American Traitor and Muslim Immigrants arrested for Jihad

This is why Islam should be outlawed. It is not only Muslim immigrants that are a threat. You have American traitors that view Islam as revolutionary and join the movement. Daniel Boyd, of North Carolina, along with his sons and their Muslim immigrant friends have been arrested for plotting Jihad. Freedom of religion should not apply to Islam since it is a movement for global domination. But Americans ignorant of this will not permit it to be banned.

WASHINGTON —  A father, his two sons and four other men living in North Carolina are accused of military-style training at home and plotting “violent jihad” abroad, federal authorities said

Officials said Monday the men were led by Daniel Patrick Boyd, a married 39-year-old who lived in an unassuming lakeside home in a rural area south of Raleigh, where he and his family walked their dog and operated a drywall business.

Read the rest.

Here’s the good part of this article. It will make Medaura proud.

Hysen Sherifi, 24, a native of Kosovo and a U.S. legal permanent also was charged in the case. He was the only person arrested who was not a U.S. citizen.

Yeah, those Albanian Muslims are different. Not! I challenge anyone here to explain to me why Albanian and Bosnian Muslims are different than others. Is it because they are white?

I challenge anyone here to tell me why Islam should not be banned in America. It is clearly not a religion, but an Arabic Imperialist Movement. Even Boyd, who is a White American, has embraced an Arabic name: Saifullah.

Islam is not a religion. Anyone want to debate me on that? If so, bring it on!

Update: Lance has brought up a valid point on what banning Islam could lead to. Therefore I take back my earlier statement on banning it. However I am for an Immigration Freeze on Muslims from coming here. That I will stand by.

Tags: , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

42 Responses to “American Traitor and Muslim Immigrants arrested for Jihad”
( jump to bottom )

  1. vapig
    1 | July 28, 2009 1:22 pm

    I challenge anyone here to tell me why Islam should not be banned in America. It is clearly not a religion, but a Arabic Imperialist Movement.

    Nope – sorry. I won’t be challenging you on that one, since I heartily agree!

    Oh yeah – FIRST!!!


  2. 2 | July 28, 2009 1:23 pm

    re: #1 by vapig

    Ha ha ha ha!


  3. 3 | July 28, 2009 1:24 pm

    ban islam and christianity and judiasm follow.

    1st amendment applies or it doesn’t.

    it doesn’t allow them to commit terrorism, but they can still face east and pray to a black rock if they wish.

    remember that there are many who come here to escape oppression.


  4. 4 | July 28, 2009 1:27 pm

    re: #3 by LanceKates

    It is not a Religion. It is an Arabic Movement. Why must people adopt an Arabic name when they become Muslim? Ask yourself that?

    I highly doubt the founding fathers imagined these Savages would come here.


  5. CloudyDay
    5 | July 28, 2009 1:31 pm

    OT/ A lot of people at LGF 1 seem to think that science is infallible or is the solution to every problem.

    CSI Myths: The Shaky Science Behind Forensics

    The article is a few pages long. Here are some excerpts:

    Forensic science was not developed by scientists. It was mostly created by cops, who were guided by little more than common sense.

    And as hundreds of criminal cases begin to unravel, many established forensic practices are coming under fire. PM takes an in-depth look at the shaky science that has put innocent people behind bars.

    ….As DNA testing has made it possible to re-examine biological evidence from past trials, more than 200 people have had their convictions overturned. In approximately 50 percent of those cases, bad forensic analysis contributed to their imprisonment.

    ….But criminal forensics has a deeper problem of basic validity. Bite marks, blood-splatter patterns, ballistics, and hair, fiber and handwriting analysis sound compelling in the courtroom, but much of the “science” behind forensic science rests on surprisingly shaky foundations.

    Many well-established forms of evidence are the product of highly subjective analysis by people with minimal credentials—according to the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors, no advanced degree is required for a career in forensics.

    And even the most experienced and respected professionals can come to inaccurate conclusions, because the body of research behind the majority of the forensic sciences is incomplete, and the established methodologies are often inexact.

    “There is no scientific foundation for it,” says Arizona State University law professor Michael Saks. “As you begin to unpack it you find it’s a lot of loosey-goosey stuff.”

    ….Fingerprints are believed to be unique, but the process of matching prints has no statistically valid model.

    And forensic examiners are often working in an imperfect world, where prints taken in a police station on an ink pad are compared to prints left at a crime scene, which may be smudged or partially captured.

    Yet, as University of California–Los Angeles law professor Jennifer Mnookin has written, “fingerprint examiners typically testify in the language of absolute certainty.”

    A 2006 study by the University of Southampton in England asked six veteran fingerprint examiners to study prints taken from actual criminal cases. The experts were not told that they had previously examined the same prints.

    The researchers’ goal was to determine if contextual information—for example, some prints included a notation that the suspect had already confessed—would affect the results.

    But the experiment revealed a far more serious problem: The analyses of fingerprint examiners were often inconsistent regardless of context. Only two of the six experts reached the same conclusions on second examination as they had on the first.

    ….Ballistics has similar flaws. A subsection of tool-mark analysis, ballistics matching is predicated on the theory that when a bullet is fired, unique marks are left on the slug by the barrel of the gun.

    Consequently, two bullets fired from the same gun should bear the identical marks.

    Yet there are no accepted standards for what constitutes a match between bullets.

    Juries are left to trust expert witnesses. “‘I know it when I see it’ is often an acceptable response,” says Adina Schwartz, a law professor and ballistics expert with the John Jay College of Criminal Justice.


  6. 6 | July 28, 2009 1:32 pm

    re: #3 by LanceKates

    I do see your point and you know normally I agree with you. But you have to read the history of Islam. If we keep letting them what do you think will happen when they reach 10-20% of the Population?


  7. vagabond trader
    7 | July 28, 2009 1:32 pm

    Its a nihilistic cult.Any group that teaches their kids the highest honor is to become a suicide murderer does not believe in the same G-d that I do.Satanic cult.


  8. 8 | July 28, 2009 1:35 pm

    re: #3 by LanceKates

    You are right and I just updated my post. Banning Islam could be dangerous. That said, there are laws that could be passed making it dificult for Islam to flourish here.


  9. 9 | July 28, 2009 1:41 pm

    re: #4 by Rodan

    it is a religion used by terrorists for political reasons…. would you have banned catholics and protestants during the warring in ireland?

    freedom of religion is to protect us from government intervention in religion.

    how can you use it to ban religion?


  10. CloudyDay
    10 | July 28, 2009 1:47 pm

    Original Post:

    Islam is not a religion. Anyone want to debate me on that? If so, bring it on!

    I’m pretty sympathetic to your views. I do not like Islam.

    I don’t know if I’d go so far as to ban it in the USA, though.

    Islam has a lot of trappings of what we think of as religious.

    It appears that there is a religious component to Islam, since they do yak about God, they pray, attend religious services regularly, they believe in the afterlife, and so forth.

    I guess I lean towards thinking it’s a little of both… it’s a political type movement, and it’s a religion, but a terribly messed up, violent religion.

    I guess I’m kind of in the middle on this topic.

    A lot of other people out there have the perception that Islam is in fact a religion, so in order to ban it under another context, you’d have to do a pretty big marketing job to convince and educate folks that it’s not a religion.


  11. 11 | July 28, 2009 1:49 pm

    re: #8 by Rodan

    as long as we resist government support of islam over any other religion, we’ll be ok.

    when they break the law with aan honor rape or honor murder, we have to be brave enough to prosecute.


  12. 12 | July 28, 2009 1:50 pm

    re: #9 by LanceKates

    I updated my post saying I agree with you. However I still don’t feel it is a religion. It is an Arabic movement.


  13. 13 | July 28, 2009 1:51 pm

    re: #11 by LanceKates

    I agree there are laws and other means to prevent it from trying to dominate.


  14. song_and_dance_man
    14 | July 28, 2009 2:17 pm

    Rodan,

    I disagree. Islam is a religion. However they do not worship the Eternal. More likely they are worshiping one of the fallen angels if not their leader himself. They want to rule the world, because as Paul says in 2 Corinthians 4:4, Satan is the god of this world. Which really means he attempts to controls it at the social and political level. Another description of Lucifer is the father of lies, whose agenda in his rebellion, is to steal, kill and destroy. That fairly summarizes Islam.


  15. vagabond trader
    15 | July 28, 2009 2:20 pm

    OT:

    Sorry,this tickled my funny bone and lord knows we need a laugh here. Old reliable Bubba, still good for an occasional giggle.

    http://www.weaselzippers.net/blog/2009/07/how-does-bill-clinton-fuels-up-for-his-speech-at-obesity-conference-by-eating-a-double-burger-onion-.html


  16. Ma Sands
    16 | July 28, 2009 2:25 pm

    re: #13 by Rodan

    One thing that gives me the shivers, is how it has a goal of taking over the earth, with all its atrocities intact, same goal, generation after generation, for hundreds & hundreds of years………puts in my mind a picture of crawling over mounds and growing mounds of their own people’s bodies, on and on…..

    That is one thing I learned, those two years that I belonged to lgf: the unending push, push, push of Islamism, with those who are said to be the “peaceable” ones not lifting a cry or a finger to stop, or to change any of it….

    And that continual pushing has made great, grave inroads, even in this country, even since 9/11…..


  17. song_and_dance_man
    17 | July 28, 2009 2:25 pm

    Rodan

    Furthermore, that is why Islam appears as an Imperialistic and fascist movement. It fits right in with the agenda of the fallen ones. To rule over humanity and destroy the souls of men in spite of the Eternal One.


  18. 18 | July 28, 2009 2:37 pm

    re: #16 by Ma Sands

    Yeah before 9/11 Islam could be mocked and treated like another religion. After 9/11 Muslism became a special class of citizens who were protected. They have defacto control over this nation.


  19. BuddyG
    19 | July 28, 2009 3:00 pm

    It’s not just muslim immigrants, the converts are a problem too:

    Long Island’s Terrorist Traitor

    Excerpt:

    A former Boy Scout from Long Island turned his back on his All-American life and converted to Islam, joining al Qaeda in Pakistan and firing rockets at a US military base in Afghanistan, authorities said yesterday.


  20. 20 | July 28, 2009 3:02 pm

    Hello Attaboid?

    182 Charles 7/28/09 11:31:54 am reply quote

    * 2
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #164 Attaboid

    Bye now.

    (as a point of reference: From the “I can call Beck & Rush a racist, but Beck cannot call anyone a racist” thread.)


  21. vapig
    21 | July 28, 2009 3:03 pm

    re: #4 by Rodan

    Thomas Jefferson did, since he had to deal with them. He also came to the conclusion that islam could never be compatible with democracy since it was also a totalitarian political system.

    So ban islam!


  22. Bob in Breckenridge
    22 | July 28, 2009 3:05 pm

    O/T, but the House will adjourn by Friday without voting on a health care bill, according to planning memo obtained by POLITICO.

    The Zero™ must be pissed. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!


  23. 23 | July 28, 2009 3:10 pm

    re: #21 by vapig

    Thomas Jefferson is un-American!

    (btw: as we all know, I am very against “banning Islam”)


  24. m
    24 | July 28, 2009 3:10 pm

    re: #20 by WrathofG-d

    Oh man, you can’t do that to us! What’d he say to get hit? “Charles might be wrong on something”?


  25. 25 | July 28, 2009 3:15 pm

    re: #24 by m

    It was deleted by the time I saw it, but there didn’t seem to be too much discussion about it either.


  26. song_and_dance_man
    26 | July 28, 2009 3:19 pm

    re: #23 by WrathofG-d

    I agree. Americans need to be educated about Islam and what it really is and that will take care of the problem. Banning a religion is not the way to go, since it will initiate the banning of other religions Exposing and revealing what they intend to do to America will do the trick.


  27. Bumr50
    27 | July 28, 2009 3:23 pm

    re: #26 by song_and_dance_man

    How do you educate without being attacked by the ACLU, CAIR, and the American academic community?

    Soon you’ll be in violation of “hate crime” legislation and labeled a “hate group”.

    It is a difficult road.


  28. 28 | July 28, 2009 3:25 pm

    re: #26 by song_and_dance_man

    Any issue dealing with ‘radical’ Islam can be resolved by the laws that are already on the books. (anti-violence, treason, hate crimes, conspiracy, etc.)

    The problem isn’t that the means don’t exist, the problem is that the will doesn’t exist.

    Thus, even if you “banned Islam” (a horrible, and disgusting idea which on its face is wrong, but would also lead to despicable things) the same people who aren’t enforcing the laws already in place would simply ignore the Islam ban as well.

    Education and enforcement of the laws already on the books is the way to go.


  29. vapig
    29 | July 28, 2009 3:29 pm

    re: #28 by WrathofG-d

    Sorry – I disagree. It will be a hate-crime since any discussion is an insult to islam – they’ve already said so.

    They need to be driven out – forceibly! That goes for the fake Nation of Islam, as well!


  30. 30 | July 28, 2009 3:29 pm

    Why the hell NOT ban Islam? Nazism was a defacto religion and that got banned.

    And Nazism has a lot LESS blood on its hands than Islam.

    It’s about damn time every one of those bloodsucking vampires was tossed right the hell out of this country. As for American converts to Islam, waterboard them until they cry uncle.


  31. song_and_dance_man
    31 | July 28, 2009 3:30 pm

    re: #27 by Bumr50

    Grassroots politicking.

    After giving it more thought, it would be aladam near impossible to eradicate the worship of Allah here in America since we have a charter that allows for the free exercise of religion.

    However, as Rodan has expressed, it is a political movement as well. If the argument could be framed around the fact this religion is also a traitorous doctrine that advances for the destruction of our representative republic, it could be abolished within that construct.

    And I agree, it is a difficult road.


  32. song_and_dance_man
    32 | July 28, 2009 3:37 pm

    re: #28 by WrathofG-d

    My #31 comment agrees with you.


  33. Ma Sands
    33 | July 28, 2009 3:38 pm

    re: #31 by song_and_dance_man

    …a traitorous doctrine that advances for the destruction of our representative republic…

    Hmmm…..sounds mightily like what the President of our country has been about….


  34. song_and_dance_man
    34 | July 28, 2009 3:42 pm

    re: #33 by Ma Sands

    Hi Ma.

    Yup. He is just as bad with his own version of taqiya.


  35. 35 | July 28, 2009 4:10 pm

    re: #30 by savage

    It’s about damn time every one of those bloodsucking vampires was tossed right the hell out of this country. As for American converts to Islam, waterboard them until they cry uncle.

    Let’s start with the asswipes who organized Arab Fest 2009 in Dearborn.


  36. m
    36 | July 28, 2009 4:39 pm

    re: #35 by Foghorn Leghorn

    And “security”.


  37. 37 | July 28, 2009 5:30 pm

    re: #30 by savage

    Yeah and in the water put an electric cord!!!!!!!!!!!!

    LOL!


  38. 38 | July 28, 2009 6:20 pm

    [...] » American Traitor and Muslim Immigrants arrested for Jihad >> 2.0 … By Rodan Freedom of religion should not apply to Islam since it is a movement for global domination. But Americans ignorant of this will not permit it to be banned. WASHINGTON — A father, his two sons and four other men living in North Carolina are accused of … “There is no scientific foundation for it,” says Arizona State University law professor Michael Saks. “As you begin to unpack it you find it's a lot of loosey-goosey stuff.” ….Fingerprints are believed to be unique, … 2.0: blogmocracy.com – http://www.littlegreenfootballs2.com/ [...]


  39. hoodaticus
    39 | July 28, 2009 8:34 pm

    I’m for amending the Constitution to ban Islam forever. And with about 298 million seconds the motion will carry.


  40. hoodaticus
    40 | July 28, 2009 8:40 pm

    @Savage

    I could not abide expelling all the Muslims if we didn’t also deport all those Neo-Feudalist Democrats.


  41. 41 | July 28, 2009 9:41 pm

    re: #39 by hoodaticus

    The Dems who are traitors can live in Florence CO.

    For many, many years. :)


  42. 42 | July 29, 2009 4:51 am

    [...] Rodan is Wrong Irrationality reared its ugly head at Blogocracy. [...]


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David