O’s Foreign Failures

AMERICA’S enemies smell blood and it’s type “O.”

All new administrations stumble a bit as they seek their footing. But President Obama’s foreign-policy botches have set new records for instant incompetence.

Contrary to left-wing myths, I wasn’t a fan of the Bush administration. (I called for Donald Rumsfeld to get the boot in mid-2001.) But fair’s fair. Despite his many faults, Bush sought to do good. Obama just wants to look good.

Vice President Dick Cheney was arrogant. Vice President Joe Biden is arrogant and stupid. Take your pick.

Don’t worry about the new administration’s ideology. Worry about its terrifying naivete.

Consider a sampling of the goofs O and his crew have made in just two months:

China: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (you know that gal married to the Saudi hireling) crawled to Beijing to tell the party bosses that human rights don’t matter. Our “relationship” is more important than freedom and human dignity.

Beijing’s response? A staged military confrontation with an unarmed US Navy vessel; continued screw-America currency cheating; a renewed crackdown on dissidents and, yesterday, a call for a new global currency to replace the dollar.

Thanks, Hill. You’re a sweetheart.

Pakistan: With viral corruption throughout and Islamist fanatics sweeping half of its territory, Pakistan’s coming apart. Its Dem-adored prez tries to ban opposition parties and gut the judiciary. It has nukes and seethes with hatred of America. And Islamabad controls our primary supply route into Afghanistan, using it as an extortion tool.

Obama’s response? Billions in new aid for Pak pols to pocket. We’d be better off handing the money to AIG to pay out more bonuses.

Afghanistan: Obama’s Vietnam. Am I the only American who remembers that candidate Obama had a plan to capture Osama bin Laden and fix our previous “mistakes” in Afghanistan? President Obama doesn’t have a clue.

Iran: Obama tried to reach out, to talk. After all, talking got him to the White House. But America-bashing is what keeps Iran’s leaders in office, it’s their political essence. After 30 years of fierce hostility, hasn’t anyone figured out that the senior mullahs need us as an enemy? Without the Great Satan America to blame, they’d have some real explaining to do to their homies. So O got the left-hand finger.

He wanted to chat with the Taliban, too. They told him he could stick it where the sun don’t shine.

North Korea: Obama wanted a fresh start. North Korea’s response? Threats of war with South Korea and the kidnapping of two American journalists. And the renewed pursuit of weapons of mass destruction, along with rocket tests.

Cuba: Obama would like to liberalize our relationship. The Castro boys told him to kiss off. They need an enemy, too. (Dear Mr. President: It’s not always about us or how evil America is.)

Venezuela: Guess who else needs an enemy?

Mexico: The good news: Obama knows where it is on a map and recognizes that Mexico’s government faces a narco-insurgency that threatens our country, too. His first action? Cave to the Teamsters, violate a lawful treaty on cross-border trucking, reignite fading anti-Americanism and undercut President Felipe Calderon.

Poland: Obama’s stance on our bravest ally on the European continent? The Russians are more important than you are. He’s sending the same message to Ukraine and Georgia.

Russia: Bolshie Biden, the commuting commissar, knows he’s the man who can turn Russia into our best pal. After “Friend of Bill” Strobe Talbott tried and failed disastrously. And after poor W saw into Putin’s soul, only to get his butt handed to him. “Uncle Joe” Biden has nothing to learn from past failures, though: He’s got a re-set button.

Moscow’s response to the Obama administration’s bid for a new start? It threatens NATO members it once occupied and continues to back Iran’s nuclear program. Plus, it bribes Kyrgystan to kick us off the critical-to-Afghanistan Manas airbase (then offers to help replace that supply lifeline, giving Russia a choke-hold on our troops).

Next, the Kremlin threatens massive re-armament and demands the abandonment of the dollar as the international reserve currency.

Obama’s response? Push that re-set button again. And again.

At what point does naivete become cowardice?

As for our allies, Obama apparently needs them less than Bush did. O treated Britain’s prime minister like the deputy Paraguayan veterinary inspector, and he blindsided the leaders of the Czech Republic, Poland, Mexico and Canada on issues ranging from missile defense to trade. But he’d like them to take the Gitmo terrorists off our hands, please.

The one bright spot thus far has been Iraq, where Obama quickly tossed aside his campaign promises. The O-man doesn’t want to be on the blame-line for snatching defeat from the jaws of victory in Baghdad. And his MoveOn.org supporters can throw all the tantrums they want. (Breaking news, folks: O’s a professional pol, not the messiah . . . )

Apart from Iraq a success Sen. Obama did all he could to prevent his foreign policy’s an instant wasteland. By comparison, the Carter administration is starting to look like a model of manly strength, courage and patriotism.

Hat tip to Bonz at GCP

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

12 Responses to “O’s Foreign Failures”
( jump to bottom )

  1. sk
    1 | March 26, 2009 6:51 am

    At BEST O is a professional pol. I’m worried that he’s a professional leftist first, a pol second.


  2. Rodan
    2 | March 26, 2009 8:22 am

    Obama doesn’t know what hes doing.


  3. no2liberals
    3 | March 26, 2009 9:25 am

    I still believe Oprompta is an empty suit, and his dark overlords are calling the shots.
    I firmly believe that the destruction of capitalism is at the top of the list. The shifts in foreign policy are too dramatic to fully comprehend.
    A few things I’ve read are pertinent to this thread.
    What kind of president thrives on chaos?

    Marxist-Leninism is Coming to America.

    Our enemies sense weakness.


  4. Anastasia
    4 | March 26, 2009 11:56 am

    Q: How would you characterize Barack Obama?
    a. A man with NO leadership experience who has never even run a lemonade stand.
    b. A neo-Marxist who has spent his entire life in a leftist bubble and cannot think outside of that box.
    c. A smooth-talking, narcissistic politico, desperate for quasi-divine worship and power.
    d. None of the above.
    e. All of the above.

    I pick E !


  5. no2liberals
    5 | March 26, 2009 12:14 pm

    Anastasia,
    Give us a tougher quiz, please. :mrgreen:

    I refer back to the Cloward-Piven Strategy often, these days.
    I wonder if they were still Professors at Columbia, when Oprompta admitted he sought out the Marxist Profs?


  6. sk
    6 | March 26, 2009 3:37 pm

    no2liberals, thanks for the link. Boy, I hadn’t thought of Cloward & Piven for 20 years.


  7. no2liberals
    7 | March 26, 2009 3:46 pm

    sk,
    You’re welcome.
    At least you had heard of it, most haven’t, and those two communists are still active today.


  8. song_and_dance_man
    8 | March 26, 2009 3:48 pm

    I think it’s apparent B. Hussein is using the ’strategy’ as a guideline.


  9. no2liberals
    9 | March 26, 2009 3:59 pm

    sadm,
    I agree.


  10. song_and_dance_man
    10 | March 26, 2009 4:02 pm

    n2l

    I have ruminating about what is happening, and writings about this strategy has brought all my thoughts into focus and gave them form. The writing and knowledge of others describes what I was groping for perfectly.

    Check this out.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html


  11. song_and_dance_man
    11 | March 26, 2009 4:07 pm

    It is a damnable shame that those who adore B. Hussein and follow him refuse to see just what is going on.


  12. no2liberals
    12 | March 26, 2009 6:31 pm

    sadm,
    I understand, and remember that article well…bookmarked it, I think.


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David