American Jihadist Umar Lee calls for Sharia law

Umar Lee is a dangerous Islamist American. He has called for the Caliphate and now wants Sharia law in the US. He makes his idea know here;

After reading an article about Sharia courts for British Muslims I wanted to write about that issue today and voice my support for a formalizing of Sharia family courts in America and the need for Muslims to stay out of non-Muslim family and civil courts as much as possible.

This man openly wants an Islamic sate in America. This is the enemy within. He also ssupports Leftist causes and openly supports and Islamic-Leftist alliance. Umar Lee is a propagandist for the Stealth jihad. he is actually worse than Nancy (Charles) Johnson

Tags: American jihadist, Caliphate, Islamists-Leftist alliance, Umar Lee

This entry was posted on Monday, November 24th, 2008 at 10:14 pm and is filed under Islamists, Sharia (Islamic Law). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments

Comments and respectful debate are both welcome and encouraged.

Comments are the sole opinion of the comment writer, just as each thread posted is the sole opinion or post idea of the administrator that posted it or of the readers that have written guest posts for the Blogmocracy.

Obscene, abusive, or annoying remarks may be deleted or moved to spam for admin review, but the fact that particular comments remain on the site in no way constitutes an endorsement of their content by any other commenter or the admins of this Blogmocracy.

We're not easily offended and don't want people to think they have to walk on eggshells around here (like at another place that shall remain nameless) but of course, there is a limit to everything.

Play nice!

4 Responses to “American Jihadist Umar Lee calls for Sharia law”
( jump to bottom )

avideditor

1 | November 24, 2008 11:54 pm

Wow. Umar is at it again. Charles and Umar should have tea some time. They both are Fascist IMHO.
rainydayweather

2 | November 24, 2008 11:59 pm

Off-topic

MSNBC poll:
Should the motto “In God We Trust” be removed from U.S. currency?

The result so far:

Yes. It’s a violation of the principle of separation of church and state. – 18%

No. The motto has historical and patriotic significance and does nothing to establish a state religion. – 82%

I voted “No.” Some people take the ‘church and separation’ thing too far; they’re hyper-sensitive about it.

They take any and all mentions of God in public to be an affront, and I get a little tired of that.
revparadigm

3 | November 25, 2008 1:50 am

He can take his sharia and shove it up his halal.

Time to bring back that good ole saying into fashion…

DON’T TREAD ON ME!!!

http://www.constitution.org/img/tread.gif
Sura 109

4 | November 26, 2008 12:46 am

He also ssupports Leftist causes and openly supports and Islamic-Leftist alliance.

The linked article does not support this contention:

…[M]y support for Obama, and my enthusiasm for his campaign, does not mean that I am “one of them”.
…
…I take what is good from the Democratic Party, and the left in general, and I discard what is not compatible with Islam. So while I am favor of many, but not all, of the economic polices championed by the left, if I am to believe in the Quran and the Sunnah I have to be at odds with their secular relativist cultural agenda. [And there's the R word again. This guy sounds like a garden variety wingnut.--109]
…
In search of allies, or in the need of love from peers in a society they are trying to fit into, we have seen a group of mostly second-generation immigrant Muslims lurch farther and farther to the left since 9-11. What started as solidarity over our shared opposition to the war in Iraq and erosion of civil liberties of American-Muslims (and even shared solidarity with Palestinians with some on the left), has sent many young Muslims on a slippery slope towards the creation of a Reformed Islam (whether this goal is stated or not). This is based not on the belief of and fear of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger ( S.A.S.) and the way of those who came after him, but in the consensus of non-Muslim Western sociologist [sic], thinkers, and activists.
…
What would make the Muslim feel strange on the college campus, coffee shop, night club, social setting with co-workers, political rallies, etc. is discarded. Islamic views on gender roles, homosexuality, marriage and divorce, dress, politics, law, warfare, family relations, cultural relativism etc. are thrown out.

This man is no friend of the Left.