Flight 93 Memorial Honoring The Terrorists?

[Note: The following is copied from Error Theory Blog]

Set to everybody’s favorite gunslinger music:

If you have a fast connection, there is a high quality viewing option at the lower right of the viewing screen here.

Part 1 focused on the blatant Islamic symbolism in the Flight 93 memorial, and on Tom Burnett’s efforts to stop this desecration of his son’s grave. Part 2 is about the terrorist memorializing features.

On first examination, the Islamic symbol shapes in the Flight 93 memorial are found to be slightly imprecise:

The giant crescent does not point quite exactly at Mecca.

The Sacred Ground Plaza that sits roughly in the position of the star on a crescent and star flag does not sit exactly in the position of an Islamic star.

But additional features turn these imprecise Islamic shapes into precise Islamic symbol shapes:

Inside the Sacred Ground Plaza sits a separate section of Memorial Wall, inscribed with the 9/11 date, that IS placed in the exact position of an Islamic star.

Remove the symbolically “broken off” parts of the crescent of Embrace (now called a broken circle) and the remaining crescent structure–what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11–points EXACTLY at Mecca.

To find these additional features, just follow the terrorist brick road: the 44 inscribed translucent memorial blocks on the flight path (matching the number of passengers, crew, AND TERRORISTS).

No need to have seen Part 1 before seeing Part 2. All of the parts of this video series will stand on their own, with only a small amount of overlap. There is a brief review of the Mecca orientation, because that is what leads to the discovery of the 44 blocks, but the blocks then lead to this whole further array of terrorist memorializing features.

If there is a group that you want to show this to–conservative campus group, church group, poker group, or just a little half-time patriotism–ask Alec Rawls about getting the video in full resolution, or in television viewing format.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

33 Responses to “Flight 93 Memorial Honoring The Terrorists?”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Yaza
    1 | December 12, 2008 10:15 am

    Has anybody investigated the L.A. Architectural firm that designed this? Could there be Saudi money there, or an architect who reverted to Islam, and wanted to honor his faith?


  2. 2 | December 12, 2008 10:16 am

    Typical of multiculturalists in putting the names of the killers in the “victim” list.

    SO I guess we should add Hitler’s name in the “World War Two” casualities’ list?


  3. 3 | December 12, 2008 10:20 am

    I think the memorial is nothing more then a tribute to the Jihadis. I hope they change the plains.


  4. Rodan
    4 | December 12, 2008 10:56 am

    This is sick.


  5. 5 | December 12, 2008 12:19 pm

    This just in:

    Muslim Man Kills Two While Speeding and Masturbating In the Car

    Alright, I admit. That is not the title Debbie had on her blog, but I am not much of a multiculturalist. Sue me!


  6. 6 | December 12, 2008 1:28 pm

    Charles is a lunatic. He has up on his blog now the following:

    More Americans Believe in the Devil than Evolution

    Which is one big reason why we have a big problem in this country with science education, why America’s lead in science has vanished, and why countries like India and China are going to the moon.

    So that must mean a lot more people believed in evolution back when we went to the moon 40 years before anyone can even think of it. And of course how did those Bible thumping idiots Corpernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, et al found modern science, seeing they believed in the Devil and God, and had never heard of Darwin. This is the kind of stupid thinking Charles and his followers are now a part of.

    The reason science and math scores have decreased in America has nothing to do with faith, it has to do with secular humanists, like Charles, taking over the greatest educational system the world has ever seen, you know back when the book of cave men the Bible was used to teach literature and actual thinking and morals. Notice O stupid one that all test scores started dropping in American Education the next year after the Supreme Court Banned prayer in school in 1963.

    By the way Charles you God-hater, the people that did put men on the moon, and those that went there…MOST of them were believers, and how many never thought of Darwin, or cared less? All of them were educated in pre 1963 schools.


  7. 7 | December 12, 2008 1:47 pm

    Amen Jehu.

    I am not old enough to remember that (in fact I wasn’t even alive by then) but I am sure some of you remember that guy from the Apole 13 reading from the very first verse of the Bible?

    Like Ravi Zacharias said, the poet could not catch the moment. The best song couldn’t either The visionary, the dreamer,the musician and all others could not silence the voice inside the man’s heart which cried for eternity. Only the Word of the Etenrla God could capture the moment:

    “In the Beggining GOD created the heavens and the earth.”

    Of all the things he could have read, why did he pick the Holy Bible? Go figure..


  8. 8 | December 12, 2008 1:54 pm

    “Which is one big reason why we have a big problem in this country with science education, why America’s lead in science has vanished, and why countries like India and China are going to the moon.”

    It’s because of things like this that I said a while ago to be weary of non-church goer christian and non religious jews “conservatives”. They will back stabb you the very first moment they have. They are, for all practical matters, liberals who endorse political conservatism.

    I guess in a way Chucky is finally showing his true colors.

    In a nation in which more than 80% of the population believes in the Judeo-Christian God,it’s totally idiotic to be so condescending to them, and then turn aroind and claim that you speak for them.

    Nice going Chucky!


  9. 9 | December 12, 2008 1:57 pm

    Hot air calls him “CJ, the creationist-slayer”.

    But wait! Before you can “slay” something, shouldn’t you know what it us first? ;-)

    Besides, if we have been “slayed”, how come the number Bible-believers seems to be growing world wide?


  10. Tex Taylor
    10 | December 12, 2008 2:21 pm

    Jehu, :lol:

    “Which is one big reason why we have a big problem in this country with science education, why America’s lead in science has vanished, and why countries like India and China are going to the moon.”

    Perhaps Darwin Johnson can explain then why in China and India, Christianity is exploding in conversions as we speak. In fact, about the only place becoming more secular by the day is the West. Wouldn’t that make all those idiots in China and India creationists by Darwin Johnson’s definition and lunatic devil believers? And Since China and India are putting people on the moon about the same time as adopting Christianity as their faith, seems Darwin Footballs has it absolutely backwards in his premise?

    So that must mean a lot more people believed in evolution back when we went to the moon 40 years before anyone can even think of it. And of course how did those Bible thumping idiots Corpernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, et al found modern science, seeing they believed in the Devil and God, and had never heard of Darwin. This is the kind of stupid thinking Charles and his followers are now a part of.

    Shoot Jehu, forget the scientific geniuses of years gone bye. That’s too obvious. Why don’t we simply talk to the those idiot Christians of the Mercury and Apollo space programs that kept quoting bible verses while on the moon?

    I am ashamed to think at one time I thought Darwin Footballs reasonably bright. Boy, was I wrong.


  11. 11 | December 12, 2008 3:19 pm

    There there, Tex. You are here because thou hast seen the great light.

    Remember: this is a man who has cut ties with Robert Spencer. How can anyone NOT like Robert Spencer?!!! How can anyone not like someone (Bob) who has written so many books in favor of human rights, free speach and the superior judeo-christian worldview?


  12. 12 | December 12, 2008 3:24 pm

    CJ is not just anti-creationist he is anti-G-d IMHO. I still think the Jihadis are worse. I would have no problem with CJ if he just said he was a lib.


  13. nathan hogroast
    13 | December 12, 2008 3:26 pm

    jehu has put part 2 of his essay about evolution on his blog, and an atheist
    came on with this comment -A better question would be “Does the magic god fairy exist?”
    i really detest atheists, they all read from the same arrogant script.
    sneering, sarcastic, wankers.
    i have never met a nice one.


  14. 14 | December 12, 2008 3:36 pm

    Is this chuckles the darwin clown?

    http://www.worth1000.com/entries/395500/395560DIlh_w.jpg


  15. 15 | December 12, 2008 4:05 pm

    What is totally ignored by these asshats (nobody had any brains until Darwin and us) is that science was founded on a culture that came from a Judeo-Christian ethic. There have not been a few writers that have pointed out the progression of cultures and science could not come from India or China even though they had much older cultures.

    It had to come from a culture that for some time believed in one God, and in fact believed him to be the Creator God. Jackasses like Charles don’t understand that Christianity and western civilization do not exist on the bedrock of science. Science is a RESULT of men believing in a creator God who gave us free will, so then it began to slowly dawn on our best thinkers that the universe operates by law, so men could then find those laws.

    Since the secular-humanists have been destroying the roots of western civilization it is now subject to periodic worsening infections WW1 WW2, War with Islam, growing crime and hatred of authority, and funny but we have stupdier populations that know nothing about science or math.

    They all want to be lawyers, or celebrities, not engineers or builders. I mean people have become so stupid they elected this corrupt “Boy Howdy,” figure because he talks real slick. Remember also Charles hated Palin…why would that be? Because she is a professing and practicing Christian…NO other REASON.


  16. arwynkafir
    16 | December 12, 2008 4:35 pm

    Rev, that has to be the best representation that I have seen yet.


  17. 17 | December 12, 2008 4:40 pm

    WHile Chucky is busy bashing Christians, Robert Spencer and others are working to give Aqsa a proper graveside.

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023904.php


  18. 18 | December 12, 2008 5:32 pm

    Mats do you think a proper grave site for Aqsa is really that important? I would rather the flight 93 memorial not be a memorial of the Jihadis. I can think of thousands of things that are going on no that are more important. Though i agree that a proper grave site is more important than what CJ is doing I think letting news Iran get Nukes and H. Obama is only going to do something after the Iranians use the nukes is more important news.


  19. 19 | December 12, 2008 5:35 pm

    Do not get me wrong I think it is terrible that Asqsa was killed in a “honor” killing on US soil. But to focus so much on her grave site is a misdirection of great minds like Spencer and Atlas.


  20. cane_loader
    20 | December 12, 2008 9:20 pm

    “Which is one big reason why we have a big problem in this country with science education, why America’s lead in science has vanished, and why countries like India and China are going to the moon.”

    WOW…

    I think Charles is a liar and has no class or morals. But I really didn’t think he was an idiot until I read that he said the above.

    Can he be that dumb? That’s just a plain uneducated statement.

    Maybe he should claim the “Iron Fist rule?” If he wasn’t drunk, then he just popped off at the mouth without thinking.


  21. cane_loader
    21 | December 12, 2008 9:23 pm

    Our lead in science is (has) evaporated due to the utter breakdown of social and mental discipline in America.

    If there is no discipline at home, there can be no discipline at school. I won’t even go into the A.D.D.-enhancing effects of modern media.

    Science, above all else, requires logic. Logic requires mental discipline.

    This is why science in America is endangered. Not due to religion.


  22. interestinconundrum
    22 | December 12, 2008 9:57 pm

    “All of them were educated in pre 1963 schools.”

    Exactly.
    The US was a much more Godly nation back then.
    The problem is not believing in a Creator or a devil.


  23. 23 | December 12, 2008 10:03 pm

    Off topic here because I didn’t know where to post this. Since its about Islamic underhanded crap with a 9/11 memorial I thought this would be a good place.

    I just watched the movie “Eagle eye”…I must say Hollywood has lost all sanity and gone off the deep end trying to protect “innocent Muslims from the trigger happy murderous U.S. Armed forces”. The premise of the movie is that it begins with U.S. Special forces firing upon a Muslim funeral because a suspected terrorist mastermind was attending. In the story line, the U.S. Military has plugged in a massive super computer to amass information & coordinate movements and calculate risks involved etc… Well the super computer has a conscience and flips out and thinks that the Military is murdering innocent Muslims and strikes back by forcing U.S. citizens to take action against the American Government “because they are violating the U.S. Constitution and have become a threat to the Republic”. The super computer has access to basically everything and sets off innocent citizens on plots to kill off the elected leadership of the nation in Washington D.C.

    I couldn’t even watch the whole steaming pile of b.s parading as a movie. All the sudden when I started realizing the plot of it, it struck me how utterly ridiculous the pro Islamic propaganda is getting with freaking left wing libtard Hollywood is trying to protect them any way they can. What a god awful waste of time & money movie.


  24. 24 | December 13, 2008 4:35 am

    Hey RevParadigm, Eagale Eye is an okay action movie. I think the New James Bond is better. The ideas that they put forth in that movie do support jihadis but what movies do not? Watch American Carol right after or to counteract the pro jihadi bias. I am out in LA and I have hope for Hollywood. I think they are slowly waking up.


  25. 25 | December 13, 2008 8:02 am

    Avi,

    Mats do you think a proper grave site for Aqsa is really that important? I would rather the flight 93 memorial not be a memorial of the Jihadis.

    Well, I was comparing Chucky’s priorities, not flight 93 against Aqsa’s burial. For sure, Flight 93 is more important due to the ramifications. However, providing a decent grave site for a girl murdered by islam is also important. Notice how Robert has his priorities right while Charles is more worried with people who reject the notion that the world created itself.


  26. 26 | December 13, 2008 8:11 am

    I’ll never give a pass to stupid movies like that ever again, after realizing subtle “stealth Jihad” that Spencer put a spotlight on recently. After adjusting focus from just the overt terrorism, slight of hand propaganda is working for the same cause, which makes it just a evil my book. I’m gonna make a list of movies I know of like Eagle eye, Behind enemy lines, Kingdom of heaven etc…and point this trash out to people.


  27. 27 | December 13, 2008 8:12 am

    just as evil I mean…


  28. 28 | December 13, 2008 8:34 am

    Yeah, Rev, lotsa movies and movie actors who are paving the way for the Caliphate.


  29. 29 | December 13, 2008 9:28 am

    Hey RevPardaigm did you watch American Carol? Doing a list of anti American movies like Eagle Eye is important IMHO. You have to admit Eagle Eye has some great action sequences.


  30. 30 | December 13, 2008 9:38 am

    But I did not pay to rent or watch Eagle Eye. I do not think any readers of LGF2 should. I can provide a link where you can watch it or download it for free. BTW I think the new James Bond has better action sequences and is not as Anti-American.


  31. 31 | December 13, 2008 10:17 am

    Avideditor no I haven’t, but thanks for reminding me. Awhile ago some people recommended it to me but I forgot about it.

    I forgot to mention “Zohan” on that list. What pathetic drivel from Adam Sandler, who is supposed to be Jewish! Then again if he runs with libtard Hollywood, ignorance is normal. I had a hard time believing, even in a comedy someone could invent such a asinine script. The Muslim terrorists are really good guys, just misunderstood of course…and Zohan, Israeli special forces, teams up with them to save Muslim businesses from the “evil conservatives” here in the USA.


  32. Redwater
    32 | December 13, 2008 1:17 pm

    #31 I’m suprised. I haven’t seen the “Zohan” movie but having seen the trailers and commercials, I was under the impression that it would be mainly about Zohan foiling a jihadist plot.

    Do the vast majority of family members and friends of the Flight 93 victims know about the Islamic symbolism of the memorial? While everyone must know about the twisted memorial plans, its really up to the victims’ loved ones to spearhead the movement in stopping the construction of this memorial and request for a different design.


  33. arwynkafir
    33 | December 13, 2008 2:01 pm

    Redwater, according to the NYT, most families love the design. Only one family had a problem with it.

    Flight 93 memorial officials say that Burnett, and his wife, Beverly, are the only family members of any of the Flight 93 victims who have spoken against the design because of its supposed Islamic influences.

    Of those other family members like Felt who have spoken against Burnett’s ideas, he said: “Those people have their heads in the sand.”


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David