Would you go back to LGF is it changed back to what it was? What do you think requires changing?
If Charles banned Killore and other people that IMHO made LGF anti-G-d and pro Jihadi in many cases, and Charles said this in a post. I would go back to LGF. Until that day I am going to keep posting here.
[polldaddy poll="1145936"]
Update: Here is a poll suggested by Rodan
[polldaddy poll="1146440"]
Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.
Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.
Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.
We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.
Play nice!
website design was Built By David
Sorry for another poll. I signed up for polldady.com I want to get some use out of it. If there is another poll you would rather see email me or leave a comment.
Lol, Ron Paul… I used to actually vote for Ron Paul on every LGF poll.
I probably wouldn’t go back. The fact is, I didn’t participate much when I was a member. On the rare occasion I stumbled in on a fresh post that didn’t already have hundreds of comment, I might have made a comment myself. But other than that, it was just one of many morning blog stops.
I’ve posted here in a day more than I’ve ever posted at LGF during my 2 year membership.
Avid,
I have a poll. Who is a bigger Jihadi threat, Umar Lee or Medaura?
I will make it and email the code for you so you can post it
I emailed you and I posted it on this thread. I chose I can not decide because Medura is bringing tons of people away from the Anti Jihad movement in there support of Jihadis. While Umar is a jihadi. I think both are terrible. Which one did you have in mind as being worse?
A poll is not a poll with out the choice of Ron Paul
You have to pay tribute to the Ron Paul spammers.
Thanks for post here DJM.
NO!
Chucky is the problem there.
no2liberals I agree with you to the point that Charles is the problem because he was manipulated by certain people. I liked LGF back in the day. DId you?
Medaura is an Albanian Jihadist. She is on the same teamas Umar.Both are a threat!
It’s not just Killgore Trout who is anti-God at LGF, it’s Charles, too.
I don’t think I’d ever go back to LGF, unless maybe Charles specifically issues an apology to all the people like me who he has banned (or whom he allowed his “monitor Lizards” to ban) over the Evolution / Darwin / Creationism stuff.
avideditor,
I liked it way back when, before about Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
If Chucky is so easily manipulated, and it’s his blog, then in my opinion, he is the problem.
For whatever reason, he went off the deep end in the latter part of ‘05, and has only gotten worse.
On the one hand, he claims to be a supporter of Israel, and the United States. On the other, he shows contempt for Judeao-Christian beliefs. His positions are too contradictory, and his center appears to be as a secular liberal. Any pretense to be opposed to nazis or racists, is just that. He has his own biases which I find reprehensible, and his behavior in attacking other blogs, authors, and his members, is as authoritarian and close-minded as any of the demonic labels he attaches to others.
While Chucky was on to something in the aftermath of 9-11, and rode the opportunity for all it was worth, his credibility as a counter-jihad icon has not been maintained.
His ruthless attacks on others, while justifying his actions as being some how morally superior, indicate an insecure and irrational individual.
And I do not wish him well.
No, I would only go back to LGF if Charles quit and let someone else run it.
He has shown that he is a dishonest actor, incapable of honest debate and fair-minded administration. In fact, he reminds me of many of today’s Democrats.
It would be one thing if he were a dishonest actor/administrator and let the threads alone. But his “Charles on Steroids” aggressive abuse of posters over the last couple years that he disagrees with would actually make him a candidate for the “ban stick,” were he just another poster.
Can Charles ban himself? Maybe we should report him!
cane….
Will Charles ban himself? Question should be, will CJ get banned by Killgore? LOL
[...] Would you go back to LGF if it changed back to what it was? What do you think requires changing? [...]
#14. That was posted on another thread here, too. Murder is wrong, so I don’t see how anyone can advocate that.
I think the man that killed Rabin is a hero. Would you advocate for the murder of Hitler before he did his crimes? Murder is a touchy subject. But I will appold l anyone that kill and destroys evil in this world.
The pingback was automatic it was something I could not control. sorry.