I May Be Of Some Assistance…


http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/33604_Overnight_Open_Thread/comments/#ctop

Ya know, it’s kinda sad to watch netizens continually choose to post in a forum that has become so oppressive that they can’t keep track of which 20k+ comment members have been cast out for not demonstrating unconditional loyalty to the admin.  But, hey, maybe that ajax thing is like crack or something.

Anyway, I know that I have a reputation of being a fierce warrior that roams the plains of the political web, but I can also be benevolent.  I’m kinda liberal, and I think I have a soft spot for the hopelessly addicted.  So, I’m going to help you lizards out…

Yes, Mama Winger was banned.  Many months ago, actually. 

In the future, I suggest that one stop by here before asking about those that shalt not be mentioned or searched for, as it could spare you the possible sentence of 50 updings to repent for your ignorance.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

51 Responses to “I May Be Of Some Assistance…”
( jump to bottom )

  1. 1 | May 8, 2009 8:06 pm

    Charles’s bannings are are unexplained most of the time. He has a very Napoleonic complex.
    he is rapidly exposing himself as a fake.


  2. Skippy
    2 | May 8, 2009 8:33 pm

    Charles? You mean Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs?

    That place is still around? It’s been the joke of the blogoshere for months now. You mean people actually still go there?
    :mrgreen:


  3. Tex Taylor
    3 | May 8, 2009 8:33 pm

    Chenzhen :lol:

    I’d forgotten how funny you can be.

    But somebody needs to notify that blog owner with the list of bad apples that he’s got one too many people listed. Tex never got the stick, and I absolutely, positively refuse to set up a sock puppet to visit Herr Charles’ site.

    But it was a trip down memory lane to see that huge list of names. I don’t even feel special anymore!


  4. Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
    4 | May 8, 2009 8:42 pm

    “Weapons Grade Crazy” – I like that


  5. 5 | May 8, 2009 8:51 pm

    Tex-

    Yea, I tried to inform her.


  6. Tee
    6 | May 8, 2009 9:12 pm

    Occasional Reader should become an occasional observer.


  7. gclaghorn
    7 | May 8, 2009 9:19 pm

    On the latest thread:

    327 Charles
    5/08/09 8:45:56 pm
    2
    down
    up
    report
    If anyone remembers “gclaghorn” — this person continues trying to register sock puppets too, every time I open registration. Five so far.

    Do your math again, Charles. I don’t even have one sock puppet there.


  8. gclaghorn
    8 | May 8, 2009 9:19 pm

    Plus I haven’t caught an open reg since I was banned. So can someone explain to me how I’m registering sock puppets I don’t even know about at open registrations I’m not even around for?


  9. song_and_dance_man
    9 | May 8, 2009 9:21 pm

    In case y’all don’t know mama was banned because she claimed to be my friend and has no problem with that.

    I am Acid in the mind of Charles the Moonbat.


  10. gclaghorn
    10 | May 8, 2009 9:22 pm

    9. song_and_dance_man

    As Charles would say, you live inside his head!


  11. Tex Taylor
    11 | May 8, 2009 9:23 pm

    gclaghorn,

    I’m convinced that Sir Charles Lackey has had to resort to lying to save face with his dwindling importance. Take it as a compliment – if he still is remembering you, you made a dent.


  12. gclaghorn
    12 | May 8, 2009 9:25 pm

    I am now 100% convinced that Charles is totally deranged. I said I liked Ann Coulter’s new book, so he banned me, and then brings me up randomly a couple of months later as an alleged “sock puppet” “stalker.”

    I think he’s trying to prove something about himself. No idea what, though.


  13. song_and_dance_man
    13 | May 8, 2009 9:26 pm

    El eś dee.


  14. gclaghorn
    14 | May 8, 2009 9:27 pm

    ¿Qué?


  15. song_and_dance_man
    15 | May 8, 2009 9:38 pm

    14. gclaghorn

    Nothing to it. I was referring to Charles that is suppositorily in our heads and meant to be witty and puny.

    However, as we can see how 1.0 is watching this blog, he is not in our heads, but rather we are in his.

    Proof? His minions are stalking us rather than their other familiar grounds, like KOS an HuffPo. He knows where the danger lies.

    And another curious thing. I started calling him a moonbat and a LLL a week ago, and now we see him using the same language since I started that in posts here and abroad.

    Methinks we who are calling him out are in his very own head.

    LOL at Charles.


  16. Jimmy The Clam
    16 | May 8, 2009 10:04 pm

    Yeah, I made the list!

    If CJ wants to, he can say ANYONE has tried to re-register multiple times and there is no way to disprove that lie.

    Part of being a phony is being a liar too.


  17. Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
    17 | May 8, 2009 10:35 pm

    I am now 100% convinced that Charles is totally deranged.

    Seeing your Alexa traffic drop by 50% in a year can do that to a guy.


  18. 18 | May 8, 2009 10:37 pm

    17 Titus

    Seeing your Alexa traffic drop by 50% in a year can do that to a guy.

    Once I get done with that punk, he will only have 4 diehards left in there.


  19. Tee
    19 | May 8, 2009 11:04 pm

    18. savage

    OK, I guessing Sharmuta. Killgore Trout, NYNana, and MandyManners. Any prizes for this?


  20. 20 | May 8, 2009 11:38 pm

    There are still many good people at LGF, but they are now standing silent out of fear of being “banned” or “blocked” and denigrated if it is done publicly. Rodan is right, many just quietly disappear, finding they have been blocked when they go to sign in the next day.

    Many are banned simply for UP or DOWNdinging the wrong comment.

    When they end up googling banned at LGF, they will end up here! Good post.


  21. 21 | May 9, 2009 12:08 am

    Just as a point of fact for the record, I have never tried to log in to LGF since Robert Spencer got Chucked, and I have certainly not ever attempted to register a sock puppet.


  22. Escovado
    22 | May 9, 2009 12:15 am

    It’s funny to see my name on the banned list at Kirly’s blog. I never got an official “get off my blog” comment from the lizard king. I just stopped posting there when he went psychotic by accusing the DI and ICR of being funded by islamic radicals. My last comment there did get -12 down ding points. I logged-in once several months ago to do a search and I my account was still active. I don’t know if I have been banned since then, but I won’t give Chuckles the satisfaction of attempting to login to find out. I really could care less.

    I have also caught several open registrations over at 1.0, but I also could care less about making any sock puppets. either


  23. 23 | May 9, 2009 12:38 am

    Thanks for that link to Kirly’s list. It was funny to see down in the comments, Colonel Panik was banned for the identical reason I was.
    The whole thing is absurd. There are a lot of genuinely respectable people on that list… Charles is making a laughingstock of himself and his once-great blog with his childish banning.


  24. imtoast
    24 | May 9, 2009 1:06 am

    In 2005 I registered as xray at lgf because I wanted to change my nic. I never used the new nic but did notice someone else posting as xray. Can two people have the same nic over there?


  25. 25 | May 9, 2009 1:32 am

    Unless he’s really that bad a programmer, I doubt it. Seems like someone else was using your nick.


  26. village Idiot.
    26 | May 9, 2009 1:35 am

    12. gclaghorn on 8 May, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    I am now 100% convinced that Charles is totally deranged. I said I liked Ann Coulter’s new book, so he banned me, and then brings me up randomly a couple of months later as an alleged “sock puppet” “stalker.”

    I think he’s trying to prove something about himself. No idea what, though.

    Ann Coulter has the hair and figure that Nancy always wished for.Nancy is very bitter about Ann and her books.


  27. sunjester
    27 | May 9, 2009 3:09 am

    #20
    sometimes they stop visiting from a sense of disgust.

    I stopped visiting LGF not because of the lack of intellectual diversity. But mainly a lack of intellect.

    I accept evolution as the most likely was we came to be, but its a ‘theory’ not a fact. There is a huge difference.

    But I guess I should have studied music rather than science for my degree. Then I would know.


  28. sunjester
    28 | May 9, 2009 3:13 am

    sorry, forgot to say…

    you’re all banned! dammit


  29. gclaghorn
    29 | May 9, 2009 4:43 am

    #26 village Idiot.

    LOL!


  30. gclaghorn
    30 | May 9, 2009 4:44 am

    #28. sunjester

    You didn’t say it right! Try this:

    “Bye now! Take care.”


  31. jeppo
    31 | May 9, 2009 4:51 am

    ChenZhen wrote: “I’m kinda liberal, and I think I have a soft spot for the hopelessly addicted.”

    Chen, you sound like you would fit right in at the new LGF 1.0. You were banned when the Google description of LGF read “Headquarters of the Lizardoid Army”, or “Anti-Idiotarian Headquarters”. Do you know what it reads today? “Weblog covering issues dear to both conservatives and US liberals”. If they added an “anti-” before “conservatives”, it would be a more accurate description, but it’s still pretty indicative of the radical ideological change that’s occured over there.

    In fact, if you were still posting over there you’d have a hard time running up a negative karma of -286. The same comments that got down-dinged two years ago would probably get up-dinged today. You’d probably have a hard time getting banned over there today, as your liberal opinions are just the kind that CJ wants to cultivate in his newly hatched lizards to reflect the new, leftish LGF 1.0.

    Me on the other hand, there’s almost no chance that I would last more than a single comment over there today. Back in the day I managed to post a few hundred comments, almost all of them defending European conservative nationalist political parties and the blogs that supported them, running up a negative karma of -708. CJ simply wouldn’t tolerate that kind of respectful dissent over there today, at least not from the right.

    An interesting thought experiment would be if you set up a sock-puppet over there and offered your honest opinions in the comments. Rather than being banned, I think you’d soon be lizard superstar, ranking up there with anti-conservative watchdogs like Killgore, Sharmuta and Thanos ;)


  32. Speranza
    32 | May 9, 2009 5:16 am

    Occasional Reader

    You might want to ask one of Charles’s notorious suck-ups what happened to peacekeeper.


  33. Speranza
    33 | May 9, 2009 5:27 am

    27. sunjester
    I stopped visting because LGF is freaking boring and has been for some time now. I just don’t feel that Glenn Beck, Pam Geller, Robert Spencer and some obscure Texas School Board is a threat to me. But then again that’s just me.


  34. Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
    34 | May 9, 2009 6:32 am

    Just noticed – I’m not on the list. Might need to contact Kirly and let him/her know.

    At least Charles banned me for a reason – I did call him a whackjob, after all. But I only did so because he is, indeed, a whackjob.


  35. coward and I admit it
    35 | May 9, 2009 6:52 am

    #20 Rose

    You describe my situation exactly.
    I do not “ding,” and I have that feature turned off my account so that I can’t see my total. I can check my karma on my profile page if I want. Someone accused me of lying about that, but it’s true.


  36. The Osprey
    36 | May 9, 2009 8:41 am

    Dick Cheney has been going on the attack against Obama for nearly two weeks now. It’s been the subject of numerous threads at Free Republic. Yet I have not seen a single thread on it at LGF. I thought the Lizards loved Dick Cheney?


  37. Jenny
    37 | May 9, 2009 11:39 am

    Tex….sorry that was my fault.

    Did you go by another name? I think you did…and now know it…Iam not perfect…
    But I think I got your other name on the list. If not …let her know. Not to mention (to all the lurkers) I am not on the computer every day like a lot of you
    are.
    Jenny


  38. Insight
    38 | May 9, 2009 12:14 pm

    A Grown man crying like a ten year old. And you wonder why people hate you charlie the enuch?
    702 Charles
    5/09/09 11:47:43 am reply quote 0downupreport

    re: #699 Iron Fist

    I’m reaching the limit of my tolerance for comments like that, and getting very tired of having to delete your comments. If this happens one more time, I’m going to block your account.

    703 Iron Fist
    5/09/09 11:56:38 am reply quote 0downupreport

    re: #702 Charles

    I’m not sure what I said that was so terrible, but it has always been your blog. I’ll try to do better.


  39. aussie_dave
    39 | May 9, 2009 12:19 pm

    38. Insight

    I’ll try to do better – Iron Fist

    That has to take the prize for “Misnomer handle of the week”


  40. RecklessProcess
    40 | May 9, 2009 12:53 pm

    I think I was banned this morning. I went and asked if it was true that Charles had become an anti-christian and if so why he felt that way. I was very very respectful and offered a thoughtful outline of where I stood. I was instantly attacked by realwest and kilgore trout. They called me names and said I should f-off. I tried to respectfully disagree and tell them I was honestly asking. They then started riffing on making up backgrounds for me proving I was a plant or something. When CJ finally showed up he just deleted all my comments.

    They are a hate filled, bigoted, and completely intolerant group who hold discussion and debate as beneath them. It is hard to believe I ever enjoyed the comment threads there. They treated me very badly. I was stunned.


  41. 41 | May 9, 2009 1:21 pm

    Reckless,

    Killgore I can see doing that, but realwest popping off isn’t in character for him.

    But he is so invested in LGF, he will defend it to his death.

    Very sad, I think.


  42. Escovado
    42 | May 9, 2009 1:24 pm

    #40. RecklessProcess:

    At least you didn’t spend a year or two there before discovering what a waste of time it is.


  43. LanceKates
    43 | May 9, 2009 1:33 pm

    41 Savage

    No. realwest will go off on folks. He once suggested that people who believe in Keeping and bearing Fire arms need psychological help and people in New York who would get guns if allowed are “Nutters”


  44. 44 | May 9, 2009 1:38 pm

    Lance,

    He really believes that?


  45. Insight
    45 | May 9, 2009 1:42 pm

    (Im supposed to be doing something important but Im too pissed off?)
    These dyed in the wool fools actually believe Pamela and Spencer are supposed to thank Charlie. Supposed to come to their senses..WAKE UP YOU CREEPOS…Spencer and Pamela don’t give a damm what you think…FOAD

    10 Charles
    5/09/09 1:19:18 pm reply quote 7downupreport

    re: #1 Summersong

    You did them a favor by exposing the rot. None of us will hold our breath on a thank you from either of them, however.

    Next time they try to sneak away to something like this, I’ll stay quiet until they’re actually there.


  46. LanceKates
    46 | May 9, 2009 2:37 pm

    44 savage

    yup. It was when he was discussing how gun Control with Rudy was a good thing


  47. Escovado
    47 | May 9, 2009 2:37 pm

    Deleted by the author: someone beat me to it in another thread.


  48. 48 | May 9, 2009 4:11 pm

    Sock Blog post linked up at LGF – attacking the banned at LGF2..


  49. 49 | May 9, 2009 5:54 pm

    Rose- I saw my name on that blog! Wow! I’ve made it!

    Defenseman was exposing me for being indecent. He apparently digs indecent exposure.


  50. bluliner10
    50 | May 10, 2009 10:06 pm

    Wow, I made the list? Awesome, just a misspelling…bluliner10 (hockey defenseman # 10) somebody already had blueliner with the e…


  51. 51 | May 12, 2009 6:30 pm

    Now you know the rules about ‘linking’ to a blog you don’t know – why they could be nazi sympathizers or something!!! I’m shocked, I tell ya, that he would link to a blog he doesn’t know. LOL


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David