Possibly Appearing Soon on LGF 1.0? – More Right Wing Fringe Websites Call for Revolution

I went dumpster diving out back behind the “Lizard Lounge” over at 1.0 and found this apparent rough draft of a post Charles might be planning.  Looks like he’s discovered yet more dangerous right wing extremists who are planning a revolution. (By the way, folks, this is satire.)


Following up on my post from yesterday that outed Jim Thompson, the founder of the right wing website Free Republic, for calling for a revolution to overturn the results of last November’s election, it seems the kook right wing fringe blogosphere’s case of Obama Derangement Syndrome is getting even worse. Obviously echoing Thompson’s extremist rhetoric, the kookish Sam Adams over at The Original Tea Party Guy gives us this little gem,

 “The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending against all hazards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks.”

But I’m sure he doesn’t mean anything violent by that, of course. Wink wink, nudge nudge. Adams’ fellow tax protestor, John Marshall who posts at the subversively named Free the Supreme Court, tells us,

“An unlimited power to tax involves, necessarily, a power to destroy; because there is a limit beyond which no institution and no property can bear taxation.”

Sheesh, how does Marshall think we’re going to fund the health care we need if we don’t have taxes? He’s probably another one of those “patriots” who wants to see Obama fail to save the economy. And I’m sure he’s a racist who doesn’t want Sotomayor on the Supreme Court, either. There is something seriously wrong with the water over there in Ronpaulistan.

As another example, see the incitements to violence by Thompson’s wacko fellow-traveller at Hanover County “Patriot”,

“It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace — but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”

Just a little bit pretentious, don’t you think? No wonder the conservative movement has been discredited by its own reactionary fringe. We can only hope that the FBI is keeping a close watch on this Henry guy. Another nugget of wisdom from the same site,

“Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”

No wonder Colin Powell doesn’t want to have anything to do with these loons anymore.  By the way, this Patrick Henry is also a creationist. Surprise, surprise.

Lastly, check this out, from a theocratic site called Independence Now,

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness….”

Good grief.

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

38 Responses to “Possibly Appearing Soon on LGF 1.0? – More Right Wing Fringe Websites Call for Revolution”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | July 20, 2009 7:03 pm

    Interesting all those sites don’t exist.

    Good old Chuckles, making up shit as he goes along.


  2. Runner
    2 | July 20, 2009 7:08 pm

    Apologies for the off topic (sort of) so soon but I just saw this post at 1.0 by Landline in the Rep. Mike Castle vs. the Nirthers thread at 6:24. It’s a pretty brave post for 1.0. Is that a sock puppet from 2.0?

    (I don’t know how to use the big green quote marks but following is the comment):

    “Charles, So the presumption on LGF these days is that Republicans are, for the most part, irrational religious fanatics, but Democrats are sane, practical, and levelheaded? Why are you contending that this video represents the Republican “base”? Are you not panting with a rather broad brush? Where is the outrage over Obama’s 30 plus czars, the lack of transparency, the short shifting of Israel on the settlements, the decision by justice not to prosecute those thugs in Philadelphia for voter intimidation, the politicization of the Census, etc.. The ratio of Republican bashing to Democrat bashing is probably 10 to 1 on here now. Why the dramatic change since the inauguration?”


  3. Runner
    3 | July 20, 2009 7:09 pm

    (deleted double post)


  4. Sparky
    4 | July 20, 2009 7:13 pm

    Hello boys and girls, back in the saddle.
    Is this a setup? He has dropped all pretense of conservationism now, doesn’t he believe in the founding fathers vision of our country. Just ANOTHER Obama.
    Did he really say this?
    “Sheesh, how does Marshall think we’re going to fund the health care we need if we don’t have taxes?” OMG is he really this dumb? We don’t NEED Obama health care, he WANTS us to be dependent on the state. Who is the bigger narcissist here, Obama or CJ?


  5. Runner
    5 | July 20, 2009 7:16 pm

    This is a satire, right?


  6. Sparky
    6 | July 20, 2009 7:17 pm

    re: #2 by Runner

    It really is out and out wackiness over there now. The rational put forth is on par the HuffPo, it really didn’t take long for the 1.0 sheeple to fall in line. Good work comrades, just follow the party line and everything will be just fine.


  7. 7 | July 20, 2009 7:19 pm

    re: #6 by Sparky

    it’s full out sedition from the lefties over there


  8. 8 | July 20, 2009 7:19 pm

    re: #2 by Runner

    I suggest we prepare a welcoming party for Landline, since s/he will be along shortly.


  9. Runner
    9 | July 20, 2009 7:20 pm

    re: #6 by Sparky

    I hear ya Sparky.


  10. Runner
    10 | July 20, 2009 7:22 pm

    re: #8 by tqcincinnatus

    I thought the same thing.

    Plus I like the way he accuses Charles of “panting” with a broad brush! “pant pant”


  11. Runner
    11 | July 20, 2009 7:23 pm

    re: #10 by Runner

    I presumed Landline was a “he” but it could just well be a “she”.


  12. Runner
    12 | July 20, 2009 7:27 pm

    re: #5 by Runner

    D’oh! I just saw the disclaimer in this post that it is indeed satire. I’m such a tool!


  13. 13 | July 20, 2009 7:32 pm

    LOL! I got fooled.

    Hey, look at the latest from Irish Rose…

    Hanging clothes on the line is surely one of lifes’ greatest simple pleasures. I love the way that the items come off the line smelling fresh and full of sunshine, with nary a wrinkle. The sun does a beautiful job whitening whites without having to use chlorine bleach.

    Such an exciting life. sheesh


  14. Sparky
    14 | July 20, 2009 7:34 pm

    re: #12 by Runner
    Oooh that fine print! But just because it is satire doesn’t mean it does not reflect the sentiment of the bigheaded one himself!


  15. Runner
    15 | July 20, 2009 7:45 pm

    re: #13 by savage

    She’s watched too many detergent commercials!


  16. 16 | July 20, 2009 7:47 pm

    re: #15 by Runner

    Welfare cheats tend to do that.

    And lots of welfare queens are big FAT pigs too


  17. Runner
    17 | July 20, 2009 7:49 pm

    re: #16 by savage

    You are a big meanie! (but you made me smile)


  18. 18 | July 20, 2009 7:56 pm

    re: #17 by Runner

    shucks


  19. Bob in Breckenridge
    19 | July 20, 2009 8:39 pm

    I see at Nancy’s site Nancy posted a thread about Bosnian Serbs being convicted of burning Muslims alive, and that ugly pig Irish Rose said how we’ll all “meltdown” here.
    Hey Rosie, how about spending your time with a plastic surgeon so he or she can attempt to make you somewhat attractive rather than attempting to predict how we will react to that atrocious act committed by the Serbs, you ugly bitch.


  20. 20 | July 20, 2009 9:03 pm

    re: #19 by Bob in Breckenridge

    What’re we melting down over?

    I thought we were enjoying ourselves and poking fun at the stupidity of the lefties.


  21. 21 | July 20, 2009 9:05 pm

    re: #16 by savage

    I remember when Nike Air shoes came out and they were way the hell over 100 bucks…. along with starter jackets that were a few hundred bucks.

    Only people I ever saw with them were on welfare or on tv.

    I never understood it…. the folks I knew who were on welfare (I’m talking about the habitual welfare folks, not the ones who have bad times and leave welfare as soon as they get stable again) had the hot new clothes, shoes and video game stuff.


  22. Bob in Breckenridge
    22 | July 20, 2009 9:17 pm

    re: #20 by LanceKates

    The ugly pig posted the following, I guess “thinking” that we’d be pissed that the murderers were convicted:

    3 irish rose7/20/2009 8:15:09 pm PDT

    * 4
    * down
    * up
    * favorite
    * report

    Meltdown at Deuce in 3…2…1…


  23. 23 | July 20, 2009 9:18 pm

    Sorry I’ve been away, but my goodness it looks like we forced CJ out of the closet on the Amazon thing. Just got it all out there, splashed a big fat “Amazon store” button at the top of the page, and then I see this PR post today.

    Pretty soon we’ll see him in videos practicing his idea for their new jingle.


  24. 24 | July 20, 2009 9:20 pm

    huh. what’s everyone’s impression of this?

    Japan’s Prime Minister dissolves Parliament.


  25. 25 | July 20, 2009 9:23 pm

    re: #22 by Bob in Breckenridge

    well, I guess I don’t have much of an opinion on it. If they did it, I guess they deserve punishment. Disagree with Islam if you like (and I do, I do!) but there really isn’t justification for burning people alive.

    I feel we may have been on the wrong side in that war, and that CLinton brought us into it to cover his sexual issues… but barbaric acts aren’ acceptable


  26. vagabond trader
    26 | July 21, 2009 2:58 am

    Great parody tc! Love that you used founding fathers quotes, something cj is so fond of doing. Betcha he hates and disregards all those bloody minded words,only mines for the quotes he can twist into his own narrow focus. Thats it, founder quotes as living flexible words.


  27. 27 | July 21, 2009 5:02 am

    re: #24 by LanceKates

    huh. what’s everyone’s impression of this?

    Japan’s Prime Minister dissolves Parliament.

    What’d he dissolve them in?


  28. 28 | July 21, 2009 5:04 am

    re: #19 by Bob in Breckenridge

    I see at Nancy’s site Nancy posted a thread about Bosnian Serbs being convicted of burning Muslims alive, and that ugly pig Irish Rose said how we’ll all “meltdown” here.

    Serbians? SERBIANS?? Serbians are SOUTH Slavs! Sorbians are NORTH Slavs! Sorbs are not Serbs!!


  29. Speranza
    29 | July 21, 2009 5:42 am

    Chuck’s brilliant retort to landline

    369 Charles 7/20/09 7:58:26 pm reply quote

    * 0
    * down
    * up
    * report

    As usual, when the thread starts to get old and they know they won’t have to face as much opposition, the Nirthers and LGF-bashers come out to play.


  30. 30 | July 21, 2009 5:56 am

    re: #24 by LanceKates

    Everyone’s moving towards smaller government except us!


  31. 31 | July 21, 2009 7:37 am

    re: #27 by tqcincinnatus

    He got rid of them and said they’re going to hold new elections.

    I don’t know much about Japan’s setup, but does he have that power?


  32. vapig
    32 | July 21, 2009 8:21 am

    re: #13 by savage

    Oh great! Another Flat (read: green) Earther!

    Some of us might actually prefer to use our dryers!


  33. tuffy
    33 | July 21, 2009 8:48 am

    re: #15 by Runner

    Yeah, and too many romance novels. Remember her comment about her strapping boyfriend?? lol


  34. Speranza
    34 | July 21, 2009 9:01 am

    re: #32 by vapig

    Somehow the idea of Irish Rose hanging out her unmentionables on a line for the world to see is not very appealing to imagine.


  35. 35 | July 21, 2009 9:26 am

    re: #28 by tqcincinnatus

    Serb are the bogeymen for Charles and his bunch. Tomorrow it will be Israel. Anyone who stands up to Islam is bad according to the Progressive Movement.


  36. 36 | July 21, 2009 9:27 am

    re: #32 by vapig

    And some of us stopped using chlorine bleach in the 1980s.


  37. Speranza
    37 | July 21, 2009 9:37 am

    re: #35 by Rodan

    The only reason he has not dumped on Israel yet is because we keep predicting he will.


  38. Former LGFer
    38 | July 21, 2009 9:09 pm

    That is funny as hell! Thanks!


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David