Charles Johnson attacks FOX in support of Pro-Jihadi/Leftist GE

Charles has once again attacked FOX news. Now he is mad that Jesse Waters who is a GE shareholder. He has a right to ask questions about MSNBC. But the LGF Cult leader doesn’t like this so he attacks.

Fox’s O’Reilly Producer Ambushes GE Shareholder Meeting

MSNBC’s extreme leftward bias is obvious to any honest observer; Keith Olbermann is the poster boy for it, and was the winner of our 2007 Fiskie award.

But with this little stunt, Fox News crossed a whole lot of journalistic lines into behavior that borders on unethical: Drama at GE shareholders meeting.

The hostility between Fox News Channel and MSNBC reached a fever pitch Wednesday when a Fox producer infiltrated the GE shareholders meeting.

Just before GE re-elected board members, company brass were hit with questions from shareholders critical of an alleged leftward political slant at MSNBC.

But one of those questions came from Jesse Waters, a producer on “The O’Reilly Factor” whose criticisms were cut short when his microphone was cut off, according to several attendees. Waters apparently did not publicly identify himself as a Fox employee.

Waters has built a reputation as an ambush interviewer, specializing in on-the-street confrontations. But this is arguably the boldest move by a Fox newsie to utilize the tactic inside their chief rival’s tent, as it were.

Many LGFers support what FOX did, at least initially so Charles responds what the cult should think.

This is sleazy journalism at its worst. Sorry, whether Waters is a shareholder or not, I can’t co-sign on this one.

13 Charles  4/23/09 9:45:29 am

This is sleazy journalism at its worst. Sorry, whether Waters is a shareholder or not, I can’t co-sign on this one.

Charles must approve of things in order to be legit. His Fascism is showing here.

68 Charles  4/23/09 9:56:45 am reply quote

I guarantee that if an MSNBC employee had pulled this kind of stunt at a Fox shareholders’ meeting, nobody on the right would be making excuses for them. Crappy behavior is crappy behavior, and this was simply wrong.

Charles doesn’t like this because he’s scared someone will do this to his cowardly self.

103 Charles  4/23/09 10:04:22 am

re: #94lawhawk

At the point I wrote that, I hadn’t seen evidence he was a legitimate shareholder. Now, there is evidence, in which case he did have every right to ask them.

Fact is that GE has been allowing NBC to run hard left at every opportunity and shareholders have not demanded an accounting. Maybe they don’t mind going for a niche market, but when you’ve got a brand that NBC does, you’d expect it to be more than a niche market.

He may have had a right to ask the questions, but it was simply improper not to identify himself as an employee of a competitor.

Charles is just thing of excuses to bash FOX and defend his Leftists and Islamist friends. I salute lawhak for pointing out Waters did nothing wrong. I read the thread and most of the LGFers support what Waters did. Charles will get his enforcers of Sharmuta, Kilgore Trout and the Albanian Islamists Medaura to enforce the antiFOX attitude of the Lizard King. There will soon be more bannings.

Charles Johnson is clearly in the Leftists camp. He defends GE which supports the Iranian regime and is a propaganda outlet for the Leftist-Islamic Alliance. Wake up Lizards, Charles is a false prophet!

Update: Charles is being hammered be most of the Lizards. His patience is runny very thin. As a Cult Leader one must not dare question him. He already lashes out at a poster!

222 Charles  4/23/09 10:45:28 am reply quote

re: #214 kay1212

The SEC doesn’t have any regulation about private shareholders announcing who they work for when they speak at shareholder meetings or any regulations about who can purchase stock in any publicly held company if they work for any competitor.

There are regulations against foreign ownership and there are regulations requiring disclosure when someone owns more than x% of a company.

There IS an SEC regulation called Reg. FD that stipulates that no information can be given to one group of shareholders or investors or analysts that is not made public to ALL. The FD stands for Fair Disclosure. So nothing secretive can ever be announced in shareholder meetings. The reason they are closed is so that management doesn’t have to answer tough questions.

Excuse me if I tend to doubt what you’re saying about this — you claimed a few days ago that you heard that completely bogus Navy SEAL Somalia rumor directly from a first-hand source. Why should I trust what you say about SEC regulations (without any links to sources) when you’ve shown that you’ll make up stories?

230 Charles4/23/2009 10:53:33 am PDT

re: #225 Orangutan

I ask you to prove your assertion that the SEC has a law regulating such questions at a shareholder meeting.

Why are you putting words in my mouth? I did not make any such assertion. I said I don’t know if the SEC has a regulation like that, and I said it very clearly.

240 Charles  4/23/09 11:03:11 am reply quote

re: #237 LGoPs

No, I respectfully disagree. It is more a matter of engaging in the fight and a fight is what this is. A fight for providing the information that the American people need to make their decisions and judgments.

Bill O’Reilly is promoting Bill O’Reilly with stunts like this. What kind of “information” did anyone get out of it? None.

You’re being played.

Clearly Charles is having a meltdown. How dare his opinions be questioned, this is unethical! Charles you are exposing yourself!

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

129 Responses to “Charles Johnson attacks FOX in support of Pro-Jihadi/Leftist GE”
( jump to bottom )

  1. BuddyG
    1 | April 23, 2009 12:55 pm

    False Prophet and Trojan Horse


  2. Former Lizard by the Bay
    2 | April 23, 2009 12:57 pm

    So, we go from “sleazy journalism at its WORST” to merely “improper” for not recognizing some formality that exists only in Charles’ mind. All in one thread.

    Will Charles ban himself now for his over-the-top rhetoric? Doubt it.


  3. CloudyDay
    3 | April 23, 2009 1:12 pm

    I already discussed my views on FOX cable news channel in post #26 here at LGF 2, so I won’t get into it here in detail.

    So all I’ll say here is that Johnson going after FOX cable news for being right-wing lunatics is a bit off, since FOX is not as “right wing” as many liberals assume it to be.

    I’m not sure I see what the big deal is for a reporter to show up at a GE meeting, not reveal he’s a reporter, and ask a GE guy some questions.

    Considering how the other networks (which are heavily liberal) lie about and drag FOX through the mud as much as they do, this one lone stunt outrages Johnson?

    Didn’t some CNN anchor lady rudely interrupt a Tea Party guy about a week ago during a televised bit, and then chalk up the crowd’s behavior against her rudeness as being a plot by FOX news (or she attributed the entire Tea Party phenomenon to being a FOX cable channel plot)?


  4. WV.Hillbilly
    4 | April 23, 2009 1:12 pm

    I was an occasional poster there and got blocked today for rating the comments on this very post.
    Disagreed with Charles, agreed with the others.

    He might want to think of changing his name to Dick.


  5. BuddyG
    5 | April 23, 2009 1:14 pm

    Sleazy journalism at its WORST

    “Teabaggers also don‘t want earmarks”
    Countdown with Keith Olbermann for Wednesday, April 15


  6. CloudyDay
    6 | April 23, 2009 1:17 pm

    Welcome, WV.Hillbilly.

    You might want to read the comments on this page at Ace of Spades. It’s quite long but eye-opening. But don’t forget to come back here and visit us.


  7. Rodan
    7 | April 23, 2009 1:18 pm

    WV.Hillbilly,
    Welcome, Charles clearly has gone the Fascist route.


  8. Victrola
    8 | April 23, 2009 1:23 pm

    #4 WV Hillbilly
    Yep, thats what got me banned; not a comment, mind you, but merely ‘down dinging’ stories or postings that I didn’t agree with. Thoughtcrime at its finest. Then that tool Hoosier Hoops has the unmitigated gall to assert (over at Ace of Spades) that the only people who get the banstick are those who advocate mass murder of muslims or some such offence. It really is a cult over there at 1.0. And, the Capt. Queeg moniker fits CJ better with each passing day.


  9. Bible Believer
    9 | April 23, 2009 1:26 pm

    Wolksvagen Hillbilly? You probably got banned for having a nazi nick.
    Wolksvagen was the Hitler car.
    “The People’s Car”
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Beetle

    And we all know what Charlene thinks of anything remotely related to national socialism.

    Btw Welcome :)


  10. Bill Jenkins
    10 | April 23, 2009 1:26 pm

    Charles Johnson jumped the shark long ago. It usually takes awhile for people to come to their senses and finally recognize they aren’t getting what they once did from his blog.

    Let’s see now… Charles bashes Fox News, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Ron Paul, Michael Savage, Ann Coulter, other conservative right-leaning to right-wing bloggers (anyone who doesn’t think exactly like Charles), creationists, considers people concerned with the border as “racists and kooks”, etc.

    Almighty Chuckles the Assclown has taken an Uzi and clearly aimed it at his own feet everytime he makes another post with his sh-tty opinion in it.


  11. Rodan
    11 | April 23, 2009 1:26 pm

    Charles has it out for FOX.


  12. Bible Believer
    12 | April 23, 2009 1:29 pm

    #10 Bill Jenkins
    Uzi? You mean a Kalashnikov, the choice of all islamists and socialists.


  13. Former LGF'er
    13 | April 23, 2009 1:33 pm

    but.. but .. but what about sleazy ‘blogulism’?


  14. Victrola
    14 | April 23, 2009 1:35 pm

    #9 Bible Believer
    Charlene. Heh.


  15. BuddyG
    15 | April 23, 2009 1:51 pm

    4. WV.Hillbilly

    So, Charles turned left and went after you today?

    Getting banned by him is a badge of honor. Welcome aboard.


  16. 16 | April 23, 2009 2:00 pm

    BuddyG, that is perfect. Lizardricide.


  17. km
    17 | April 23, 2009 2:04 pm

    BuddyG, dude you must spend hours crawling through pics of lizards to find those gems.

    I just wish I was more organized and would remember to save them and file them away somewhere.


  18. Qob
    18 | April 23, 2009 2:21 pm

    boy I went to that thread. CJ is eiethre gonna blow up big time or have a come to Jesus moment soon. He is being challenged politely but firmly and is loosing footing with every exchange.


  19. 19 | April 23, 2009 2:26 pm

    That Ace thread is gonna be a keeper!

    And check out #490. Classic!


  20. Qob
    20 | April 23, 2009 2:30 pm

    317 Charles 4/23/09 2:28:18 pm reply quote

    * 0
    * down
    * up
    * report

    re: #312 Orangutan

    Since you are espousing the positive, (although you try to skirt it), maybe you could back up your supposition or hope.

    Complete bullshit. You wrote:

    I ask you to prove your assertion that the SEC has a law regulating such questions at a shareholder meeting.

    I made no such assertion.
    318 Charles 4/23/09 2:28:45 pm reply quote

    * 0
    * down
    * up
    * report

    I smell another meltdown approaching.


  21. Speranza
    21 | April 23, 2009 2:31 pm

    #4 WV Hillbilly and #8 Victrola
    Crybaby and ass kisser Zombie complained about WV Hillbilly so Charles gave him the boot at the suggestion of his faithful satrap. The relationship between Charles Johnson and people like zombie, Sharmuta, Killgore Trout, Mandy Manners, and Medaura is similar to the one between Germany and Vichy France in World War II.


  22. Rodan
    22 | April 23, 2009 2:33 pm

    They are forming a Blacklist!

    288 Honorary Yooper
    4/23/09 1:50:37 pm reply quote 0downupreport

    re: #274 Irish Rose

    Post them here, for everyone who visits LGF to see.
    No quarter.

    Fair enough.

    Let me start…

    Savage Nation
    Avid Editor
    Kirly (also known as The Sneaker)
    Rayra
    Gordon (aka the Nodrog)
    Rodan


  23. Qob
    23 | April 23, 2009 2:36 pm

    I want to be listed!


  24. Speranza
    24 | April 23, 2009 2:36 pm

    Charles Johnson is now a regular poster on his blog threads, just looking for people who deviate from the party line so he can ban them. In another time in another country and under another dictator they would have been sent to the Gulag or to the basement of the Lubyanka prison in Moscow for a rendezvous with a bullet to the back of the head. I used to think that Pam Geller was a bit high strung and hyperventilated but I am coming to the conclusion that despite her shoot from the hip rhetoric she had him pegged correctly.


  25. In Exile
    25 | April 23, 2009 2:57 pm

    WV Hillbilly… I got here exactly the same way, just a few days earlier.

    Here’s a quote from the comments:

    “re: #303 Stratergic Thinking

    Charles is really off base on this one.

    Of course saying so he’ll likely throw a fit and ban me.”

    Charles:
    “A lot of people have differed with my viewpoint on this thread.

    People get banned for being jerks, and daring me to ban them. Not for expressing different opinions.”

    He really is a liar, no?


  26. 26 | April 23, 2009 2:59 pm

    Rodan, why are you being such a meenie to Chuckles? He is such a great man, nay, a GOD to all the world and the firmanent above, and all the fish that swim in slimy seas.

    /Irish Rose


  27. km
    27 | April 23, 2009 3:00 pm

    Savage,

    I agree that thread on AoS is superb. The flaying is so merciless I even started to feel sorry for Chuck.

    Then I remembered what a cunt he is.


  28. CloudyDay
    28 | April 23, 2009 3:02 pm

    #19 Savage

    It is pretty much, ‘tho starting around post #699 or so (esp. around #711) folks began debating about whether certain political parties in Europe are racist or not, how to define American classical liberalism, and other topics that bore me.

    Post 702 is funny.

    Just saw this referenced at AoS; it’s a post on LGF 1 LGF post

    [#388 by Charles Johnson, in a thread called "The Ron Paul Tea Party/Fox News Nightmare" at LGF 1

    in response to a post by a guy calling himself "Jack Bauer's Evil Brother"]
    ——-
    re: #387 Jack Bauer’s Evil Brother [wrote]

    I am willing to admit when I am wrong, and I certainly jumped the gun when I said last night that Afrocity used the n-word to refer to herself in a post at AOS which HoosierHoops cut and pasted here. We don’t know that, and it may have been a sockpuppet using Afrocity’s name. HoosierHoops was provoking us over at AOS last night and I allowed myself to be provoked, and I have to take responsibility for that. I apologize to Afrocity, Charles and everyone else here. I will now post an apology over at AOS.

    [Charles replied:]

    It looks to me like nobody needed any “provoking” in that thread. There are thousands of ugly, hateful comments directed at me, including people wishing for me to die.

    If that’s the kind of site you feel comfortable at, I’m going to make it easier for you to spend more time there by taking away your LGF account.

    No need to thank me.

    I’ve read the entire AoS thread, and I saw maybe only one or two people jokingly announce their wishes that Johnson get physically injured or die, but that’s it.

    I don’t feel comfortable when people start making threats against other people, even if they do it to be funny, but…

    There is not a constant issuance or refrain of death threats against Johnson at ‘Ace of Spades.’

    Most folks in the AoS thread (see my post above here, #6, for link to the AoS thread) are simply telling the truth about Johnson’s behavior at LGF – that he’s become a thin-skinned, petty tyrant who permits little to no dissent at LGF.

    That “Jack Bauer’s Evil Brother” fella was trying to be classy, by issuing an apology at both sites, and to keep things above board and accurate, and Johnson thanks him by banning him.


  29. Bill Jenkins
    29 | April 23, 2009 3:10 pm

    I don’t wish for Charles to die. I just hope he rides his bike into a rail arm and flops off his bike to where his legs are laying across the rails as the train passes.

    Oh wait. Then instead of being on the internet 23 hours a day, that would make it a full 24.

    I take that comment back.


  30. imtoast
    30 | April 23, 2009 3:12 pm

    #27 km

    Not me. I read the Waters thread at LGF. Something spooky is happening to CJ, a sickness that can’t be cured. I’m saving the Civil War thread from AoS. It is absolutely truthful and funny too.


  31. 31 | April 23, 2009 3:13 pm

    Now Bill, that’s not a particularly christian thing to think. You’d better go pray augustine’s prayer. ;)


  32. 32 | April 23, 2009 3:13 pm

    imtoast,

    I just made a post of the Ace thread.


  33. imtoast
    33 | April 23, 2009 3:14 pm

    “It looks to me like nobody needed any “provoking” in that thread. There are thousands of ugly, hateful comments directed at me, including people wishing for me to die.”

    When did the truth become “hateful?”

    I don’t remember any threats to his life, so if there were I assumed that who ever said it was joking. Just like CJ when he says you can disagree with him and not be banned.


  34. imtoast
    34 | April 23, 2009 3:18 pm

    Savage

    I saw your post, that’s why I came over here.


  35. 35 | April 23, 2009 3:22 pm

    Thanks, imtoast.

    Really.


  36. imtoast
    36 | April 23, 2009 3:29 pm

    In the open thread Irish Rose is asking for the names of all the banned. She wants the ones who assaulted CJ. There really won’t be many of those as most of us got our gold badges for dinging someone up with whom we agreed and CJ didn’t.


  37. imtoast
    37 | April 23, 2009 3:31 pm

    This is way more fun than reading LGF thoroughly.


  38. 38 | April 23, 2009 3:31 pm

    That lackey IR can put me on her fucking list 3 times.

    I wanna feel special! haha


  39. BuddyG
    39 | April 23, 2009 3:33 pm

    17. km

    I do enjoy finding those various lizard pics. More fun than porn.


  40. Former Lizard by the Bay
    40 | April 23, 2009 3:39 pm

    28. Cloudy Day

    Simply participating in other blogs Charles doesn’t like is absolutely a banning offense at 1.0. Just ask half the people at GCP. Simply mentioning that someone Charles doesn’t like is a friend of yours will get you labeled an extremist, Nazi, kook, or whatever else your “friend” is accused of being.

    CJ is a scrotal lesion.


  41. 41 | April 23, 2009 3:41 pm

    I should mention that I got banned because I took issue with his attacks against Pam Gellar on Atlas Shrugs over Vlaam Begaans (sp) and Filip DeWinter way back when.

    He also didn’t like the fact that I admired and worked for Rabbi Meir Kahane, Zt”l


  42. 42 | April 23, 2009 3:44 pm

    I guess Kahane was a closet Nazi, according to the Chaz.

    Wow, how was the Rabbi as a person? I always wanted to meet him.


  43. 43 | April 23, 2009 5:39 pm

    22 – lookit that! i got an “Honorary” mention! from a “Catholic” who doesn’t believe his own scriptures!

    25 said “He really is a liar, no”
    yes, indeed. lies, lies, all lies.


  44. CloudyDay
    44 | April 23, 2009 6:41 pm

    Bill O’Reilly had a segment on his show tonight about this Waters journalist guy going to the GE meeting, but I missed it.


  45. Speranza
    45 | April 23, 2009 7:22 pm

    Long time LGF poster ‘Nam Grunt has been banned by the Almighty One. His punishment wsa because he posts on AoSHQ under the same nic.


  46. 46 | April 23, 2009 8:03 pm

    See, I told you AoSHQ was where all the cool right-wingers are hanging out.


  47. Sky King
    47 | April 23, 2009 9:10 pm

    Irish Rose, don’t forget to add my name to the honor roll.

    I was banned for down-dinging a comment on a “Creationist bashing” thread. And, according to a comment by Charles under his own unique color, because my IP was from Olympia, Washington. Yes, it’s true. We recently moved to Olympia, Washington where my wife and I are dedicated to helping vulnerable people at a hospital and from a non-profit health care organization. We also attend a Christian church with our family – even our grand son. Truly, I was fit to be banned.

    I am proud to have my nic name on the list, Irish Rose. And I am happy to be here and at the AOSHQ – among the “banned.”

    On a serious note, I believe Charles Johnson has a real mental health problem and I hope he gets professional help. I am sincere in this. I suspect, however, that as long as he has minions to prop him up, he will not seek out such help. He is building up a wall around him and he will require a constant supply of “hatchlings” to replace the “banned.” A funny and also a sad spectacle.


  48. LanceKates
    48 | April 23, 2009 9:20 pm

    why am I not on that list? Come on and try to Silence Me …


  49. Qob
    49 | April 23, 2009 9:20 pm

    I went to her blog and asked to be added to the list, we’ll see what happens.


  50. CowardKerry
    50 | April 24, 2009 6:54 am

    Charles AKA Jim Jones is losing it. A pure nut.


  51. Lawrence
    51 | April 24, 2009 8:28 am

    Poor pitiful pathetic Billo has no way out. Amanda Terkel is a sadist and has been unmercifully turning the screws on the vice that contain little Billy’s nutz.
    I am retiring on Tuesday and am going to stock up on soda and cheese pops. This is going to be so much fun to watch.
    My two cents: I think Billo is enjoying this way too much, he has got to be a bottom.

    Lawrence


  52. 52 | April 24, 2009 8:40 am

    I’ve been a registered LGF member since early 2002, was one of Johnson’s earliest advertisers, posted thousands of comments on LGF, and Charles has even posted things I’ve written on his main page.

    It seems, however, that I’m no longer welcome there because I politely expressed the fact that CJ is not the final arbiter of what is ethical.

    I happen to agree with him about racists in the Euro right-wing, but he’s jumped the shark. Now that he’s turning on long time lizards for simply disagreeing with him, it’s just sad.

    I send CJ a note saying that as someone who financially supported LGF common decency demands that he explain why he banned me. I won’t hold my breath.

    I’m so glad I have friends who call me out when I’m full of myself. Charles seems to be intent on pushing away a lot of folks who have affection for him and LGF.

    It’s pitiful.


  53. Lawrence
    53 | April 24, 2009 8:47 am

    Rodan:

    I finished my project and have all the time in the world to debate. Want to discuss the Bill O”Reilly melt-down?


  54. Beagle
    54 | April 24, 2009 9:11 am

    Chuckles is an idiot. Asking questions at a venue FOR asking questions is never improper. He’s falling in love with the nonperson designation, where certain people can be arbitrarily silenced and 1+1=2, or maybe 3, when he says it is.


  55. The Osprey
    55 | April 24, 2009 9:17 am

    Nonperson? LGF is becoming Big Lizard’s Digital Oceania.

    We’ve always been at war with Eastasia!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_C992KPzKs

    See the lizards fury against the enemies of the Party!

    And Robert Spencer is Goldstein.


  56. WrathofG-d
    56 | April 24, 2009 9:20 am

    41. Underzog

    Welcome to The Blogmocracy.

    Here, although we as a policy neither support or reject Kahane, we are all for reading his work, and making up our own dang minds.

    See, unlike other people, some of us here have actually read many of his books, articles, teachings, etc., and thus have formed our own opinions of him and therefore don’t solely rely on rumor and others’ opinions.

    Just two other aspects that differentiate us from the old country, I guess.


  57. Lawrence
    57 | April 24, 2009 9:24 am

    Rodan, I don’t think O’Reilly has got a way out of this sticky mess. Can you think of any scenario with an ending other that has Bill looking like an insane bully?
    Amanda has got to play this carefully so that she doesn’t get covered in $hit. The next week is going to be exciting, I’m looking forward to watching how Amanda and Bill fight this epic battle.


  58. Lawrence
    58 | April 24, 2009 9:30 am

    Rodan:

    The reason you lost so easily is because the whole thing was rigged from the start….you have been had!
    Keith Olbermann is the diabolical mad genius behind this adventure.
    I am no longer playing any part in this ticking bomb of a story, so if you want to debate, I have all the time in the world.


  59. CloudyDay
    59 | April 24, 2009 11:55 am

    Ronnie Schreiber, #52

    Welcome.

    And I just posted the other day that Johnson has no loyalty for anyone at his blog.

    Other long time members who used to regularly donate funds to LGF 1’s “tip jar” were also banned.

    I never donated money to him myself, mostly because I don’t have any to spare.

    I’m glad that he didn’t get any of my money.


  60. 60 | April 24, 2009 12:03 pm

    Lawrence AKA Joe Cantwell,
    What the hell you are talking about? Care to discuss the topics here?


  61. Lawrence
    61 | April 24, 2009 12:49 pm

    Rodan, I am being on topic, quit being myopic and please zoom back a little. Things have become a wee bit silly at Fox as of late and there may be a direct connection to Bill O’Reilly’s unfortunate predicament.
    KO handed Amanada Terkel Bill nutz in a vice. O’Reilly is a laughing stock to everyone who knows the ugly truth, Billo was pwned by a carefully written hack job on the thread attached to that infamous thread……tbc

    Are you following so far and can you see the connection? If you have any questions, I am a man with all the TIME in the world.

    Lawrence


  62. Lawrence
    62 | April 24, 2009 1:16 pm

    Rodan:

    I may or may not have given Mr. Charles Johnson a set of Bill’s Waterloo Blog when I faxed him copies of the Santorum blog from the end of February.
    Now do you get the picture? We’re dealing of the inter-connectivity of everything.

    Any questions?


  63. Lawrence
    63 | April 24, 2009 1:59 pm

    I know for a FACT that Mike Stark is soon to have his hands on a copy of Bill’s dirty little secret.


  64. Speranza
    64 | April 24, 2009 7:21 pm

    63. Lawrence
    You got an O’Reilly obsession?


  65. Lawrence
    65 | April 24, 2009 7:38 pm

    Speranza:

    Actually, Bill O’Reilly was the subject of a project I spent a couple years working with as a contributor.
    I am now retired and am enjoying watching the end of O’Reilly as a credible newscaster. I have the feeling that this site is going to be ground zero.
    Bill has a dirty little secret that cannot be revealed or his days at Fox News are over.

    Lawrence


  66. Lawrence
    66 | April 24, 2009 7:52 pm

    Speranza:

    This is were things become bat$shit crazy. I have copies of the redacted posts and it appears Rodam may have inadvertently(?) set up Billo on a blog at Think Progress.
    It doesn’t pass the smell test and I am going to hang around waiting for the truth to come out.

    Lawrence


  67. CloudyDay
    67 | April 24, 2009 8:46 pm

    Uh… what is the deal with all the posts about Bill O’Reilly?

    Can you just come right out and tell us what the heck you’re talking about?

    O’Reilly was already kind of in trouble a few years ago, what with some lady on his staff who claimed he sexually harassed her (her claims are on the smokinggun.com site and involve discussion of a loofah. Or falafel. Or something.)


  68. no2liberals
    68 | April 24, 2009 9:07 pm

    Cloudy Day,
    I was vaguely curious about the conversation he was having with himself about O’Reilly, as well.
    I gather this person is not an O’Reilly fan, and has a boner for Rodan, but I could be wrong.


  69. CloudyDay
    69 | April 24, 2009 9:22 pm

    #68 n2l

    That was I got from his posts as well, but it’s hard to tell, they’re so vague.

    I watch O’Reilly’s TV show almost every night – I don’t agree with all of O’Reilly’s views on everything, but it’s an interesting show.

    Anyway, I wish this Lawrence guy would just tell us out-right what he’s talking about.


  70. no2liberals
    70 | April 24, 2009 9:29 pm

    #69 CloudyDay,
    Unlike you, I seldom watch his show.
    If I do watch, I usually start flipping channels when two or three people start trying to over talk the others.
    I know he scares the pants off of liberals, though, as his ratings are consistently the highest in his time slot.
    I think this person was being intentionally provocative toward Rodan, and purposefully vague.
    Or, he is a producer for O’Reilly’s show, and was pimping for even more viewers. :roll:


  71. Lawrence
    71 | April 24, 2009 10:03 pm

    Rodan:
    I am not surprised you are avoiding talking to me about the reality based universe.
    If you are afraid to talk here, you can always use Toaster-heads old place. The story is going to break soon, there is a mole amoungst the participants.

    Lawrence


  72. Tex Taylor
    72 | April 25, 2009 1:05 am

    You want to know how I know deep in his heart of hearts Charles knows he is becoming irrelevant and unimportant? That he blew his opportunity to be something of importance instead of the butt of jokes?

    For you long time LGF posters from days gone by, think back at how often Charles would be seen with his own posts attached to a thread? Almost never.

    The fact that he now is an integral part of each thread tells me that he isn’t near as busy as he used to be.


  73. Lawrence
    73 | April 25, 2009 7:03 am

    69. CloudyDay on 24 April, 2009 at 9:22 pm

    Anyway, I wish this Lawrence guy would just tell us out-right what he’s talking about.

    ——————————————————-
    I will tell you everything after I have had a chance to clarify a few minor details with Rodan. He knows more about this sticky situation than probably anyone else who was involved.
    I don’t want to accuse Rodam of working for both sides, until after he has had ample opportunity to tell his version of reality.


  74. Lawrence
    74 | April 25, 2009 10:08 am

    Rodam:

    I need about an hour of your time to clarify a few minor inconsistencies.
    If you keep hiding from me it’s going to reinforce the theory that you are Charles Johnson’s mole at TP.
    I am leaning more to the theory that you are being made the patsy and this rumor is merely BS from the TP bloggers.
    All I am doing is making sure I have the real back story ready by the time Keith Olbermann reveals the hidden comments from the O’Reilly blog written by Ms. Terkel.
    BTW Rodam, I haven’t posted at Think Progress for over a month because I don’t want to be tainted when the $hit hit’s the fan.


  75. Bob in Breckenridge
    75 | April 25, 2009 10:08 pm

    Lawrence, I’ve come to the conclusion you’re full of shit. You have more obfuscations and do more ducking and diving to avoid all this O’Reilly stuff that you claim to know as “fact”.

    Do us all a favor, and STFU, you imbecile!!!


  76. Lawrence
    76 | April 26, 2009 7:58 am

    75. Bob in Breckenridge on 25 April, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    Lawrence, I’ve come to the conclusion you’re full of shit.

    ————————————————————
    Rodam knows all the gory details……ask him why he and his fellow trolls were too afraid to post even one single comment on the Bill O’Reilly/Amanada Terkel thread during the 7 days the flaming comments towards O’Reilly stayed up.
    I smell a rat!


  77. Lawrence
    77 | April 26, 2009 9:01 am

    75. Bob in Breckenridge on 25 April, 2009 at 10:08 pm

    Bob, here is an example of one of the flaming comments towards Bill O’Reilly. Rodam and his posse were afraid to comment on that thread and I am calling him out for shenanigans.

    …Rodan fixed the fight by taking a dive.
    ——————————————————————-

    159. Trajan75 IQ Says:

    Hi Billo
    .
    .
    .
    .
    I
    am
    your
    worst
    nightmare
    a person that
    can’t be blackmailed
    and who lives beyond the reach
    of those lovable stalking producers
    that the Antichrist employs at his pretend news-network
    March 4th, 2009 at 8:29 pm Add Karma Recommend (0) | Report Abuse

    ————————————————————————–

    160. Trajan75 IQ Says:

    Bill
    when you are
    ready to act
    like an adult
    grow a couple balls
    drop in sometime
    and we can debate
    the issues of your
    ….choice
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    NO SHOUTING!!!!!
    .
    .
    .
    .
    no bull$hit talking points
    .
    .
    .
    .
    just me and you
    .
    .
    .
    I
    will
    clean
    your clock
    but it matter
    anyhow because you’re a little pussy
    and you have to have everything your way
    March 4th, 2009 at 9:00 pm Add Karma Recommend (0) | Report Abuse


  78. 78 | April 26, 2009 9:35 am

    Lawrence,
    You really are a weirdo. Nobody knows what the hell you are talking about. Can you comment on any topics here? This isn’t Think Progress so this must be above your reasoning level.


  79. 79 | April 26, 2009 9:40 am

    Everyone,
    Lawrence is a poster from Think Progress. This guy makes no sense. What the hell is he talking about?


  80. Lawrence
    80 | April 26, 2009 10:00 am

    Rodam:

    1) I have never written under the name Jo Cantwell. I do know that Jo Cantwell is a female blogger

    2) I have not posted even a single time at Think Progress is almost 2 months

    3) All I am asking Rodam is to answer a simple question, why didn’t you or any member of your posse attempt to post a message on the O’Reilly/Terkel blog?

    4) that thread was fake and it appears that Rodam had something to do with O’Reilly being flammed unopposed for nearly a week.


  81. Lawrence
    81 | April 26, 2009 10:02 am

    Rev. Wright hit the nail on the head:

    The Chickens have come home to roost


  82. 82 | April 26, 2009 10:13 am

    Lawrence,
    I don’t post at Think Progress so I have no idea what you are talking about. You really are a loon. Now, can you as a progressive explain why your side supports Islam?


  83. Lawrence
    83 | April 26, 2009 10:43 am

    Rodam:

    I assumed you were paying attention and had the ability to follow current events.

    This is very very very very relevent to this thread.

    We both know the real reason that Jesse was sent to the GE Shareholder’s Meeting, you have to go back to the events of April 18 2009.

    You have that date blocke out of your mind and that is the real reason you didn’t post on the infamous Amanda Terkel blog of march 1 2009.
    Rodam, you are between a rock and a hard place. I have everything backed up with proper documentation.
    You are afraid to discuss this very relevent issue because you have something ugly to hide.
    I accusse you in front of everyone here of being a coward and the person most responsible for the disaster case that remains of Poor Old Bill O’Reilly.


  84. 84 | April 26, 2009 11:20 am

    Lawrence,
    Again what are you talking about. Seriously you are a loon.

    Everyone,
    It’s people like Lawrence/Joe Cantwell that post at Think Progress. They live in delusions.


  85. 85 | April 26, 2009 11:21 am

    Larry,
    “I accusse you in front of everyone here of being a coward and the person most responsible for the disaster case that remains of Poor Old Bill O’Reilly.”

    Again what are you talking about? You really live in a fantasy world.


  86. Lawrence
    86 | April 26, 2009 11:22 am

    Rodan:
    Don’t play games with me, everything I claim is backed up with solid eveidence in the fact based universe. Quit living an internet fantasy.
    You are in denial and that is not healthy. I can prove everything and you are too cowardly to discuss real things in the real world.


  87. Lawrence
    87 | April 26, 2009 11:31 am

    Rodam:

    Do you remember these comments?

    Do you think these may partly explain Mr O’Reilly’s unusual behaviour as of late?

    =======================================================

    150. Trajan75 IQ Says:

    B
    I
    L
    L
    .
    O
    R
    E
    I
    LIAR
    LIAR
    Y
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    W
    O
    R
    S
    T
    .
    .
    .
    .
    P
    E
    R
    S
    O
    N
    .
    I
    N
    .
    T
    H
    E
    .
    W
    O
    R
    L
    D
    !
    March 4th, 2009 at 9:05 am Add Karma Recommend (1) | Report Abuse
    ———————————————————
    151. Trajan75 IQ Says:

    BILLO

    you have been pwned by TROLL BUSTER

    B
    R
    O
    U
    G
    H
    T
    .
    t
    o
    .
    Y
    O
    U
    .
    b
    y

    KEITH OLBERMANN
    March 4th, 2009 at 9:10 am Add Karma Recommend (1) | Report Abuse


  88. no2liberals
    88 | April 26, 2009 11:36 am

    Rodan, any claims by this nut job, and obvious attention seeker, are irrelevant.
    That he keeps misspelling your name tells me he is being disrespectful, or has mistaken identity.


  89. Lawrence
    89 | April 26, 2009 11:39 am

    I am willing to back up everything with facts.
    Rodam is responsible for the posts at TP trashing Bill O’Reilly.


  90. Lawrence
    90 | April 26, 2009 11:40 am

    I am asking Rodam why he posted those comments at TP?


  91. no2liberals
    91 | April 26, 2009 11:42 am

    Try spelling his name correctly, dingus.


  92. Lawrence
    92 | April 26, 2009 11:52 am

    It is not his real name and the spelling is not relevent to this thread.
    Rodan refuses to admit that he is responsible for Bill O’Reilly’s dilema. I guess he realises that he is now on Bill O’Reilly’s $hit list. His days as a blogger are over and he needs to DEAL WITH IT.
    I have dumped everything at TPM Muckrackers and have walked away.


  93. Lawrence
    93 | April 26, 2009 12:54 pm

    Maybe Bill O’Reilly should send producer Jesse Waters to ask RODAN aka TRAJAN 75 why he posted that crap on the O’Reilly/Terkel thread.

    An even better question is ask him why he didn’t post anything to defend Bill O’Reilly.

    But the best question has got to be why is he covering up for Keith Olbermann?

    Is it Stockholm Syndrome?


  94. Lawrence
    94 | April 26, 2009 12:55 pm

    Rodan KNOWS that thread was faked by Think Progress.


  95. bar
    95 | April 26, 2009 1:00 pm

    Lawrence

    As someone who doesn’t have a f**king clue what the hell you are talking about.

    You are insane.


  96. Lawrence
    96 | April 26, 2009 1:02 pm

    Rodan is in deep $hit.

    He knows it

    I know it

    Bill O’Reilly paid a big price to know it.


  97. 97 | April 26, 2009 1:19 pm

    Lawrence,

    You are on the edge of getting the boot. Now come up with something concrete here or face the music.

    I’m only gonna say this once. Thank you for listening.


  98. Lawrence
    98 | April 26, 2009 1:31 pm

    Savage:
    I am more than happy to answer questions and provide facts.

    What I am blogging about is very relevent to this thread. I have been prudent not to make any statements that I can’t back up with iron clad facts.

    Lawrence


  99. 99 | April 26, 2009 1:34 pm

    Lawrence,

    Fair enough. Any links you could send us?


  100. Lawrence
    100 | April 26, 2009 1:52 pm

    Savage:

    This is a very elaborate story and there are literaly thousands of strong links.
    Do you know about the rigged O’Reilly thread at think progess? I suggest that you ask Rodan for the background 411
    There were several dozen comments made by a MERC sent by Keith Olbermann that brutally flamed Bill O’Reilly.

    it stinks to high heaven


  101. Lawrence
    101 | April 26, 2009 4:14 pm

    Savage: Thanks and I will try to make this brief and as painless as possible.

    Here is the back story….O’Reilly got pwned by Olbermann but Keith cheated, got caught and now he has to sit on this story because, to report it honestly would be the end of his dream of being the reincarnation of Egbert Roscoe Murrow.


  102. Lawrence
    102 | April 26, 2009 5:37 pm

    O’Reilly can’t run with this story and make a jacka$$ out of Olbermann because Rodan isn’t willing to honestly answer one simple question.

    What gives?


  103. Lawrence
    103 | April 27, 2009 7:29 am

    Keith Olbermann must be an eunuch because he doesn’t have the balls to report the truth regarding this news event.
    I can’t believe it and am going to call out Keith for being the cowardly lion. Hey big guy, your manhood is now being called into question.


  104. 104 | April 27, 2009 7:34 am

    I don’t know about you all, but I still don’t see any links to back up this big bad conspiracy in which Bill O’Reilly is an evil evil man and poor Keith Olbermann is just a victim.

    And somehow it is all Rodan’s fault?

    need to lay off the ‘medically prescribed’ pot, Lawrence.


  105. 105 | April 27, 2009 7:55 am

    Lawrence,
    What are you talking about? I think you are deranged. Seriously you make no sense. Then agsin you are a Think Progress poster. You make up stories on O’Reilly, Olbermann and some somments I supposedly made. You are nuts!


  106. Lawrence
    106 | April 27, 2009 8:14 am

    Rodan:

    I have not posted at Think Progress in almost 2 months and it’s been weeks since I last even visited.
    I am accusing Think Progress of faking certain threads and I have proof to document my accusation.


  107. 107 | April 27, 2009 8:29 am

    Lawrence,
    Please present your proof. Anything to expose Think Progress.
    What made you turn on them.


  108. Lawrence
    108 | April 28, 2009 9:18 am

    Rodan:

    I have successfully completed the mission, retired and am now merely a very interested & biased observer. Hang on J, things are about to become very very very improbable.

    Good Luck and thanks for all the fish.


  109. 109 | April 28, 2009 9:35 am

    Lawrence,

    Col. Mustard, in the library, with the candlestick.

    ?


  110. 110 | April 28, 2009 9:56 am

    Lawrence,
    Can you tell us what you arte talking about? You make no sense?


  111. Lawrence
    111 | April 29, 2009 12:25 pm

    Rodan:

    You invited me here to debate, I waited for a thread were my question would be relevant. You chose not to debate and I am giving up. It’s obvious you cannot debate this issue here on the site. Would it be better for you to do this debate at a different venue?

    My accusation against Think Progress is that they ARE name-jacking. You’ve seen that silly game they play, it happens all the time.
    Pay attention Rodan, I will make this clear enough for a child to understand.

    THINGS THAT ARE FACTS

    1) Think Progress NAME-JACKS

    2) They rigged the infamous O’Reilly/Terkel thread….the one that contains all the hate comments at O’Reilly.

    3) Amanda Terkel has Bill O’Reilly’s nutz in a vise

    4) K.O. was the one that set it all up and he can’t run with the ball because they cheated.

    Rodan, I am pissed at TP because they were too elitist to meet me in the real world in person.


  112. Lawrence
    112 | April 30, 2009 11:30 am

    Why are you running away from reality James? It’s official, you have been selected by all involved parties to be OUR official Patsy.
    Since you’re an editor at Eric Odom’s Think Progress Watch, you must be aware that they were mocking you on one of the late night threads at TP.
    Toasterhead had the sharpest knife, if you haven’t read it, it is a must see.
    It’s obvious now that TP didn’t intentionally rig the O’Reilly/Terkel disaster.
    We do know that you chose not to post a defence of O’Reilly but chose to ignore that the comment thread for 7 days.
    Why didn’t you post?
    You are out on a limb and Eric Odom is sawing off the branch….

    You are the fall guy and the starting gate is rolling and the bets have been placed


  113. 113 | April 30, 2009 11:49 am

    serously, Lawrence. Do you have a point? Or are you just here to cause trouble?

    I’ve seen one-trick ponies before, and so far they still have accomplished more.


  114. 114 | April 30, 2009 11:50 am

    Lawrence,
    You are talking compklete utter nonsense. When I asked you to debate, I’m asking you to debate the Left’s support of Islam. Instead you come here with some fantasy about a thread.

    Can you please discuss something normal.


  115. Lawrence
    115 | April 30, 2009 1:55 pm

    Trajan, Rodan, Jay, James, Jeff or whoever you are pretending to be today……the man of a thousand names…. we all know who you are, don’t pretend you don’t know me.

    For almost a week I have been waiting for you to answer one question and still no answer.

    WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO HIDE that makes it impossible for YOU to answer my ONE simple question?

    I assume you understand plain English.

    I will lay 100 to 1 that Trajan gets the knife in the back by his own side.

    THIS ONE IS ETCHED IN STONE


  116. 116 | April 30, 2009 2:05 pm

    Lawrence,
    I really don’t know what you are talking about.
    I can’t answer what I don’t know. Why don’t you come here and participate in other threads?


  117. 117 | April 30, 2009 2:08 pm

    Wow, seems we have a live one here.

    Have fun with it gents.


  118. Lawrence
    118 | April 30, 2009 2:19 pm

    WHY IS BILL O’REILLY AFRAID OF LITTLE OLD LAWRENCE?

    I HAVE CHALLENGED HIM TO DEBATE
    but he ran away like a cowardly lion.

    Why did O’Reilly instead start a personal war with Ammanda Terkel?

    He got cocky when Amanda finally decided to redact my comments and chose to go on the offense.

    He sent a stalker producer even though he was warned about using that tactic was futile.

    And now Bill O’Reilly is playing the fool, thanks to Rodan aka Jay aka Trajan75.

    Rodam, you believe in fair speech don’t you. You sure seem to believe in free speech when you spam the threads at Think Progress.

    THAT IS A PROVEN FACT!

    You are going to have to ban me Rodan, if you want to stop me from trying to enter facts from reality to this strange little blog.

    I came here and played fair and you have run away from me little a little child.
    Everyone knows you are one of the trolls at THINK PROGRESS…it is a proven fact.


  119. 119 | April 30, 2009 2:22 pm

    Lawrence,
    Bill O’Reilly doesn’t even know who you or I are. I still DON’T know what you are talking about. I will not ban you but you really need mental assistance. Can you please comment on the subjects on thread. Seriously you make no sense.


  120. 120 | April 30, 2009 2:23 pm

    Lawrence,
    If you keep up this nonsense the other Admisn will ban you! Can you make sense!


  121. 121 | April 30, 2009 2:31 pm

    Rodan,

    Why does this person believe you can speak for Bill O?

    I am confused.

    I agree though. If this person could actually work within reality and maybe comment on the subject of the threads that would be great.


  122. 122 | April 30, 2009 2:34 pm

    WrathofG-d,
    He’s an example of people that post at Think Progress. They really believ they are leading some movement for Global Revolution.


  123. Lawrence
    123 | April 30, 2009 2:36 pm

    Trajan/Rodam

    I have been on topic,
    go back earlier in this thread.
    I am playing by the rules,
    Cuz I am not a troll.

    You are jealous of me
    because I pulled off the prank
    I told you about at the
    first Think Progess Watch.
    I see you have that one poorly hidden.
    You posted a lot of hate
    and threats back then.

    I see you have it hidden under the name Trajans Blog.

    Think Progress wants me to get banned here so we can make it a free speech issue. I bet they would release my redacted posts in a second

    THE CHICKENS HAVE COME HOME TO ROOST!

    checkmate


  124. 124 | April 30, 2009 2:38 pm

    123 Lawrence

    I personally invited you to the most recent open thread.

    Welcome to The Blogmocracy!


  125. 125 | April 30, 2009 2:39 pm

    Lawrence,
    I have looked at your posts. They make no sense. You really are crazy.


  126. Lawrence
    126 | April 30, 2009 2:45 pm

    Rodan:

    Do you deny that you are the blogger Trajan75?


  127. Lawrence
    127 | April 30, 2009 2:46 pm

    Rodan:

    Are you denying that you blogged at Think Progress under the name Jay?


  128. 128 | April 30, 2009 3:13 pm

    Lawrence,

    Time for you to leave. I just blocked you. Since you can’t seem to bring something worthwhile to the discussion, your time has come and gone.

    Sorry about that.

    I have spoken.


  129. 129 | April 30, 2009 3:14 pm

    AoS is covering the Blog Wars? They’re stealing my thunder! I’ve actually never been there, to be honest.

    Did Irish Rose, of all people get banned?!?!? WHAAAAT? Now that’s just really screwy. Charles isn’t so much a fascist, just a man desperately afraid of being an itty bitty fish in a very big pond. Once he started getting outnumbered he started to cull his lovely little koi fish and add new ones until his little tank was sufficient for him.

    Pamela is still nuts. People don’t call her “The Shrieking Harpy” for no reason. She just got one thing that people here like. I should say she got one thing right that people here like. She has plenty of other,,um, attributes for others here to like. We may not be pals anymore, but I’m not denying that she is really, really attractive.


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David