Progressive allies, the Totalitarian Arabic Imperialist movement known as Islam has struck in Russia. 20 Police men were killed in this attack in the city of Nazran in Southern Russia.
NAZRAN, Russia – A suicide bomber rammed a truck into a police station in the Russian region of Ingushetia on Monday, killing at least 20 police in the worst attack to ravage the poor North Caucasus republic in years.
The blast, which wounded more than 130 others, undermined Kremlin claims that its efforts to bring calm and prosperity to the impoverished patchwork of ethnic groups, clans and religions were succeeding. It also stoked fears that Ingushetia has replaced Chechnya as the next battleground in the southern Russian region.
There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack, which left the two-story building smoldering and a crater in the compound’s courtyard, where the attacker detonated the bomb.
Read the story.
This is just another in a long list of atrocities committed since the foundation of this movement back in the 7th Century. Islam is a Totalitarian system, where Arabs are at the top of the Caste system and all others are their slaves. Hopefully, the Russians discover the culprits and give them what they deserve.
All humanity must unite against this Arabic movement as it is a threat to all nations. It’s goal is to Arabize the world and make us slaves to the Arabs. They are assisted by the Progressives since they have a common goal of destroying Western Civilization.
I know many don’t like Russia because of their policies but if it comes to them or Islam, I stand with Russia.
Update: I am in no way supporting the policies of the Russian government. I support them against Islam, that is all.
Tags: Arabic Imperialism, News, Politics
Religion of pieces.
Like the Chinese, the Russians will swat the fly with a howitzer!
To wit I say, AMEN, to that!
I don’t care for Putin but he does know how to deal with Muslim terrorists in Russia.
re: #2 by vapig
Yeah, I am not saying the Russian are good guys. I am saying that Islam is evil. With Russia its just a conflict of interests, not a civilization fight.
re: #3 by Speranza
Correct, that is my point and I will update my post before I get called a Putin supporter.
re: #3 by Speranza
Funny, I had a co-worker say that exact same thing about Putin last week, Only on another issue.
re: #4 by Rodan
Understood. But the fact is it’s a control issue to both sides. I just happen to side with the commies on this one! It’s not unprecedented (i.e. WWII)…..
re: #5 by Rodan
I’m with you.
Please don’t feel the need to “keep up appearances” on my account EVER!
I came to this site after my banning and was immediately impressed with the openness, yet still being civil, process that was happening here.
It’s all PC to me, when you have to explain to people your opinions.
IMHO, if I were new here and for some reason thought you were a Putin supporter somehow, the onus would be on me to go back and look at your previous posts to get an idea of where you stood.
Instead of highlighting this latest Islamic atrocity, a certain blogger has this as a thread (we’ve seen this movie before).
re: #6 by mary lee
The one thing that I admire about Putin is his allegiance to his country.
It’s rare in American politicians to see someone with such resolve as to their unapologetic nationalism.
re: #9 by Speranza
The Great Creationist Menace strikes again!
//
re: #6 by mary lee
I mean he is a ruthless KGB bastard but he at least takes care of the Muzzies in his own country (although too close to Iran on foreign policy).
re: #5 by Rodan
Didn’t Putin have dead terrorist Chechen Muslims thrown into a pit and emptied pigs entrails all over them?
re: #11 by Bumr50
It’s like the dumb bastard runs the same thread title about Texas School Board Creationists over and over again. Hey Charles we don’t give a fuck and neither does in their heart of hearts your ass kissing posters too!
re: #12 by Speranza
I know exactly what you mean on ALL counts.
re: #13 by Speranza
Ye he did do that.
re: #12 by Speranza
And I agree with you.
I wonder where Princess Natasha is? She’s Russian and would be interested in this.
Rodan,
‘Russians’ needs two letter ’s’.
re: #10 by Bumr50
Putin is the Russian Reagan, he loves his country. He is not a Transnationalists Progressive. He is a Russian Nationalist pure and simple.
I respect that about him.
re: #9 by Speranza
Studying the Bible, per se, isn’t a violation of the Establishment Clause. It takes a profound ignorance of the issue to say that it is. After all, we all studied Greek and Roman religious beliefs in the course of our education. It is all part of being educated. Likewise, a knowledge of the fundamental beliefs of a majority of your nation’s population would seem to me to simply be being well educated.
what matters is how it is taught. If it is preached as the One True Word of God, and student’s are required to repent of their sins as part of the instruction, then I’d say we have a problem (although this is effectively the way Islam was being taught in some California schools a few years ago).
Many of the great classics involve the Bible or Biblical themse. Things like Dante’s Inferno, Chaucer’s Canturbury Tales, or just about anything by JS Bach (to expand from literature into music). Regardless of one’s faith or lack thereof, a good grounding in Judeo-Christian theory and principles seems to be a requirement for a rounded education in Western Civilization. If these classes are taught in that manner, then there is no Establishment violation, and I would expect the Court system to agree.
re: #9 by Speranza
Apparently, the whole country wasn’t aware of the the “establishment clause” until the early 1960’s when the SCOTUS made it up out of thin air.
I would guess that certain blogger would not object if the Koran was taught in texas schools. Hmmm?
re: #16 by Rodan
I wish that Israel did the same.
re: #21 by Iron Fist
Yeah the Bible is bad, but Kids can be taught the Koran and Islamic conquests are praised.
This is unreal!
re: #19 by Escovado
Hey Thanks!
re: #22 by Escovado
He probably would approve of it as part of our glorious cultural diversity.
re: #20 by Rodan
I disagree. Putin is a totalitarian at heart while Regan loved freedom.
re: #24 by Rodan
You’re welcome.
re: #21 by Iron Fist
It’s not about God or creationism.
It’s about THEM. The true progressives.
God steals their mojo by virtue of being more important than anything they can possibly say.
They would put up with Islam until it became the dominant religion, if we were to run the experiment.
Then they would hate it too.
Did you ever notice that they spend a lot more time talking about God than most people who believe in Him do?
That’s probably a sad comment for both groups, but true nonetheless.
re: #21 by Iron Fist
Studying the Bible is perfectly fine, it (at least the King James version) is one of the two greatest books of our wonderful English speaking heritage (the other being the works of William Shakespeare).
re: #17 by mary lee
And I agree with you.
Thanks. Great minds, think alike LOL!
I read where Putin really loved Ariel Sharon because Sharon had tipped off Russia about a major Chechen terror attack plan that was in the works.
re: #30 by Speranza
LOL,I hope that says alot.
re: #9 by Speranza
Nancy has some pretty shitty priorities in his miserable, useless life.
re: #32 by mary lee
Are you new here?
re: #33 by Foghorn Leghorn
He has become insanely tyrannical, short tempered, arbitrary and generally unpleasant. As a Civil War buff I am starting to notice a personality resemblance between Charles Johnson and Confederate (the very incompetent) General Braxton Bragg who had the same quarrelsome qualities.
Too bad – he used to be a hell of a guy not so long ago.
re: #9 by Speranza
Someone should post this:
Islamists Invade American Public Grade Schools and Universities
re: #9 by Speranza
See if you can tell a difference?
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/8/16/767679/-Bible-study-required-this-year-in-Texas-public-schools.
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/34469_Texas_Public_Schools_Required_to_Teach_Bible_Studies
re: #34 by Speranza
YUP,about a week now,How about you.
re: #37 by bar
Charles is part and parcel of the Progressive Machine. Notice he puts up the same threads as Think progress and Daily Kos now.
re: #38 by mary lee
I came here in the Spring. I got sick of LGF and stopped posting there last December and then someone told me about this place.
re: #37 by bar
And how we used to despise the Koslings. I wonder how many people still posting have made that comparison? not many, I bet. It is really shocking.
re: #39 by Rodan
I firmly believe that a lot of his obnoxious left wing posters have migrated to LGF (under different nics of course) from Kos, Democratic Underground, Huffingotn Post, Media Matters, Crooks and Liars, The Wonkette, and Think Progress.
re: #19 by Escovado
and you missed totailitarian?
I was just called an idiot by a dancing bunny.
Talibangelicals? Sky creature? How thoughtful of Kos.
What happened to open-mindedness?
Hate-mongering at it’s finest. And my city’s convention center just hosted this idiot and gave him press.
re: #37 by bar
What a coincidence! By the way you need to remind people to cut and paste any LGF links as the middle school baby has that stupid redirect.
So Ambrose Burnside is a poster on the Daily Kos? Figures that the worst general in American history posts on the worst blog in American history.
re: #35 by Speranza
Yea, he used to be. I remember when he covered the Beslan atrocity, back when he cared. Now he just yawns and watches Glen Beck.
re: #42 by Speranza
I went to Wonkette one time and left wondering “do people really talk like that?”
Their self-importance MUST cause headaches.
re: #21 by Iron Fist
When I was a kid we said the Lord’s Prayer in the morning, and they taught us Psalm 23.
re: #40 by Speranza
OH BOY! I guess someone is losing a lot of good people,it’s too bad, but are lucky to have 2.0 See it all works out for the best!
re: #43 by mjazz
Hey, the first word correction is free. I start charging for any words after that!
=p
As so often it would probably take an outsider to explain to Charles what the “establishment clause” actually means. Teaching bible study in a school is not in any way “establishing” a state religion. Federal mandates that prevent the expression of religious belief in school, however, clearly breach the first amendment yet he’s perfectly fine with the government – as represented by the school boards – preventing the expression of religious faith by both teachers and students.
Separation of church and state means that you can’t allow the state to control or co-opt religion for its own purposes. That’s it. Of course that would mean that he can’t use the state (or encourage the use of the state) to suppress the religious beliefs of a large majority of your citizens which is why so many of his ilk corrupt the meaning of the first amendment to include any religious expression on state-owned property (And even outside it now). If you can convince people that your constitution allows the state to suppress religion in the name of tolerance you’re already 90% of the way towards establishing laws regarding religion.
re: #44 by Bumr50
You have to cut and paste the links.
So every single person who happens across this website and decides to click on a link is an idiot?
re: #50 by Escovado
re: #49 by mary lee
It was once a great blog (LGF 1.0) but the blog owner gutted it. Well it is LGF2, Ace of Spades, Sweetness and Light, Protein Wisdom, Hot Air, etc. gain.
re: #48 by mjazz
When I was in High School trying to learn geometry and taking all those tests – I did a lot of praying.
MUST SEE – The progressive politician in a nutshell.
Rep. Massa is a disgrace.
re: #47 by Bumr50
“I went to Wonkette one time and left wondering “do people really talk like that?” Their self-importance MUST cause headaches.”
Try attending any party on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, Bel Air, Cambridge, Georgetown et al and you will hear that type of crap all the time. Check this out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_GG5mb_tfo&feature=PlayList&p=F47FB9DB46F9DAEC
I’d rather crawl into a pit with a bunch of angry cobras then attend one of these parties.
re: #54 by Speranza
Haven’t posted much any where eles,But am happy with what i see here.
re: #55 by Speranza
Yep, as long as there are tests, there will always be prayer in schools.
re: #54 by Speranza
Actually, this blog is more “1.0″ than the original. The original has morphed into something else; a “2.0″ if you will.
This blog is just getting back to the roots of what 1.0 used to be (before UpChuck went insane).
re: #51 by archonix
They always forget the other half of the Establishment Clause “…or prohibiting the free excercize thereof…” when they forbid prayer, forbid discussion, and so forth, they are forbidding the free expression of religious belief. That is Unconstitutional itself.
There are gray areas, and there is room for the Courts to interpret exactly what is “establishment”, but they also need to look at what is “prohibiting free expression”. A simple class on Biblical Stories as part of either History (or Social Studies) or English could be entirely appropriate and Constitutional. it certainly isn’t necessarily something to get all upset about.
Unless you are phobic about the judeo-Christian faith. Which Leftists are. Kos is a good example.
The lizard was a chameleon.
Getting back to the original thread, i.e., the murder of Russian citizens in Nazran by Arab terrorist: has our Dear Leader commented on this atrocity? ***crickets***
Oh, I guess he’s waiting for a call from George Soros or Bill Ayers to tell him what to think.
re: #62 by mjazz
He turned his cloak, that is for sure.
re: #44 by Bumr50
Actually, you [was] called “a” idiot by the anti-idiotarian, how is that for irony.
re: #37 by bar
CJ is re-directing links from this blog.
Keep an eye on him.
re: #63 by baileyrams
If you can’t spin it good, it didn’t happen.
David Axelrod Goebbels hasn’t figured out how to work that one yet.
The Rules For Radicals don’t permit him to shift his focus.
re: #58 by mary lee
I will be looking for you!
Speaking of suicide bombing – how smart was it for Israel against all the whining by the rest of the world (including the Bush administration) to build that security barrier? That barrier must have saved at least 1,500 Jewish lives.
re: #60 by Foghorn Leghorn
Yes I was thinking the same thing. the type of threads and posts seen here remind me of the old LGF while the current LGF reminds me (of I don’t even want to think of) something out of Leftfield.
re: #68 by Speranza
Sounds good!
re: #21 by Iron Fist
“what matters is how it is taught. If it is preached as the One True Word of God, and student’s are required to repent of their sins as part of the instruction, then I’d say we have a problem (although this is effectively the way Islam was being taught in some California schools a few years ago).”
Hi Iron, keep in mind the Bible is the only “religious book” that teaches that.
re: #60 by Foghorn Leghorn
It’s awesome that we can have conversation about real issues on this blog.
lunch is over…back to VERK!!!!
Obama has spoken. No mention of Islam, just “terrorism.”
I thought that word was a no-no.
re: #75 by Bumr50
Maobama meant to say: “anti-islamic activity”
I’ve often thought that one of the reasons these intellectual types hate christianity is because it has such a low entry requirement. Anyone can be a christian just by saying a few simple words and believing them.
Of course it doesn’t really stack up. You can be muslim by saying a few little words… you don’t even have to believe those words, as long as you observe the rituals and observances with unstinting regularity. There’s no faith in Islam but there’s a great deal of obedience to the pronouncements by the imams and clerics and it controls every aspect of your life, often without reason for any particular injunction.
On the third foot there’s plenty of rituals in Judaism as well but there’s a faith component, and injunctions against meaningless rituals that have no actual faith behind them. To be a jew means following the law, but to follow the law you have to understand the law and the fatherly love that prompted that law to be put in place.
So perhaps that’s it. Perhaps it’s love that challenges these people. A religion that celebrates the love of God for his children and the love grown between those believers seems threatening to these loveless progressives. They don’t understand love as anything but control and obedience. There is no love in Islam, or joy, or laughter. And there is no true love behind the “compassion” of the left.
This is interesting. I don’t know that I agree totally, but this is certainly how things may play out:
In many ways, I hope this is true. I hope his socialized medicine crashes and burns, and that will probably take his presidency down with it. So much is good, but not everything is.
Afghanistan looms large in foreign policy, and Obama doesn’t appear to either know what to do or to have sense enough to get out of the way of Generals who do. while it is probably too late for Obama to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in Iraq (thanks to Bush and Petreus), he appears to be doing exactly that in Afghanistan.
I don’t know that it is as grim as this author says. He says the Taliban are winning. That seems a stretch. But we are not winning, and no wonder. Our Commander in Chief doesn’t think victory is the appropriate goal. Our troops are the finest in the world, but they can’t work miricles when the problem is, ahem, above their pay grade.
The buck stops somewhere, Mr. Obama. If not with you, then who? Who is really running the show here?
re: #78 by Iron Fist
I want his socialized medicine policy to never see the light of day. Does that make me unpatriotic? Hell no!
re: #78 by Iron Fist
I’d bet money right now that Barry will be a “one term wonder” and will go down as one of the worst presidents in history (right along with Jimmy Carter).
He’s too stupid to see where he’s screwing up and too Marxist to change.
The sad thing is, we’re stuck with the jug-headed maggot for another 3 1/2 years.
re: #72 by davehm
That is certainly not true. The Koran is not only taught as the inspired word of God, but the directly revealed word of God. that is why Koran “desecration” is such a big deal to the mohammedans (at least that is their claim).
It is my understanding that something similar is true about the Bhagavad Gita, though my knowledge of Hinduism is scant. There isn’t an equivelant work in Buddhism that I am aware of, but among the five so-called Great Religions that would be the abberation. Buddhism is something of an abberation, anyway, because (depending on the sect) they don’t necessarily believe in any particular higher power at all.
re: #69 by Speranza
For some insight into the Left’s thinking on “barriers”, I refer you here.
Gotta go to work. BBL.
re: #21 by Iron Fist
Exactly. A person – even a complete, flaming, unabashed unbeliever – who is not at least familiar with the Bible, will be ignorant of much of the richness and depth of Western literature, etc.
I don’t know if you have seen this yet, but it is appropriate and funny
http://babalublog.com/2009/08/theres-never-an-egg-timer-around-when-you-need-one-2/
re: #37 by bar
re: KOS and LGF
George Orwell, Animal Farm
re: #79 by Speranza
Oh, of course not. I hope you don’t think that is what i’m saying. I hope his socialized medicine plan crashes and burns. I hope it is soundly rejected by both houses of this Democrat congress. that would be a collossal political failure. I don’t think you could point to where either Bush (I or II), Clinton, or Reagan suffered such a dismal failure. Johnson, maybe. I don’t remember that far back.
On the battlefield, though, I wish he’d figure out he isn’t the fucking Field marshall of the World and step back and let the Generals do what they are paid to do: win the fucking war. “Win” is not a dirty word. It should always be our objective in war, and, for that matter, in peace.
Winning can prevent wars, as our victory over the Soviets in the Cold War proves.
re: #41 by Iron Fist
Who at LGF is telling Gopers to fight fair, loose your kooks, don’t be like the democratic scum. You can be better. Don’t imitate Axelrod tactics, it’s not manly.
Then look at those same people and see what political party they are professing to be leaving yesterday, today, or soon.
Fair weather friends or people already in the other camp and executing axlerodian/rovian games for fun and profit?
tuquo is getting thrown around now as a counter-argument. It doesn’t apply. When the other side beats you, you look at their tactics and co-opt whatever is useful to you. part of that is putting negatives on the other side while appearing not to.
Hey everyone – big OT here, but would y’all mind taking a look at a free conservative bi-weekly (I think that’s the word meaning “every other week”) newsletter that I edit and publish? URL is at http://www.conservativesunderground.us/cu.html, which is the archive of back issues.
re: #66 by beltfed
I think tinyurl is the way to get around that or a google link.
http://tinyurl.com/
re: #61 by Iron Fist
Also, the 1st Amendment starts out with, “Congress shall, (thereby implying The Federal Government),…”
States can impose any religion they choose – and most did, once upon a time ago.
This practice ceased when schools started accepting federal funds, which opened the door to the anti-religionists (except islam, that is).
If a school were to reject federal funds, they could theoretically impose any religion they wanted.
re: #82 by Bumr50
The left only approves of barriers if it keeps oppressed people in (by left wing governments of course). If it is keeping terrorists out, they disapprove of it.
re: #86 by Iron Fist
I agree with what you wrote. As for his military strategy, since he despises the military he has no strategy based on victory, only a feeble containment.
re: #90 by vapig
Islam should be called religitics or poligion to distinguish it’s combination of sharia with religion. Then make a case it can’t be treated as a regular religion in the United States.
In Russia there Putin should create his own Islam of which he is the head of. Then leverage it into his troublespots.
re: #90 by vapig
I’m not exactly sure where First Amendment law is on that currently. If a school wants to reject Federal funds and have a religious curriculum they are free to do it, but I don’t know what the Supreme Court would say if an entire State did that.
It would be an interesting case, more about Federalism than the First Amendment I would think. The State could reject Federal funds, but I don’t think that would free them to establish an Official State Religion or a State Religious School Curriculum. I think that would bring in the First Amendment through the Fourteenth Amendment and apply that to the State. States do not have carte blanch to violate the Bill of Rights, Federal funds or no. I’m not a lawyer, but I think that would be the reasoning the Court would take.
re: #88 by tqcincinnatus
Looking good, tqcincinnatus. I’ll bookmark and start sniffing around the archives.
re: #9 by Speranza
The Bible, along with Greek and Roman texts, is the foundation of Western civilization. Allusions in art, music, literature, law, history, etc. are lost to ignorance without a basic understanding.
It MUST be taught as a text to be studied, not necessarily one to be believed–that’s the Establishment issue.
As I explained to a student when she challenged me on explaining the background of the Pilgrims, I don’t teach students WHAT to believe; I teach them what those we’re studying believed.
re: #21 by Iron Fist
I just read this post, Iron Fist–you beat me to it!
re: #94 by Iron Fist
I don’t know that the supremes would have a leg to stand on. If a state is not accepting federal funds – the usual boot applied to state’s throats – then I don’t know how they could enforce it.
Also, I’m not suggesting an official religion (as they had in the old days) but just a beneign allowed use of the bible.
The feds could threaten to take away other funds and no state, as far as I know, would ever refuse all federal funds. But should a state choose to do so, what other leverage would the fed have short of sending in the military?
Wouldn’t that be a declaration of war?
re: #88 by tqcincinnatus
I’ve read you before, excellent stuff, Cultural Marxism,yup. Bookmarked.
re: #88 by tqcincinnatus
TQC, you really ought to make a post about that. It looks like a fabulous site.
savage
re: #88 by tqcincinnatus
Read Vol. 1 Iss. 1
I likey. Bookmarking for further review. Will make sure dad knows about it too.
OT
The Pussy in Chief talks about shit he knows nothing about.
re: #92 by Speranza
I’m waiting for the headline:
AFGHANISTAN: OBAMA’S VIETNAM?
I doubt it will come from the left.
The Russians don’t play around. And they certainly don’t like playing nice with people who are murdering their citizens en-masse (unless its them doing it!)
Expect bodies of muslims to start showing up in back alleys and dangling from street lamps in and around the Russian region of Ingushetia where the attack occurred.
And once the Russians find out who ordered the attack, no matter what islamic hellhole country they are presently hiding in (or openly given refuge), the guy and his bodyguards will all end up meeting allah in hell sooner than they each had anticipated. I believe in response to a previous attack, the Russians killed the guy on a busy street in downtown Damascus.
Chuckles is now defending Rffqa Bary’s father, since the Baptist minister is just a likely a “fanatic”:
“537 Charles
8/16/09 5:54:10 pm reply quote
re: #536 armaros
As is Spencer, Chesler and many others.
The issue is not whether her story is fishy or not, it is about whether you (or the state) want to take the chance given the obvious history of Muslim killings for apostasy and/or honor, well documented in the US, UK, Canada and France to name a few…
Being out in the open declaring her Christian faith and condemning Islam has not only placed her in danger of her family but any of the many nuts out there willing to fight the holy war.
It will be late and silly to say sorry once her head is separate from her body.
[Chuckle's pearl of wisdom]
And exactly what evidence do you have that her family intends to murder her? I saw the video and they sure didn’t look like crazed fanatics who wanted to kill their family member to me — but hey, what do I know? I’ve only reported on honor killings for 8 years.
Are you aware that the preacher who’s sheltering her is exactly the kind of crazed fanatic you’re trying to say her family is?”
This is on his latest Pamela Geller Attack Thread:
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/34463_Pamela_Gellers_Obama-Hitler_Obsession/comments/#ctop
re: #105 by Infidel
Charles is trying to prove he’s a Progressive.
re: #105 by Infidel
Remind people here to copy paste the link from LGF as CJ has a stupid immature redirect.
re: #105 by Infidel
CJ will whip out the ban stick in 5..4..3..2..1..
Poor guy that posted that comment is getting ripped apart by the POS’es over there.
Aloha Guys,
Just take it from Chuckie, he KNOWS what a crazed fanatic looks like. After all, he looks in the mirror every morning.
P.S. Thanks for the reminder on the Pony Tail Girl’s infantile redirect.