Charles (Nancy) Johnson upset at Americans

Wanna be Scientist Charles Johnson is up set at Americans. He is mad that more Americans believe in Satan than Evolution. This is not allowed in his world and something must be done. However Chuckles can’t do anything but complain!

More Americans Believe in the Devil Than in Evolution

Sci/Tech | Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:54:35 am PST

Allahpundit points out a new Harris poll, showing that more Americans believe in the devil than in evolution.

Which is one big reason why we have a problem in this country with science education, why America’s lead in science has vanished, and why countries like India and China are going to the moon.

Meanwhile, Discovery Institute creationist David Klinghoffer is not only promoting the “intelligent design” hoax—he’s also pimping ghosts and demons.

Remember this the next time someone tries to tell you that “intelligent design” is science and not religion.

This reveals Nancy’s agenda. He/She wants to silence religious belief and impose his. The problem for the LGF Cult leader is that the real world isn’t like the LGF cult, people can’t be silenced.


Tags: ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

80 Responses to “Charles (Nancy) Johnson upset at Americans”
( jump to bottom )

  1. interestinconundrum
    1 | December 12, 2008 6:24 pm

    Funny thing about that statement.
    The way Americans believe in God has not changed for the most part.
    When we were without peers in the world, people believed in God and the Devil.
    This is not the reason we are declining, it is because the educators are dumbing down America. Our kids have sky-high self esteem and can put a condom on a banana at record speed, they just can’t add worth shit and can’t find our country on a map.


  2. coward and I admit it
    2 | December 12, 2008 6:27 pm

    Not all educators are! :)


  3. Bob in Breckenridge
    3 | December 12, 2008 8:04 pm

    Who’s Nancy?


  4. Rodan
    4 | December 12, 2008 9:12 pm

    nancy is Cahrles Johnson. We call him that because he acts like a bitch.


  5. rainydayweather
    5 | December 12, 2008 10:30 pm

    “…and why countries like India and China are going to the moon.”

    Isn’t India a pretty religious nation, aren’t they mostly Hindu there?

    If so, is Johnson saying that he just hates a Jewish or Christian brand of theism, but is totally cool with a Hindu version of it, what with people believing in reincarnation, the worship of cows, or what have you?

    As for China, it’s my understanding that Christianity has been growing at a very rapid rate there for years now.

    I agree with post #1. The United States was based on Judeo-Christian beliefs, or a respect for them, and people who were Christian, and for years afterwards, it was pretty much the same way, and Americans were responsible for many great inventions during that time.

    To now maintain that Christianity, or a belief in God, is responsible for stupidity among American students seems dishonest and a little ‘off.’

    For the past couple of decades, educators have been more concerned with building self esteem in pupils rather than in making sure they’re good at reading, writing, and math.

    Johnson is really grasping at straws here, in trying to blame the downfall of American education on American religious beliefs.


  6. rainydayweather
    6 | December 12, 2008 10:32 pm

    “…and why countries like India and China are going to the moon.”

    Isn’t India a pretty religious nation, aren’t they mostly Hindu there?

    If so, is Johnson saying that he just hates a Jewish or Christian brand of theism, but is totally cool with a Hindu version of it, what with people believing in reincarnation, the worship of cows, or what have you?

    As for China, it’s my understanding that Christianity has been growing at a very rapid rate there for years now.

    I agree with post #1. The United States was based on Judeo-Christian beliefs, or a respect for them, and people who were Christian, and for years afterwards, it was pretty much the same way, and Americans were responsible for many great inventions during that time.

    To now maintain that Christianity, or a belief in God, is responsible for stupidity among American students seems dishonest and a little ‘off.’

    For the past couple of decades, educators have been more concerned with building self esteem in pupils rather than in making sure they’re good at reading, writing, and math.

    Johnson is really grasping at straws here, in trying to blame the downfall of American education on American religious beliefs.


  7. 7 | December 13, 2008 1:05 am

    I read through the first 100 comments on LGF and Charles is getting his ass kicked by his own posters. He went too far this time. Not one person agreed with his analysis in the first 100 posts. It was so bad he had to change the wording of the aritcle, here is Charles’ post #100

    Posted in: More Americans Believe in the Devil Than in Evolution

    100 Charles
    12/12/2008 12:13:24 pm PST

    I changed the wording above from “exactly why” to “one big reason why,” because it sounded too absolute. I don’t believe it’s the only reason, but I do think it’s a big factor–and I’m not alone in that.

    Uhh, yeah Charles actually this time your are alone you God-hating fanatic. Everyone is busting you on your own blog. I think this thread revealed to a lot of people over there your real agenda.


  8. savagenation
    8 | December 13, 2008 1:18 am

    Jehu,

    Interesting thread there. Thanks for informing us about it.

    Chuckie is hip deep in his own crap, isn’t he?


  9. 9 | December 13, 2008 8:09 am

    I think Chucky forgot that America is not europe. You can’t bash the Judeo-Christian worldview and expect to come out shinning.

    Thanks Charles for revealing your anti-God nonsense. Your “science” posts about evolution arenot about science at all, but, as with the majority of darwinists, you are on your own crusade against God.

    Good luck on that!


  10. 10 | December 13, 2008 8:10 am

    Remember this post next time Chucky says that he is not anti-Judaism and anti-Christianity.


  11. bar
    11 | December 13, 2008 8:58 am

    I like Allahpundit, most of his stuff is pretty spot on, but here I think he is completely wrong.

    Which is one big reason why we have a problem in this country with science education, why America’s lead in science has vanished, and why countries like India and China are going to the moon.

    I think that is complete BS,
    I am only going by my limited beer tarred memory, but I don’t recall India or China doing anything in advanced science, unless you count putting lead paint on toys and lead into pet food headed to American consumers.

    I also suspect those scientist from India and China got their education here in America, not in their own country.

    Of course Queeg is not going to let his bigotry not get in the way of his thought process.


  12. theparson
    12 | December 13, 2008 9:01 am

    I am disgusted with LGF and what that once fine blog has become. In the past, I have seen folks who asked Charles to close their accounts (as a protest) and had lot’s of shots taken at them for it. I have also seen folks who just quit posting there, which is fine but makes no statement (not that Charles cares what anybody thinks who disagrees with him but perhaps some readers do care). And, I have seen some who “resigned” by posting on another blog (is that what I’m doing here ’cause I haven’t been banned yet?)

    I’m curious to know how many of the great unwashed think it important to actually make a statement at LGF by making a final fare thee well (and no doubt be vilified by the sychophants a la Robert Spencer). Or, is it better to simply stop being there?


  13. bar
    13 | December 13, 2008 9:14 am

    One reason I consider Darwin Queeg Johnson as an cretin, putting your faith in Darwinism has little if any effect on your ability to push buttons and take notes, read: experiment.

    A chemist is not effected by his belief or non-belief in natural selection when mixing chemicals and creating new ones.

    Its so far beyond stupid, but that is the cult mentality all cults do it or they wouldn’t survive.


  14. bar
    14 | December 13, 2008 9:20 am

    Theparson

    That is a matter of opinion,

    I did enjoy very nicely telling Darwin Queeg Johnson what a hack he was and how I would never promote his site again, not that word of mouth means much in the blogs sphere.

    Back then (last summer) making any disparaging remarks about LGF got you the ban stick rather quickly.


  15. interestinconundrum
    15 | December 13, 2008 9:41 am

    Oh, I said a couple of times how I thought LGF had changed, and not for the good.
    I guess I wasn’t banned.
    I just don’t go back.
    I am a fish out of water there.


  16. Rodan
    16 | December 13, 2008 9:47 am

    LGF is just a toy in Charles’s mind. his posters are toys to play with. Once he’s bored he gets rid of his toys by banning people. He’s a jerk.


  17. arwynkafir
    17 | December 13, 2008 10:13 am

    And he is a bully. He wants to post thread after thread after thread until the religion is only for darwin, and chaz is his muppet.

    ha


  18. 18 | December 13, 2008 10:14 am

    arwynkafir what do you mean my muppet?


  19. arwynkafir
    19 | December 13, 2008 10:36 am

    The shahada states that there is no god but allah and mo is his prophet.

    Their god is darwin and chaz is darwin’s muppet.


  20. vinegarjoe
    20 | December 13, 2008 11:37 am

    I believe in deevolution.


  21. arwynkafir
    21 | December 13, 2008 11:40 am

    Avid – muppet- darwin’s puppet.


  22. 22 | December 13, 2008 11:46 am

    Okay you never know. I find it better to ask. Every time I hear Sock-puppet I think of someone making a puppet out of socks with their hands. Only when Charles accused me of being a sock-puppet of Rodan did I figure out what it means. BTW I am not Rodan. We live currently in opposite sides of the US.


  23. 23 | December 13, 2008 11:47 am

    On the bright side, Chucky has actually made it to six articles in succession that don’t have anything to do with the creationism vs. evolution tiff. I gotta say, that must be some sort of personal best for Chucky. Wonder how long that will last?

    /probably not long.


  24. 24 | December 13, 2008 11:52 am

    Yes Passionate Conservative LGF is not what it used to be. It sucks that Charles will not admit openly that he is Anti-G-d.


  25. 26 | December 13, 2008 1:46 pm

    The U.S. was more religious when we were going to the Moon, and beyond, than we are today, when we struggle to put a shuttle into space.
    Nice reasoning ability there, Chucky.

    For a refreshing view, here is an article from Imprimus, by Dinesh D’Souza.


  26. bar
    27 | December 13, 2008 2:24 pm

    No2liberal

    Robert Spencer does not have kind words for Mr Dinesh D’Souza.

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/014869.php

    His views on Mohammadanism and terrorism are a bit tweaked.


  27. 28 | December 13, 2008 2:34 pm

    bar,
    I was unaware of that.
    I have heard him interviewed extensively on the radio, about his latest book, What’s So Great About Christianity.
    I haven’t detected any sympathy for islam, in his Q&A sessions.
    Something to look for, however.


  28. bar
    29 | December 13, 2008 3:06 pm

    No2liberal

    From what I recall Robert Spencer disagrees with Dinesh D’Souza about the root cause of Islamic terrorism.

    So I don’t think D’Souza is an apologist for Islam, he just attributes other factors as to why Islamic terrorism exists today.


  29. Bob in Breckenridge
    30 | December 13, 2008 3:19 pm

    I just watched “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” last night, and it’s a lot like LGF these days. It’s ok to talk about ID as long as you toe the LGF line, otherwise you get called names and dinged-down by the ass kissers/brown-nosers such as killgore, sharmuta, etc.


  30. nathan hogroast
    31 | December 13, 2008 4:04 pm

    i will tell you what i think.
    cj is a coming out homosexual that feels persecuted by the christian right in the usa and is fighting back at a subliminal level.
    i have met many like this.
    they hate christians because they have the ordasity to question their lifestyle.
    but he is trying to not show his agenda.
    it will surface soon and the whole blog will become something totally different. just my opinion i could be wrong.


  31. 32 | December 13, 2008 4:34 pm

    bar,
    Gotcha.
    That rant you linked to was certainly terse.
    Anyway, the link to Imprimus is an excellent article, about the role of Christianity in Western Culture.


  32. Nicetoberight
    33 | December 13, 2008 6:06 pm

    CJ Has gone way over to the dark side. His anti-religious threads have made it very hard for me not to comment. I find many people there very disgusting and anyone that even try’s to stand up as a Christian is hit so hard by his surrogates that they want to never post again or band in a minute. I have been at LGF for over 5 years and have posted several thousand posts. I do understand why he feels the way he does about ID and I agree for the most part but there are people there that just to mention “GOD” turns them into hateful assholes and by allowing it he must be one also! Charles I hope you are reading this and understand I am not the bad person that you may think I am but to post this on LGF would have me out the door before I could post it.


  33. rainydayweather
    34 | December 13, 2008 6:25 pm

    I don’t know why I have a double post above (posts #s 5 and 6); if the moderators would like to delete one of the two, that would be fine with me.

    Bar, you made very good points in #11 and #13.

    #23 Passionate Conservative wrote,

    On the bright side, Chucky has actually made it to six articles in succession that don’t have anything to do with the creationism vs. evolution tiff.

    That is truly amazing. I’m sure it won’t last too much longer.

    I don’t visit LGF anymore, so I rely on updates from those of you who do go back.

    I won’t say I never, ever visit LGF, but it’s rare, and I usually only do so if someone else says, “you really have to go look at this at LGF.” Other than that, I stay away, since that blog makes me sick.


  34. 35 | December 13, 2008 6:57 pm

    Dinesh is good to debate atheists, but is totally clueless when it comes to the jihad.


  35. bar
    36 | December 13, 2008 7:48 pm

    No2liberals

    Hugh Fitzgerald wrote that and yes he can be really, really terse and really long winded.

    What I like about the man is he is very well read and he is a self proclaimed liberal, but not a typical liberal, this man can think!

    He is one of the only liberals that I read and would have a beer with.


  36. savagenation
    37 | December 13, 2008 8:44 pm

    Well, the reason I can’t fucking stand that blogwhore Johnson is I was at LGF for seven years. I posted a lot of good shit in there for discussion and I made one comment about the worthless child molester stepdaughters boyfriend (who BTW dumped the stepdaughter the other day when their baby is only 2 months old) and that fuckhead took all 7 years worth of my blog life and flushed it down the memory hole.


  37. rainydayweather
    38 | December 13, 2008 9:05 pm

    #37 savagenation.

    There is a sense of betrayal and disloyalty about it. That’s why I get tired of the people who bray in Johnson’s defense that “it’s his blog he can do whatever he wants.”

    True, it is his blog, but some people spent years there, there was a sense of trust and community, and some people, such as yourself, contributed a lot of material. And what do you get for it but a slap across the face?


  38. savagenation
    39 | December 13, 2008 9:10 pm

    Yeah, and there are fewer and fewer of the old guard over at LGF.

    All you have over there are the bootlickers like Sharmuta, Killgore, MandyManners, and Medaura. Then you have the psychopaths like TFK (who can’t string a sentence together) and good old realwest.

    They can all come over here and plead their case if they want to. I’ll be happy to cut them all off at the kneecaps. And as for NY Nana, I hope that cunt drops dead. That is one less POS on Earth to feed.


  39. 40 | December 14, 2008 4:15 am

    LadyCatnip challenged Queeg to name one public school where evolution isn’t taught and is replaced by ID or creationism.
    No reply to her repeated requests. No surprise there. Queeg never attempts to debate anyone who shreds his arguments.

    His fears of the coming Christian theocracy are sheer paranoia. He doesn’t even have a point in this post. He certainly can’t show how the belief in Satan (or absolute evil) relates to less people being interested in science or learning it.

    All the problems with our public school system lies with the Left and govt. bureaucracy. This is easily proven, and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out. BTW, I know there are some outstanding teachers out there. I lay most of the blame on the Leftist politicians and bureaurats, and the leftist teachers federal and state unions that embrace Leftist ideology.

    Homeschooled kids do remarkably better than kids at public schools, as does kids who go to chartered, private, Catholic, and Protestant schools.
    So tell us again, Queeg, how does a belief in Satan or God, or miracles, or young earth or old earth creation, ID, literal or allegory or symbolic Bible or Torah reading have anything to do with the failures of the public schools?
    Answer: It doesn’t!

    But Charles will keep up his crusade against the evil Christians and Jews who (in his mind) are barbarians who don’t want Americans to learn science.
    Yeah, that’s the real threat to our liberty. Afterall, I’m sure Charles can prove that no Christians or Jews are scientists.

    The only problem with this irrational and delusional ideology that oozes in the mind of Queeg and his queeglings (yes, I know not all lizards believe this) is it’s not true and it never was.


  40. Lex
    41 | December 14, 2008 7:32 am

    Of course Chuckles is in the evolution camp (though I am too). He uses his site to try and mirror evolutionary theory. Think about it. He winnows out undesirables trying to evolve LGF into what he wants it to be, then adds new “hatchlings” in an attempt to keep up his little gene pool. Actually he’s more on the eugenics side of things in what he is attempting, but still, one flows from the other in a way.


  41. Born Again Bible Believer from Sweden
    42 | December 14, 2008 1:42 pm

    Well satan created evolutionism, so in reality we do believe in evolutionism as one of the snares of the devil.
    So what’s he so upset about?

    This guy speaks just like the socialists here in Sweden, he even has the same mindset as them.
    The village idiot atheist mindset that is.

    Perhaps he should move here to Sweden, like 95% believe in evoultionism here, due to the fact that it is drilled into the childrens heads from age 1 up to 20 when most end their education/indoctrination, then you have all massmedia and multimedia drilling the belief of evolutionism into their heads, daily there’s “millions of years…” articles, games, movies, tv programs… fairy tales…
    I know of thousands of people that believe in evolutionism here and I think 10 people that believe in six day creation. And even better in North Korea ALL believe in evolutionism, he would love it there I’m sure. :)


  42. Born Again Bible Believer from Sweden
    43 | December 14, 2008 1:49 pm

    #40 USS Ben USN (Ret)

    well soon ALL lizards will believe in evolutionism, or dragons as I like to call them.

    Dunno why anyone would like to call themselves a lizard, especially a Christian.
    The big red dragon…
    Revelation 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.


  43. 44 | December 14, 2008 1:52 pm

    Wow! A Christian in Sweden?! ;-) I thought that the marxist gov had put you in “education camps”.


  44. 45 | December 14, 2008 2:00 pm

    #3 Bob in Breckenridge
    There’s a good site out there called Urban Dictionary where you can learn the new lingo people use.
    Just add whatever word they use and usually there’s a definition.

    People add a definition of a new word or saying and people vote if they think it’s so or not by giving a thumbs up or a thumbs down.
    Here’s the take on Nancy:
    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=nancy

    and also there’s the great:
    http://www.dictionary.com


  45. 46 | December 14, 2008 2:02 pm

    Mats well I followed:
    Matthew 10:16 Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves: be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless as doves.

    so they haven’t caught me yet. You can see me as a commando behind the lines, the frontline is right now in USA. Chopping them down with the Word of the Lord, the only offensive weapon I have, and the tracts as my mines :)


  46. 47 | December 14, 2008 2:39 pm

    Born Again Bible Believer from Sweden,

    Always nice to read about that. I myself am a fundamentalist YEC from Portugal..

    Nice to read about you…

    Cheers.


  47. song_and_dance_man
    48 | December 14, 2008 2:58 pm

    Jezebel’s boy bitch Nancy and his site has become a hovel for the spirit of antichrist.

    Read what our brother and fellow servant wrote about Yeshua the Christ.

    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men. The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it.

    The neshema didn’t evolve but is going to die in some when the eternal separation of the judgment commences.

    Now back to my point.

    By denying the Creator one denies the Eternal Father’s son which is denying Christ and makes one a sponsor of the spirit of antichrist.

    Why any believers remain there is beyond me. We are to remove ourselves from entertaining or engaging the Whore.

    Then I heard another voice from heaven say:
    “Come out of her, my people,
    so that you will not share in her sins,
    so that you will not receive any of her plagues;


  48. bar
    49 | December 14, 2008 3:01 pm

    Song and dance man

    Very nice pointed post its spot on, that passage has been on my mind when talk of evolution comes up.

    How are you doing?


  49. song_and_dance_man
    50 | December 14, 2008 3:10 pm

    Thanks and I’m doing great.

    I haven’t seen you at Babba’s site lately so here is a sample of some music I made when I was gigging as music director at a fairly large church in Los Angeles. Some time in the near future I will post some of my non-worship music.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsLRIXqQSG4&feature=channel_page

    BTW that’s me doing all the vocals and instruments on all of the songs posted so far.


  50. bar
    51 | December 14, 2008 3:16 pm

    I have not been commenting at Babba’s much, I have been reading it, just not posting comments.

    Wow, very cool S&D man, that is really awesome.


  51. song_and_dance_man
    52 | December 14, 2008 3:19 pm

    Yeah, I don’t post much anywhere anymore. I joined a local band and have been uber busy learning songs and practicing.


  52. 53 | December 14, 2008 3:24 pm

    Thanks for posting here song_and_dance_man. But I am Jewish and I do not believe in you messiah. Do you think that I am “a sponsor of the spirit of antichrist”? Just curious to see you response. Feel free to type what ever you think.


  53. bar
    54 | December 14, 2008 3:27 pm

    S&D man, you have a good singing voice, you sound like a great worship leader.

    It is good to be busy doing the Lords work.


  54. 55 | December 14, 2008 3:31 pm

    Satan created evolution? Um yeah……


  55. song_and_dance_man
    56 | December 14, 2008 3:40 pm

    avideditor

    Anyone who denies the Christ denies the one who sent him. We both serve the Eternal, that is if you are a practicing Jew, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and the only difference between us is you have not yet accepted Yeshua as the prophesied Messiah.

    Now as to being a sponsor of the spirit of antichrist – I have yet to hear or read of you, with purpose, oppose those who believe in Yeshua, so I would say no, you are not a sponsor of that particular spirit. Nancy is out there with purpose facilitating outright opposition to the Christ Yeshua, who as I stated is believed to have been the instrument and engine of creation, or as you believe, the Eternal as creator of heaven and earth. Bottom line – Nancy is denying the Eternal in your case, or Christ in mine and carries and pushes the spirit of the god of this world.

    BTW, I’m half or almost half Jew myself. That and Spanish from the Galicia region.


  56. 57 | December 14, 2008 3:54 pm

    Re 55: I have to agree with Hegee on this point. When the messiah is walking down the streets of Jerusalem one of us is going to have a lot of reconsidering to do. Have you seen my comment on this thread http://littlegreenfootballs2.com/2008/12/13/saturday-open-thread/#comments ? it is #29. I said, “Worship Rats for all I care, in fact people do: http://magazinely.com/world/strange-religion-in-india-temple-devoted-to-rats But I draw the line at when people want to kill me and others.” So as long as you do not want to kill me or enslave me because of you believes, I really don’t care what you believe. But LGF has become anti-G-d IMHO.


  57. rainydayweather
    58 | December 14, 2008 6:03 pm

    #40 USS Ben USN (Ret) wrote,

    His [Charles Johnson's] fears of the coming Christian theocracy are sheer paranoia.

    You are 100% correct.

    A Christian theocracy was supposed to happen under George W. Bush (I saw posts over the years at various political blogs by assorted atheists and liberals who kept saying that the U.S.A. would be turned into a Christian theocracy under G. W. Bush), and it did not happen, of course.

    And obviously no such thing would ever happen with a genuine Christian anyhow, because Christianity is a voluntary faith, not one of compulsion.

    Christianity is a faith where the individual has to accept or reject Jesus Christ on his or her own; nobody can “force” anyone to accept Christ, and anyone who thinks they can doesn’t know their Scriptures, and if they try to, they’re violating the Scriptures.

    #41 Lex
    Lex, you and I may not agree on all issues, but I like how you summarized what’s been going on with Johnson at LGF – the “eugenics” part seems especially apropos (and funny), LOL.

    #55 Lex, Agent of Chaos
    I’m a Christian, and I do not believe that Satan created “evolution.”

    I don’t know of any Christians who disagree with or reject MICRO evolution, I believe it’s called, but some will reject MACRO evolution.

    Lex, Agent of Chaos, I notice that Born Again Bible Believer from Sweden (in post #42) kept using the term “evolutionism,” rather than the phrase “macro evolution.”

    Maybe that was his (or her) way of saying that some people have turned Darwinism/Macro-Evolution into a religion of sorts, and that is what he’s referring to.

    There are many adherents of Macro-Evolution who do treat it like it’s a religious dogma, in that dissenters are cut off, they are ostracized (whether from blogs like LGF, or from universities, or scientific circles).

    Macro Evolutionist supporters demand total allegiance to Macro-Evolution at all costs, no questioning of it is allowed, and if you do dare to question it, you are treated like a heretic and you are banished.

    Maybe Born Again Bible Believer from Sweden was trying to get across a point like that.


  58. 59 | December 14, 2008 7:01 pm

    rainydayweather:

    Evolutionism is just that, a religion.
    But if you mention that it is and point that they indeed have to BELIEVE that things are a certain way and not factual they go mental on you and call you all sorts of names. I mean Communist nations are all Evolutionism nations. People need to believe something it seems to be hardwired, these people have just chosen to believe in what people told them.
    It is presented in realm as absolute truth which it is not, God’s Word is truth, not these silly little men and women.

    And since I believe Satan do exists literally it’s not very far fetched from me to believe he created the teachings of evolutionism, I mean this belief goes much further back than Charles the copycat Darwin.
    Henry Morris has a good book on this called:
    The Long War Against God

    that goes into the history of evolutionism.

    Micro-Evolution has a much better name Adaptation.
    Organisms adapting to their environment.
    From there to thinking dinosaurs turning into birds is… you gotta smoke a lot of dope to believe that one and I think Charlie boy smoked a lot of dope, I mean long haired rock musician… or he was like myself indoctrinated into this belief.

    But you know Lex don’t want to believe and wants to stick with the mainstream, let him. As one of you said Biblical Christianity is voluntary, no one will be forced, only people I know that might want to force people are Catholics, Reconstructions, Dominionists and couple of other groups. But then again infact what is happening is that Socialists, Communist and others are actually forcing their faith via indoctrination on others while at the same time deceptively telling me I may not proselytize but they will proselytize all with my tax money? Nice one there…
    This utter hypocrisy of Charles Nancy Johnson and his cohorts, not to talk about public schools and their filthy deeds. Talk about having a cruise missile in their eye being all whiney about a speck of dust in my eye.
    So yeah it’s a religion and a retarded one at that very much like islam, and they really can’t see it because they broke the mirror.

    I was fed this garbage for so long it’s ridiculous really, they don’t sit on any evidence yet they claim this faith of theirs is fact base, going through my old school books I don’t see any evidence for their precious religion, all they point to is adaptation, and this explains that all came from a cosmic bang 20 billion years ago (btw have they increased the number yet? Remember that started with like 70,000 years ago, now we’re up to 20+ billion years ago… great science there :) )

    But you can’t expect people like Lex to believe, I mean just look at the implications on his life, his life would have to be turned like 180 degrees, I don’t think Lex would want that. Still weird he got banned though, thought he was one of the favorites of the Lizardking.
    But glad he came out of that… that must mean there’s still a tiny chance for him.

    I’m a he by the way.

    Oh and before I go I present this one:
    Strategy of the Devil
    http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v16/i3/devil.asp


  59. 60 | December 14, 2008 7:16 pm

    #47 Mats

    Well then you’re in trouble, just look at the new laws they’re trying to pass forbidding Creation and even the none offensive ID.
    http://euobserver.com/9/24914?rss_rk=1

    I mean ID is silly they should go 5900+ years six day creation straight out, no fence straddling.

    Hasn’t come to pass yet but soon. Then Charles Nancy Johnson don’t have to worry too much about any pesky creationist, off to prison we go, or camp perhaps.
    He would make for a great camp commandant in the style of Amon Goeth. Guess he’s training on his lizards.
    Totally hysterical people, they make me LOL every time :)

    the offence of the cross.

    2 Timothy 4:2-4 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

    guess we arrived… or just about to arrive.


  60. Anastasia
    61 | December 14, 2008 8:19 pm

    #46 and #47- Mats & Born Again, I am not a young-earth creationist myself. I believe that any of the “days” in Genesis could refer to billions of years— or to one billionth of a second, for that matter. I also believe that God certainly could have used macro-evolutionary methods as part of the creation process. I believe the evidence suggests that He did just that, even if it is not perfectly conclusive.

    What I do NOT believe is that young-earth/6 day creationists are knuckle-dragging, “anti-science” morons. I have met far too many bright ones, including engineers, surgeons, veterinarians, botanists, and mechanics.
    I find the sneering and derision that LGF directs against YECs extremely offensive.

    Initially it was carefully explained that LGF was not gratuitously making fun of a particular religion; it was simply opposing a specific political agenda to teach religious views in the public schools. It doesn’t matter what you believe, it was said, as long as you don’t try to impose it on others through the education system. Alas, this rationale quickly dissolved into a thin excuse for playing endless games of Let’s-Make-Fun-of-the-Bible-Boys.

    This seems to be enormous fun for a few obsessive minds prone to tunnel vision and knee-jerk hysteria, but for the bulk of lizards, boredom (if not outright annoyance)has definitely set in. Some regulars will muster a perfunctory comment, while most will grit their teeth and wait for the thread to go off-topic.

    The darlings of the Inner Circle believe they are engaged in a great drama, but, truth be told, it is a farce.


  61. Anastasia
    62 | December 14, 2008 8:21 pm

    #40- USS Ben You hit all the bases there! Well said.


  62. theparson
    63 | December 14, 2008 9:14 pm

    Well, Mr Blogmaster, you can be sure that CJ reads your blog. I attempted to log in to check something and my account has been blocked. I hope his paranoia carries through and he deletes all my posts because there were many times I really stood up for him and what WAS a really good blog.
    For the record (of course it’s probably erased) I tried to uphold CJ and his right to post what he wanted. I tried to ignore the vehement ugliness of many “lizards” who immediately assaulted anyone who they thought was stupid enough to believe the Bible. I even scolded some Christians who were claiming to be victims. I did all this because I believed in the greater good I thought his blog could accomplish. But it became apparent that he is on a crusade to belittle and berate believers. Other than being really fascinated by his strange narcissistic turn, I really have no interest in him or what he does.


  63. 64 | December 14, 2008 9:44 pm

    Ya I think Charles follows this blog more then most of the readers. If you are pissed about being kicked off LGF, email charles. It worked for one person I know. I personally think LGF sold its’ soul. LGF IMHO changed for the worse.


  64. theparson
    65 | December 14, 2008 10:00 pm

    Not in the least. I really couldn’t care less and there’s no way I would go crawling back to Charles and promise to “be good”. I just think it’s sad that he is that terrified of people who believe in God.


  65. bar
    66 | December 14, 2008 10:01 pm

    Someone here on another thread suggested that Queeg perhaps was coming out of the closet, “not that there is anything wrong with that”.

    I have wondered the same thing for quite some time, not all homosexuals but a good portion have a deep seated hatred for anything that is remotely Judeo-Christian.

    So if that is the case, it would kinda make sense.


  66. song_and_dance_man
    67 | December 14, 2008 10:13 pm

    Nancy is a servant of the fallen one.


  67. song_and_dance_man
    68 | December 14, 2008 10:15 pm

    bar,

    What? Ha. Open the pod bay door Hal.


  68. bar
    69 | December 14, 2008 10:20 pm

    song_and_dance_man

    LOL

    In case anyone doesn’t know, Queeg is Gagdad Bob’s nickname for Nancy.


  69. song_and_dance_man
    70 | December 14, 2008 10:33 pm

    Yeah, I read Bob’s posts after the ‘I am a dumbshit’ comments by Nancy. And FYI, Nancy was first used by Rayra in his criticism of her right before the Little Green Dumballs first night of mass cleansing.

    It was the September 1, 2006 thread entitled “Hizballah Sets Up Shop in Venezuela”. Courtesy Nodrog.

    #231 Rayra

    Now I’m really thinking this isn’t Charles. Too childish. wtf, who is this nancy?


  70. bar
    71 | December 14, 2008 10:40 pm

    So that is where the nickname Nancy came from, interesting.

    Its so nice having a long time former LGFer to explain shit to me.

    S&D man is the man.


  71. The Osprey
    72 | December 14, 2008 11:04 pm

    I think that Nathan Hogroast is right and that Nancy Boy is struggling with “coming out”. He even had a thread in which Republicans were bashed for supporting traditional marriage initiatives like California’s Prop 8…even though it passed in a state that went overwhelmingly for Obama. Killgore Carp, who I am absolute convinced is Queeg’s Cabin Boy, if you get my drift, had a little hissy fit in which he claimed that opposition to Gay Marriage was causing Republicans to lose votes. If that was the case Prop 8 should have lost by a landslide in CA.

    I think Nancy Boy is going to be Andrew Sullivan, Part Deux.


  72. song_and_dance_man
    73 | December 14, 2008 11:14 pm

    And to think how close I came to naming the Queeg as Jezebel’s boy bitch. He is the servant of Stan and that is apparent from what he embraces and promotes.


  73. theparson
    74 | December 15, 2008 7:13 am

    I seem to remember a few years ago an ongoing discussion about whether Charles was straight or gay. As I recall he never would give a definitive answer but just gave coy answers. Anybody else remember that?


  74. 75 | December 15, 2008 8:35 am

    Actually, I have never seen him speaking about his family (wife/kids or something).

    Anyway….


  75. Rodan
    76 | December 15, 2008 8:57 am

    Charles is Feminine.


  76. 77 | December 15, 2008 9:05 am

    Who cares if Charles is Gay? He is anti-G-d. Ik he is gay then there is less competition for women. I do not think he omits details about his family because of his sexual choice but because of the death threats.


  77. 78 | December 15, 2008 10:05 am

    Avi,
    I second that. Doesn’t matter to me if he’s gay or not. In fact, I think it’s a nasty rumor to start. What matters is that he is a fake republican/conservative, gay or not.


  78. song_and_dance_man
    79 | December 15, 2008 4:37 pm

    Nancy was never a conservative. His blog has always been a liberal site but attracted conservatives because of his backing of Bush after 9/11 and anti jihad postings. I always thought it was 50/50 there with the posters. However that is changing since he is trying to bum rush any who believe in God and a Creator. His backsliding into what he was before just took a little longer than the most liberal lefties.


  79. arwynkafir
    80 | December 15, 2008 5:41 pm

    I think the anti-jihad threads brought in the best posters around. The posters brought the links he would make threads of later. The posters made the blog what it was. The comments were educational, diverse, and always thought provoking (even amid the boob/gun threads). Charles stayed in the background and people could give him whatever personality they wanted him to have. Then he decided to get in on the comments and his true personality came through with flying colors (that was -not a gay joke :) )

    Turns out, his personality really sucks. He should have stayed behind the curtain.


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David