“The Speech Obama Should Give in Cairo”, by Robert Spencer

As Barack Obama prepares to give his long-anticipated major address to the Islamic world from Cairo, as a public service I here offer the speech he should give:

Dear friends,
I have said that in this speech I would offer my personal commitment to engagement with the Islamic world, based upon mutual interests and mutual respect. Establishing peace between the forces of the global jihad and America and her ally Israel is something that I would very much love to do. The first thing I must acknowledge, however, is that much as I would love to see this peace dawning over the world, it is not within my power to achieve this.
That may surprise many of you. You have grown accustomed to thinking that the tensions between Muslims and the United States – tensions that boiled over on September 11, 2001 and on the occasions of many other acts of jihad terrorism as well – are entirely the fault of the United States. Americans have been told that we are hated because of our support for Israel, and because of our attempts to bring freedom and stability to the overwhelmingly Muslim people of Iraq and Afghanistan. We are hated because we have spent American treasure to try to secure a better life for Muslims the world over, spending billions of dollars in aid for Egypt, Pakistan, and other Muslim countries.
I must speak honestly with you. It puzzles and pains Americans to see ourselves vilified and hated for trying to help others. Now, unlike the Islamic Republic of Iran and other Islamic entities, we seek no apologies, no restitution. We do not ask for a word of thanks for our numerous attempts to help Muslim societies become safe, prosperous places to live for all their citizens. We do not ask for your approval. But at this point we are going to cease efforts to build bridges of understanding with the Islamic world that have turned out to be fruitless, and even self-defeating.
We have showered billions on Pakistan to enable the Pakistani government to fight the Islamic jihadists, only to see a great deal of that many being funneled to those same jihadists, who are now stronger than ever.
We have tried to establish democracies in Iraq and Afghanistan, only to see non-Muslim minorities treated worse than ever, such that they have been streaming out of Iraq in unprecedented numbers, while the few that remain in Afghanistan are subject to increasingly violent persecution.
We have brokered peace treaty after peace treaty between Israel and the Palestinians – from Camp David to Oslo to the Road Map for Peace – only to see the Palestinian side again and again trample upon its commitments to recognize and respect Israel’s basic right to exist.
I have offered you America’s outstretched hand. In doing so I have followed a path blazed by my predecessors. But that gesture of conciliation has never been reciprocated. And so now, even as my good will is still extended to you, I must act more realistically.
Pakistan and other Muslim countries will not receive another penny of American aid unless and until they demonstrate – in a transparent and inspectable fashion – that they are working against, not abetting, the forces of the global jihad. This will include instituting comprehensive nationwide programs to teach against the jihad doctrine of Islamic supremacism, teaching that Muslims and non-Muslims must live together as equal citizens on an indefinite basis, without any attempts by Muslims to subjugate non-Muslims as inferiors under the rule of Islamic law.
I trust you will understand that we cannot continue to fund the cutting of our own throat.
Afghanistan and Iraq must immediately guarantee the equality of rights of women and non-Muslims, or American arms will no longer devote themselves to keeping regimes in power that do not guarantee those rights.
I will call upon Israel to make no further territorial concessions. The withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 demonstrated only that such concessions whet, rather than sate, the appetites of Islamic jihadists for more concessions. The assumption that territorial concessions will bring peace ignores not only recent history, but also the stated goal of the jihadist movements arrayed against Israel: the destruction of the Jewish state.
That state is an American ally – a more reliable one than any Islamic state has ever been. And we will do whatever is necessary to preserve and defend that ally.
Our hand is outstretched, but we are not unrealistic about the nature of the world. The animus between us is as much, if not more, the result of the doctrines of jihad and Islamic supremacism as it is a result of American policy. I am telling you today that we understand this, and will be acting accordingly. Ultimately a policy based on realism will be much better for both of us than policies based on the fantasies and half-truths that have hitherto prevailed.
Thank you, and may God bless you.

Hat tip:   no2liberals

Tags: , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

47 Responses to ““The Speech Obama Should Give in Cairo”, by Robert Spencer”
( jump to bottom )

  1. justin case
    1 | June 2, 2009 3:55 am

    first.
    smell that, thats the smell of victory.
    i love the smell of victory in the morning.


  2. justin case
    2 | June 2, 2009 4:00 am

    if obama just told them to stop blaming all their problems on the west, that would be good enough for me,
    he can call them wankers as well if he wants.


  3. justin case
    3 | June 2, 2009 4:11 am

    why is it all the best people dont become politicians, and all the worst ones do.


  4. bp_sf
    4 | June 2, 2009 5:07 am

    Yeah right, as if!

    “will not receive another penny”

    You have some vivid dreams there Mr. Spencer.


  5. Speranza
    5 | June 2, 2009 5:11 am

    Charles really has no problems with Geller and Spencer, his problem is that he needs a strawman to attack so he can move back to the Left.


  6. vapig
    6 | June 2, 2009 5:20 am

    Sorry – we say first because we were not allowed to over there. All of us have done it – try it!


  7. Speranza
    7 | June 2, 2009 5:30 am

    re: #6 by vapig

    It was one of the few things Charles actually did right!


  8. newsjunkie_ky
    8 | June 2, 2009 6:03 am

    Robert Spencer on FNC now discussing the islamist terrorist that murdered the Recruiter.


  9. CarolinaJen
    9 | June 2, 2009 6:04 am

    does every single post here have to include a dog at Charles. I understand you guys don’t like him but damn….I was reading this post thinking ok…this is the kind of stuff that I come here to read. I’m thinking….”tell it, my friend”, high-fiving the air as if he was right beside me. Then I get to the end, feeling great about what I just read and there it is. A dig a Charles. So disappointed.


  10. Ed Mahmoud
    10 | June 2, 2009 6:11 am

    Barack Obama in that bizarro parallel universe where Spock has a beard.


  11. justin case
    11 | June 2, 2009 6:14 am

    re: #9 by CarolinaJen

    get used to being disappointed on here.


  12. bp_sf
    12 | June 2, 2009 6:22 am

    @ #9 Carlolina Jen

    I’m with you. This BS is getting real old real fast.

    Any plans for this blog to stand on own merits?
    (This decade would be nice).


  13. Granny
    13 | June 2, 2009 6:23 am

    CarolinaJen – I’ve seen you make this argument about every time that I run across you. I strongly suggest to you that if you do not like what people say here, then you are welcome to go elsewhere, not letting the door hit you on the way out.


  14. vapig
    14 | June 2, 2009 6:29 am

    Regarding the post – it is the speech he should give.

    However, what I expect is more genuflecting, apologies for America and his commitment to cut Israel off at the knees.

    Did you all hear he’s totally dissed the Queen of England? She hasn’t even been invited to Normandy. She’s like one of the few people left who was actually alive during WWII.

    Also, maobama’s uncle criticizes Teh Won over his planned trip to Buchenwald.


  15. CarolinaJen
    15 | June 2, 2009 6:31 am

    I don’t have a problem with free speech nor what is said here, but damn label a post for what it is. Don’t lure us in with something that promises some commentary on serious issues then slap another CJ dig. I just think it alittle pointless, and sorry m, I may just have to do that.


  16. CarolinaJen
    16 | June 2, 2009 6:35 am

    Like yesterday, m tried to post some serious post about the attack in Ark. only to be posted over with another post addressing CJ, therefore the serious issue did not recieve the attenton nor the commentary that it deserves.


  17. Granny
    17 | June 2, 2009 6:36 am

    re: #14 by vapig

    Vapig, he totally dissed the Queen of England from the get-go. Worse than barring the queen, he has also closed Normandy to those families and Vets who still pilgrimage there. Leaves me wondering just how long it will be before he digs up the graves.


  18. Granny
    18 | June 2, 2009 6:38 am

    re: #15 by CarolinaJen

    Of course you have a problem with what is said here CarolinaJean. That is why you comment every single time – and it does not matter whether the “thread is labeled.” I’ve seen you do exactly the same, repeatedly, and most stridently when it is the commenters who mention Chuckles the Magic Musician. Like I said. . . . . .


  19. CarolinaJen
    19 | June 2, 2009 6:41 am

    18. Granny

    Oh please, I have critized CJ on this blog myself. I don’t like the man either. But this post was too good to end that way. I’m outty. Oh Granny….bite me, you don’t know me.


  20. justin case
    20 | June 2, 2009 6:43 am

    re: #15 by CarolinaJen

    this whole blog was started to be a slap in the face to the bully boy of the blog world, charlie
    you must know that.


  21. vapig
    21 | June 2, 2009 6:45 am

    Hiya, justin!


  22. vapig
    22 | June 2, 2009 6:48 am

    re: #19 by CarolinaJen

    Good grief! Enough of the whining, already! Seems to me you’re the only one that refuses to let go of the bone!


  23. justin case
    23 | June 2, 2009 6:49 am

    re: #21 by vapig

    hi vapig, hows your day going, just going to take the dog out, speak soon


  24. Granny
    24 | June 2, 2009 6:58 am

    Good G_d Almighty! Get a load of this -

    SAN PEDRO SULA, Honduras — In a new overture to Iran, the Obama administration has authorized U.S. embassies around the world to invite Iranian officials to Independence Day parties they host on or around July 4th.

    This is an absolute outrage!


  25. vapig
    25 | June 2, 2009 7:09 am

    Seeya in a bit then, justin!

    Has anybody seen this? Eric Holder to assign US Marshaps to protect abortion clinics.

    My question? Did he also assign the marshals to protect our recruiting centers?


  26. vapig
    26 | June 2, 2009 7:11 am

    re: #24 by Granny

    Dang, Granny! You just full of good news today. first the Normandy diss and now this?

    Someone needs to keep this jerk in the country!


  27. exceller
    27 | June 2, 2009 7:17 am

    personally I feel the whole idea of a US president
    making an address to the Muslim world is an outrageous idea. I can’t understand why there isn’t more condemnation about it. Its not like its a single entity with common interests from India, to Indonesia to Pakistan to Saudi and Egypt. It’s a religion, not a state. Of course Obama has acted like he doesn’t even know India exists even though they should be considered a very strategic ally for many reasons.

    oh and Carolina Jen; in case you haven’t noticed people are going to talk about CJ here on nearly every thread. Among other things this place is comprised of people that wish to expose him for what he is, to counter his assertions. This is an ongoing process.


  28. vapig
    28 | June 2, 2009 7:19 am

    Morning, exceller!


  29. Ed Mahmoud
    29 | June 2, 2009 7:22 am

    I’m sure the intelligence officers at the various Iranian embassies and consuls would love a look at the layout and security protocols of US embassies.

    And the free sour cream dip.


  30. Ed Mahmoud
    30 | June 2, 2009 7:27 am

    GM following the model of Amtrak to be a lean, mean efficient private company

    Deja vue all over again

    Analysts said the government’s hope of creating an efficient mass transit service through a partial nationalization of the rail system was stymied by its inability to get tough on unions and rein in labor costs.


  31. vapig
    31 | June 2, 2009 7:27 am

    27. exceller on 2 June, 2009 at 7:17 am
    oh and Carolina Jen; in case you haven’t noticed people are going to talk about CJ here on nearly every thread. Among other things this place is comprised of people that wish to expose him for what he is, to counter his assertions. This is an ongoing process.

    I’ve noticed people doing this a several other sites. When it became apparant that a muslim killed our soldier and his flippant response it was posted everywhere.

    Seems this man is becoming a bad joke in the blogisphere. People are posting his comments and going, “See what shark-jumper said!?”


  32. Ed Mahmoud
    32 | June 2, 2009 7:33 am

    I haven’t referred to any deviant Dancing Clowns all day…


  33. Granny
    33 | June 2, 2009 8:02 am

    re: #30 by Ed Mahmoud

    And Amtrak has worked out SO well!


  34. vagabond trader
    34 | June 2, 2009 8:30 am

    re: #24 by Granny

    These sobs blew up our barracks in Lebanon, kidnapped our people,sent jihadis into Iraq to kill our troops and this ass is going to make nice with them on our soil on the 4th of July.That is a diss on America, make no mistake.


  35. Buckaroo
    35 | June 2, 2009 8:57 am

    not “my house” so if racing to be “first” and gratuitous cj bashing are the order of the day, well, i got no beef with either …

    /on topic, mr. spencer really needs to think about enhancing his personal security based upon the events of the last 2 days …
    [!!]


  36. phoenixgirl
    36 | June 2, 2009 9:49 am

    spencer is brilliant!

    but apparently inconsiderate as walter is still waiting for a response to his email!


  37. 37 | June 2, 2009 11:39 am

    re: #36 by phoenixgirl

    LOL!


  38. Speranza
    38 | June 2, 2009 12:06 pm

    re: #36 by phoenixgirl

    I’ve been at the coffee shop.


  39. 39 | June 2, 2009 12:17 pm

    re: #9 by CarolinaJen

    I agree, and thus took liberties to remove it. It just really doesn’t fit here.

    For the record, it said something to the effect of “and Charles wants to hate Robert…what do you to fight jihad, Charles you…..”, or something like that.


  40. 40 | June 2, 2009 12:19 pm

    re: #24 by Granny

    This just in: Killing Americans with bombs, more efficient than the American plan to kill Iran with kindness.


  41. ghost707
    41 | June 2, 2009 1:12 pm

    Obama is going on another apology tour.
    It will be a non-stop bashing of America speech by the Kenyan Marxist-in-chief.

    The crowd will love it and know that they can continue killing Americans without reprisal.


  42. Blazer
    42 | June 2, 2009 3:44 pm

    Here’s my idea for the speech Obama shouldn’t give in Cairo.

    Anything with the words, I apologize in it.


  43. Blazer
    43 | June 2, 2009 4:45 pm

    re: #33 by Granny

    heh, Amtrak.

    But who could forget Conrail ? The government entity other wise known as the Pennsylvania, New York Central and Erie Lackawanna Railroads.

    Another bailout and government takeover.

    Was run just like any other government agency, rife with wasteful spending and didn’t turn a profit again for twenty years until it was sold off to CSX and Norfolk Southern.

    Sadly they didn’t learn their lesson there.


  44. Former LGFer
    44 | June 2, 2009 4:53 pm

    Here’s a better version:

    Barbarians and Homicial Manics!

    If you don’t stop attacking Western Civilization we will turn your Countries into Glass.

    The Flash you see will be your last.

    Have a nice day!


  45. Rose
    45 | June 2, 2009 9:21 pm

    This really is beautiful, and says it all. Too bad he won’t use it. Thanks for the post.


  46. AZfederalist
    46 | June 2, 2009 9:57 pm

    re: #17 by Granny

    Does Obama have any control over the Normandy remembrances or is it France that controls that?


  47. 47 | June 3, 2009 12:36 am

    A better way to end the article would be:

    “May the Lord JESUS Christ bless you”

    Now, that would make multiculturalists and islamo-nazis crazy.


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David