I don’t want to dump my next couple comments on the previous two threads, as I don’t want to demean or derail them, so here’s an open thread.
I get home from work and turn on Fox News, what do I see? Geraldo. Makes an introduction of the man who he feels, rather than Steele (the head of the gop) is the REAL leader of the black caucus……. Al Sharpton.
Geraldo, you radically leftist racist. You sit there and let Sharpton call Republicans racists and defend his own racist views. You coddled him then, when Ann Coulter came on, you let her make 2 sentences, then got in her face (interrupting her) and, instead of letting her respond, cut to commercial.
Then when it was her turn to talk again, you cut her off and cut to commercial.
What the hell is wrong with you, you racist supporting radical liberal? I don’t care HOW nice you are in person, what I just saw you do is a DISGRACE.
Knock, knock
Who’s there
Just, apparently according to Al Sharpton and not challenged by Geraldo, a racist by virtue of NOT being a democrat:
me.
ahhh… i like a new room…
howdy all
I got a question for everybody: Which Steven Seagal film features, in your opinion, his best action sequences?
“cut to commercial.”
He does that crap all the time.
seems to me that the the black caucus is a liberal caucus. do they even allow mike steele in there? or is he allowed in as the token republican?
re: #4 by coldwarrior
howdy
re: #5 by Morgan
Executive Decision.
Because his plane blows up.
*evil grin*
Holy shit : shug just flounced at 1.0
re: #3 by LanceKates
Racism is a disease of Liberals. Like I said earlier, when everyone is a racist, then no one is a racist. The Left, including the Obama Administration, are too quick to cry “Wolf!” over racism. There is a whole cornucopia of reasons to oppose the Obama Administration that have absolutely nothing to do with his pigmentation. It is the Liberals that can’t see anything beyond the color of his skin and see what those issues are. Blinded by color, they can’t see what great fools that have become. I hope we give them an Idea of the scope of our loathing in the 2010 elections.
re: #6 by Beltfed
yep, constantly.
that’s why i never watch his schtick on the tube.
i stay away from news channels on sundays..i need a break once a week.
re: #9 by LanceKates
Yeah, that was quite a sight. Never saw it coming.
re: #11 by Iron Fist
well they can kiss my oversized butt.
No one who supports a black person BECAUSE THEY’RE BLACK and lets any horrible events blink by out of blind racist support has NO ground to stand on when it comes to calling anyone else racist.
Even worse is Geraldo, letting Sharpton call republicans racists, then by virtue of not even confronting him, agreeing with him….. then shoves crap in Coulter’s face and then cuts to commercial after interrupting her.
I’d just not go on his show again if I were Coulter.
Repeat from downthread.
Shug went poof.
re: #13 by Morgan
yup. I had a friend that paid for a ticket to the movie, opening day, and was rather upset as they were a BIG fan, heh.
re: #5 by Morgan
Marked for Death. I loved the sword work at the end of the movie. Segal ain’t much of an actor, but he is the real deal when it comes to martial arts. Akido is a serious style. It isn’t as flashy as some, but it is effective. It is a hard style to learn (as opposed to just a hard style; Akido is a soft style in that regard). If you really want to be a rounded martial artist youneed some Okinawan Karate style, some grappling style (jujitsu), and some joint-lock/throwing style.
I’ve =got all three. Isshinryu Karate (3rd Degree Black Belt), Arnis (2nd Degree Black Belt), and I’ve trained in the jujitsu stuff, but hold no rank in it. I’ve also spent years studying Chinese Medicine and pressure-point techniques. It is fun
re: #15 by HomeGrownVeggies
good for her
re: #17 by Iron Fist
do plays, jitsu doesn’t.
That’s an old saying.
What I liked about aikijujitsu (and the akido variant) is that I can choose between causing pain but no damage (in the case of some idiot drunk who just needs to sleep it off) or doing serious damage to stop an attacker who is truely evil.
Not everyone you fight is evil, some are just stupid. Aiki (do or jujitsu) at least lets you make the choice.
re: #15 by HomeGrownVeggies
FYI, HGV = CC. Enough subterfuge on my old nic.
re: #15 by HomeGrownVeggies
Way to go, shug!!
maybe 0 has his minions out there playing the race card over and over and over and over so that eventually, a bunch of whities have enough and by god become racists because they have been called that over and over again.
do ya think the prez would want that? i do. just so he and his types can point at it and use it to their advantage.
re: #5 by Morgan
mmmmmm, none
re: #20 by CynicalConservative
Expect it to be banned from LGF before you can refresh this page.
and expect the lgf’r that reports you to giggle with glee at the brownie points they earn.
Karma: 21,191
Shug
This user is blocked.
Registered since: May 14, 2006 at 2:18 pm
No. of comments posted: 18,764
No. of links posted: 151
re: #25 by Beltfed
that kinda looks like a headstone…
weird…
re: #24 by LanceKates
Was banned back in August, been lurking on both sites for a while.
re: #25 by Beltfed
the best person commenting there. she is gone and 1.0 is really truly gone
1.0 is officially done
re: #27 by CynicalConservative
Ahhhh, ok then.
OFFICIALLY: Welcome
Giants have no offense, man this sucks.
re: #27 by CynicalConservative
Welcome here!
re: #29 by LanceKates
Thanks! Drank the 2.0 propaganda for a while that 1.0 was serving, but finally remembered that I’m a thinking human and did my own research. Found a new blog home here.
re: #19 by LanceKates
I’m very much a jitsu kind of guy. When I work self-defense I try to set up my response to chain together a series of escalating disasters leading to a fatality. That gives me options, and the time to think them through. It stops only when the enemy has completely submitted and is no longer resisting. A case in point, the last bar fight I was in dude grabbed me by the back of the neck. I turned around with my right hand up as a block (I figured there was a punch comming; he wasn’t grabbing me like that just to say hi). My left hand was down low where I could execute a groin strike. It wasn’t needed. The guy just wilted. He almost burst into tears. Hell, I bought him a beer, told him to calm down. His Old Lady had come into the bar a little while before him, you see, and had hit me up for a drink and conversation. Understandable that he’d be upset, but I’d have still dropped his sorry ass to the floor if he haddn’t give complete submission before I got started.
re: #17 by Iron Fist
I do remember the sword fight in the end; that was good. Thanks for the info on the martial arts; very interesting.
Welcome Cynical Conservative!
shug is a guy. I’m glad he flounced. I always liked shug.
re: #23 by spidly
Just out of curiosity, do you have a favorite action film star?
Touchdown Giants!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
re: #32 by CynicalConservative
WANTING to find the truth of the matter will always lead to interesting moments, like realizing how screwed up 1.0 is.
Just last week I asked my old man if it would be a good idea to ask Rupert Murdoch to seed a corporation competing with FOX in an effort to impart some balance and vary the direction of attack.
He didn’t say anything so I’m asking an open question from my brain.
Wouldn’t it benefit him?
re: #15 by HomeGrownVeggies
Great post by shug. Wow. If only someone would listen to this kind of reason over there, too bad such a thing is so clearly beyond hope.
re: #33 by Iron Fist
“I’m very much a jitsu kind of guy.”
Gentile jitsu or jiu jitsu?
re: #33 by Iron Fist
I studied for 2 years, wu wei gung fu, aikijujitsu, some samurai sword work and escrima fighting.
I enjoyed it and it was a good workout (especially when 100 degrees outside and you’re inside an unairconditioned dojo), but I couldn’t afford to keep going, had to stop.
(I tried to post that already but got an error, sorry if it doubleposts)
re: #38 by Rodan
I need Witten to score one more, then your team is allowed to win.
Steelers lose. Freakin’G-20 YOU DO NOT WANT TO BE HERE THIS WEEK.
re: #42 by Moe Katz
see, that’s high comedy right there.
So, Lance, were you experiencing low blood pressure and decided a few minutes with Gerald would give you a quick pick-me-up?
I wouldn’t watch that guy for any reason, irrespective of who is guest was.
re: #41 by Edouard
and so quickly banned.
just proves her point that dissent is not tolerated
Wait, I thought this was the Open thread, not the Hollywood Football thread.
The Karma count means the number of updings compared to any possible downdings.
Shug had more updings than the total number of posts.
What a loss for 1.0 — I hope Shug comes here!
re: #37 by Morgan
I’ll have to say after the Daniel Craig Casino Royale I just want to see somewhat realistic fights where people get effed up and stay that way. It might be a function of watching too much UFC. Either that or over the top obviously cartoonish action and wirefighting.
A favorite I dunno. Just not Stephen Segal.
repost from last thread..
Rodan, Our G-d is not a vengeful G-d against those that follow him. He is a loving and a forgiving G-d. Our G-d also HATES evil. Same as us. Please don’t beat yourself up for thing that are in our human nature to feel. Go to Confession if you feel it necessary, but you, along with a lot of others here (including myself) found our way; away from the site that censored us from our beliefs and our convictions. I am so sad that it took me so long to find my long time friends from 1.0. I did not post much on 1.0 and did have not been banned (yet). There will be few here that know who I am, but I know that I recognize and respect a lot of the posters here. I learned so much from 1.0 and those that posted, still post and have been banned from there. I have missed a lot of you and still miss a lot that will no longer post because of that site (Bubbazee – for example). I used to pray for realwest everytime I logged into lgf, now I pray for him every time I open up this website. You all did right by starting this site.
I am not posting under my lgf blog name and, no, to the best of my knowledge, have not been banned. I do not read the blog anymore, however I do go there once or twice a day to see if realwest has posted to see how he (and his mom) are doing.
Ed Mohammad… etc, etc.etc., You may know who I am. We e-mailed back and forth back in the Katrina/Rita day’s. I am so happy to have found you all again.
BTW – the Manning suck! lol!
It looks like we have our new Plaxico, Mario Maningham!
re: #40 by Bumr50
With FOX, there’s no competition…. no other stations have near that much conservativism.
If he created a ‘liberal’ news station, he’d have to compete with abc, cbs, nbc, msnbc, cnbc, cnn and cspan 1, 2 and 3.
re: #43 by LanceKates
My old man informs me that they do yoga at his gym in 103 degree rooms.
I did some Tai Chi with a Korean War vet gym teacher I had and I still remember some katas he taught me.
I use them to this day.
re: #51 by Lizzie_in_Texas
Thanks for that!
The Giants have no running game. Another Field Goal.
30-24.
re: #53 by LanceKates
You misinterpreted me. I meant create some conservative competition for himself. Gamesmanship.
re: #46 by no2liberals
I just came home and turned on the tv. I was still deciding what to watch with the on screen guide when I heard that crap.
I work in a call center, dealing with the general public.
What’s ‘low blood pressure’ ?
I prefer a 1911A1. Don’t have to get all sweaty.
re: #50 by spidly
Understood. The action scenes in Casino Royale were well done.
re: #57 by Bumr50
OOoOohhh…. gotcha.
I don’t know. I think it’d split the viewers, and the msm would be pushing it as the liberal rags ‘making a comeback’ and it’d be shown as the ‘death of right wing news’
night all…
i have an early tee time tomorrow.
see yinz when i get back.
re: #59 by Number6
hands and feet don’t run out of ammo.
Neither does a knife.
They say never bring a knife to a gun fight… and that may be true….
but a knife sure comes in handy in a fist fight.
Don’t fight fair, the person trying to attack you doesn’t.
re: #56 by Rodan
Fortunately for them, Eli Manning has been having better luck with his passing than Tony Romo.
re: #49 by Eliana
That number of posts, by the way, is the equivalent of at least a couple of very full books in length.
The thanklessness and remorselessness over there in the swift banishing of such a thoughtful and humane commenter — who never said anything close to a single nasty or abusive thing that I can recall — is a prime example of the moral bankruptcy that rules that place nowadays.
Such a crying shame, but I hope shug feels a weight lifted.
Damn, Barber is just killing the Giants. Dallas is inside the 10. Damn Dallas just scored.The running game is killing the Giants.
re: #65 by Edouard
He didn’t even rag on charles… he THANKED charles.
re: #65 by Edouard
So do I.
re: #58 by LanceKates
Just messin’ witcha.
I hate it when I sit down to eat something, turn on a channel and something I really don’t want to see comes on when my hands are full.
re: #51 by Lizzie_in_Texas
A beautiful letter.
re: #61 by LanceKates
I just don’t see how Fox can ever gain legitimacy without a measuring stick. They’re so far apart that they don’t have anything with which to demonstrate superiority or deficiency.
Or are we just AVOIDING the ugly middle.
Objectivism is as adrift as our foreign policy.
re: #63 by LanceKates
I’m old, slow and blind in one eye. The trigger finger still works, though.
Damn 2 Penalties, The Giants are in a hole.
re: #69 by no2liberals
yup yup. heh. All I know is, we’re not going to get over the “Republicans are Racists!” if we don’t start LOUDLY standing up to scumbags.
re: #70 by Kali
Thank you. Just posting from my heart.
Because I’m still obsessing… Peg K just went poof. Gah, gotta get a hobby….
re: #74 by LanceKates
I say turn the tables and call them racist. Use Alinsky’s methods on them. If not racist coin a negative term and it will stick to them.
And thanks for the welcome to the site from everybody. (also here as HomeGrownVeggies)
In answer to my own question at comment #5: On Deadly Ground. The climactic scene at the oil refinery is amazing, in my opinion.
re: #71 by Bumr50
The truth is, Fox isn’t “right wing” . . . it really isn’t.
They’re balanced… they have both liberals and conservatives.
The REST of the news is so radically liberal that they just seem that conservative.
What’s the big deal about the Wild Cat formation? I hear about it alot this year.
re: #77 by Rodan
It is reported as ‘those conservatives just being hateful again.’
Apparently even by Fox when Geraldo is on.
re: #74 by LanceKates
But we will always be WAYTHISTS to the left.
We need to mock them, to prove how absurd they are.
I just think that it would behoove Rupert Murdoch if he indeed espouses conservative values to oh I don’t know build a Libertarian style entity in whatever form to give the so-called extreme right-wing an organized guidepost from which to express their displeasure and anger at the current state of things. It would counter O’Reilly et al.
re: #83 by no2liberals
We need to adopt Conan The Barbarian’s method of dealing with such folks.
… heh.
re: #84 by Bumr50
I think first of all, the ventures Murdoch is involved in are for profit, and not necessarily because of his personal choices.
If there were profits to be made in creating a competing news source against FOX he would do it.
The fact that FOX is blowing all other cable news and network news out of the water is proof he has a winning formula.
OUTRAGE OF THE DAY! as some strung out code monkeys might put it
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mflynnjnolte/2009/09/20/pregame-report-the-nea-conference-call/>breitbart
Eli comes through once again!!!!!!!!!
Giants win 33-31 on a Field Goal by Tynes!
Jerry Jones was pissed! Ha ha ha!
re: #88 by Rodan
The only reason the Giants were able to win; Eli Manning’s passes. Exciting game.
re: #80 by LanceKates
YOU know that. And I know that. But the majority of America doesn’t
I’m sorry if I sound like I’m rambling I’m just working through some stuff.
re: #83 by no2liberals
For the millionth time we need to coin: RACIALISTS and get it into vocabulary as one who represents those who would take advantage of one’s race in an effort to get ahead as if it were an all encompassing qualification.
re: #85 by LanceKates
Or Bluto Blutarski:
Let’s go! Come on!
re: #86 by no2liberals
Do you at least understand my postulation?
re: #90 by Bumr50
One problem with that is the term ‘racialist’ is already used by the more scientifically oriented people that challenge politically correct shibboleths on the subject of race—to distinguish themselves from simple racists, who overgeneralize and are unscientific.
re: #91 by no2liberals
germans?
shh…. he’s on a roll.
re: #22 by coldwarrior
do ya think the prez would want that? i do. just so he and his types can point at it and use it to their advantage.
************************
I think so too. I can feel some racist tuggings myself and they are causing that. I hate them for that.
re: #93 by Moe Katz
Political Correctness is an abomination to language.
re: #92 by Bumr50
Yes I do, but my question is, is it profitable?
re: #94 by LanceKates
Danged right he was on a roll, all the way to getting the beauty queen and becoming a Senator.
re: #79 by Morgan
I am very partial to Above the Law.
Love the 1 against 12 ass-kicking scenes.
Lately I find the Borne series of movies to be excellent.
re: #89 by Morgan
He earned his pay! Tomorrow, his big brother plays on Monday Night Football.
re: #96 by Bumr50
it is also an irrational concept.
Ignore fact A because X is part of Y, but when X is not a part of Y, make a point out of fact A.
mathematically,
If x=y, then A=0
if x(does not)=y, then A=infinity
so, A=0 AND infinity, dependent upon x = y.
re: #90 by Bumr50
Racialism/racialists has an established definition.
I agree a new term is a good idea, race baiter or hustler just doesn’t seem to do the trick.
re: #98 by no2liberals
which explains QUITE a bit about congress…
re: #102 by no2liberals
I propose, in honor of Red Foreman and Walter:
Dumbass.
re: #103 by LanceKates
Yes, yes it do!
iron fist….
what got you banned at 1.0?
glad to see the Shug flounce…..anyway to alert him to the castaway island that is 2.0?
re: #104 by LanceKates
Accurate, but well worn.
re: #107 by no2liberals
The classics never go out of style.
He’s always defending Zero and has admitted he voted for him many times. With all is journalism experience, he should recognize a Marxist/Socialist when he sees one. I don’t get him. The only thing he’s good at is talking endlessly when he’s sent to a news scene. Give the guy a mike and he won’t shut up until THEY cut to commercial. He’s a bit dramatic too.
re: #99 by bar
That’s always been the cool thing about Steven Seagal movies: seeing him take on large numbers of people at a time and putting them down one by one. Above The Law features plenty of it.
re: #102 by no2liberals
So I see.
I’ll stop attempting to hijack language from now on.
I HATE it when I think I’m smart!
Although the word “race” itself is a bit of a whore to say the least.
re: #101 by LanceKates
I thought x=5
re: #112 by spidly
Sure… it’s gotta be like that, huh? Gotta be hatin’ on the x, huh? WHy just 5?
TYPICAL y’s….. racist.
*grin*
105,000 people in the new Cowboys stadium. The highest attendance for a Season game vere.
re: #111 by Bumr50
There has to be a word/phrase that could be entered into the lexicon that would accurately describe what you are referencing.
Maybe a good nights sleep would do it.
Something I will experience very soon.
Pie are squared.
Oh f**k me!
Drudge and ace link to this
Obama open to newspaper bailout bill
Here is what 1.0 will look like in 2 months.
Charles: Craziness coming from the right, that Michael Steele sure is a racist.
Sharmutta: you are so right Charles?
Kilgore Trout: I could not have said it better my self Chalres. I updinged you Sharmutta.
Sharmutta: Well said KT, that was worth an upding.
Charles: Hey, here is a picture of a sign that criticizes Obama…unhinged crazy I say.
Sharmutta: thanks for all you do Charles (upding)
KT: Well said Sharmutta (upding).
KT: Hey where is everyone else?
Charles: they are were all little flouncy flounclings who flounced away.
Sharmutta: WHo did those peple think they were? (upding to Charles and KT)
KT: I miss Cato and LudwigVanQ?
Sharmutta: I think hey merely lost their internet connections from not paying their bills. BEing out of work and online 24/7 made it hard for them.
….
….
Sharmutta: I pdinged you CHarles, and you as wll Kilgore
re: #116 by Bumr50
No, pie are round.
Eli had a QB rating of 100, and went 25/38 for 330 Yards, 2 Touchdowns and o Ints.
re: #110 by Morgan
Seagal, that liberal wuss?
I tried, several times, to count how many Bruce Lee took on in Return of the Dragon, when he goes into the dungeon of the eeeevil man who organized the karate competition.
I kept losing count at 64, as they kept coming so fast.
Bruce Lee and Chuck Norris could go through a cast of Filipino extras faster than Michael Moore can go through a buffet.
re: #117 by spidly
pfft, who needs freedom of the press?
THere’s free government money to be had!
Sure, they start up MiniTrue, but a least we get to pay for it!
Wait… there’s no upside for us.
crap.
re: #113 by LanceKates
Yeah. Imaginary number.
WhatEVER!!
SLAM!
Tony Romo is all sad, he had a bad night.
re: #121 by no2liberals
I’m a jackie chan fan.
mixture of martial arts and comedy.
re: #123 by Bumr50
Hey, under the new PC laws, it is called the transgendered number.
re: #122 by LanceKates
That bill is Obama’s means of taking over the Press. They need their propaganda organs going. All this is formalize the merger of the Media with the Progressives controlled government.
re: #122 by LanceKates
Is this about the newspaper bailout?
re: #124 by Rodan
Jessica got sumthin hangin from her lip?
re: #127 by Rodan
all the signs:
1. Wants to push rail. (WHy do socialists ALWAYS want to push rail?)
2. Wants to control ‘the rich’ as a means to control the poor.
3. Wants to control production.
4. Wants to control Press.
I feel like I’m taking crazy pills for being able to see it when so much of the country sits idly by.
re: #128 by Bumr50
Yup
I can truly say that I did not give a shit about tonights game.
Given that, Dallas sucks it on a Field Goal!
Happy Happy!
re: #126 by LanceKates
If it tries to use my stall I’ll drown the POS.
re: #17 by Iron Fist
“”I’ve =got all three. Isshinryu Karate (3rd Degree Black Belt), Arnis (2nd Degree Black Belt), and I’ve trained in the jujitsu stuff, but hold no rank in it. I’ve also spent years studying Chinese Medicine and pressure-point techniques. It is fun”"
That is nothing!
I have a Black Belt, Elebenty Dan in Origami!
I can’t kill you, but I could give you a really nasty paper cut.
re: #132 by Bumr50
you THOUGHT that?
dude… that’ll cost you.
*calls the pc-favored thought police*
AS you are not a transgendered number, it is illegal for you to think negative thoughts against any number.
Doubly so against transgendered numbers.
This will be rectified by intense number-gender diversification training in our confidential facility.
We’ll pick you up tonight.
don’t leave town.
seriously.
re: #125 by LanceKates
I like Jackie.
He has made some very entertaining movies.
IFC has carried the classic Samurai movies, for years, like this series.
As well as many of the very best Samurai movies ever made. The actor in the above link, Shintaro Katsu, had a very successful series Zatoichi, The Blind Swordsman.
I love the old samurai movies better than the Kung Fu movies. When they deliver a kill shot, the victim stays dead, and the morality tales are so much more compelling.
re: #133 by Possum
I have a black belt….. blue jeans…… grey shoes……
Ohhh…. you mean martial arts….. I thought we were discussing fashion.
re: #135 by no2liberals
I’ve watched a few of the blind swordsman movies.
Very good.
Goodnight all, see you all tomorrow night!
Aloha folks…I finally found my way over here.
Yes, I too was banned by charlie. My offense?
I suggested that Charles was being a hypocrite for condemning Robert Spencer while featuring his adds in the side bar.
Anyway, I am glad to see some names I remember fondly over here and look forward to checking in more often.
Cheers
In other news, Carrie Prejean Electrifies Conservative Base.
That’a girl!
Lemons into lemonade.
re: #139 by soul surfer
Those clue-bats hurt.
Welcome aboard.
This is an eggshell free zone.
Charlie is cherry picking the 9/12 March again; he’s got a video of a lone individual carrying a banner reading Public Option Now through the rally. Police were there, but even then, the reaction was basically boos and chants of No Public Option.
Well, got to hit the bunk.
That salt won’t mine itself.
Be excellent, y’all.
re: #118 by danrudy
lol, true, updinkindink
re: #139 by soul surfer
Hi!
Jeans, always with the jeans!
Trying to outdo me with the denim, eh?
re: #121 by no2liberals
That was absolutely hilarious.
re: #146 by FurryOldGuyJeans
I didn’t even mention the leather vest with chain on it.
re: #122 by LanceKates
there’ll be a handy link on the bottom of each web page to turn in yourself or friends, and when the government cannot supply toilet paper the print media will still be there. So there are upsides!
re: #142 by Morgan
UNlike the conservatives at the TOwn Hall meetings that got roughed up by SEIU.
re: #147 by bar
I can squeeze one out, time to time.
Later, dude.
re: #149 by spidly
and you’ll be promised a reward, which will be the same as your pay… and will actually be your pay….. but you’ll be told that it is a reward, so you’ll believe it.
After all…. would the government lie?
I’ve REALLY never understood how liberals (JUST like conservatives) believe that all the folks in the government lie, and they’re just abunch of liars who are out for themselves…..
…. yet they want that same group of people to decide things in OUR lives.
I don’t get it… if they’re slimeballs, why give them more power?
There’s just NO thought process there. None. Not one iota.
Hey it’s G-20 Week here in Pittsburgh!
I’m getting married on 11/25 in Mexico so I’m not gonna go play with the LIBTARDS RIGHT?
I’ve been in trouble before, It’s not worth it. But so tempting.
Too soon for fraternity pledges,huh?
re: #150 by LanceKates
Exactly, the worst I saw in the video paraded by Charlie was very mild compared to how one of Arlen Specter’s constituents was being manhandled during one of his town hall meetings.
Here’s an outrage of the sort that Charles used to post about when he was still faking that he gave a shit about Jews
The Rooster checks in, looks around, and is happy to see a Sunday Night Open Thread with activity after midnight (east coast) Well done folks.
I almost forgot Kenneth Gladney, by the way, something not brought up by Charlie.
After Sundays Obamanation swamping of the airwaves and the totally incredible claims about his ignorance of ACORN funding and actions by the Obamanation.
Even if despite all the evidence you never thought the Obamanation was a LIAR up to now his UNBELIEVABLE statements regarding ACORN and his proclaimed ignorance of their criminal actions and the fact that HIS OWN Porkulus Bill awarded them millions of dollars of State funding then you must know he is now. Barrack , you can call me HUSSEIN now I won, Obama is a BLATANT BAREFACED NARCISSISTIC LIAR. The only ones who could possibly deny this are the racist Blacks who voted overwhelmingly for him and left wing ‘libtards’ either too stupid to know any better or with a vested interest in this sad inappropriate, unqualified CONSTANTLY LYING document HIDING BOGUS POTUS.
If he did not know he is INCOMPETENT and not fit for office if he ,as he must have, knows and LIED then he is not fit for office. There are no other conclusions to draw.
Oh and just in case you think I made the previous post up here is a Transcript of the OBAMINATIOn LYING as usual to ABC. Comments in the brackets are mine.
“ABC Presenter:- It was one of the most popular topics among the questions you submitted to me for my interview with President Obama – the controversy involving ACORN.
While the President said that ACORN “deserves to be investigated” in light of the “inappropriate” video that’s gone viral, he did not endorse recent votes in Congress to cut off federal funding for the community group.
Here’s our FULL exchange:
STEPHANOPOULOS: How about the funding for ACORN?
OBAMA: You know, if — frankly, it’s not really something I’ve followed closely (LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE). I didn’t even know that ACORN was getting a whole lot of federal money.(TOTAL UNADULTERATED BLANTANT LYING)
STEPHANOPOULOS: Both the Senate and the House have voted to cut it off.
OBAMA: You know, what I know is, is that what I saw on that video was certainly inappropriate and deserves to be investigated.
STEPHANOPOULOS: So you’re not committing to — to cut off the federal funding?
OBAMA: George, this is not the biggest issue facing the country. It’s not something I’m paying a lot of attention to.”
http://www.weaselzippers.net/blog/2009/09/shocker-obama-wont-commit-to-cutting-federal-funding-for-acorn-.html
OBAMA = ACORN, ACORN = OBAMA you cannot put a cigarette paper between them.
Sep 20, 2009 – 8:42 pm
Bummer out!
re: #158 by Pragmatist
aiding pimps of illegal immigrant child prostitutes get a loan for a brothel AND Cheat on taxes……
To the left, that’s qualifications for public office.
Just as long as you lay off my 8 inch platform man shoes I’ll let it slide.
re: #160 by LanceKates
Barney Frank! We can’t offer up the criticism that he’s never run a business. He knows all about the long hard hours, night deposits….
re: #106 by danrudy
Iron Fist had non-existent sock puppets!
And I should know. I’m not one of them.
re: #161 by FurryOldGuyJeans
I don’t think that it’d be a good look for me when I’m riding my motorcycle.
re: #162 by spidly
or, at least, his gay lover does….. the one who ran the brothel out of his apartment….
when asked, Frank ‘didn’t know about it’
….
who’d he think the scores of gay men exchanging sex for money in his apartment were?
re: #165 by LanceKates
The Village People?
re: #139 by soul surfer
Do not drop in in front of me, and it will be all good.
re: #166 by Beltfed
that insults villages.
I hereby propose that we change the name of the band that sang YMCA to the “Barney Frank Apartment People”
re: #155 by Godzilla
sort of on that topic:
Conservative Movement: Hatikvah Instead of Shofar
I took it as a good sign – maybe The Rabbinical Assembly is really scared of what is going on and trying to get people to wake up a bit. The Rabbi seemed a bit perplexed when he talked about the email today as though he did not understand there is a growing threat to Israel, but then he kind of believes in the healing words of The 0.
re: #59 by Number6
Ah, someone after my own heart. I like the following:
What you’re thinking
re: #168 by LanceKates
“Barney Frank Apartment People”
And so it is written.
re: #165 by LanceKates
O’Keefe received FRANK advice from ACORN – don’t go over there! You gotta keep plausible deniability!
re: #167 by IslandLibertarian
LOL
My beach, my wave…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjGoxq2YWo4
re: #59 by Number6
M1A Douglas barrel, 24x scope. Reach out and touch some one. Long distance, some times its just plain better then being there.
re: #72 by Number6
Along those lines, Dad is 84, still farms and probably has more endurance than I do. Mom’s a little younger. However, neither of them could work the slide on my Kimber last year when they visited. At some point, arthritic hands and fingers apparently take their toll on grip strength. So, having a good wheel gun as one gets older is probably not a bad idea.
re: #121 by no2liberals
I love watching the action stars take down multiple opponents one by one (or two on occasion), and the faster, the better. Doesn’t matter who the guy is (Bruce Lee, Chuck Norris, Steven Seagal, Jackie Chan), as long as there’s plenty of dead (or down for the count) bad guys left in their wake.
re: #173 by bar
I have never used the terms:
“Gnarly Dude!”
“Tubular!”
“Groady”
….but I have vibe’ed non-locals……been vibe’ed too.
Hey Morgan,
Notice on the video that Nancy posted it says across the top “Teabaggers…” a new low, even for Nancy.
re: #167 by IslandLibertarian
Actually this one is more appropriate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdDQtgsjrpQ
re: #178 by Infidel
Yeah, I noticed it, but with his attempts to demonize the 9/12 March, I can’t say I’m surprised.
re: #177 by IslandLibertarian
I “surfed” or attempted too back in the 80’s.
So gnarly dude and bogus and stoked, were the cool babble. And Colve cigs were the in thing.
I could boggie board fairly well.
re: #179 by bar
Actually, today I was surfing with my regular break with six other guys I see in the water all the time….it was small, inconsistent but fun…..then these four Haole guys I’d never seen before paddle into the line-up…instant crowd….but it was all good….no problems…we all shared waves…smiles all around….localism sucks. It’s only surfing……..
re: #181 by bar
I never said “bogus” then, but use it all the time now in reference to “0″ and LGF.
A real Surf song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH5WGWX4MPg
The King and Master:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UmmbF1Zyvk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xymVxcLQVT8
And the best TV show intro evah:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AepyGm9Me6w
And the best TV show intro evah:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AepyGm9Me6w
Ala Moana Bowl…….
re: #182 by IslandLibertarian
That’s cool.
I have never been a local.
I was in Maui back in May, couldn’t believe the beautiful waves in north east Maui.
On the one hand, I think it’s good that conservatives of every type are waking up to the travesty that is now LGF.
However, as a Christian, I find certain blog pages about this distasteful, and I mean specifically the ones by condescending Non Christians, or by Non Christians who are hostile towards Christianity, almost as much as Johnson is.
More and more often, I see conservative atheists, agnostics, and other non Christians say they do not like Johnson’s tilt toward the left, but they are totally cool with Johnson’s anti-Creationism / I.D. positions.
It’s not so much I have a problem with these people supporting Johnson on evolution, as I am with the attitudes of some of the ones expressing this view.
(The polite, respectful Non Christians do not bother me, I am talking about the ones who hate Christianity or who are arrogant towards people of faith, who mock and ridicule Christians and their beliefs.)
Here’s one example (not a perfect example, as this guy is not nearly as arrogant or hateful towards Christians as I’ve seen from others over the years; he’s pretty mild):
New Clarion
Maybe I am wrong, but I’ve seen this kind of remark so often, I think I’m probably not wrong on this one.
I take it that the author would place “normal” Christians under the heading of “nutty.”
I wish he would have defined who he thinks of as a “nutty” Christian.
My hunch is that like many very angry atheists/agnostics, anyone who believes in Jesus and the Bible and who takes that stuff seriously is a “nut.”
Other than that, I do appreciate that guy’s position, in that he’s speaking out against the horrible things that have been going on at LGF.
As far as his apparent disdain for Christians goes, he’s not the only one. Over the last week, I’ve seen similar posts by other agnostics/ atheists who are speaking out against Johnson.
On that “Clarion” blog, I left a couple of comments on that page.
One guy, “Jim May,” retorted with a post to mine where he sort of missed the point in what I was saying.
At the same time, he actually proved my point above: most Christians believe in a literal understanding of Genesis, that is, we believe that Satan appeared as a ‘talking snake’ to deceive Eve.*
This “Jim May” who replied to my post said that kind of belief was “crazy.”
——————
*Even most Christians who may take that content in an allegorical (symbolic) sense would be respectful enough of their brothers and sisters in Christ to refrain from referring to the literalists as “nutty.”
I’ve just watched this live performance of Dick Dale doing Miserlou for about the 1000th.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UmmbF1Zyvk
And it’s still jaw dropping awesome!
P.S. Morgan, I’m glad the rest of the blogosphere has caught on to selrahC libelblog.
Original post:
I saw the Ann Coulter part of the show but missed the first part.
They were discussing the guys who were recently arrested over being suspected terrorists.
You’re right, he kept cutting Coulter off, which was annoying.
re: #187 by CloudyDay
I concur and agree with you. The vile anger is what gets me most. To top it off how are they so sure there is no God?
There is a saying:
If you believe in God and there is no God big deal (although I know there is a God).
But if you don’t believe in God and there is a God…you’ll have problems….
re: #188 by Infidel
Infidel….the bannings are at least 20 or more a day. And there is no telling how many stealth bannings there have been. Or people just walking away saying nothing.
Island Libertarian:
Video of a place I used to live about a mile from:
“Kehena Beach is a beautiful black sand beach in the Puna section of the Big Island of Hawaii. Located near the end of the famous Red Road, it is one of the few places where you can get into the water in the area.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rpDTLHQH6k
Lily, I was banned (I think) for having links on my blog that selrahC didn’t approve of. It was probably a stealth banning, although thanks to 2.0 I’m listed on the Book of the Banned.
re: #169 by spidly
It looks like the conservative rabbis have their heads screwed on right, but the author of the article? Not so much:
What troubles me most about this suggestion is how profoundly it flies in the face of the very meaning of the festival itself.
Follwed by a few lines of what the real meaning of the festival is, and then:
Beyond the political arguments over such a statement, it strikes me as something approaching idolatry.
In other words, he was expressing a negative sentiment with regard to the conservative rabbinical request, though politely.
The comments also express, for the most part, a negative reaction. It looks like the liberal Jews are still asleep. I can’t believe they discount a nuclear Iran and worry instead about last year’s invasion of Gaza.
re: #190 by Lily
There is a name for that idea, and many antitheists discount the notion because to them its just hocus pocus.
Many of them are set in their ways. Not because they want to believe there is no GOD, but rather because the existence of GOD means their life is imoral and evil and they do not want to surrender their positions.
Denial of GOD is just an excuseso they can be as immoral as they can be.
Some times I point out to them, especially in hte face of some horrific evil, that by their standard it should not matter, that if there is no GOD then it is purely survival of hte fittest and only the strongest’s opinions matter. I then continue by pointing out htat their inbred revultion is a part of what GOD built into hteir hearts, and that he is alive, he does care, and he will judge.
Most are hard sells because htey loe what ever crutch they cling to.
re: #186 by bar
My daughter lives on Maui. ‘Was over there a few times this year for work and to see her. Maui is nice but my favorite island is Kauai.
But here in Honolulu, I have all the convience of the big city and Hawaiian living.
re: #188 by Infidel
dick dale hava nagila to tie a couple subjects together.
re: #194 by Godzilla
yes, i’d say the author of the article is a bit of a schmuck
aladamit.
I knew you guys were somewhere.
*must remember to check for new threads*
re: #190 by Lily
It’s called “Pacal’s wager” after Blaise Pascal who is credited with formulating it. This was during the so-called Enlightenment when people like Voltaire were expressing radically athiest views and denigrating people of faith. While Pascal’s wager would reveal an extremely weak faith, it still does address the conundrum — namely that those of faith are in a more favorable position than those rejecting faith.
re: #199 by AZfederalist
Rats, that should be “Pascal’s Wager”
re: #187 by CloudyDay
The Orthodox Jewish position (going back about 850 years from the rabbi / philosopher / sage called Maimonides) is that it is impossible for science to contradict the Bible.
Thus, Orthodox Jews (most, anyway) see the six days of creation as days that took place over the course of about 13 billion years. Orthodox Jewish physicists have used physics to explain how this worked (and it isn’t simply a matter of dividing up the total billions of years into six parts). It’s complicated and they’ve written books to explain how science and the Bible don’t contradict each other.
When you mentioned that most Christians believe that Satan appeared as a ‘talking snake’ to deceive Eve — Orthodox Jews believe this too.
The belief is that snakes started out as creatures who had feet and legs (and who could speak.)
Well — there’s a story in the news right now about a snake found in China recently. It was born with a foot.
Check this out:
Snake with One Foot Discovered in China
Interesting, eh?!?
re: #192 by Infidel
I visited there in the ’70s. Beautiful place.
I’d like to see this beach. Puu Mahana – Big Island of Hawaii…Green Sand!
http://pixdaus.com/pics/1247358769GHaYPvi.jpg
re: #199 by AZfederalist
Thanks, couldn’t remember the name and wasn’t gonna google it.
re: #106 by danrudy
I failed to see how a picture of Obama’s face photoshoped onto the body of a Borneo witchdoctor was the Worst Racism In The World™. Charles got it into his head that this was a reference to Obama being African (something that happens to be true), and therefore racist. My position was that the image in question was using a real witchdoctor from the south sea islands to call Obama a witchdoctor for his attempts to socialize the American Health industry. Charles was just getting to the “everyone who disagrees with me is a white supremacist” level of his psychosis, and I faild to follow his lead against a legitimate piece of political commentary.
Of course, that was just the begining of it. Now the Left says anyone that disagrees with the President on anything is only doing so because he is black, and therefore are racists. That is laughable. I opposed HillaryCare when Clinton was President. I guess that was racism, too.
The truth is that there have been so many cries of “racism” that are bogus that I simply consider the source and, unless the motherfucker in question has a swastika tattooed on his forehead or such, let it slide. When everyone is racist, no one is racist, if you know what I mean. They’ve decimated their credibility on such issues.
let me try that link again…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce-0uFhDxx4&feature=player_embedded
re: #201 by Eliana
They should name it the barackus Obaminus. After all, he does seem to always have a foot in his mouth.
re: #204 by Iron Fist
And don’t forget the sock puppets!
Non-existent racism and non-existent sock puppets.
But that’s not anything! Glenn Beck is a WACK-O!!! That is most important!
one more try to show you “Green Sand Beach” and then if that fails, screw it. Buy a plane ticket….http://www.letsgo-hawaii.com/beaches/GreenSand2_beach.jpg..
Why is it when I show up the threads just die?
Oh well, good night all.
Ok, let’s all go to bed now. Jerry the thread killer just showed up.
Will you be performing an autopsy?
re: #204 by Iron Fist
The uber-liberal weirdo Janeane Garofalo claimed in a street interview that an entire tea party awhile back was racist because she saw a sign that said, “Whatchoo talkin’ about, Willis?”
I’m not sure what the sign meant (since she didn’t explain the entire sign that might have given it some context) — but her idea was that mentioning this hugely, hugely, hugely popular TV show is racist??? Why? Simply because the most popular person on this mega-popular TV sitcom was black and so is Obama? How could this be racist?
Garofalo characterized the entire modern tea party movement as racist for this one sign.
They’re looking for ANY possible way that they can claim racism.
People in this country are worried about the health and lives of 300 million Americans and the future of our country under incessant liberal trillion dollar spending sprees — and liberals can only see this as racist.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
re: #199 by AZfederalist
Thanks AZ didn’t know the history of it.
But I really think it is a wise saying.
Because even of weak faith if you believe in God over time that faith will grow. Just my opinion on that though.
190. Lily
and
re: #201 by Eliana
Oh yeah, I saw that headline (about the snake with the foot) a few days ago. I’ll have to check out the link you gave and read up on it.
I personally understand the creation days in Genesis to be 24 hour periods each, but I’m not going to be rude or nasty to someone who disagrees and thinks each day was equivalent to millions of years.
That was at the heart of what I was trying to get at in my previous post.
I can accept (or I try to accept) someone having a different view than I do on a topic (I don’t always find it easy, but I do try).
What yanks my chain and annoys me to no end are people who will treat you as though you’re a moron, idiot, fool, or uneducated yokel for having an opposing view on whatever the subject is.
One doesn’t have to treat another person like a piece of trash, or mock that person’s religious beliefs, just because their opinion is different.
re: #206 by Jerry
Agreed!
IslandLibertarian:
Still not working. If that’s Green Sand Beach in South Point you need 4WD to get there. I lived in Puna, which is on the east side of the Big Island, south of Hilo. The nearest town was Pahoa.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mMywSyio_w
If you go back give yourself at least a week to explore that Island.
re: #213 by CloudyDay
I understand…I have been told I believe in fairy tales. I don’t dismiss their opinions..but they seem hell bent on trying to make me come to my senses and I have flawed
reality. Personally I think it is the other way around. But don’t delve to that type of talk to them. They can believe whatever they want.
It will not change my faith or belief.
The best part of any Steven Seagal film is the end credits, lol.
re: #213 by CloudyDay
Agree 100%!
What gets me when I see anti-Creationism people on blogs is that they seem to think that it’s downright dangerous to believe in Creationism and ID. They hunt down politicians who believe in Creationism or ID and try to expose them as if it’s shocking and unacceptable.
It makes me sick when I see this.
By the way, when it comes to believing in the days of creation being 24 hours, it does actually add up (six days = roughly 13 billion years) if G-d moved at the speed of light for six days. Orthodox Jews added it up.
Who’s to say that G-d didn’t move at the speed of light for six days? He invented time and He exists outside of time, so it makes all the sense in the world that He could do this.
re: #190 by Lily
That might be a rewording of Pascal’s wager.
re: #216 by Lily
dont you love it when an atheist asks you what your IQ level is.
re: #217 by justin case
He was good in executive decision getting sucked out of the plane and all. I enjoyed it anyway. He should always die in the first 20 minutes
re: #219 by mjazz
Yes it wasn’t the exact wording. I’m going on memory and it is late. But I think I got the same point across…at least I hope.
re: #220 by justin case
Lucky for me none have been that dumb to even ask that to me.
If they did…either I would have to bite my tongue till it bled. Or they would get an example of my IQ.
I can’t believe Geraldo would associate with Al Sharpton. He was responsible for riots against Jews where someone got killed, I don’t remember all the details.
re: #221 by spidly
the last film i saw him in was that one on the aircraft carrier, i really cant watch the guys wooden acting, having said that he is a couple of notches above norris and van damm.
re: #220 by justin case
Justin what I have come across mostly is the vile anger and condesending tone. Like they know all.
re: #143 by no2liberals
Hey! WTF! What’dya do that for?
re: #222 by Lily
He was a child prodigy and mathematical genius that had a near brush with death that left him in a coma for a while, where he said he had an experience of God, but not of the philosophers, but of Abraham and Jacob.
re: #218 by Eliana
Who’s to say that G-d didn’t move at the speed of light for six days? He invented time and He exists outside of time, so it makes all the sense in the world that He could do this.
If GOD is all powerful, my thought is, why did he take so long to create it? Well, in Genesis it say it was good, so obviously he took his time and made sure it was right.
had to check back and see if it was really dead or if you all were just hiding.
I feel as if you all think I’m a spy and reporting back to Charles. Oops, I wasn’t supposed to let that slip!
Good night, and GOD bless each of you.
re: #225 by justin case
he’s gotten so fat he barely has fight scenes at all – he just does the same miracle hand twisty flippy thing or clotheslines everyone. give the fat bastard a gun.
I don’t know how anyone can look around and deny there is a Creator, even with all the suffering in the world. A lot of it is our own doing.
re: #226 by Lily
there are two types, the online type that from the start of the discussion treat you like a child with an imaginary friend.
or the real life types that bite their lip while trying not to snigger in your face.
i have yet to meet the third type who believes in live and let live.
re: #230 by spidly
lol. he must have a huge following,
as they keep churning out movies written for him.
re: #228 by mjazz
Thank you I did not know that.
And I agree with you it is hard to look around
and deny the Creator. The suffering is sometimes a blessing and most times it is of our own doing from free will.
For example on the blessing I have a cousin who was deep into drugs and not a good mother. She was diagnoised with cancer. She said it was the best thing that had happened because she turned her life around. Started behaving like a mother and a good person all around. She said it enlightened her. She is in remission now and credits God for it.
re: #231 by mjazz
However long it took to create the Universe, it’s something we won’t fully understand while we’re living in the physical world.
People have spent thousands of years trying to figure it all out, but we’re never going to get to the point of understanding how the Infinite Being Who exists outside of time built the universe with all its energy, matter, space and time.
At least not while we’re still in the physical world.
McChrystal: More Forces or ‘Mission Failure’
Top U.S. Commander For Afghan War Calls Next 12 Months Decisive
0 can give a couple speeches and sort this out. Two more joint session speeches and the number of uninsured should be zero. It’s just hard as he’s also got to charm A-jad out of his nukes, whisper sweet nothings into Chavez’s ear, talk China out of a trade war, scold the deficit back into shape, chide those inflationary pressures into obedience, wile consumers into spending money they don’t have, entice employers to hire people they cant afford…..lotta talking ahead.
I’m not sure what he could say about Car showrooms quiet after clunkers clamor ends doh! They told me so.
re: #232 by justin case
I haven’t met the third type either.
One can only pray that one day God will
soften their hearts and let the Light shine in.
re: #235 by Eliana
It will always be a mystery.
re: #237 by Lily
fat chance of that when you have people like dawkins making it fashionable for the young to give god the finger.
Romney taunts Democrats with memories of Carter
the bad new in the story:
great… the one guy I thought made McCain look somewhat viable as a candidate.
re: #238 by Lily
Yup!
While we’re still living in the physical world, anyway.
re: #239 by justin case
Justin and this is one of the worst of sins.
I would not want to be Dawkins.
But parents have influence.
It is important to lay a good foundation with children concerning God. As they get older then they can sort things out if they wish.
But the older my children get, both in their 20’s the stronger their faith becomes.
It is good feeling to see that.
re: #241 by Eliana
some have seen the other side and given us a sign.
http://vatopaidi.wordpress.com/2009/07/18/whys-the-smile-of-elder-joseph-of-vatopedi-from-eternity/
re: #243 by justin case
Near death experiences?
Some have seen heaven and some have seen hell.
People used to say to me what was there before God, and I’d say He created time. Recently I realized He created space also. One can sort of conceive of a Being that exists outside of time, outside of space is just… incredible.
re: #243 by justin case
Wow!
re: #244 by Lily
yes and some have seen things that cant be explained, so much so that a lot of people in the medical profession have been turned to jesus.
Some muslims have had visions of Jesus, and have converted.
re: #245 by mjazz
Time and space were both created as part of the universe.
G-d does indeed exist in a way that is not limited by absolutely anything He created (including time and space).
re: #249 by Eliana So there is nothing saying that He can’t work in the past.
re: #245 by mjazz
There was a Pope walking along the beach trying to understand the mystery’s of the Trinity of God. He spotted a small girl with a spoon. She was dipping the spoon in the ocean and emptying the ocean water on the sand. He asked her what she was doing.
She said she was emptying the ocean of the water.
The Pope said that was impossible. She then said that is exactly the same thing as trying to understand the mystery of the Trinity of God…impossible.
The Pope recieved his answer and the girl was no longer there.
re: #247 by justin case
Indeed Justin…indeed.
re: #250 by mjazz
Why would this be necessary when G-d exists outside of time so He knew everything that was going to happen before it actually happened?
if you were out walking and came across a wing from an aircraft, you could look at that wing and say with absolute certainty that it had been designed by a person with knowledge of aeronautical engineering and the properties of air ect.
so when we find a seed of a sycamore tree that is also a perfect wing with exact size in relation to the weight of the seed and the density of the air that will assist its travel.
why is it suddenly not a design but a random example of evolution.
re: #253 by Eliana I see what you mean. I believe He’s already in the future, then, also.
Even if unbelievably you never thought the Obamanation was a LIAR up to now his UNBELIEVABLE statements regarding ACORN and his proclaimed ignorance of their criminal actions and the fact that HIS OWN Porkulus Bill awarded them millions of dollars of State funding then you must know now. Barrack , you vcan call me HUSSEIN now I won, Obama is a BLATANT BAREFACED NARCISSISTIC LIAR. The only ones who will deny this are racist Blacks and left wing ‘libtards’ with a vested interest in this sad lying inappropriate unqualified LYING document HIDING BOGUS POTUS.
‘Justin case’ have you thought that perhaps over MILLIONS and MILLIONS of years of evolution its because all the other Sycamore seed that were NOT wing shaped FAILED.
re: #251 by Lily
The best explanation I heard of the Trinity was space, time and matter. The three are different but they are not seperate.
re: #255 by mjazz
He isn’t limited by time, so yes, He sees it all.
re: #257 by Pragmatist
no the wing is to take the seed away from the tree, its always been a perfect design,
trees are very clever you know.
re: #260 by justin case I was thinking that about maple seeds, they’re like helicopters.
G’night all!
re: #262 by Eliana Good night, I was just going to say the same thing.
Before I go: Why is Geraldo buddying up with Sharpton: http://www.jeffjacoby.com/633/al-sharpton-the-democrats-david-duke
re: #261 by mjazz
damn thats the one i meant,
wish i could go back and edit my posts.
Nite all! :]
UK: Christian Hotel Owners Arrested for Offending Their Muslim Guests….
I’m sure they are BNP members and probably wonder about the birth certificate a lot as well.
the links in the Mail story are good too
More…
Muslim lovers to be caned for trying to have sex in a car
Jedi church founder thrown out of Tesco for refusing to remove his hood was left ‘emotionally humiliated’
MAIL ON SUNDAY COMMENT: A disturbing use of law
Christian nurse accuses hospital of discrimination after being removed from frontline duty for wearing cross necklace
coulda been a Full day of 1.0 threads at one time
I read somewhere on this site where littleoldlady went but I forgot. Can anyone help be out?
Morning, everybody!
re: #268 by Fiat_Lux
All I know is that she was banned at 1.0 because they mistakenly believed her to be posting here, and as far as I know nobody has seen her.
73 Salamantis Mon, Sep 21, 2009 1:15:55am replyquote
* 1
* down
* up
* report
Just fyi, I have now exceeded 20,000 karma points in less than 13,200 posts, for a ratio exceeding 1.5 karma points per post. I guess people here must think I’m doing something right…;~)
Wow! his e-member is larger than yours!
re: #271 by HadEnough
It’s a mutual admiration society.
“Love me and I’ll love you!”
Losers.
re: #270 by spidly
I remember Charles posting that she was sent to the cornfield for posting here, yet everyone says
she has not. Could CJ be lying?
re: #273 by Fiat_Lux
Yes.
re: #274 by no2liberals
That was a rhetorical question, of course. He lies about everyone who is “disloyal”
justin case I bet you dont have PROOF of your claim dated back MILLIONS and MILLIONS of years. No good just spouting ‘ntelligent Design’ PROPAGANDA you have to prove it.
re: #276 by Pragmatist
You know, it’s entirely possible to win an argument and still be a complete arse.
re: #276 by Pragmatist
no old chap its you that have to prove to me that everything on this earth came from a puddle of crap.
you know where i am coming from, i totally reject the theory of evolution.
apart from micro evolution.
re: #278 by justin case
Hey everyone, good to see y’all. I don’t want to be a bother to anyone, but I have a question. Why is it that people can not resolve the two. Meaning God and evolution. I am a Christian and proud of it. I believe that God created the heavens and the earth, but I also understand that there is science to back up evolution. I do not see the two as seperate and negating each other. I look at God as a type of clock maker. Atleast in the very beginning. He set up the necessary parts, and then kicked things into motion. I mean, even for God that must of been one hell of a show watching the universe in it’s infancy.
re: #279 by linoleumknife
I don’t think we will ever know how it all happened. But I can tell you this: There are those who adhere to something so strongly, that anything else is lunacy. Black is black, white is white.
I often pondered on those threads (I would never post on them, instant ban), you know, there are a lot more important things going on than this.
Oh noes! someone mentioned the word creationism, the world will end as we know it!
Just shakes my head. Here we have our economy in shambles, getting worse, and there are those still like avanti, who “hopes” it gets better.
That’s like watching a serial killer, and “hoping” he just stops soon.
re: #280 by HadEnough
LOL, very true. It’s funny that the same people who mock others for having a blind faith in God, would have blind faith in a mere mortal.
Good morning, guys! What’s new?
re: #279 by linoleumknife
i think a lot of people are cool with believing the two can be together.
for my part i see the theory of evolution being used as a weapon to kill the belief in god.
that is the main reason i reject it,
and i think its a load of crap as well.
Dr. Kent Hovind is my man,
dawkins is the evolutionists man.
Good morning, y’all!
re: #284 by goddessoftheclassroom
{goddess} good morning.
re: #284 by goddessoftheclassroom
{Goddess}
re: #283 by justin case
Well from what I have read, Darwin never meant it to be an assualt on God. There is no doubt though that it is being used as such.
Hi, Goddess!
{HadEnough}
{linoleumknife}
The thing I could never understand at LGF was the contention that a belief in creation doomed the study of science. I mean, once things get going it doesn’t matter (to a scientist) how they started.
re: #288 by goddessoftheclassroom
How is school going for you this year so far?
And I know what you mean.
re: #286 by linoleumknife
agreed darwin had his doubts.
How ironic that Charles Darwin, after a lifetime of turning the scientific world on its head, began in later years to question his own conclusions.
“Often a cold shudder has run through me,” Darwin wrote in a letter to his friend and colleague Charles Lyell, “and I have asked myself whether I may have not devoted myself to a phantasy.”
I never posted on a Creationism thread. It is a debate with no end. Faith versus science. Passions run very high and no one is persuaded, often resulting in bitterness and resentment. It is a lose/lose argument for a blog or a forum, IMO.
re: #289 by HadEnough
It’s a great year. I have terrific students. VERY busy, of course, but in a good way!
re: #291 by Number6
but at least here we can have a debate and get as passionate as we like without getting the ban stick and some snide comment to go with it.
Morning all!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
“400 stage walk in Hill District demanding jobs
Monday, September 21, 2009
By Kaitlynn Riely, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The first of what will likely be several G-20 demonstrations took place peacefully yet forcefully in the Hill District yesterday, as 400 people marched through the streets calling for an economic recovery that includes jobs for the unemployed.”
And WHAT did we SAY creates jobs, Brain?
NOTE THE COLD WEATHER REPORT!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09264/999586-482.stm#ixzz0Rjh45eEF
re: #292 by goddessoftheclassroom
Wonderful for you.
okay, time to head in to work, be back soon.
Have a great day, everyone.
re: #290 by justin case
Well as it stands, I’m not devoted to the idea that we evolved directly from apes. I think there could be a strong possibility that God created them as a test run. Life has been on this planet for far longer than we have. We are his most magnificent creation, and complex is probably to mild of an adjective to describe the human race. With that, we need a very particular set of circumstances to live and thrive. I see the time leading up to us as a way to set up the environment that was required.
I’m so happy a morning bunch is evolving…*hee! hee!)
Have a great day, y’all!
Fiat…
LoL has never posted here. After her banning she posted at least once at Babs place. I am on FB and we chat alnost everyday. She is very, very busy. Keep her and ToM in your prayers, MeanNastyTeenager too.
re: #293 by justin case
Absolutely, Justin, and that is a very good thing!
One more reason why we have twice as many posts as 1.0 in the overnight thread. There is no threat in here–and no echo!
Bye, Goddess, have a good one!
re: #295 by HadEnough
re: #296 by linoleumknife
re: #297 by goddessoftheclassroom
Sorry for my outburst guys! I hope I didn’t spoil morning group.
I feel like the drunk guy that walks into the diner after a WAY late night, not realizing that most of the world had started their day already.
Not that I’m drawing from experience…
re: #301 by Bumr50
Lol, no worries bud.
I’m sure I have said this atleast once, but seeing as this was the end of my first week here, I love this site. This is the first time I have been comfortable enough to express my views on evolution. At 1.0 the atmosphere was so hostile on those threads that I never felt up to posting in them. Even on the more casual threads it felt elitist. I feel at home.
does anybody here remember the dead thread on lgf a few years back when migel in mexico used to get flamed by a drunk girl, she really hated him.
i cant think what her nic was.
If life evolved from simple (ha!) 1 celled microbes to the species we have today, simplest exorcises of all to prove your point, list a 2 celled organism, 3? 4? 5? 6? 7?
Of course when I say simplest I mean you have to devote you life to it and die a failure.
justin
Bubblegirl?
re: #306 by BenZacharia
not sure if thats the one, the nick had girl at the end and an american state, like phoenix girl
or something, she was always going on about her brother serving in iraq.
justin…
I was off line for most of ‘08. What happened to MdiM?
re: #185 by IslandLibertarian
IL, you still around? Back in the day a bunch of us would get together on Tuesday nights to watch 50. Dress code: Hawaiian shirts, lol. Good times.
Morning!
re: #308 by BenZacharia
quite a few people asked that, and i think someone who was in email contact with him said that he had a heart attack and it left him quite disabled.
he was a nice bloke.
Atheists believe nothing created everything.
Faithful Jews clearly believe The Name created everything.
Zazi is toast. F’n splodey dope. So is a prominent NY cleric.
re: #303 by linoleumknife
I feel the same way. This is a good place and we are getting more good people very day. BTW, the old place was elitist and still is. At one time I thought that was fun–but then it wasn’t anymore.
re: #313 by Number6
the worst thing is when people start forming little groups and then start to gang up on posters that they disapprove of.
i really hope it dont happen here.
but as the numbers grow so does the chance of it happening.
Ray Comfort=RC Dick Dawkins=DD
RC’So, you’re an atheist?’
DD’Yep.’
RC’So you believe that nothing created everything, a scientific impossibility?’
DD’Well, no.’
RC’So you believe something created everything?’
DD’Well, yeah. Something did, obviously.’
RC’So you’re not an atheist?’
DD’OK, I’m not an atheist.’
RC’This something you believe created everything, do you think it was intelligent? I mean, could you create a bird or a flower or a tree or a blade of grass from nothing?’
DD’No, I can’t do that.’
RC’Well, is this something you believe created everything intelligent?’
DD’Obviously.’
RC’Congratulations, you’ve just become an anti-science, knuckle-dragger in the eyes of our learning institutions, because you believe in intelligent design.’
DD*boom* (head explodes)
re: #304 by justin case
Kirls is too long to scroll through, but did Gordon have a case study of MdiM?
re: #316 by African Moondog
i dont think he was banned, he had a heart attack abd just stopped posting.
“the worst thing is when people start forming little groups and then start to gang up on posters that they disapprove of.
i really hope it dont happen here.
but as the numbers grow so does the chance of it happening.”
Good moderation should take care of that. So many people here now just came from an oppressive environment that they are likely to be on guard against this place going that same way. At least I hope so.
Israel doesn’t need mooselimbs for enemmies when the have Bibi.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=110464
Coming to think of it, there is a doctoral theses in the making in Kirl’s book of the banned, it is now so long only dedicated students have the time to go through it all.
wish they would put the edit function back.
jc
pimf?
re: #317 by justin case
I hope he recovers, it is possible. Perhaps he should be considered an honorable bannee, if he carried on posting he would have been.
I’m beginning to see why people have misgivings about Bibi.
re: #319 by BenZacharia
morality always takes a backseat to politics.
re: #324 by Number6
People, quite correctly, have misgivings about politicians all the time and Israeli politics are famously robust. Why are people having misgivings about Bibi.
Ok My bad, I read Ben Zach’s post.
re: #323 by African Moondog
i bet little old lady knows all about migel.
they used to talk everyday.
re: #327 by African Moondog
‘Tis OK.
That is a great nic you have, BTW.
another thing that really used to piss me off on lgf was.
how the hell does having thousands of posts make your opinion more valid than someone with just a few.
re: #291 by Number6
EXACTLY, which is why you will never see me discussing a faith versus science or faith versus faith topic. minds are never changed because it is impossible to argue faith, by definition, faith is not debatable. (it is a relief to have a place to do such things, no?)
so, number6, as i am heading out to me tee time…
For properly framing and defining the pitfalls of faith debates, the awards committee of the country club awards Number 6 gets a “Well Reasoned”.
“Well Reasoned”
the country club has spoken!
re: #330 by justin case
I call that “door slamming”. It means, “you are nobody until you’ve been here as long as me!” Utter crap.
Well, Wifffeees awake and it’s her birthday. TTFN
“For properly framing and defining the pitfalls of faith debates, the awards committee of the country club awards Number 6 gets a “Well Reasoned”.
“Well Reasoned”
the country club has spoken!”
Wow, I never expected to get the Award. I mean, just to be nominated is an honor!
I’d like thank all the people who made this possible: my writers, the director, the producers, my Mom, my Third Grade teacher…
Gosh, you like me! You really, really like me!
#6
Although it is true here
re: #334 by Number6
display it proudly…
re: #333 by BenZacharia
happy b’day benz wife…
of to the cc…
FORE!
ttfn
re: #332 by Number6
I gather that there has been major bannage on a rush post over there. One has to wonder whether it is orgasmic? I cannot think of another reason for getting rid of so many posters for inoffensive, innocuous posts or those who stimulate debate.
re: #297 by goddessoftheclassroom
nice to see some of the old lizards here, think I’ll stick around :<)
Hey, apachegunner, good to see you here!
scanning 1.0 it appears they are now backing the public option. is it me?
re: #339 by Number6
hey 6, nice to be here. this place seems more friendly than the other place :>)
question, do you refresh the page to see new comments?
re: #338 by apachegunner
Hey gunner! nice to see you here!
re: #337 by African Moondog
I can’t help but think that those threads are created for the express purpose of “smoking out dissenters”. They are purposefully controversial, then when controvery erupts, the hammer comes out.
It’s like a weird cult.
“scanning 1.0 it appears they are now backing the public option. is it me?”
Some of them have been backing the public option for weeks now. It has turned into pretty much of a lefty blog.
refresh for new comments
re: #342 by apachegunner
press F5
At first I thought the idea of creating threads to smoke out the conservatives was raging paranoia. Now, I’m not so sure.
The bottom line, though, is that so many conservatives have been banned or walked away, that the balance there has shifted way to the left and will likely stay that way.
re: #345 by Number6
weasel slapper leading them all I bet. I started to ignore her completely when she was talking about the UN resolution saying health care was a right, and we signed it, so we must socialize medicine.
I never took an oath to defend the UN against all enemies.
*spit*
Greetings & salutations from the airport.
Big news, I have successfully navigated the complexities of crack TSA Security!
I see that they are still giving extra scrutiny
to Scandanavian looking types.
We are covered in case Sweden gets all terroristy on us.
re: #343 by HadEnough
HadEnough? Hiya, s’ok if i join the morning crowd?
Hiya, RIX!
re: #349 by HadEnough
“weasel slapper leading them all I bet. I started to ignore her completely when she was talking about the UN resolution saying health care was a right, and we signed it, so we must socialize medicine.”
The weasel is the worst thing that ever happened to 1.0, IMO. Her arrival and rise to prominence was very detrimental.
re: #352 by Number6
Yo number 6, w2hat up?
re: #353 by Number6
yes, i watched her rise in popularity from day one. her karma numbers were in the thousands quickly and her support was amazing. she and i went at it several times but at least she was always polite.
If you look at the overnight thread at the Johnsontown cult Sharmuta is there at the beginning & she is still there.
That kind of tells me that she is monitoring for flouncers& deviations from the Party line, with her finger on the report button.
She may soon open a veon for Charlie.
re: #354 by RIX
Hangin’ with the morning crowd. Where are you heading off to?
re: #355 by apachegunner
She is sly, she picks her fights and her victims carefully. She’s got a couple dozen scalps on her belt by now, if I bothered counting them.
re: #353 by Number6
Word up. Weasel arrived with her posse & all civility was gone.
She is a vulgarian & an ad hominen attack creature.
I do not think that it is a coincidence that the far lefties arrived all at once.
WHat would attract them to LGF? Hmmmm
re: #351 by apachegunner
Isn’t up to me, but you have my vote. Hadn’t seen you over at 1.0 for a while. Don’t blame you. The more the merrier.
re: #353 by Number6
I have to agree. First day I met her, she lost all credibility.
re: #359 by RIX
“Word up. Weasel arrived with her posse & all civility was gone.
She is a vulgarian & an ad hominen attack creature.
I do not think that it is a coincidence that the far lefties arrived all at once.
WHat would attract them to LGF? Hmmmm”
She/they were invited. I’d bet a week’s pay on it. I’m not sure if the consequences were anticipated back then but I am sure he brought them in.
Oh this is good. Over at the cult somebody named Songbird said that she has been out of the loop & now notices lots pof deletions.
Canadian Club Akbar said, “They chose to flounce”
SB came back & said that she heard that lots of favorites got banned. She might be next.
re: #361 by Number6
That’s what I think, they all climed off of the same buses.
Whatever CJ is into, he sinks lower.
“Over at the cult…”
Damn, that is funny! (If it wasn’t so damn true it might be funnier.)
Good Morning All….a hot cup of joe and I’m ready to get at it.
re: #364 by Number6
Yeah, unfortunately it does have the ring of truth.
If Charles starts serving Kool Aid in the Lizard Lounge, I would demand a food taster.
re: #361 by Number6
I believe they were also. One of the threads last week I believe someone was welcoming a new poster. that poster said that he was invited to join by charles.
Time to board. See ya.
re: #365 by mawskrat
Good morning.
re: #355 by apachegunner
GUNNER……………………………………. Sup my friend…….
BBIAB
Just checking in this morning. I looked at the 1.0 too and noticed not many minions left. But the one comment that did grab me was SONGBIRD’s comment link.
I give it here (original source) so as not to give 1.0 any referrals. This cartoon is spot on, 70 years ahead of time.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Wl-emmkneyw/SrdsuIzoV_I/AAAAAAAAAMc/sglv2GjWtZE/s400/Chicago+Tribune+1934+cartoon+congress+spending.htm
BTW, apparently SONGBIRD hasn’t drunk the Kool-Aid since he had been absent for a while.
re: #370 by doriangrey
dorian! How bout them chargers!
re: #188 by Infidel
I’m glad the rest of the blogosphere has caught on, too.
re: #373 by HadEnough
GO CHARGERS…… AND TAKE THOSE #$% #$%^% PADRES WITH YOU….
Listening to Harrison Ford. liberal whack job
re: #356 by RIX
i always checked stinky’s updings just to see who his backer were, i never say a comment by him that wasn’t updinged by her, time after time after time. kinda seemed like butt kissing.
LGF is feeling the loss of its psoters
101 SanFranciscoZionist Sun, Sep 20, 2009 8:03:10pm replyquote
* 3
* down
* up
* report
re: #85 BigPapa
Yeah, flounced. Bitched about Sharm, the echo chamber, comparisons to The Island of Dr Moreau.
People, STOP LEAVING please! I like almost everyone who’s left around here
i got booted from 1.0. charles told me to “get off my website, i am tire of your sniping at me”. ya know, he was right. i down dinged him constantly, talked of him and his followers. when i got booted a new guy had said something positive about glen beck and i told him his karma was at risk of charles and his kids and then i was gone! don’t miss lgf much, kinda like it better here!
re: #370 by doriangrey
hey dorian! nice to seeya here, how nice to see this place gaining ground. how long you been posting here? did stinky hit ya with da stick to?
re: #378 by Speranza
Good morning Speranza!
Well they should have thought about that when they boarded the express elevator to Bedlam.
re: #378 by Speranza
ROTFLMAO…. “People, STOP LEAVING please! I like almost everyone who’s left around here”
The only people that are left are liberal douche bags…
re: #361 by Number6
“She/they were invited. I’d bet a week’s pay on it. I’m not sure if the consequences were anticipated back then but I am sure he brought them in.’
Correct. iceweasel, Diego, Jimmah – all come from The Daily Kos and the Puffington Host. selrahC got the word out that he wanted more “balance”.
re: #380 by apachegunner
ROTFLMAO… Been here maybe a month, no Charles smacked me himself, he didnt appreciate my suggestion that Islam be designated a political movement at war with the IS Constitution that should be banned from the United States, he said I was a fucking racist and he wouldn’t tolerate racists on his site… And bam I was gone…
re: #378 by Speranza
1.0 is slowly bleeding out
morning folks
upthread, someone asked about littleoldlady,
she is doing well
she and a core of 1.0 oldtimers have formed their own blog(took cj’s advice doncha know)
because of the brewhaha on the web they want to keep a low profile for now, some of them could be hurt if cj chose to lash out.
they just want a fresh start and forget all the bad stuff
re: #385 by mawskrat
ROTFLMAO… slowly my ass, it’s bleeding out in record time, it only seems slow because it is a frickin dinosaur and has ten thousand gallons of blood…
re: #384 by doriangrey
yeah, amazing how fast it goes huh? i got my account banned a few years back when i knocked the stinking muslims but for some reason stinky unblocked it after i said he’d misintrepreted my comment, the knucklehead!
ban count 1277
cj and 1.0 avg over 20 bannings per day!
re: #382 by doriangrey
SF Zionist aought to get off that train fast!
re: #379 by apachegunner
You have a home here and do not have to walk on eggshells.
things that make you go hmmm…
Earth approaching sunspot records
http://www.cjonline.com/news/local/2009-09-20/earth_approaching_sunspot_records
re: #381 by vagabond trader
Good morning VT. Anyone who (right of center) who remains on that train wreck has self esteem issues.
re: #384 by doriangrey
selt]rahC banned you for things that were said every day on LGF from 2002 -2008.
re: #386 by rain of lead
Is littleloldlady bitter about what happened to her? I heard that NY Nanan still defends selrahC and is in denial over what happened to her.
re: #391 by Speranza
thanks, i can feel that already and i’ll watch closely for any racism or unfairness. who is the leader here, whose blog is this?
re: #393 by Speranza
Yes,and probably in need of intervention and or deprogramming.
Cult mentality plus Stockholm Syndrome, imho.
re: #395 by Speranza
No! she is living well and THAT is the best revenge.
grace and class all the way
re: #386 by rain of lead
Morning Rain,now think of what you just said about lol and her friends:
“some of them could be hurt if cj chose to lash out.
they just want a fresh start and forget all the bad stuff”
That in and of itself tells the story. Long time respected lgfers are actually fearful of the Johnson Cabal hurting them.Sick sick sick people over at Bedlam. Get the net!
re: #396 by apachegunner
there are at lest 10 administratiprs jhere
1. m
2. Rodan
3. Savage
4. bar
5. TQuintiusCincinnatus (sic)
6. BobinBreckinridge
7. No2liberals
and at lest 3 others whose namse escape me.
I am just a poster here as Cowboys fass are not welcome as administrators!
oops I forgot LanceKates
re: #396 by apachegunner
The only racism I’ve seen has come from
agent provocateurs who were not well received.
Geez my typing is awful this morning and there is no edit function up today.
re: #402 by vagabond trader
such as Champion692G
re: #399 by vagabond trader
sick stuff indeed, cj has already outed people
via paypal info and they are cautious
re: #402 by vagabond trader
outstanding, seems like a great place :>)
re: #231 by mjazz
Earthly suffering does not disprove GOD, but rather proves he is long suffering regading us, it proves the depth of his love.
GOD gave us three gifts, the first and the least is the gift of life. Least? Yes indeed, for without the other two, it is condemnation to either puppetry, or eternal torment. The second gift is eternal life through Jesus. This is the greatest gift of all, bt one we must choose to open. The third gift is self determination, free choice. We each decide what we will do, how we will act. If a particularly evil person were to be struck down by GOD in a most spectacular way, That would deny freedom of choice.
The person struck down would be denied the option of repentance, but more importantly, those who saw it would be denied freedom of choice. They would bow before GOD out of fear of his wrath. (sorry RoG) GOD wants us to worship him out of faith and love.
He gives guidance to those who love him, some times a gentle nudge, some times a swift kick in the shorts, but they are ones who are justified by his grace, and it is never done in a way that reveals his nature to unbelievers.
All the suffering in the world is caused by men. for by man, sin entered the world, and death by sin.
I do not believe tha GOD rejoices when any evil person dies. rather he mourns, for he wishs for all men to turn to him and be saved.
That is why I believe he intended capital punishment to be a horrible way to die, not the slipping off to sleep that lethal injection has made it.
re: #405 by rain of lead
ya mean people used paypal to give dollars to lgf and charles later used that information to harm those individuals? fortunately i never felt the need to give money to him.
re: #405 by rain of lead
Cannot blame them,sad. Last week I was willing to cut cj some slack due to his obvious emotional problems.I now regret that bit of mercy.
re: #406 by apachegunner
Growing in leaps and bounds as the floodgates have opened.
re: #408 by apachegunner
I don’t know about “harm” but he did revel their
real ID’s and if he would do that who knows what else he would do
re: #408 by apachegunner
Yes he did that to “m” our lovely administrator.
re: #404 by Speranza
The other one on Saturday, sloggin4u, very suspicious..
Heh, spelling grammar, whats dat? The older Iz get the worser it getz.
re: #409 by vagabond trader
He is definitely having a nervous breakdown. I think that Ace’s smack downs as well as Powerline’s delinking him and Hot Air’s banishing him to”Left Channels” on its blog rolls has really pushed him over the edge.
re: #413 by vagabond trader
I’m just a lousy typist (although a good speller).
re: #414 by Speranza
If he has any real world friends I honestly hope they do an intervention.
re: #411 by rain of lead
Also his two lackeys – Defenseman (HoosierHoops) and Irish Rose – have no problem revealing peoples names and pictures.
re: #416 by vagabond trader
Since he is on his blog 24/7 I wonder if he has any friends (unless it is his newly found leftist friends).
re: #417 by Speranza
Rodan says he received new info that Defenseman is Honorary Yooper.
re: #419 by vagabond trader
Honorary Yooper, HoosierHoops – the same thing!
re: #407 by Jerry
Good post, I might add that the God of love does not force Himself on anyone, (if He did that wouldn’t love at all) but the Lord has given us a free will to accept Him and worship Him by faith.
Ephesians 2:8 “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and not of yourselves; it is a gift of God”
Faith is to the spirit what hands are to the body, God offers us a free gift of salvation and we receive it through faith.
Faith is the vehicle in which we receive God’s grace.
re: #392 by rain of lead
Where are you at tha you read the crapurinal?
Manhattan for me.
re: #420 by Speranza
re: #408 by apachegunner
Charles also has access to log in and passwords. It is not encrypted, at least he bragged that was how he outed one sock puppet.
The guy is purest evil.
re: #413 by vagabond trader
Yeah, I was wondering what happened there…seemed to be on only one thread, whereas the rest of us are doing like the old days at 1.0, bouncing from thread to thread.
re: #424 by Jerry
i think he uses a search routine to look for duplicate ip addresses in the user database to determine those.
re: #426 by apachegunner
I’m curious. If I get a new internet service provider, does that change my IP address as well?
Morning all.
I see more and more new (old) names every day. Very cool.
Is our Lord and Master Obama up to any new tricks this morning?
re: #414 by Speranza
Not sure if its a nervous breakgown, but serious mental problems is a given. Isn’t that true of all lefties?
re: #427 by Carolina Girl
hello carolina girl, i am a carolina guy, what part of the state are you, i am in the midlands. not sure but i know each individual computer can be identified with some part of the ip address although i can’t say how.
re: #430 by apachegunner
I only WISH I were still there. I was raised in Goldsboro (Dad was assigned to Seymour Johnson AFB) but now I live in Northern California and work in San Francesspool
re: #431 by Carolina Girl
ohhh noooooooo, i am sooooooo sorry :>(
re: #427 by Carolina Girl
Yes.
“Yeah, flounced. Bitched about Sharm, the echo chamber, comparisons to The Island of Dr Moreau.
People, STOP LEAVING please! I like almost everyone who’s left around here”
Oh, the irony! Abso-frackin’-lutely hilarious!
re: #428 by Lincolntf
Interesting summary of President Wee Weeds wall to wall media coverage thus far.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/on_the_air_prez_seems_like_endless_QNYXXyakSyHi8h306QRAKL
re: #426 by apachegunner
He bragged abotu it once, after an early bannee snuck back in, he swung the stick and later said they had registered two sock puppets with diffrent e-mail addresses, but used the same password.
I some times wonder what he would stop at in his attacks on people.
http://urbaninfidel.blogspot.com/2009/09/glenn-beck-derangement-syndrome.html
re: #435 by vagabond trader
GMTA! Browsing Hot Air, too?
re: #438 by Number6
Drudge had a link.
re: #439 by vagabond trader
Good morning! I had about five windows open and I forget where I was getting what! I was just going to post your link.
re: #435 by vagabond trader
“During his first eight months in office, President Obama has sat down for three times as many television interviews as his most recent two predecessors combined.”
I know Obama and the media are in denial about this, but constant wall-to-wall coverage is not a good thing. It can be overdone.
His career is beginning to remind me of Britney Spears (or any other manufactured “star”).
Now I’m just waiting for his big “flame out” moment. Just hope it’s not too embarassing for the country when he has his inevitable meltdown.
re: #441 by Lincolntf
Too late.
The embarassment part that is. He just hasn’t received the message yet, since no one is allowed to convey it.
re: #440 by Number6
Good morning to you 6! Yup, did you also catch the blatant lies re: his knowledge of ACORN? Funny how our “most brilliant and technically savvy” leader convieniently forgets that we have him on tape praising ACORN and promising to work with them on their mutual agendas.
re: #441 by Lincolntf
Fly in Air Force One.
Give speech.
Fly in Air Force One.
Go on TV shows.
Fly in Air Force One.
Play golf.
Over 200 days in office and I’ll bet they still haven’t had to change the sheets in the master bedroom in the residence.
re: #426 by apachegunner
Easy to do, but inaccurate