Progressive Influence in the Military

As a person who has family that served in the US Military, this disgusts me. Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is now saying that the US should do actions to please the Muslims. His critique is that America needs to do better actions to win over the Hearts and Minds of Islamic people.

WASHINGTON – The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has written a searing critique of government efforts at “strategic communication” with the Muslim world, saying that no amount of public relations will establish credibility if American behavior overseas is perceived as arrogant, uncaring or insulting.

The critique by the chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen, comes as the United States is widely believed to be losing ground in the war of ideas against extremist Islamist ideology. The issue is particularly relevant as the Obama administration orders fresh efforts to counter militant propaganda, part of its broader strategy to defeat the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

“To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate,” Admiral Mullen wrote in the critique, an essay to be published Friday by Joint Force Quarterly, an official military journal.

Read the rest.

Did we try to win the communication war with the Nazis or Imperial Japanese? The answer is no, we won the war with these 2 nations militarily. This is an example of the Transnational Progressive disease now infiltrating our Military. We need to develop methods to defeat the Islamo-Fascists militarily. They don’t care what we think of them, we should not care what they think of us. We need to make them FEAR us!

To the Blogmocracy Military Veterans, I would love your take on this. My opinion, we need to be focus on defeating and crushing them, not them liking us.

Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

73 Responses to “Progressive Influence in the Military”
( jump to bottom )

  1. vapig
    1 | August 28, 2009 8:29 am

    Won’t work. Didn’t work when we sided with islam over communism. It didn’t work when we sided with islam over islam (iraq/kuwait) and it didn’t work when we sided with islam over Christians in Bosnia.

    Islam motto – what have you done for me lately?

    Oh – yeah! Foist!


  2. 2 | August 28, 2009 8:30 am

    re: #1 by vapig

    Exactly, we should never help or side with Muzzies.


  3. 3 | August 28, 2009 8:38 am

    The only thing the Koran-thumping muzzie imperialists understand and respect is getting the living shit kicked out of them.

    Anything else we do is perceived as weakness, and rightly so.


  4. 4 | August 28, 2009 8:40 am

    re: #3 by Foghorn Leghorn

    Exactly, they needs to be defeated and humiliated.


  5. My5princesses
    5 | August 28, 2009 8:46 am

    re: #4 by Rodan

    Where’s that Champion guy, my day ain’t been complete unless I’ve been called a racist by someone who hates whiteys.


  6. 6 | August 28, 2009 8:51 am

    re: #4 by Rodan

    Exterminated is more like it…

    /want to get under IR’s thin skin LOL


  7. 7 | August 28, 2009 8:52 am

    re: #6 by savage

    On your Sicilian side and on my Spaniard side, they had alot of experience doing that!

    :-)


  8. Beltfed
    8 | August 28, 2009 8:58 am

    With all due respect Adm. Mike Mullen winning the hearts and minds was used in Vietnam, it did not work.

    What did work was having them by the balls, then their hearts and minds soon followed.


  9. 9 | August 28, 2009 9:00 am

    re: #7 by Rodan

    indeed


  10. 10 | August 28, 2009 9:03 am

    re: #8 by Beltfed

    Yup like we did in WW2.


  11. 12 | August 28, 2009 9:08 am

    re: #11 by Skippy

    That motherfucker needs to be forced to turn his gun and badge in NOW!

    Fire that fascist POS.


  12. 13 | August 28, 2009 9:16 am

    re: #12 by savage

    Ditto. He’s obviously an Obama worshipper who doesn’t like folks who poke fun at his G-d.

    Now, if the officer had taken the same actions against a Code Pinko who was holding a similar sign but with President Bush on it, the commies at the ACLU would already be on the case.

    Unbelievable!


  13. Skippy
    14 | August 28, 2009 9:20 am

    Protester: This is America, isn’t it?

    Officer: It ain’t no more!

    Unbelievable. They aren’t even trying to hide it anymore.

    :roll:


  14. Beltfed
    15 | August 28, 2009 9:26 am

    re: #14 by Skippy

    Officer: It ain’t no more!

    What’s it called now, 0bamaland.


  15. quiet man
    16 | August 28, 2009 9:26 am

    I cant say I think the Germans and the Japanese are a fair comparison..and lets face it, when it comes to pointing the tanks and guns against the “Islamofacists” for a firefight…Exactly where would that be??

    Al qaida and Iran in Iraq, the Taliban in Afganistan..Where we are fighting..the government of Iran, which we need to be damaging badly.

    I also believe in a hearts and minds approach, yet coupled with a strong effort to punish those who cross us. We will not need to fight the people of Iran, like we didn’t have to fight the people of Iraq or Afganistan.

    The only “peoples” who we need to either change their mind or scare into living in peace are those in Pakistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia..these countries governments are already at peace with the US.

    So what can be a true win militarily in this modern world with the accepted norm is not to kill innocents?? I personally like that norm and want it to continue.

    Maybe Talk softly, carry a big stick in one hand, and bag of Big Macs and bluejeans in the other


  16. Bumr50
    17 | August 28, 2009 9:27 am

    There is a segment of America that, through no fault of their own in many cases, feel that having Obama in office is going to make things tangibly better for them based on their skin color or perceived social status, or both.

    When it inevitably doesn’t happen for them because the standard of living in this country is economically bound to decline due to reckless spending, they will eventually grow impatient with Obama.

    Let’s hope that happens sooner rather than later.


  17. quiet man
    18 | August 28, 2009 9:35 am

    re: #17 by Bumr50

    They are already scared and it is taking little effort from the left to make those sheep feel panicked and ready to follow the Obama goat


  18. vapig
    19 | August 28, 2009 9:38 am

    re: #17 by Bumr50

    Obama will start a class war. His rhetoric is a constant, “blame the wealthy (to include anybody who has a job),” meme has already got them whipped up. It won’t take much more to send them looting for their just rewards!


  19. Bumr50
    20 | August 28, 2009 9:39 am

    re: #16 by quiet man

    There was a thread a few days back on whether the war in Afghanistan was worth it or not given the high rate of casualties and lack of definition. When I left it was pretty much up in the air to no.

    Without a definitive end result, fighting is futile. The enemy is unidentifiable in many cases. And now with our primary intelligence gathering agency in chaos, how are we to know where the enemy lay?

    If we are to continue, we need a better commander in chief, a new strategy, and TOTAL commitment.

    Anything less is insulting to our men and women in uniform.


  20. bar
    21 | August 28, 2009 9:39 am

    re: #11 by Skippy

    Protestor: What is the difference between those over there and mine?
    Officer: Those don’t have pictures on it, yours has a picture on it!

    I would have forced the officer to arrest me, then a nice lawsuit against both the city and the officer would [be] filed.


  21. vapig
    22 | August 28, 2009 9:45 am

    re: #21 by bar

    Probably would have been his/her (I can’t see this video) best move. They would have had to at least settle and then this would have defined by departmental proceedures. As it is – this guy (cop?) can do as he pleases.


  22. lobo91
    23 | August 28, 2009 9:46 am

    re: #16 by quiet man

    I cant say I think the Germans and the Japanese are a fair comparison..and lets face it, when it comes to pointing the tanks and guns against the “Islamofacists” for a firefight…Exactly where would that be??

    Precisely correct.

    Admiral Mullen is not taking a “PC” approach to the war, folks. I think you’ve seriously misread what he’s saying:

    He also challenged a popular perception that Al Qaeda operates from primitive hide-outs and still wins the propaganda war against the United States. “The problem isn’t that we are bad at communicating or being outdone by men in caves,” Admiral Mullen wrote. “Most of them aren’t even in caves. The Taliban and Al Qaeda live largely among the people. They intimidate and control and communicate from within, not from the sidelines.”

    That is exactly the problem we face in Afghanistan. The Taliban aren’t hiding in caves anymore, but they’re also not operating out of a building with a big neon sign on it that says “Taliban, Inc.”

    If you want the people in a village to tell you who the bad guys are, blowing up their houses and shooting their family members isn’t a very productive way to obtain information. And sorry, the idea that we can intimidate them into cooperating is bullshit.

    They know we’re only going to be there for a relatively short time, and as soon as we leave, they expect the bad guys to return and kill them if they’re seen cooperating with us.

    I hate these assholes as much as anyone else does, but I have to tell you, you guys are way off-base on this one.

    For those who don’t know my background, I’m a USAR sergeant major, and my unit’s entire mission revolves around training units that are deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan. I’ve spent more time in the New Mexico desert over the last 5 years than I have at home.


  23. 24 | August 28, 2009 9:52 am

    re: #18 by quiet man

    re: #23 by lobo91

    I will disagree with you 2. We need to put fear into the hearts of Muslims. Their societies only respect strenght. Islam has never been defeated thorugh hearts in minds. They only understand power.

    I’m glad you 2 disagree with my post, I like dissent and please speak freely!


  24. tunnelrat
    25 | August 28, 2009 9:53 am

    O.T. Over at 1.0 they are now slamming the “extremist retoric” of Senator James Inhofe. This is his “inflammatory” statement regarding massive spending and the growth of government:

    “People are not buying these concepts that are completely foreign to America,” Inhofe said. “We’re almost reaching a revolution in this country.”

    Cannot for the life of me see what is “extreme” or “radical” about that statement. Cj and his ass lickers are taking him to task though.


  25. chickadee
    26 | August 28, 2009 9:58 am

    Wars are not won by ‘doing actions to please’ the enemy.
    Especially jihadists who would use any concessions to further their blood thirsty desire to deliver the world to allah.

    Think how demoralizing this leftist shit must be to our troops on the ground doing the dangerous heavy lifting. Putting their lives on the line. Facing these savages.

    It seems even the military isn’t safe from the commie libs who are out to wreck this country.


  26. vagabond trader
    27 | August 28, 2009 10:02 am

    Yuh, the hearts and minds approach worked out so well in ‘Nam.//


  27. mike
    28 | August 28, 2009 10:03 am

    Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security —

    This is the kind of shit that will get you thrown off of LGF. And really can you blame them?


  28. 29 | August 28, 2009 10:06 am

    re: #28 by mike

    Wait till my next post. That one will send chills down everyone on here’s spine!


  29. Bumr50
    30 | August 28, 2009 10:07 am

    re: #25 by tunnelrat

    It’s simple – they’re not comfortable living in a country that has a Second Amendment.

    They realize that the people who are angry are expressly NOT ignorant and therefore controllable, they simply believe that the country has a greater responsibility to protect the individual rather than the collective, a feeling they don’t share. And the great majority of these people are armed and are not willing to let the government seize control of their lives in any way.

    They’re scared to death of us.


  30. bar
    31 | August 28, 2009 10:07 am

    re: #22 by vapig

    Thats right you cant see the you tube stuff.
    Taken at a Town Hall meeting in VA. Jim Moran’s (D-VA)
    The video is 1:36 long showing what appears to be a black police officer demanding this protestors sign be removed. The sign in question shows a picture of Obama with the joker makeup on pointing like the “we want you” uncle sam posters from WW2. And some text about socialist healthcare.
    So at a political event, this government worker (cop) stops a citizen from exercising their first amendment rights.

    The cop threatens to arrest the protestor for trespassing or as the officer states “anything he wants to” if the sign goes back up.

    I still think the gentleman has a good case for civil rights violation.
    But him getting arrested would have made him much richer.


  31. bar
    32 | August 28, 2009 10:09 am

    re: #25 by tunnelrat

    Anytime we wont just rollover and take it, is extremist stuff to those folks.


  32. tunnelrat
    33 | August 28, 2009 10:11 am

    re: #28 by mike

    Somebody named “Gatorbait” just posted that at 1.0 and WAS banned. You perhaps?


  33. 34 | August 28, 2009 10:14 am

    Hey,
    Words of wisdom from the Socrates of our Time!

    21 Sharmuta
    8/28/09 9:45:41 am reply quote 1downupreport

    “We’re almost reaching a revolution in this country.”
    This thinking is so dangerous. People who talk like this make me think they actually want to see it. This would not only be bad for our country (duh!), but the entire planet. America is one of the most important cogs in the machinery that keeps this planet functioning. They not only want to tear down our society, but the global society as well. It won’t just be Americans who die in this revolution.

    She has revealed her Transnational Colors.


  34. mike
    35 | August 28, 2009 10:14 am

    re: #33 by tunnelrat

    It’s the fucking Declaration of Independence for God’s sake. WTF?


  35. vapig
    36 | August 28, 2009 10:16 am

    re: #25 by tunnelrat

    I think they are misconstruing “revolution” in this context. We are already in the midst of a revolution – a quiet one. It is a cultural revolution and “We the People” have finally woken up to that fact and are currently and actively fighting back. That is what these Tea Parties and Town Halls are all about. Writing and calling their congresscritters has obviously not worked and they are “getting in their faces” now.

    Now, if congress continues to ignore these people (us) then there very well may be hell to pay. But that time is not yet.


  36. Skippy
    37 | August 28, 2009 10:17 am

    re: #34 by Rodan

    She is dumber than Mike Tyson. :shock:


  37. 38 | August 28, 2009 10:20 am

    re: #36 by vapig

    Yup, Inhofe is reffering to nwhat happned in 1994. Not some violent revolution.

    Hey when Bush was President, the Progressives talked about revolution and assasinations.
    How come no one was upset about that?


  38. vapig
    39 | August 28, 2009 10:21 am

    re: #31 by bar

    Ahem – did you say Virginia? As in, MY VIRGINIA!!??!! This happened HERE?????

    Oh! There’s gonna be hell to pay, bucko! Oh yes, sirree! There’s gonna be REAL HELL TO PAY!!!!!


  39. tunnelrat
    40 | August 28, 2009 10:21 am

    re: #36 by vapig

    Exactly!! CJ is preaching to his lemmings that armed and crazy right wingers are about to take to the streets. I don’t know what is worse, him saying such BS, or the herd of lizards which are lapping it up.


  40. 41 | August 28, 2009 10:24 am

    re: #40 by tunnelrat

    Yeah especially Sharmuta who is so concerned for the World. I only care about America and our allies. The rest of the world can go to hell.


  41. bar
    42 | August 28, 2009 10:24 am

    re: #39 by vapig

    I sure hope so.
    Now if that happened in Chicago or LA, it would be more understandable, but not in VA.


  42. vapig
    43 | August 28, 2009 10:25 am

    re: #40 by tunnelrat

    I can’t believe a guy got banned for posting a portion of the Declaration of Independance. Haven’t those morons ever read the thing?


  43. 44 | August 28, 2009 10:26 am

    Plato has no chimed in!

    29 Killgore Trout
    8/28/09 9:49:51 am reply quote 1downupreport

    I think we’re looking at something more like the early 70’s. Radical revolutionaries are very trendy these days. I don’t think we’ll see the revolution or civil war the right wing radicals are hoping for but we might see right wing versions on Weather Underground or symbionese liberation army. Probably from the Liberty or Militia movements.


  44. no2liberals
    45 | August 28, 2009 10:27 am

    re: #23 by lobo91
    I agree with you and quiet man on this.

    Admiral Mullen is not taking a “PC” approach to the war, folks. I think you’ve seriously misread what he’s saying

    That is my impression.
    Whenever AQ or Towliebans face our military heads up, and give us a clear target, they get their 72 raisins.
    I think too many confuse our concerns of what islam is all about. The majority of muslims do not want to fight, and it is those people we need to be communicating with. I’ll never forget a post made at Iraq The Model, where Mohammed said the one thing that AQ is really good at, is making new enemies.
    Look at what Gen. Petraeus was able to accomplish, and it was due in large part by getting those who were not militant muslims to fight those who were.
    In a perfect world, islam would cease to exist, but to pretend that we are in a fighting war with every single muslim in the world is not accurate.
    Adopting a “kill them all” attitude toward muslims is simplistic and unrealistic. I didn’t adapt that approach to the greatest enemy of all time, the commies, and even though new commie bastids spring up everyday in our midst, many were reborn and are now hard core conservatives.

    As to another look into what really should concern folks about PC BS and social engineering in our military is found in this excellent piece from 1992.
    The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012.

    Why did the uniformed leadership of our day acquiesce to this transformation of the military? Much of the answer can be traced to the budget showdowns of the early 1990s. The collapse of the Soviet Union left the US military without an easily articulated rationale for large defense budgets. Billions in cuts were sought. Journalist Bruce Auster put it bluntly: “Winning a share of the budget wars . . . require[s] that the military find new missions for a post-Cold War world that is devoid of clear military threats.”[63] Capitulating, military leaders embraced formerly disdained assignments. As one commentator cynically observed, “the services are eager to talk up nontraditional, budget-justifying roles.”[64] The Vietnam-era aphorism, “It’s a lousy war, but it’s the only one we’ve got,” was resuscitated.


  45. 46 | August 28, 2009 10:27 am

    re: #28 by mike


    36 Charles
    8/28/09 9:52:12 am reply quote 1downupreport

    re: #32 gatorbait

    Get off my website.


  46. Skippy
    47 | August 28, 2009 10:29 am

    Killgore Trout is dumber than Mike Tyson too!

    :shock:

    :mrgreen:


  47. 48 | August 28, 2009 10:33 am

    re: #46 by Rodan

    Any idea what gatorbait said to the chuckie?


  48. bar
    49 | August 28, 2009 10:34 am

    The wisdom of Capt. Queeg
    Religious fanatic Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.)….
    [...]
    Republican leaders across the country denounced Inhofe’s radical rhetoric and determined ignorance … oh, wait. No, they didn’t.

    Boy Capt. Queeg sure is the hater among haters and a extreme religious bigot to boot.
    Who knew that Capt. Queeg liked to toss Markos Moulitsas salad?


  49. Iron Fist
    50 | August 28, 2009 10:37 am

    re: #25 by tunnelrat

    I’ve been saying for a while that we are currently fighting, and have been fighting for almost twenty years now, a Cold Civil War.The underpiningd of it were there even under the Reagan Administration, where there were a sizable segment of the population (you guessed it, Progressive “Democrats”) who weren’t at all sure that it would be a good thing for America to win the Cold War. They couldn’t (quite) come out and cheer for the Soviets, but they did what they could when they could.

    These people were absolutely dismayed when the Soviet Union collapsed. However one thing came out of that collapse that they could hold on to: the same thing could happen here. If they worked hard enough to bring it about. Thus began the Cold Civil War, with the Transnational Progressives and their useful idiots on one side, Conservatives, some libertartians, and even a few old-style Liberals on the other, but with most of the country completely oblivious to the existence of either side.

    That is what has slowly been changing. Under the Clinton Administration, you saw our side exemplified not so much by the militia members as, at least in rhetoric, the remaining Cold Warriors of the Reagan Republican Party. They couold talk a good talk, and after only two years of Clinton enough of us were able to persuade enough of the blind (or at least nearsighted) to remove the Democrats (Trans-Progs and all) from power. We voted a revolution. That is part of what makes America great. Unfortunately, the Republicans did not do a very good job of implementing the revolution that we voted. Nevertheless, the Trans-Progs did not dare come out of the shadows. Despite the very close election between Bush and Gore, it looked like we had more or less won.

    And then 9-11 happened. We had more impoortant and immediate things to do than worry about the Trans-Progs. At first 9-11 seemed like the ultimate disaster, but they quickly saw a potential to come out of the shadows as “anti-War”. In truth, they had picked a side in the war and that side was not America’s. This became more obvious as things went on. It was interesting how quickly the Democrats as an entire party flipped to this side. To the point that they tried to remove Joe Lieberman from office because he wasn’t sufficiently Leftist. No doubt, while we were acendant during most of the Clinton Administration, they were working within the Democrat Party to take the raines of power.

    Now things are almost totally out in the open. The power-grab they are calling “Health Care Reform” may pass. But there is a lot of resistance to it. People who’ve never heard of the Trans-Progs recognize the very real threat to their liberty. They are loudly turning out at town halls and tea parties, and they are buying guns and ammunition like nobody’s business. The dividing lines are there, the pressures are very real. If this keeps up, we may again
    vote a Revolution in 2010. And then things may get very interesting.


  50. no2liberals
    51 | August 28, 2009 10:38 am

    That cop at Moran’s event is only one of many behaving that way. I posted a few weeks ago a Baton Rouge cop behaving much the same way with a group of nuts from ACORN basically directing him what to do.
    But those are individual cops we know about. What to watch is when the activities are directed by the Mayor.


  51. no2liberals
    52 | August 28, 2009 10:44 am

    Dang!
    Forty percent of all physicians in the UK’s NHS are already from foreign countries, then this insulting injury is added.
    Foreign surgeons flown to UK to cut waiting times ‘botched one in three operations’

    Foreign surgeons flown to UK to cut waiting times ‘botched one in three operations’


  52. vapig
    53 | August 28, 2009 10:45 am

    re: #48 by savage

    See mike #28


  53. no2liberals
    54 | August 28, 2009 10:47 am

    Filed under “Don’t Bogard That Joint.”
    Um… What? Palin Was Picked For McCain by the Media?


  54. 55 | August 28, 2009 10:49 am

    re: #48 by savage

    Read Mike’s number 35. A poster on LGF wrote that and charles banned him.


  55. no2liberals
    56 | August 28, 2009 10:49 am


  56. 57 | August 28, 2009 10:54 am

    re: #50 by Iron Fist

    Hey Good 2 see you!


  57. bar
    58 | August 28, 2009 10:57 am

    re: #56 by no2liberals

    That is funny.


  58. no2liberals
    59 | August 28, 2009 11:03 am

    re: #58 by bar
    Channeling Muttley-Mutt.

    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


  59. tunnelrat
    60 | August 28, 2009 11:16 am

    re: #50 by Iron Fist

    I agree. There has been a revolution of sorts going on for many years, but it has not been an armed conflict as we see in many third world countries. As long as the U.S. remains a democracy this will (and probably should) continue as it promotes the free exchange of ideas.


  60. Iron Fist
    61 | August 28, 2009 11:31 am

    re: #57 by Rodan

    Hey, man! It is good to be seen. I’ve been out of commission. Hope everyone has had fun in my abscence :-)


  61. 62 | August 28, 2009 11:49 am

    re: #61 by Iron Fist

    It’s been good but I missed your insight on things. Glad you are OK!


  62. Empire1
    63 | August 28, 2009 12:12 pm

    re: #31 by bar

    As someone else who can’t run videos, thanks for the description.


  63. lobo91
    64 | August 28, 2009 12:14 pm

    re: #45 by no2liberals

    Unfortunately, very few outside the military understand the concept of counterinsurgency anymore. Wars are fought on terrain, but in this instance, the terrain in question is the population.

    For anyone who’s interested, I highly recommend David Kilcullen’s recent book, The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One.

    Unlike Chuckles, I don’t get paid by Amazon to push books. This one is definitely worth your time, however.


  64. Empire1
    65 | August 28, 2009 12:20 pm

    re: #61 by Iron Fist
    Heyla, Iron Fist! It’s great to see you again — hope things are going well for you.


  65. Rides A Pale Horse
    66 | August 28, 2009 12:24 pm

    Re: #43 vapig

    Apparently NOT

    http://i979.photobucket.com/albums/ae277/RAPH6969/CommentonImhofethread.jpg


  66. P
    67 | August 28, 2009 5:07 pm

    This is typical of the termite like behavior of the left. They make it a point to infiltrate the institutions they wish to destroy.


  67. 68 | August 28, 2009 6:08 pm

    re: #25 by tunnelrat

    that’s MY senator! Love the guy


  68. 69 | August 28, 2009 6:14 pm

    re: #40 by tunnelrat

    we’re not?

    *unloads and sighs*

    what good is being an evil right-winger if you can’t shoot?


  69. 70 | August 28, 2009 6:18 pm

    re: #49 by bar

    Inhofe is a ‘religious fanatic’?

    LOL that’s great!

    people blowing up innocents because they’re not ‘muslim enough’ and Inhofe is the fanatic for opposing obamacare?


  70. 71 | August 28, 2009 6:22 pm

    re: #66 by Rides A Pale Horse

    priceless!

    They really didn’t know where it came from.


  71. Macker
    72 | August 28, 2009 9:03 pm

    re: #4 by Rodan

    NOW I can say it.

    ISLAM DELENDA EST!!


  72. Iron Fist
    73 | August 29, 2009 12:57 pm

    re: #50 by Iron Fist


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David