TERROR COPS FEAR ‘MUMBAI ATTACK’ IN UK

From the Daily Star:

RANTING Anjem Choudary launched an astonishing anti-British tirade as terror experts warned yesterday of a Mumbai-style massacre in Britain.

The hate preacher called for apartheid in the UK just days after backing the killers in India. And his supporters threatened to unleash “blood on the streets”.

Experts said the chance of a terror attack here has increased since last week’s gun rampage in Mumbai left nearly 200 dead.

Choudary, 41, spoke at a packed public meeting called “Not So Great Britain”.

It was held at a council-owned arts centre in Southall, Middlesex, by Islam4UK.com – a website he founded with banned hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammad.

Filthy

He branded Britain “filthy”, accused children of being “prostitutes” and demanded non-Muslims wear signs like the Nazis forced on the Jews in WWII.

Crazed Choudary said: “In Britain there are 230 rapes every day, that’s 10 per hour. Supermarkets are selling poles for little children so they can become prostitutes when they grow up. There’s no comparison between our way of life and theirs.

“In an Islamic state, non-Muslims will have to wear a sign to show what they are – it should say Kaffir. We won’t discriminate on height, race or appearance but we will discriminate on faith.” Earlier, Bakri spoke via videophone from Lebanon. [oh surrrrrrrrrrra...]

Meanwhile, one of Choudary’s henchmen at Islam4UK, which has close links to banned group al-Muhajiroun, warned: “You will know when the Muslims have ignited an insurrection when there is blood on the streets of London and New York like there is blood on the streets of Fallujah and Mumbai.”

MP Patrick Mercer, the chairman of the Commons counter-terrorism committee, warned: “What can happen in Mumbai can just as well happen in Manchester or Birmingham.

“This style of attack is something we would find very difficult to deal with.”

* Last week 99 per cent of Daily Star readers called for Choudary to be booted out of Britain and police pledged to crack down on his rants.

(hat tip: Muslims Against Sharia)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

30 Responses to “TERROR COPS FEAR ‘MUMBAI ATTACK’ IN UK”
( jump to bottom )

  1. Sura 109
    1 | December 5, 2008 12:19 pm

    W00t. So now I’m getting called out on the front page. Does this mean I’m becoming to this site what the famous Nodrog once was to chez Chucky?

    Anyway, on the Gerin Oil thread you lot were calling me a Feelthy Queer. Now suddenly I’m a MooseLimb? Given that MooseLimbs think about as much of Feelthy Queers as the Dobsonistas do, this seems rather absurd, n’est-ce pas?


  2. bar
    2 | December 5, 2008 12:32 pm

    The only thing Nodrog is famous for, is tooting his own horn.


  3. arwynkafir
    3 | December 5, 2008 1:03 pm

    Hey Sura, do you have a problem with reading comprehension? Please show me where I called you a filthy queer OR a muslim? You really need to keep your commenters straight. You have a problem remembering who said what.

    Even in this post, do you see “sura is a muslim” anywhere in it? No, but sura is a muslim apologist. That part is a fact. And again, I couldn’t care less if you are actually muslim or not.

    I was pointing out the quote about religious discrimination, and wondering if you were going to raise hell about it coming from the islamic side like you do when it supposedly comes from a Christian side (and again watching to see if you equate lack of gay marriage with lack of any rights). I also wondered if you would continue to shill for islam after seeing that direct quote? (or will you give them a pass as usual?)


  4. arwynkafir
    4 | December 5, 2008 1:18 pm

    And while I’m on the subject, Sura. Why do you always say moose limbs? You act like you’re parroting us, but you’re the only one I keep seeing use the term.

    The left and their gift of projection. If only they would use their powers for good.


  5. DJM
    5 | December 5, 2008 2:32 pm

    Sadly, I don’t think the West will wake up to islamic terrorism until another major attack. Our leaders are so worried about offending muslims, they would allow hundreds, maybe even thousands, of innocent people to die before acknowledging the true culprit of modern terrorism – ISLAM.

    Know islam, no peace.
    No islam, know peace.

    This may be a cliche statement, but when you consider almost ALL terrorists are muslims and a majority of ALL major world conflicts involves islam, we can never say we just didn’t know any better.


  6. LanceKates
    6 | December 5, 2008 3:04 pm

    Can’t happen in the UK.

    The folks in India had guns.

    We all know that the UK has good and secure gun control laws and, therefore, no criminal would have a gun.

    duh.

    /sarc


  7. Lex
    7 | December 5, 2008 4:15 pm

    Anjem Choudary is probably certifiable I hope you realize. The sad thing is that non-Muslims have let things get to a point where anyone as nuts as Choudary have any platform at all. Shut the bugger down for all I care. No Bill of Rights in the UK.


  8. Lex
    8 | December 5, 2008 4:16 pm

    P.S. Sura, I’ll have to fight you for Nodrog status until the real one shows up and demands it;)


  9. arwynkafir
    9 | December 5, 2008 5:00 pm

    Non-muslims let things get to the point where Choudary has a platform? You’re really a masochist, aren’t you? It’s all our fault! It is your fault that he’s an islamic loon and uses any chance he gets to call for a caliphate and the death of anyone that isn’t a slave to allah? I’m all for everyone hearing it until muslims themselves kick him to the curb.

    The article calls him a hate preacher and crazed.

    * Last week 99 per cent of Daily Star readers called for Choudary to be booted out of Britain and police pledged to crack down on his rants. [islmaphobes?]

    Did you read a different article than the one linked? What surprises me is that they are that blatant with the critism. That is unusual. You can tell it isn’t the guardian.


  10. Purple Prose
    10 | December 5, 2008 5:17 pm

    It is unbelievable that this guy has not been deported or is not in jail. Britain will soon come around to the necessity of a Guantanamo-type facility for these animals who incite violence and murder and are as much a part of the Jihad, if not more, than the foot soldiers.


  11. Purple Prose
    11 | December 5, 2008 5:18 pm

    BTW, can we remove the link to or add a disclaimer to the “LGF Banned and Blocked” link? Nodrog is no friend of sanity. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.


  12. Tex Taylor
    12 | December 5, 2008 5:28 pm

    Does this mean I’m becoming to this site what the famous Nodrog once was to chez Chucky?

    Well hell no…at least not for me. Gordon carries a measure of respect in that I find him wrong in most every regard, yet still interesting.

    Mullah Sura, you are like a piece of chewed bubblegum stuck on the bottom of someone’s shoe – no apparent purpose other than being a nuisance, and a real bitch to clean up.


  13. arwynkafir
    13 | December 5, 2008 8:04 pm

    BTW, can we remove the link to or add a disclaimer to the “LGF Banned and Blocked” link? Nodrog is no friend of sanity. The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. -Purple Prose

    He sees things in an alternate reality, doesn’t he? It’s kind of icky. And thinking we’ll have dueling nodrogs here just made me ill. But since there is no Charles to whine after here, what’s a nodrog wannabe to do?


  14. savagenation
    14 | December 5, 2008 8:06 pm

    just do the nodrog as only he can!


  15. shiva
    15 | December 5, 2008 9:58 pm

    Anjem Choudary

    A good reason to bring back the death penalty by hanging for treason, and for Islam to be a totally abolished

    Failing this, Choudary and the whole of his family should be stripped of their citizen ship and sent back to pakistan.

    Britian has now a whole bunch of Jihadis who are second generation migrants. Despite the fact that they have had every chance to first class education. Choudry enrolled as a medical student at the University of Southampton, but he switched to commercial law, and now is a qualified lawyer.

    There are already so many jihadi skumbags, and there where hardly any Islamic schools, what is the situation going to be like that more and more accomdation to islamic education is permitted


  16. Sura 109
    16 | December 5, 2008 10:08 pm

    Please show me where I called you a filthy queer OR a muslim?

    What, am I supposed to keep a journal of who called me a Feelthy Queer, a MooseLimb, a Baal-worshipper, a neo-pagan, an atheist, et cetera ad nauseam?

    You have a problem remembering who said what.

    I don’t really care. A wingnut is a wingnut.

    Even in this post, do you see “sura is a muslim” anywhere in it? No, but sura is a muslim apologist.

    Proof or it ain’t so.

    I was pointing out the quote about religious discrimination, and wondering if you were going to raise hell about it coming from the islamic side like you do when it supposedly comes from a Christian side

    1) Would you believe me if I did?

    2) When a prominent Muslim says something stupid, there are plenty of good little wingers to call him on it. So who will call the Christians on stupid ideas like Prop 8? Oh, and there’s no “supposedly” about it. If the jackboot fits, wear it.

    (and again watching to see if you equate lack of gay marriage with lack of any rights).

    Any restriction of personal freedom without justification is oppression, and that the Morons and Dobsonistas find something icky is no justification.

    I also wondered if you would continue to shill for islam after seeing that direct quote?

    Please point to where I shill for Islam or any other religion.

    And while I’m on the subject, Sura. Why do you always say moose limbs?

    For the same reason that I say “Feelthy Queers”, and that some use “Jooos” when making fun of Nazischweine. It’s called sarcasm.


  17. rainydayweather
    17 | December 5, 2008 10:19 pm

    OT (off Topic Post)

    ABC News: New Details Emerge in Matthew Shepard Murder

    The story garnered national attention when the attack was characterized as a hate crime. But Shepard’s killers, in their first interview since their convictions, tell “20/20’s” Elizabeth Vargas that money and drugs motivated their actions that night, not hatred of gays.


  18. Lex
    18 | December 6, 2008 9:25 am

    Arwyn–the Brits have in place laws to go after those like Omar Bakri and Choudary, yet they still are free. Why? The Brits outlaw things such as owl totems when no Muslims even ask. Why? You guys complain about people being already “dhimmis” or at least acting as such. On some level of that point I was agreeing with you. No Westerners have to let these things happen yet they are, despite mentioning some as “hate preachers”. How is that not then the fault of the Brits who should have long since kicked this bastard out of the country or to jail for incitement/racial or religious hatred etc.? Muslims aren’t making them, so whose fault is it?


  19. arwynkafir
    19 | December 6, 2008 11:27 am

    sura: What, am I supposed to keep a journal of who called me a Feelthy Queer, a MooseLimb, a Baal-worshipper, a neo-pagan, an atheist, et cetera ad nauseam?

    If you’re going to bring it up in every fucking post, it would be helpful.

    sura: I don’t really care. A wingnut is a wingnut.

    And a hypocrite is a hypocrite. I wasn’t using the name calling, but you are proving yourself to be a non-debate worthy jackass.

    sura: Proof or it ain’t so.

    You have to prove the obvious to you? I thought you were slow, but wow. Proof of that is all over every blog you “grace” with your presence. I could link 50 examples from lgf with a simple search if I wanted to give charles any clicks to show the people that haven’t read you. But you’ve read you, so you already know :-) (I’m leaving the obvious for later)

    1) Would you believe me if I did?

    Of course. It would garner a bit of respect as well. Why only bitch about Christian examples and give muslim examples a slide? It makes you look like a… oh what are the words I’m looking for… muslim apologist, yeah that’s it.

    2) When a prominent Muslim says something stupid, there are plenty of good little wingers to call him on it. So who will call the Christians on stupid ideas like Prop 8? Oh, and there’s no “supposedly” about it. If the jackboot fits, wear it.

    “Good little wingers” have to call them on it, because the “liberal elite” seem to have their heads up their asses. You’re also assuming the vote was 100% christian against prop 8. All 52% of the total. And you use that to justify violence against christians, leaving a big jackboot print yourself there, sparky.

    sura: Any restriction of personal freedom without justification is oppression, and that the Morons and Dobsonistas find something icky is no justification.

    If they would have the same freedom with civil unions, your argument is false. If they don’t, they need to petition to cover everything. There is no “right” to the title of – marriage. Admit it.

    Please point to where I shill for Islam or any other religion.

    See the previous answer to the obvious. And your nic is more than enough proof of that. If muslims left other people to their own religion, we wouldn’t be having these discussions. There would be no Mumbai terrorist attacks, no killing apostates, no separate roads for infidels in saudi and honor killings could be cut in half. The other half would still happen because girls will be still be girls and sometimes you have to kill them for acting like they are their own people and try to make their own decisions or something (/s).

    sura: For the same reason that I say “Feelthy Queers”, and that some use “Jooos” when making fun of Nazischweine. It’s called sarcasm.

    It would be called sarcasm when commenting to me if I actually used either of those terms. Here again we have the example of needing to keep your debating opponents straight. If you don’t, you just look like an idiot to all of them.


  20. arwynkafir
    20 | December 6, 2008 11:37 am

    Damn Lex, you actually said something I agree with. Dhimmis need to stand tougher against that bullshit. But muslims are a nice fat voting block, so if they were unhappy with the way islam was being betrayed by the hateful imams and they said so in unison, the dhimmis would take the cue and do something about it.

    Instead you usually get calls of islamophobia for pointing it out.

    How about the Friday sermons coming from mosques all over the muslim world? The dhimmis can’t be to blame for those. Can muslims at least take responsibility for that? They wouldn’t have the platform if they were speaking to empty mosques instead of overflowing ones.


  21. Sura 109
    21 | December 6, 2008 10:43 pm

    sura: Proof or it ain’t so.

    You have to prove the obvious to you? I thought you were slow, but wow. Proof of that is all over every blog you “grace” with your presence. I could link 50 examples from lgf with a simple search if I wanted to give charles any clicks to show the people that haven’t read you. But you’ve read you, so you already know

    Yeah, I didn’t think you had any proof. Just as McCarthy was never able to produce that list of commies in the federal government. You must have deleted an “err…uh…buh” before clicking on Submit Comment.


  22. bar
    22 | December 6, 2008 11:32 pm

    Hurry and get your Obama collector coins now.

    He is the messiah for the left, since they hate any real religion, cults are more there style.
    https://www.officialobamacoin.com/Default.aspx


  23. 23 | December 6, 2008 11:35 pm

    Why would people pay 10 dollars for a dollar coin? Why did people support this Jihadi? I think it out of pure ignorance.


  24. Lex
    24 | December 7, 2008 7:15 am

    Well, believe it or not, there are numerous Muslims mentioning their Friday services post Mumbai and they are hardly saying that these were happy or hate-filled. Religion is something that we humans need and just because Muslims try to be close to G-d by gathering together just as I do with other Christians doesn’t mean I’m going to judge them for it.

    If, however, the Imams are preaching hate here in the U.S. I believe they should be investigated and shut down if possible if indeed the FBI still cares at all. As far as Britain goes the situation is just screwed up (though they can readily deport hate preachers and regularly do so with some). The class system is still in place to degrees we can’t even imagine over here. Most immigrants aren’t accepted as readily as they are here, yet there is still a collective guilt over colonialism so concessions are handed out to assuage the guilt yet these all end up misplaced. Well, I’m sure there are some that aren’t, but the many items being banned (the St. George flag, the owl totems, The Three Little Pigs etc.) are being thrown out by guilt-ridden Brits. And they shouldn’t do it! They shouldn’t sacrifice national pride due to a perceived anger and self-loathing of their own doing. (note: most examples can be found at Daniel Pipes site)

    This puts me on the outs with most of the more left people I’m friends with but it is, and always has been, the way I feel. I just don’t believe that one should lash back and hate the Muslims and certainly no longer blog in that way. But there you go, I don’t think we should ever sacrifice national pride and institutions out of some misplaced sense of guilt. I do believe we should invite our immigrants to welcome these traditions however, which worked wonderfully in the past and continues to with most here now. Europe , OTOH, seems rather screwed IMHO.


  25. LanceKates
    25 | December 7, 2008 8:12 am

    Sura: Yeah, I didn’t think you had any proof. Just as McCarthy was never able to produce that list of commies in the federal government. You must have deleted an “err…uh…buh” before clicking on Submit Comment.

    Uh, McCarthy had a nice long lists of communists working in federal goverment. He did not want to release their names in case some of those people were NOT communist spies. He believed in ‘innocent until proven guilty’…. but the Democrats on HUAC demanded that he make his list public. So he released most of the list’s names. Over the decades, as we’ve decoded the Verona Cables, we’ve discovered that with the exception of 2 folks who were just Communist Supporters instead of communist spies, he was 100% correct.

    But then, I imagine that you also feel that McCarthy was also responsible for blacklisting hollywood moviemen.

    McCarthy, a man so demonized by the LEft that even the Right is having to speak ill of him. But, he was right. So was Nixon, and Nixon was booted from Office for doing what (Democrat) Presidents before him did.


  26. LanceKates
    26 | December 7, 2008 8:12 am

    bar: Hurry and get your Obama collector coins now.

    There’s also a Collector Plate. I wonder if the Left will find that as tacky as the Nascar plates.


  27. shiva
    27 | December 7, 2008 8:49 am

    Lex

    Good sentiments, and I agree with you until we get to the muslims, and their evil ideology.

    Today we are faced a great danger. Islam is on the rise and there hatred is brewing in the minds of millions of Muslims. This hatred must be contained or there would be disastrous consequences.

    We must realize that Islam is a false doctrine and we must let the rest of world know the truth. Islam is a religion that thrives on the arrogant assumption that it is the most logical, the most scientific and the most perfect religion. While the fact is that it is the foulest of doctrine — the most barbaric and evil belief. The truth about Islam must become common knowledge, it must be destroyed.

    Hundreds of billions of dollars are being expended to combat Islamic terrorism, yet no effort is made to contain the ideology behind this terrorism. It is my belief that Islamic terror will not be eliminated unless and until the ideology behind it is exposed and eradicated.


  28. bar
    28 | December 7, 2008 10:01 am

    Maybe they will do a “fathead” of Obama next,
    so Obama supporters could hang it on the wall up high so its easier to worship?

    http://www.fathead.com/


  29. arwynkafir
    29 | December 7, 2008 10:17 am

    Says Sura as he ignores the rest of the quote he has no answer for (forgetting that people can scroll up): Yeah, I didn’t think you had any proof. Just as McCarthy was never able to produce that list of commies in the federal government. You must have deleted an “err…uh…buh” before clicking on Submit Comment.

    You asked for it.

    Sura 109:
    [109:0] In the name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful
    [109:1] Say, “O you disbelievers.
    [109:2] “I do not worship what you worship.
    [109:3] “Nor do you worship what I worship.
    [109:4] “Nor will I ever worship what you worship.
    [109:5] “Nor will you ever worship what I worship.
    [109:6] “To you is your religion, and to me is my religion.”

    [0] …the most hateful to non-believers.
    [1] What?
    [2] I can tell.
    [3] Damn skippy.
    [4] I’m not demanding it.
    [5] Right again!
    [6] Proof or it ain’t so, shill. There is evidence proving otherwise.

    002.193
    YUSUFALI: And fight them on until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression.
    PICKTHAL: And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers.
    SHAKIR: And fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah, but if they desist, then there should be no hostility except against the oppressors.

    Justice comes when faith in allah prevails? hm. Fight until persecution is no more? I wonder if he meant the persecution of gay people in muslim countries? Maybe it was the persecution of women that have the nerve to act all slutty by showing men they aren’t related to their hair or faces? It has to be the persecution of non-muslims in muslim countries. A “righteous, oft-forgiving, merciful” god like allah must have wanted to put a stop to all that, right?

    002.244
    YUSUFALI: Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.
    PICKTHAL: Fight in the way of Allah, and know that Allah is Hearer, Knower.
    SHAKIR: And fight in the way of Allah, and know that Allah is Hearing, Knowing.

    He’s making a list, he’s checking it twice,
    he’s gonna find out who’s “moderate” and who fights…

    009.073
    YUSUFALI: O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell,- an evil refuge indeed.
    PICKTHAL: O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites! Be harsh with them. Their ultimate abode is hell, a hapless journey’s end.
    SHAKIR: O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.

    A good muslim should follow the example of the prophet.

    009.029
    YUSUFALI: Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    PICKTHAL: Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.
    SHAKIR: Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

    Do you want more?

    But before you get all giddy looking for Bible quotes, leave out those that are historical passages (certain time and place) and not open-ended orders to kill all disbelievers until the whole world believes in their god or submits to jizya and feels subdued and you might have an argument. Good luck.

    Non-believers would not care what the quran said if it wasn’t being used as justification for killing, persecution and oppression on a daily basis all over the world in 2008.

    Muslim apologist… shill. Whatever makes you happy.


  30. 30 | December 7, 2008 1:54 pm

    The Ealing gazette states on 5/12/2008:

    The Dominion Centre was due to host a conference on Sunday called Not So Great Britian, featuring key speakers linked to a dissolved Islamic group called Al-Muhajiroun.

    Councillor Jason Stacey, leader of Ealing Council, said: “We are not prepared to allow council premises to be used for events that could undermine community cohesion, and we therefore cancelled the booking.”

    The event was relocated and took place at a room above a restaurant in Southall Broadway.

    How was the meeting “held at a council-owned arts centre in Southall?”

    Was it really “a packed public meeting” above a restaurant?

    The vast majority of Muslims would not go near them.


back to the top
The Blogmocracy

website design was Built By David