This is about what it would sound like. hehe
Tags: Charles Johnson, lgfsucks
If Charles had the balls to debate ME….
Comments
Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.
Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.
Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.
We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.
Play nice!
Charles’ fountain of knowledge
/thirst !
I’d forget it. I’ve invited him to debate me several times, but he’s afraid to.
re: #2 by tqcincinnatus
The best part of that is at 1:24. LOL!
Charles would run away like a punk if he saw you.
He would never debate anyone.
re: #4 by Rodan
I can run faster.
Charles would debate nobody, he’s an intellectual midget.
Was that Mark Levin? I don’t know who the host was? Liked listening to him though.
Looks like Charles has one ball but no guts
re: #5 by savage
Charles copied my Krauthammer post that I wrote earlier. He really has no originality.
I’ve noticed that since Obama’s numbers are declining he’s becoming more critical of Obama. He’s a bandwagon jumper. Watch him be on the Conservative/Libertarian Side again!
re: #7 by imtoast
Yeah, it was Levin.
Interesting, LGF is verrrrrrrrrrrrrry slow today.
I wonder if he’s getting hit with a DOS attack.
Hmmmm
Evolution
re: #12 by BuddyG
Yeah, he’s got the moves! hehehe
Wow did she crib this wisdom from a Chinese fortune cookie?
174 Sharmuta 7/10/09 1:28:13 am reply quote
* 2
* down
* up
* report
Sometimes looking for the truth can be a little like falling down the rabbit hole.
re: #14 by Speranza
She’ll never find the truth with her lips planted firmly on cjs backside. Pitiful.
re: #14 by Speranza
Is Sharmuta’s hole half-full or half-empty ?
re: #16 by BuddyG
She’ll have to check with C.J. first.
re: #15 by vagabond trader
I don’t know who is the funnier intellectual poseur – Sharm or Irish Rose?
re: #18 by Speranza
Definitely a competition for the affections of cj going on there, but alas, it’ll be a pyrrhic victory.
re: #18 by Speranza
Check each one of them to see who has the mark of the beast
Hey O/T, but Denny, my friend who runs http://www.grouchyoldcripple.com has been trying to register here at 2.0 for a couple days with no luck.
I tried registering him, but I’m having problems also with the image validation code.
It keeps telling me I’m not putting in the correct one, yet I am.
Anyone have any thoughts on why this is happening and how to correct this?
re: #20 by BuddyG
One of them is going to Play Misty on him.
re: #22 by Speranza
uh-huh, lol.
@ Buddy G, perfect!
re: #21 by Bob in Breckenridge
You can add them through the admin panel.
Look for Users.
re: #21 by Bob in Breckenridge
Have Denny send us an email at the blogmocracy email addy and I will manually register him.
yo savage i think chas would love to mass debate over your corpse.
its the only way he would win the point.
re: #26 by justin case
No kidding.
re: #27 by savage
I’d pay for the
part.
re: #28 by m
You know him, you love him, he’ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
BLASTER!
Debate? What does that word mean?
/cj
This is so funny. Watch to the end. What one man can do to a political candidate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=de3WWGCK4N0
Given how Nancy Johnson gets the vapors about ‘Creationists’ and their dangerous notion that the creation of the universe was not a random, meaningless accident, how does he feel that his Little Bronze God has appointed as his Chief Science Adviser a eugenicist that advocated sterilizing the public involuntarily through the drinking water.
re: #15 by vagabond trader
#15 BuddyG
Note the time stamp – 4:28 AM EST. That gal lives and breathes to post on LGF.
re: #33 by Speranza
Sheesh, she is really something!
re: #34 by savage
She really needs to be examined by a team of doctors and I am not talking about your $150 an hour LA shrinks – I mean she needs to go to Vienna and be examined round the clock by teams of doctors.
Charles Johnson has no official office. His sole claim to fame was his principled integrity, something which he recently has chosen to squander. The caliber of the LGF membership has suffered accordingly.
So why bother considering what he has to say at all? It seems a pointless exercise.
re: #35 by Speranza
Fixed that. heh!
re: #21 by Bob in Breckenridge
Hey, Bob!
I’ve run into that myself — I just e-mailed the admin on duty and it got fixed.
re: #35 by Speranza
Seinfeld!
“Note the time stamp – 4:28 AM EST. That gal lives and breathes to post on LGF.”
Is she the one on welfare? Or is that Irish Rose.
Both of them need to get a life, and the one on welfare needs to go get a damn job.
re: #22 by Speranza
ha ha. Doubt he’d unlock the door if one of ‘em showed up. Hopefully they have Rosie O’Donnell’s address as backup.
re: #40 by Intravenousdemilo
I do not think that Sharm is even employable. As for Irish Rose she is such a poseur that I have no idea what her real story is.
re: #39 by Intravenousdemilo
You Win! That episode was on my local station here (Sarasota-Bradenton) the other night.
re: #36 by Cuffy Miegs
Charles Johnson has no official office. His sole claim to fame was his principled integrity, something which he recently has chosen to squander. The caliber of the LGF membership has suffered accordingly.
Ah the days when LGF was a great blog, intelligent posters, an administrator who knew what was important and what was irrelevant (creationism for one). That is why I self banned. I took a look at who was posting and decided that these were people I did not care to communicate with. Haven’t posted in 7 months and do not regret it.
Yes, but now LGF is an anti-Christian hate site catering to quasi-conservative Obama supporters. As Charles Johnson is clearly part of the driving force behind this new change, he’s forfeited his position as a respected pundit.
There really is no further need to respectfully address his views until he apologizes. Given to what depths he’s already gone to, either directly or through surrogates, in continuing to abuse people he’s already wronged, it’s unlikely he’ll be worthy of a hearing anytime soon.