Read 1.0’s “private” thread in its entirety here (edited for appearance):
http://tinyurl.com/clusterchuck
To paraphrase what Charles said about savage and Rodan when he outed them: They don’t get to hide behind a login screen while spewing hatred at us, sorry.
Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.
Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.
Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.
We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.
Play nice!
website design was Built By David
gc, kudos to your technical contributions, but no way in hell am I slogging through 1500 “invisible” self congratulatory guano laden posts.
Well,maybe one. This former poster gets it right.lol.
YankeeBaseball 6/14/09 3:44:30 pm
* -9
* down
* up
* favorite
* report
Seems a wee bit paranoid
re: #1 by vagabond trader
that’s sort of like a “wee bit pregnant”. No?
The mental image of a “private” online forum?
Think of two dogs sniffing each others crotches.
Whatta circle jerk.
it wont last long, his blog will be killed stone dead, his traffic will stop followed by his advertizing.
very silly man that queeg,
but then mental people usually are.
re: #3 by bp_sf
At least that is a form of communication.
although “spy sniffing privates” would be a good name for this new feature of 1.0
Perhaps “Cone of Silence” would be another one.
Hey, I’ve dipped my toe in paranoia so I can usually relate but I can’t fathom the use of “private threads”.
What would they comment about that they couldn’t comment in “public”. I mean THEY’RE ANONYMOUS.
Maybe what he’s up to is he intends to do more “outing” and he wants “private threads” to do it in to protect himself from any liability if he “outs” in public for anyone to see.
He’s got a pretty high opinion of his registered users if he thinks there aren’t a few with some loose screws. Someone who might think it amusing to harass or assault someone because they are heretic apostates that the “Great Leader” has condemned as unworthy of protection.
I’d be willing to bet that that is the moving force behind this.
re: #3 by bp_sf
Hey at least with a circle jerk, SOMEBODY gets a happy ending.
:>
My goodness, speaking of galloping paranoia, saw this on Drudge. Whatever would Hussein have to hide?
Obama blocks access to White House visitor lists… Developing..
jakee:
I admit to being jealous of dogs. I’d love to introduce myself by jamming my snout under a cute French Poodle’s tail.
Bonjour, mon petit! Woof!
re: #1 by vagabond trader
Seems a wee bit paranoid
Notice that YankeeBaseball’s post was also downdinged to a -9.
I guess we can expect to see YB showing up over here at 2.0 within the next week or so?
re: #9 by tqcincinnatus
That’s why I wrote “former” poster, gmta!
Of course yankeebaseball will be warmly welcomed here, unlike the disdainful scrutiny offerred to newbies by 1.0
re: #10 by vagabond trader
That’s why I wrote “former” poster, gmta!
LOL, I didn’t even notice that!
It’s funny because it’s true….
re: #11 by tqcincinnatus
“Truthers” need not apply during LGF registration!
/…sort of
Good morning, all!
re: #13 by vapig
vapig! How you doing, back any better?
re: #14 by vagabond trader
{VT}
Yes! Actually it is! Finally! It lingered for so long I was becoming concerned. I think I still need to take it easy, but I now think the worst is behind me – thank goodness!
Oh Sharmuta….. your private thread isn’t private…..
Just so you know that I can.. And I’m not even a stalker. Just someone home sick from work today. You remember work, right?
Sharmuta complaining that other people have no lives is hilarious.
Hey Sharmie, Chuck ain’t going to marry you.
re: #15 by vapig
Yay,back problems can be sooo debilitating. My Dad sufferred and the hubby has a disc problem.
Old nurse trick: Always bend your knees and point feet in direction of what you are doing, like making a bed, lifting.
End of lecture.
looks like they don’t get to hide behind a login screen and spout hate at us either. Not by attempt, but by inept programming.
Good Work Charles, lets put you in charge of China’s hackers.
Posted this on the previous thread. Some of the criteria are dead on in regard to 1.0. Yikes!
In fact this could also apply to Obamatons.
http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cult_q0.html
re: #5 by jakee308
Needed a little video…
Thanks gclaghorn, I enjoyed some popcorn with this one. And it read just like I thought it would >>BORRRRRINNNG. Sharmutie tries to be all high-falutin in open threads, but she really shows how juvenile she is when she thinks no one’s looking. And isn’t it interesting how QUICKLY most of the conversation turned to us when the door was closed. Honestly I had no idea they stalked us so much.
Truly illuminating in that regard, and well worth the popcorn.
re: #22 by tuffy
Yup. They spend ALOT of time being angry at us.
More than they spend being angry at liberalism, terrorism, socialism or many other isms.
Morning you all,
They are not allowed to ‘hate’ on the rop anymore or obambi so they have to direct it somewhere or their heads would explode.
re: #16 by LanceKates
WOW, “maggot stalkers”? Such a pretty girl, isn’t she? Looks like she has a bit of a temper too and her mouth goes flyin’. How attractive.
Hahahaha! Get’em GCLAGHORN! !
From a comment at GatewayPundit, I give you Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R-MN):
http://rightsoup.com/rep-michelle-bachmann-we-now-have-a-gangster-government/
re: #20 by vagabond trader
Dang, that nailed 1.0 to a T!
re: #28 by m
Yup, except the one about no exit.
There’s always banning at 1.0
RickMZ,
Heard that the other day. I like her and hope she keeps up the pressure. This is what all Rs should be doing.
From Drudge via HotAir,
ABC rolls over and offers neck to WH.
http://www.drudgereport.com/flashaot.htm
re: #29 by LanceKates
True, but even after he throws people out, or they leave on their own – the man thinks he can dictate where they can post and what they can say.
Charles is like an abusive boyfriend, as evidenced by his mis-characterization of Goddessoftheclassroom once she was gone.
To them- they own the internets and everyone that has ever clicked on the lizard homepage, lol.
if anyone needed an example that 1.0 had jumped the shark, there could be none better than this “private thread” concept. Basically to my way of thinking its like an admission that the blog is not popular anymore and has nothing to offer. Seeing them updinging Charles and Sharmuta in the private thread is a scream. Think about that for a moment. They’re in a thread where they think they are safe from the eyes of the outside world, and right on cue the drones still pat each other on the back and slavishly upding the king and his court. what a creepy cult.
One of my favorite LGFers “loppyd” (who backs down to nobody) has started her own blog. Check it out
http://spitfiremurphy.wordpress.com/
speranza, did jammiewearingfool get banned?
exceller, it is a bit creepy but i think some are playing a game
re: #34 by Speranza
Took a look at it, not bad. I notice no LGF on the blogroll.
re: #36 by phoenixgirl
and what game is that?
re: #31 by newsjunkie_ky
I have a post on that right now.
exceller
the game i think some are playing is “how long will i suffer the insanity of this place i used to respect……and when i finally get fed up with it i’d like to go on my own terms not a quiet banning but the big bang banning!”
yea, I scanned through about 150 comments, but finally, no I don’t need to do that anymore. LGF isn’t omprtant enough to hate, but I do have to say that when we get a nutty chuck post here, I stop and check it out for the train wreck aspect of it.
qob, you got that far? you have stamina!
re: #40 by phoenixgirl
gotcha!
re: #40 by phoenixgirl
PhoenixGirl
paladin says hello!
re: #35 by phoenixgirl
I believe he did not get banned.
re: #37 by exceller
Please spread the word
Actually LGF is still on JammieWearingFool’s blog roll. I thought he might have gotten the stick after he outed Sharmuta on LGF.
re: #40 by phoenixgirl
I would love to go out in a dramatic fashion but Charles just deletes all your comments.
Tags: Open Thread
.
.
.
.
1201 comments (Private)
Newspeak?
re: #35 by phoenixgirl
35. phoenixgirl on 16 June, 2009 at 7:47 am reply
speranza, did jammiewearingfool get banned?
I got confirmation that JammieWearingFool has not been banned by Charles.
spidly banned?
Of course, the solution to CJ’s privacy problem could be to restrict access to those 1.0ers who have an X or above karma rating. That should keep the sockpuppets from snooping, and finally provide a tangible benefit for all the butt-kissing (which, in turn, would also drive the drama meter up a few notches).
Watch for it!
(oh, and CJ, no need to hat tip)
Someone posted sharmuta has 81,000 posts in two years.
That is approx 110 posts every single day.
She says we need to get a life?
re: #53 by P
lol, yeah. The irony abounds.
re: #53 by P
I was the one who pointed that out. Also funny how they call us stalkers when they come onto this site all the time as does Charles himself.
re: #25 by tuffy
WOW, “maggot stalkers”? Such a pretty girl, isn’t she? Looks like she has a bit of a temper too and her mouth goes flyin’. How attractive.
Maybe what she means is that they’re the maggots, and that we’re stalking them?
re: #56 by tqcincinnatus
Ahhhh, YAY! We’re good old-fashioned maggot stalkers. Thanks for clarifiying that, Sharmuthag Desperanza!
re: #57 by tuffy
she’d better beware your black box of Dewm!
re: #58 by LanceKates
hehehe. She LIVES in a black Box of Doom at 1.0. Tis a pity. I could say some really mean things about the physical effects of sitting at a computer all day, lack of vitamin D (sunshine) and what that does to a person and all the other pleasantries that come with being trapped in a black box of doom so desperately, but instead I will just feel sympathy for someone who is in dire need of an intervention. That must be a terrible loneliness and needing to belong there. Quite sad actually.
One thing I would hope is that we can move past being an anti-1.0 site and concentrate on fighting jihad like we thought CJ was into “back in the day” I think there is evidence that we are getting there!
re: #60 by Qob
I agree with you. 2.0 implies a new version of a site that went left, and we are to pick up where they left off.
There are many of us here that think the 1.0 bashing should end. However, that is not to say they shouldn’t be fact-checked when warranted. They are open game as anyone else is to fact checking. For instance the recent Filip Dewinter and Marcus Beisicht fauxtography faux pas committed by them.
Hmmmm – I wonder if Nancy can play the Ukulele better than he programs his moonbat whack job website?
re: #61 by song_and_dance_man
I agree with the big picture, but it’s early for some. I’m glad we have a place where they can vent. It sure made me feel better~
But no matter how hard Charles/whatever Sharmutant variant the nutter is using this week types wish it otherwise… they don’t really silence anyone.
Maggot stalking by proxy is pretty neat~ I don’t even have to click over there. People note the crazy here.
re: #63 by m
Maggot stalking by proxy. Coooool. I think I’ll get a bumper sticker that says “Have you hugged your maggot stalker today?”
re: #63 by m
I realize that. As more bannings take place at 1.0, they have a place here to express their disappointment and opinions and settle in.
I was perusing the 2.0 archives and those posters that were coming here under different nics, while still at 1.0, can be identified by their avatars.
Not that it matters much, but is interesting to now know who we were talking to without knowing them with their 1.0 nics.
It won’t be long before we have a poster here named Maggot Stalker. lol
M, is that your chin? It’s pretty, reminds me of my wife.
re: #66 by song_and_dance_man
lol
Everyone, just thought I’d share. I like to look at the “bottom comments”–for a good laugh and to see who the late lizards are. So followed a spat involving HH and another guy who doesn’t like Sharm. HH was threatening to clean the floor with the guy–which I think is an absolute riot–would that be virtual punches or a sock puppet duel at sunrise?
Anyway, I followed the string (won’t call it a thread) back to this comment by Sharmuta:
I was once told I was too much woman for one man to handle. This was strictly based off my personality. I’ve come to think it’s true. Men fear me.
I had to stop because I started to laugh and laugh and laugh.
re: #69 by Special K
Are you my X? Because you sound like her.
I bet Chuckles is totally torqued off now. Hahaha
re: #69 by Special K
“Too much woman for one man” can mean alot of things, ESPECIALLY if someone told her that…not a good sign. Someone was trying not to hurt her feelings. It’s kind of like when I guy tells a girl, “it’s not you, it’s me” (reasons for breaking up), or “you’re a really great girl, I’m just not ready for commitment”, that kind of thing. When someone tells a woman she’s “too much woman for one man”, that conjures up all KINDS of nightmarish scenarios for me, and NONE of them are good. I doubt it was a compliment, but it’s funny she took as one and is even bragging about it. MAN, this girl must be real mess, and scary to boot.
Man I read that extracted thread. Those people are so consumed by hatred.
I am sure the LGF 1.0 story is following a cult path, the result of which ends up in a major shoot out with the authorities or a round of Kool Aid.
Maybe Charles is preparing to reveal himself to his followers and tell them about the space ship which is on its way to take them from this terrible planet.
re: #64 by tuffy
lol,
SAVE THE MAGGOT STALKERS!
Maggot Stalkers Are People Too!
re: #67 by archonix
That be me!
Does she have dimples too? Never underestimate the power of the dimples!
re: #69 by Special K
Men fear not being able to get rid of her ass!
hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
re: #73 by aussie_dave
I bet he is already passing out the uniforms. They are already trying to infiltrate the political system.
re: #76 by m
Well her name does imply shes’s meant for more than one man!
re: #78 by Rodan
30 days same as cash?
BWAHAHAHAHA!
re: #79 by m
how about 2/10 net 30?
hehe