jobs.
Good night everyone. If you are interested there are amateur psychological profiles of those who have left LGF, on the late night thread.
I have A.D.D. I rush through things at times, and that post is good evidence of it.
re: #326 by BatGuano
With a heavy emphasis on “amateur”.
re: #326 by BatGuano
Nite, Bat. Take care, and I hope we see you soon.
re: #323 by BatGuano
Yes, we’ve been watching. I just read about jorline. And their comments about you. Looking back through some of these older threads, I can see their predictions coming true as well.
Seems there is a massive purge. The turn to the left has been seismic.
re: #323 by BatGuano
Correction: He IS losing posters daily.
Did you post anything as you left? I don’t see it in that thread… Or was it on a previous thread?
re: #326 by BatGuano
I just went and read the comments. They are in denial. They see it as people being immature for not following the group think. They have become sheeple. Sad really, it used to be great hearing all the different ideas and view points. Now it’s just one giant echo chamber that gets smaller everyday.
re: #332 by Rightside
He bade a fond adieu to the Island of Doctor Moreau and was “disapeared”. He repeated his post further up this thread if I remember correctly.
I didn’t even look for deleted.
Shug left. Not sure he will come here, but who knows?
re: #335 by Rightside
It’s interesting to see how they react to events over there. When folks come here, if they are upset, it is at Chuckles, and they tend to recover in a decent amount of time. Over there they attack and try to humiliate the banned, and the more people that get shoved out the door, the more they echo each other. It is a downward spiral.
re: #336 by linoleumknife
Various amounts of angst I guess. I went to log in Sat and found out I was “disappeared”, why I don’t know I hadn’t posted there for a while. My reaction – chortles – I couldn’t get mad, he’s not my “daddy”.
re: #337 by Lightning
I understand where you are coming from. He has put a huge number of people down the memory hole. I went without a warning. Pretty close to your description. If you listen to his choir though, we are misfit children who have always had a dark side, and it finally showed itself. Amazing really. It’s like watching an Amtrak wreck in slow mode.
re: #338 by linoleumknife
A train wreck in slow motion – yes. What makes me mad/sad is how it seems to be on a constant loop with different cars derailing each time.
re: #339 by Lightning
It is an ugly business. At times I wonder if Charles has lost his mind, or if some she-devil has infected his brain.
re: #340 by linoleumknife
I don’t know and couldn’t venture an opinion since I’m not there. Speaking of not being there it’s 5:07 on the Gulf and I’m starting to resemble the train wreck. You keep it cool while you’re tracking rails – Now there’s a pickup line – “Why yes, I track rails, would you like to see my magnometer?”
79 F and 90% humidity, a far cry from Arizona I’m sure.
re: #341 by Lightning
LOL, well have a good day and get plenty of rest.
re: #260 by BatGuano
you are going to have to explain yourself to the coca cola company
re: #297 by BettsAZ
Welcome to the party!
to all new members, please go to kirlys blog
and get your nic in the book of the banned
http://kirls.blogspot.com/2009/05/banned-monium.html
End of thread:
[ Then disables comments. ]
Of course there won’t be. Show us the money, Charles, on the “plenty” then. You are the quintessential bearer of false witness so you are more than up to the task.
First you published the complete transcript, which makes you racist, then you insulted the owner of the blog. Get off your blog./
re: #346 by waldensianspirit
Charles, on the “plenty” then. You are the quintessential bearer of false witness so you are more than up to the task.
See now, I would have said lying sack of shit. Maybe that’s why I got banned. Although not to him because back then I was trying to not get banned and not responding to him directly.
62 Charles
Wed, Aug 5, 2009 11:58:30am replyquote
22
down
up
favorite
report
re: #34 Born Again Republican
I’m beginning to think Charles has an agenda. Make Republicans look like kooks.
You caught me. You have seen through my facade. Exposed my inner fascist leftist sekrit agenda. I thought I was tricking you, but you’re too sharp for me.
No, I’m just slow Charles.
re: #348 by kansas
I was banned while being polite and doing him a favor but that is a story for a rainy day.
just ran the numbers, cj’s banning avg is now up to 24 a day
keep hammering those posters cj, with just a little more work you can get it up to 25
re: #279 by BatGuano
I respect what you wrote but believe me, iceweasel and Sharmtua will be bashing you. You left LGF for a reason and the primary one is becasue it became a fetid leftist swamp.
re: #323 by BatGuano
I heard that JacksonTn was given a “time out” by selrahC for calling iceweasel a bitch Was she actually banned?
re: #353 by Speranza
re: #353 by Speranza
I think she just left
re: #354 by rain of lead
actually, I think alot of old timers did that,
no “flounce” just stopped showing up
re: #354 by rain of lead
I hope she comes here. Man has he lost a lot of great posters this year.
Okay I see I’m tardy to the party once again. OK folks, who did we pick up from 1.0 last night?
re: #357 by Carolina Girl
batguano
re: #358 by rain of lead
Superb.
re: #350 by waldensianspirit
Then the fact that we’re expecting El Nino this year should work out well, then…
re: #360 by Carolina Girl
I really want JacksonTn to come here. The fact that she called iceweasel a “bitch” makes her a heroine!
re: #2 by Rodan
Geez that guy is Coyote Ugly!
Btw I would recommend that we neither visit or psot on Irish Rose’s or Defenseman’s blog’s . We are only giving them traffic and they are doing it just to rile us up. They are a pathetic tag team combo.
I feel comfortable here. I got thrown out of LGF too. That guy and his barking dogs turned into huge flakes.
re: #363 by Jim
What was your nic at LGF?
Silas. I don’t think I posted half a dozen times before I was bounced out. re: #364 by Speranza
Any semi-regular listener of Rush would know that sarcasm is one of his most common literary devices.
Just in case there was any doubt left (and there shouldn’t have been), Johnson reveals himself for the left-wing DNC hack that he is, and always has been in his heart-of-hearts.
And as a bonus with this post, he’s proven himself to be one colossal mud-flap dumb jackass!
re: #365 by Jim
Thanks. You will be updated into the honor role of The Book of the Bannes!
Shithole Defending ACORN now.
It turns out that the ACORN worker seen on that now-infamous video from National City, California, actually did contact the authorities: ACORN Worker In Video Reported Couple.
re: #368 by kansas
Yeah I noticed that. First Van Jones and now ACORN. It is a shit hole.
re: #369 by Speranza
A frothing, steaming pile to boot.
re: #370 by song_and_dance_man
He has not recovered from Ace’s smackdowns.
re: #263 by WrathofG-d
Sorry, I fight fire with fire. They want to out me, I out them.
That’s teh way it is.
I just left. No need to put CJ to the trouble of deleting me! Nice to see all these folks – and I saw that Baldilocks was banned, and knew that the end is near gor thet place. She’s the best.
re: #372 by Rodan
CJ’s new found direction aside, IMO – it was the day he outed savage that he lost most Lizards respect. Lizards have been evolving and moving away since.
Outing is no game, and could result in someone getting hurt.
/my 2 cents
re: #372 by Rodan
From the InCaseYouHadn’tSeenItDepartment:
457 Honorary Yooper9/22/2009 8:24:49 am PDT
* 1
* down
* up
* report
re: #412 Dark_Falcon
HY, I need to let you know that Rodan and Avid_Editor are claiming that you are Defenseman. They also posted what they say is your real name, and your general location. I won’t post the link, but you should be aware of what they’re saying.
I saw. I’m not Defenseman, but they’ll claim away, just as they did claiming Hoosier Hoops was Defenseman.
[...] true extremism, which isn’t the same as cowering in fear of whatever fake outrage the Left tries to make into political [...]
[...] Johnson has already been called out for this faux [...]