I think he is. I am glad to see that LGF page view are down.
Tags: censorship, Charles Johnson, Fascism, lgfsucks
Is Charles a pro-censorship Fascist?
Comments
Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.
Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.
Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.
We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.
Play nice!
Charles has turned LGF into a cult. What he says goes and he insults those who don’t agree. He has minions like Medaura, Sharmuta. Killgore Trout, Realwest, NY Nana and Mandy Manners there to enforce the party line. Those who disagree are silenced.
Yes that is true Rodan. But IMHO he is a pro-censorship Fascist. Do you agree:?
Avid,
Yes he is a Fascist. A cult is Fascist by nature. As the LGF supreme leader He is the Fascist commander. Charles is a sick deranged man.
Looks like new membership declining as well.
I remember a time when he opened registration for 15 minutes and new members flooded in. Just a day or two ago, he opened registration, and after 6 HOURS only managed 60-something members.
(I wonder how many were duplicate memberships of current members who know its just a matter of time before they are banned?)
Yes he is a pro-censorship fascist, but at least he is brave enough to tackle the horrible threat posed by creationism.
/
I hope you where being sarcastic. I do not know what a / by itself means.
/ is a sarc indicator.
seriously though, if I beleieved that would I be posting here and making fun of Charles?
PIMF: believed
DOH!
thanks for clarifying exceller
“Just a day or two ago, he opened registration, and after 6 HOURS only managed 60-something members.”
Wow, that is bad.
Yes, Johnson is pro-censorship.
Many, many people have done posts in old threads here explaining why they were banned from LGF, and most of the reasons had to do with disagreeing with Johnson on some topic or another, or for voting down Johnson’s posts.
It looks as though I was banned for pasting in anti-Darwin links – in a total of around five posts over a month or two long period. I was not making any other posts there at the time, either.
If you want to prove Charles’ lack of integrity, its easy.
I’m sure there are more than a few here who have secret memberships at LGF. If you are willing to sacrifice one here’s how you do it:
Use a member id that hasn’t been used. That way, no one at LGF can say it was a “troll” or “troublemaker.” Scan Charles comments (or those of his loyal minions mentioned in comment #1 above). Find comments that you disagree with and give a negative. Do as many as you can, but don’t just arbitrarily give out negatives, make sure there’s a good reason, like a trollish comment or a petty insult against someone who didn’t deserve it.
If someone gives Charles or his pets enough negatives, even deserving negatives, I’d be willing to bet they’ll be banned and it will prove the LGF are childish, pro-censorship jerks.
rainydayweather – same here, but my terrible, unforgivable offense was 1 Obama birth certificate link, which was actually being reported by the mainstream media that day. I had posted quite a few news links of various subjects that morning, but I guess that one was the wrong one.
BTW, Charles then later lied about me, saying I “insisted” posting such birth certificate links, implying I posted several and repeatedly ignored warnings. When I protested using another ID (immediately blocked), he not only deleted my comment so no one could read my side, but he deleted another person’s comment who had replied to me and had included my defense in his post.
He was not only dishonest, he went out of his way to cover up his dishonesty.
Avid, you should add the Alexa LGF traffic link to this post so people can see LGFs decline for themselves!
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/littlegreenfootballs.com
If LGF were a stock, I would have sold long ago!
DJM, look at the sidebar. I added the Alexa rankings there. haha
I saw that, that’s where I got it. But it goes so well with this post, it would have been a nice quick link to include.
I was banned nearly 4 years ago, I think
I was banned a long time ago, I know
I was banned after only two comments, I think
I was banned for anti-islam comment thus LGF became irrelevant a long time ago
Any way Fuck Keith Jarret
This about sums up LGF
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POa6IozEco0
Well feel free to say anything you want here Shiva. How does that video some up LGF in your opinion. After a couple of seconds I turned it off. Should I listen to the lyrics?
I think the Charles hatred around here is a bit much. LGF2 would be better if it just stuck to doing what it is supposed to: Be LGF without the nonsense. All this concentration on what a jerk Charles is makes LGF2 nothing more than LGF but with different nonsense. Its like the anti-LGF instead of Charles worship, it stinks of Charles hatred.
It is not nonsense, C-bag is a coward, it needs to be pointed out.
Opera,
Look at our other threads.
Hate is a strong word. It’s more contempt.
I think Charles is doing his best to derail the anti Jihadi movement. I think Charles is anti-God. There are some threads where Charles is not exposed go there. But I think LGF recently has turned more into a stain then a blessing to the anti Jihad movement.